1707- July 11
Planning & Development Department
102 West Main Street Prattville, Alabama 36067 334-595-0500 334-361-3677 Facsimile
planning.prattvilleal.gov
CITY OF PRATTVILLE
BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT
A G E N D A
July 11, 2017
4:00pm
Call to Order:
Roll Call:
Chairman Leo Jamieson, Vice-Chairman James Miles, Mr. Jerry Cimis, Mr. Jerry Crosby, and Mrs. Jerry Schannep.
Minutes:
June 13, 2017
Old Business:
None
New Business:
1. 170711-01 VARIANCE:
To encroach into the required front yard and rear yard setbacks
202 Denise Drive
R-3 Zoning District (Single Family Residential)
Valerie Sherrer, Petitioner
District 7
2. 170711-02 VARIANCE:
To allow changes to the landscape requirements.
124 South Memorial Drive
B-2 Zoning District (General Business)
Baptist Health/Goodwyn, Mills & Cawood, Petitioner
District 6
Miscellaneous:
Adjourn
Approved 8/8/17
Prattville Board of Zoning Adjustment
July 11, 2017 Minutes
Page 1of 4
City of Prattville Board of Zoning Adjustment
Minutes
July 11, 2017
CALL TO ORDER:
The regular meeting of the Prattville Board of Zoning Adjustment (BZA) was called to order by Vice-
Chairman James Miles at 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday,July 11, 2017.
ROLL CALL:
Present:Vice-Chairman James Miles,Mr. Gerald Cimis,Mrs. Jerry Schannep,Mr.Jerry Crosby and
alternate member, Mr. Neal Parker.Absent:Chairman Leo Jamieson.
Quorum Present
Staff present:Mr. Joel Duke, City Planner and Ms. Alisa Morgan, Secretary.
Vice-Chairman Miles stated the governing rules for the Prattville Board of Zoning Adjustment according
to the Code of Alabama, 1975 and the procedure of the meeting.
MINUTES:
Mr.Cimis moved to approve the minutes of the June 13, 2017 meeting.Mr. Crosby seconded the
motion. The motion passed unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS:
There was no old business to discuss.
NEW BUSINESS:
VARIANCETo encroach 25’ into the required 25’ front yard and 20’ into the required 30’ rear yard setback.
202 Denise Drive
R-3 Zoning District (Single Family Residential)
Valerie Sherrer, Petitioner
Mr. Duke introduced the request to allow an encroachment into the property lines at 202 Denise Drive.
He stated that the property is zoned R-3 and requires a 25’ front setback and a 30’ rear yard setback.
Attachment A in the staff report shows the structure is on a corner lot fronting Denise Drive and Joyce
Street both requiring a 25’ setback. He stated that the house sits at an angle on the lot which inhibits
the setback requirements being met on the east side of Joyce Street where the proposed accessory
structure is to be located. He stated that the Scenic Hills subdivision was annexed into the City of
Prattville in 1985 and the house,which did not meet city zoning standards,was built in 1981.He also
stated that a variance would be required whether the structure is attached or detached.
Warren Hill, petitioner’s representative, presented the request for encroachment into the front and rear
yard setbacks at 202 Denise Drive. He stated that his sister is the owner and has resided at the
property for 20 years. He stated that they inquired with Elmore County about permitting and they
informed them that they only needed business license for Wetumpka.He stated that had they known,
they would have applied for building permit in Prattville. He stated that the slab is about three and a
half to four feet from the house, six feet from the existing concrete, 10 feet from where cars park to the
rear. He stated that the slab had been poured for two weeks before they received the violation notice
from the City of Prattville.
Vice-Chair Miles opened the public hearing.
Fred Brown, 307 Angela Street, spoke in favor of the request. He stated that he understood how there
could be confusion in knowing where to apply for permit with the property being located in Elmore
Approved 8/8/17
Prattville Board of Zoning Adjustment
July 11, 2017 Minutes
Page 2of 4
County and City of Prattville. He stated that the garage would not hurt the neighborhood.
After no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
*Note: Brenda Brown, 307 Angela Street, signed in but did not speak.
Vice-Chairman Miles allowed the petitioner final comments.Mr. Hill addressed the Board asking for
understanding and to allow the construction. He stated that they were not trying to evade getting a
permit and did not hesitate to rectify the error.
Vice-Chair Miles opened discussion for the board. Mr. Cimis acknowledge a letter of opposition
received from Bill Lawrence who owns adjacent property on Joyce Street.(Made a part of the
minutes).
Mr. Crosby stated that it is very confusing with the property being located in Elmore County and in the
City of Prattville.
Mr. Cimis stated that he couldn’t support a variance that would allow a structure that close to the
property line.
Mr. Parker expressed that although he is sympathetic to the petitioner and appreciates those in support
of the request,he felt that a corner lot garage would block traffic view.
Ms. Schannep stated that she visited the site. She stated that an open carport would be favored over a
garage since a variance would be required for any improvements to the slab.
After no further discussion,Mr. Cimis moved to establish the finding of facts. 1)The special
conditions and circumstances do result from actions of the applicant;2)the granting of a variance will
confer a special privilege on the applicant that is denied by the zoning ordinance to other lands,
structures,or buildings in the same R-3 district;3) the granting of a variance is not in harmony with
the intent and purposes of the zoning ordinance;and 4) a variance may adversely affect the
surrounding property, the general neighborhood, or the community as a whole.Mr.Crosby seconded
the motion.
The motion to approve the finding of facts failed by 3/2 vote as recorded.Favor: Mr. Crosby, Mr.
Cimis, and Mr. Parker. Oppose: Mrs. Schannep and Vice-Chairman Miles.
Vice-Chairman Miles asked Mr. Hill if a carport is an option he will consider over a garage. Mr. Hill
replied that they were willing to modify the request to an open carport to keep from losing the money
they had invested for the garage.
Mr. Duke stated that the existing slab is approximately three and a half to four feet from the house and
is 24 feet wide.Covering half of that would allow for a single car parking space and keep the structure
nine feet from the property line.
The vote was called.Mr.Cimis moved to establish the finding of facts. 1) The special conditions and
circumstances do result from actions of the applicant; 2) the granting of a variance will confer a
special privilege on the applicant that is denied by the zoning ordinance to other lands, structures, or
buildings in the same R-3 district; 3) the granting of a variance is not in harmony with the intent and
purposes of the zoning ordinance; and 4) a variance may adversely affect the surrounding property,
the general neighborhood, or the community as a whole. Mrs.Schannep seconded the motion.
The motion to approve the finding of facts passed by 4/1 vote as recorded. Favor: Mr. Crosby, Mr.
Cimis, Mr. Parker and Mrs. Schannep. Oppose: Vice-Chairman Miles.
Mr.Cimis moved to approve the request based on the approved finding of facts with modifications to
Approved 8/8/17
Prattville Board of Zoning Adjustment
July 11, 2017 Minutes
Page 3of 4
restrict the request to a 12 feet wide pole barn carport with a flat roof,24 feet from front to back. Mr.
Crosby seconded the motion.
The motion to approve passed by 4/1 vote as recorded.Favor:Mr. Crosby, Mr. Cimis, Mr. Parker and
Mrs. Schannep. Oppose: Vice-Chairman Miles.
The BZA voted to approve the variance to encroach into the required front yard and rear yard setbacks
on property at 202 Denise Drive as modified.
VARIANCETo reduce the required 30’ landscape buffer to 10’ and to eliminate the required 30’ berm.
124 South Memorial Drive
B-2 Zoning District (General Business)
Baptist Health/Goodwyn, Mills & Cawood, Petitioner
Mr. Duke introduced the request for a variance to the landscape requirements at 124 South Memorial
Drive. He stated that the applicant has submitted development plans for construction of an additional
parking bay in front of the main hospital’s entrance consisting of 27 spaces located between theexisting parking and the hospital’s property line fronting South Memorial Drive. The existing parking
existed before the landscape ordinance making it a legal non-conforming use.He stated that the
additional parking requires that all parking come into compliance as required by the zoning ordinance.
He stated that the applicant is required to have a landscaping setback of 30 feet and a berm and is
requesting a variance to reduce the required frontage landscaping along South Memorial Drive from
the required 30 feet to 10 feet, reduce the required frontage landscaping along Wetumpka Street from
the required 30 feet to 15 feet and eliminate the required berm along both street frontages.
Derril Strickland of Goodwyn, Mills & Cawood, petitioner’s representative, presented the request for a
variance to the landscape requirements. He stated that an additional bay of parking will be added to
mimic the existing two parking bays.He stated that they will be adding landscaping from Wetumpka
Street down to Gillespie Street. He stated that there will be landscaping throughout the parking area.
He stated that the new parking will create a covered drop off space at the entrance which will eliminate
15 existing parking spaces.Mr. Strickland also acknowledged Jeff Sims, architect of the project,in
attendance at the meeting.
Vice-Chairman Miles opened the public hearing.There were none to speak. The public hearing was
closed.
Vice-Chair Miles opened discussion for the board. Mr. Cimis stated that the request was consistent
with previous landscape approvals.
Mr. Crosby stated that this is a much needed addition.
Mr. Parker stated that additional parking bay is a good idea but hate to see existing parking spaces
being lost.
Mrs. Schannep stated that the hospital need the additional parking area.
The vote was called. Mr. Cimis moved to establish the finding of facts:1)The granting of a variance
is in harmony with the intent and purposes of the zoning ordinance;2) the variance will not adversely
affect the surrounding property, the general neighborhood, or the community as a whole;3) the
variance will not allow the establishment of a use prohibited under the terms of the zoning ordinance
in a B-2 district.Mr.Crosby seconded the motion.
The motion to approve the finding of facts passed unanimously.
Mr. Cimis moved to approve the request,as presented, based on the approved finding of facts.Mrs.
Approved 8/8/17
Prattville Board of Zoning Adjustment
July 11, 2017 Minutes
Page 4of 4
Schannep seconded the motion.
The BZA voted unanimously to approve the variance request to reduce the required 30’ landscape
buffer to 10’ and to eliminate the required 30’ berm on property at 124 South Memorial Drive.
MISCELLANEOUS:
ADJOURN:
After no further comments, questions or discussion the meeting was adjourned at 5:51 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Alisa Morgan,Secretary
Board of Zoning Adjustment
CITY OF PRATTVILLE
Board of Zoning Adjustment
Planning Department Staff Report
VARIANCE 202 Denise Drive
BZA Application – 170711-01
DATE July 9, 2017
PROPOSED DEVLOPMENT
Petitioner: Valerie Sherrer
Property Owners: Valerie Sherrer
Agent: N/A
Location: 202 Denise Drive
Development Status and History
Previous Variance
Requests/Approvals:
No previous variances
Conditions of Previous
Approvals:
N/A
Property Configuration
Acreage: Approximately 0.29 acres (12,632 square feet)
Zoning Classification:
R-3, Single Family Residential
Relevant Standards: Prattville Zoning Ordinance
Section 68 – Definitions.
Yard, front. The yard extending across the entire width of
the lot between the main building including covered
porches, and the front lot line, or if an official future street
right-of-way line has been established, between the main
building, including covered porches and the right-of-way
line.
Page 2 of 4
Yard, rear. The yard extending across the entire width of
the lot between the main building, including covered
porches, and the rear lot line.
Yard, side. The yard extending along a side lot line, from
the front yard to the rear yard, between the main building,
including covered porches and carports, and such lot line.
Section 71— R-3 Districts
Minimum Lot Size: 7,500 square feet
Maximum Lot Coverage: 35%
Yard Setbacks:
Front: 25’
Rear: 30’
Sides: 6’/ 8’
Requested Variance:
Effective variance as re-stated by staff (see application for
applicant statement): Permission to construct an attached
garage on the east side of the existing structure. 202
Denise Drive is a corner lot requiring a 25’ setback on the
Denise Drive and Joyce Street frontages. The proposed
new garage will extend to the property line on Joyce Street
and require 25’ variance. The existing house is a non-
conforming use and currently encroaches into the
required 30’ rear yard. The proposed garage will further
the non-conforming status and require an encroachment
of 20’
Statement of Hardship:
(taken from application)
“I'm asking for more footage from Joyce Street 15 more
feet for the attached garage. The ordinance wasn't in
place when the house was built in 1981. I pay my taxes in
Elmore County. I called an asked did I need a permit and
I was told that they only need it in the area of Wetumpka.
I stated that I live in Prattville. By me not knowing that I
needed a permit in Prattville. Therefore, I hired for to have
cement poured for a slab for my garage. Once I found out
that's when I went to apply for the permit and was denied.
The hardship is that I paid nearly $4000 for the slab. I've
been in my house 18 years and if I need I needed a permit
Page 3 of 4
I would've gotten on(e) prior. I finally was able to save
money to get a garage built.”
PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION
Reviewed by: Joel T. Duke, AICP
Site Visits Conducted: May 30, 2017 and June 20, 2017
Recommendation: Recommend denial – hardship is self-created and is not the
minimum necessary to allow common usage of the property.
Planning Staff Comments:
Permit Application 17-000707 was submitted on May 19, 2017 requesting to construct a
detached accessory structure in the east side yard of the house at 202 Denise Drive (permit
request included with BZA application). Since accessory structures are not permitted in the
side yard, application 17-000707 was denied on May 26, 2017. After the denial, the applicant
stated that the foundation had already been poured in a location that placed one corner at
the property line.
Planning Department staff visited the site on May 30 and June 20 to verify location of the
proposed structure. Aerial photography and the site visit showed that 202 Denise Drive was
not built in conformance with the R-3 setback requirements. It is likely the structure was
constructed prior to annexation by the City of Prattville in 1985. Planning staff advised that
an accessory structure that meets zoning standards for an R-3 district cannot be approved
in the side yard.
The applicant was advised that they may seek a variance. The applicant modified their
request to make the proposed garage an attached structure making it a part of the main
structure and subject to the R-3 setback requirements. If approved as submitted, the main
structure will extend to the property line on the Joyce Street frontage (roughly 10’ from the
back of curb).
State code and best practices require the BZA to measure variance requests against
several basic standards. Below is the staff opinion regarding the standards and this
request.
Page 4 of 4
1. No special conditions and circumstances exist regarding this structure which are
not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same R-3 zoning
district.
2. A literal interpretation of the zoning ordinance would not deprive the applicant of
rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms
of the zoning ordinance.
3. The special conditions and circumstances do result from actions of the applicant.
4. The granting of a variance will confer a special privilege on the applicant that is
denied by the zoning ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same
R-3 district;
5. The granting of a variance is not in harmony with the intent and purposes of the
zoning ordinance;
6. A variance may adversely affect the surrounding property, the general
neighborhood, or the community as a whole;
7. A variance will not allow the establishment of a use prohibited under the terms of
the zoning ordinance in an R-3 district.
ATTACHMENTS
A. 1” = 40’ scale aerial and property map
(Additional attachments distributed with earlier mail out.)
DENISE DR JOYCE ST209 JOYCE ST
207 JOYCE ST
208 JOYCE ST
203 DENISE DR
205 DENISE DR
207 DENISE DR
208 DENISE DR
198 DENISE DR
202 DENISE DR
²
1 inch = 40 feetAerial photography date: March 2010
Legend
EASEMENTS
County Tax Parcel
Attachment A
Location Map
202 Denise Drive
CITY OF PRATTVILLEBoard of Zoning AdjustmentPlanning Department Staff Report
DATE:6/21/17
CASE FILE NUMBER:170711-01
APPLICATION TYPE:Variance
PROPERTY LOCATION
or DESCRIPTION:
202 Denise Drive
PETITIONER(S) ANDAGENT(S):Valerie Sherrer
ZONING DISTRICT(S)R-3 (Single Family Representative)
REQUESTED ACTION:Variance to encroach 25’ into the required 25’front yard and to
encroach 20’ into the required 30’ rear yard.
ZONING ORDINANCE
REFERENCE:
Appendix A-Zoning Ordinance Section 71 Residential district
requirements:
R-3 District:
Minimum Yard Size
Front yard -25'
Rear Yard –30'
Side Yard –8'& 6'
CITY OF PRATTVILLE
Board of Zoning Adjustment
Planning Department Staff Report
VARIANCE Prattville Baptist Hospital – 124 S. Memorial
Drive
BZA Application – 170711-02
DATE July 9, 2017
PROPOSED DEVLOPMENT
Petitioner: Health Care Authority for Baptist Health
Property Owners: Health Care Authority for Baptist Health
Agent: Goodwyn, Mills and Cawood, Inc. (Derril Strickland)
Location: 124 S. Memorial Drive – front parking lot
Development Status and History
Previous Variance
Requests/Approvals:
January 27, 1976 – use-on-appeal approved for operation
of hospital in a B-2 zone
Conditions of Previous
Approvals:
N/A
Property Configuration
Acreage: 4.18 acres (two lots 2.85 acres and 1.33 acres)
Zoning Classification:
B-2, General Business
Relevant District
Standards:
Zoning Ordinance, Article 13, Section 145
General Site and Off-Street Parking Area
Landscaping Requirements.
(a) Frontage Landscaping and Foundation Planting
Requirements.
Frontage landscaping shall require a landscaped strip with a
minimum 10-foot depth along all adjacent public rights-of-
way. Frontage landscaping shall include a minimum of one
(1) tree and six (6) shrubs per full forty (40) linear feet of the
frontage strip; shrubs are optional in areas where a berm at
Page 2 of 4
least four (4) feet in height is used, Trees and shrubs shall
be well distributed, though not; necessarily evenly spaced.
A lot with less than one hundred fifty (150) feet frontage and
adjacent to a right-of-way shall have a frontage strip depth of
ten (10) feet; a lot with one hundred fifty (150) feet to two
hundred fifty (250) feet frontage shall have a frontage strip
depth of twenty (20) feet; a lot with over 250 feet frontage
shall have a frontage strip depth of thirty (30) feet…
For developments of two (2) or more acres with frontage
of to two hundred fifty (250) feet or more, the frontage
strip shall be bermed in order to minimize the visual
impact of the off-street parking area, unless the
Administrator determines that the natural topography
does not require site to be bermed. The berm shall not
have a slope of greater than one (1) foot of rise per three (3)
feet of run, and shall not be less than four (4) feet in height
at its apex. Landscaping of bermed perimeter strips shall be
in accordance with all requirements as outlined in this
section
Requested Variance:
Effective variance as re-stated by staff (see application for
applicant statement):
Applicant has submitted development plans for
construction of an additional parking bay in front of the
main hospital entrance. The new parking area of 27
spaces will be located between the existing parking and
the hospital’s property line fronting S. Memorial Drive. The
hospital’s existing parking is considered a legal non-
conforming use. The additional parking triggers Section
142 (c) of the zoning ordinance, which requires new and
existing parking to be in compliance. With more than 250’
of frontage on S. Memorial Drive and Wetumpka Street,
the applicant is required to have a landscaping setback of
30’ and a berm. Due to space and parking considerations
on the lot, the applicant is requesting relief from the
frontage landscaping setback.
Page 3 of 4
1. Reduction of the required frontage landscaping
along S. Memorial Drive from the required 30’ to
10’.
2. Reduction of the required frontage landscaping
along Wetumpka Street from the required 30’ to
15’.
3. Elimination of required berm along both street
frontages.
Statement of Hardship:
(taken from application)
“The hospital needs additional parking in the subject area.
In order to provide the most efficient/effective layout, the
proposed back of curb will be closer to the street right of
way than is allowed by the Landscape Ordinance. The
existing improvements were installed prior to the
implementation of the ordinance and therefor, advanced
planning for future improvements did not allow for the
Ordinance's requirements. Future planned construction at
the entrance to the main hospital will eliminate some
existing parking, thereby making the new construction all
the more vital.”
PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION
Reviewed by: Joel T. Duke, AICP
Site Visits Conducted: Several visits in June and July 2017
Recommendation: Approval – overall spirit of the ordinance is maintained and
amount of landscaping required is provided on site.
While a special privilege is confirmed on the applicant, the
requested variance is similar to those granted for lots with
deep right-of-way setbacks and for those developed prior to
the adoption of the landscaping ordinance.
Page 4 of 4
Planning Staff Comments:
State code and best practices require the BZA to measure variance requests against
several basic standards. Below is the staff opinion regarding the standards and this
request.
1. No special conditions and circumstances exists regarding this structure which are
not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same B-2 zoning
district.
2. A literal interpretation of the zoning ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights
commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of the
zoning ordinance.
3. The special conditions and circumstances do result from actions of the applicant.
4. The granting of a variance will confer a special privilege on the applicant that is
denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same B-4
district;
5. The granting of a variance is in harmony with the intent and purposes of the
zoning ordinance;
6. A variance will not adversely affect the surrounding property, the general
neighborhood, or the community as a whole;
7. A variance will not allow the establishment of a use prohibited under the terms of
the zoning ordinance in a B-2 district.
ATTACHMENTS
Application and attachments sent by earlier e-mail.
CITY OF PRATTVILLEBoard of Zoning AdjustmentPlanning Department Staff Report
DATE:6/19/17
CASE FILE NUMBER:170711-02
APPLICATION TYPE:Variance
PROPERTY LOCATION
or DESCRIPTION:
124 South Memorial Drive
PETITIONER(S) ANDAGENT(S):Baptist Health
Goodwyn, Mills & Cawood, Agent
ZONING DISTRICT(S)B-2 General Business
REQUESTED ACTION:To reduce the required 30’landscape buffer to 10’ and to
eliminate the required 30’ berm on property.
ZONING ORDINANCE
REFERENCE:
Section 135 General Site and Off-Street Parking Area
Landscaping Requirements:
(a)…A lot with less than one hundred fifty (150) feet
frontage and adjacent to a right-of-way shall have a
frontage strip depth of ten (10) feet; a lot with one
hundred fifty (150) feet to two hundred fifty (250) feet
frontage shall have a frontage strip depth of twenty (20)feet;a lot with over 250 feet frontage shall have a
frontage strip depth of thirty (30) feet.For
developments of two (2) or more acres with frontage of
to two hundred fifty (250) feet or more, the frontage
strip shall be bermed in order to minimize the visualimpact of the offstreet parking area, unless the
Administrator determines that the natural topography
does not require site to be bermed. The berm shall not
have a slope of greater than one (1) foot of rise per
three (3) feet of run, and shall not be less than four (4)feet in height at its apex. Landscaping of bermed
perimeter strips shall be in accordance with all
requirements as outlined in this section.
GOODWYNMILLSCAWOOD2660 EastChase Lane, Suite 200 | Montgomery, AL 36117Tel 334.271.3200 | GMCNETWORK.COM PLANSOF THEBAPTIST HOSPITAL PARKINGFORBAPTIST HOSPITAL OF THECITY OF PRATTVILLEVICINITY MAPNOT TO SCALEGOODWYN | MILLS | CAWOOD JOB NUMBER CMGM-160215JUNE 2017CherokeeBlountCullmanWinstonLawrenceMorganMarshallDekalbJacksonMadisonLimestoneLauderdaleMarionFranklinColbertFayetteWalkerSt. ClairCalhounConecuhGenevaCovingtonCoffeeDaleWilcoxMonroeButlerCrens
h
a
w
PikeLeeBarbourBullockMontgomeryLowndesDallasMarengoHalePerryAutaugaElmoreChiltonCoosaT
a
l
l
a
p
o
o
s
a
ChambersRandolphClayBibbTuscaloosaShelbyTa
l
l
a
d
e
g
aJefferson
CleburneEscambiaHoustonHenryRussellLamarWashingtonChoctawSumterClarkeGreenePickensMobileEtowahLOCATION MAPNOT TO SCALEPRATTVILLE, ALABAMAAUTAUGA COUNTYCMGM-160215 - BAPTIST HOSPITAL PARKING
FOR BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF THE CITY OF
PRATTVILLE, ALABAMAINDEX TO DRAWINGSCIVILSHT NO.SEQ. NO.DESCRIPTION1COVERINDEX TO DRAWINGS & VICINTY MAP2C1.00EXISTING CONDITIONS & DEMOLITION PLAN3C2.00SITE PLAN4C3.00GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN5C4.00EROSION CONTROL PLAN PHASE I6C4.01EROSION CONTROL PLAN PHASE II7C5.00DETAILS8C5.01DETAILS9L1.00LANDSCAPE PLAN10L1.01LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE, NOTES, DETAILSBaldwinAPPROVEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER NO.MaconPROJECT LOCATION
DRAWN BY:
ISSUE DATE
CHECKED BY:sheet ofA EDGFH12346578109BC12346578109BAPTIST HOSPITAL PARKING
PRATTVILLE, ALABAMA
GMC Project #160215
ISSUE DATE
PRELIMINARY 06.01.2017
INITIAL SUBMITTAL 06.09.2017
2660 East Chase Lane, Suite 200
T 334.271.3200
G M C N E T W O R K . C O M
Montgomery, AL 36117
EXISTING CONDITIONS/
DEMOLITION PLAN
C1.00 030'60'Scale: 1" = 30'
DRAWN BY:
ISSUE DATE
CHECKED BY:sheet ofA EDGFH12346578109BC12346578109BAPTIST HOSPITAL PARKING
PRATTVILLE, ALABAMA
GMC Project #160215
ISSUE DATE
PRELIMINARY 06.01.2017
INITIAL SUBMITTAL 06.09.2017
2660 East Chase Lane, Suite 200
T 334.271.3200
G M C N E T W O R K . C O M
Montgomery, AL 36117 020'40'Scale: 1" = 20'SITE PLAN
C2.00
DRAWN BY:
ISSUE DATE
CHECKED BY:sheet ofA EDGFH12346578109BC12346578109BAPTIST HOSPITAL PARKING
PRATTVILLE, ALABAMA
GMC Project #160215
ISSUE DATE
PRELIMINARY 06.01.2017
INITIAL SUBMITTAL 06.09.2017
2660 East Chase Lane, Suite 200
T 334.271.3200
G M C N E T W O R K . C O M
Montgomery, AL 36117
GRADING & DRAINAGE
PLAN
C3.00 020'40'Scale: 1" = 20'
DRAWN BY:
ISSUE DATE
CHECKED BY:sheet ofA EDGFH12346578109BC12346578109BAPTIST HOSPITAL PARKING
PRATTVILLE, ALABAMA
GMC Project #160215
ISSUE DATE
PRELIMINARY 06.01.2017
INITIAL SUBMITTAL 06.09.2017
2660 East Chase Lane, Suite 200
T 334.271.3200
G M C N E T W O R K . C O M
Montgomery, AL 36117
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
PHASE I
C4.00
4.01 020'40'Scale: 1" = 20'
DRAWN BY:
ISSUE DATE
CHECKED BY:sheet ofA EDGFH12346578109BC12346578109BAPTIST HOSPITAL PARKING
PRATTVILLE, ALABAMA
GMC Project #160215
ISSUE DATE
PRELIMINARY 06.01.2017
INITIAL SUBMITTAL 06.09.2017
2660 East Chase Lane, Suite 200
T 334.271.3200
G M C N E T W O R K . C O M
Montgomery, AL 36117
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
PHASE II
C4.01
4.01 020'40'Scale: 1" = 20'
DRAWN BY:
ISSUE DATE
CHECKED BY:sheet ofA EDGFH12346578109BC12346578109BAPTIST HOSPITAL PARKING
PRATTVILLE, ALABAMA
GMC Project #160215
ISSUE DATE
PRELIMINARY 06.01.2017
INITIAL SUBMITTAL 06.09.2017
2660 East Chase Lane, Suite 200
T 334.271.3200
G M C N E T W O R K . C O M
Montgomery, AL 36117
DETAILS
C5.00 Use Tilt-Out Curb & GutterAway From Curb & Gutter,Where Pavement Slopes
DRAWN BY:
ISSUE DATE
CHECKED BY:sheet ofA EDGFH12346578109BC12346578109BAPTIST HOSPITAL PARKING
PRATTVILLE, ALABAMA
GMC Project #160215
ISSUE DATE
PRELIMINARY 06.01.2017
INITIAL SUBMITTAL 06.09.2017
2660 East Chase Lane, Suite 200
T 334.271.3200
G M C N E T W O R K . C O M
Montgomery, AL 36117
DETAILS
C5.01 NOTE:1. INLET FRAMES AND GRATES LOCATED IN THE GRASS AREAS SHALL BE EAST JORDANIRON WORKS, INC. GRATE 5390 OR PRE-APPROVED EQUIVALENT.2. IF AN ALTERNATE IS CHOSEN, SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THEENGINEER FOR APPROVAL.Typical SectionPlan
SOUTH MEMORIAL DRIVE(U.S. Highway 31)BAPTIST
HOSPITAL
BAPTIST HOSPITAL
WETUMPKA STREET
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
3
4
5
MATCH LINEMATCH LINE SOUTH MEMORIAL DRIVE(U.S. Highway 31)BAPTIST HOSPITAL
2
2
1
MATCH LINE
DRM
EAOEATLAAABFEITCHA
G
R
T E
I SRETSTCJOHNBENJAMINBRICKEN, IIINUMBERLANDSCAPE538DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATECHECKED BY:sheetofA
E
D
G
F
H
1 2 3 4 65 7 8 109
B
C
1 2 3 4 65 7 8 109 BAPTIST HOSPITAL PARKINGPRATTVILLE, ALABAMAGMC Project #160215ISSUEDATEPRELIMINARY 06.01.2017INITIAL SUBMITTAL06.09.2017LMWJB2660 East Chase Lane, Suite 200T 334.271.3200G M C N E T W O R K . C O MMontgomery, AL 36117REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE
LANDSCAPE PLAN,REFERENCE NOTESL1.00
DRM
EAOEATLAAABFEITCHA
G
R
T E
I SRETSTCJOHNBENJAMINBRICKEN, IIINUMBERLANDSCAPE538DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATECHECKED BY:sheetofA
E
D
G
F
H
1 2 3 4 65 7 8 109
B
C
1 2 3 4 65 7 8 109 BAPTIST HOSPITAL PARKINGPRATTVILLE, ALABAMAGMC Project #160215ISSUEDATEPRELIMINARY 06.01.2017INITIAL SUBMITTAL06.09.2017LMWJB2660 East Chase Lane, Suite 200T 334.271.3200G M C N E T W O R K . C O MMontgomery, AL 36117PLANT SCHEDULE,NOTES, DETAILSL1.01TREE PLANTING DETAIL1 MULTI-TRUNK TREE PLANTING2 SHRUB BED PLANTING3 GROUNDCOVER PLANTING DETAIL4
PLANT SCHEDULE PLANTING NOTES