1909-September 261 0 2 W e s t M a i n S t r e e t \ P r a t t v i l l e , A L 3 6 0 6 7 \ 334. 5 9 5 . 0 5 0 0 \ p r a t t v i l l e a l . g o v
BILL GILLESPIE, JR.
MAYOR
J. SCOTT STEPHENS, AICP
DIRECTOR
C I T Y O F PRATTVILLE
H I S T ORIC PRESERVATION C OMMISSION
AGENDA
September 26, 2019
4:30 p.m.
Call to Order:
Roll Call:
Chairman Langley, Mr. Barrett, Mrs. Davis, Mr. Ferguson, Mr. McCord, and Ms. Musgrove.
Minutes:
July 25, 2019
Old Business:
None
New Business:
1. CA1909-01 Certificate of Appropriateness
Demolition-Remove additions to original structure
Moving Building-Relocate original structure
148 First Street
Charles Sanderson, Petitioner
Public Hearing
Miscellaneous:
Adjourn:
CITY OF PRATTVILLE
Historic Preservation Commission
Planning Department Staff Report
CERTIFICATE OF
APPROPRIATENESS
148 E First Street – CA1909-01
DATE
September 26th, 2019
PROPOSED DEVLOPMENT
Petitioner: Charles Sanderson
Property Owner: Same as above
Agent: N/A
Location: 148 E. First Street
Review Status and History
Submission Status: First submission for this address/building.
Previous Approvals: None
Conditions of Previous
Approvals:
None
1984/2007 Historic
Properties Inventory
Details
148 East First Street (circa 1850, circa 1930, and
circa 1985, non-contributing)
A cast-concrete block addition was made to the
Southern elevation of the original one-room,
frame, gable-roofed building circa 1930. More recently
large lateral additions of brick and vinyl
siding were added. (2007 Historic Properties Inventory)
Proposed Alteration, Renovation or Addition
The following changes have been requested by the applicant. See the application
included as Attachment B for the owner’s description of each item.
Item 1. Demolish all additions after circa 1850 to structure.
Item 2. Move original circa 1850 structure to adjacent lot east of 150 East Frist Street.
Page 2 of 3
PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION
Reviewed by: Austin Brass, Senior Planner
Site Visits Conducted: August, 2019
Recommendation: Commission should review structure for general
compatibility with guidelines of demolition & moving
buildings.
Evaluation:
The requested alterations were reviewed against the standards contained in the Prattville
Residential Design Review Guidelines Manual. The relevant sections of the manual are
included. Staff comments/evaluation follow the relevant sections.
Item 1. Demolish all additions after circa 1850 to structure
Demolition of buildings that contribute to the historic character of the district results in
an irreversible loss to the physical fabric of the community. Demolition of such
buildings is an outcome to be avoided.
1. Demolition is appropriate if the building does not contribute to
the historic character of the district.
2. Applicants for demolition and the Historic Preservation
Commission should explore possibilities for selling or reusing
historic buildings, preferably onsite but also in other locations,
as alternatives to demolition.
3. Demolition may be appropriate if the denial of the demolition
will result in a demonstrable economic hardship on the
owner.
Staff Analysis (Item 1):
Per the national registry of historical places inventory from 1984, 148 East First
Street is a one-room, frame, gabled structure built as a servants house for the
original dwelling that formally stood on the current site of the 1895 house at 150
Page 3 of 3
First Street. A Pre-cast concrete block addition was added to the south side c.
1930. The applicant has submitted as request to demolish any additions that were
added to the structure after 1850. Likewise, any possible contributing factor of the
original 1850 structure has been significantly altered with 20
th
century additions
that detract from the original structure. Demolishing these additions would add
historical interest to the structure by bringing back the original footprint of the
dwelling.
Item 2. Move original circa 1850 structure to adjacent lot east of 150 East Frist
Street
Because much of a building’s historic significance results from its relationship with
other buildings and landscape elements, moving buildings is a less desirable
means of preservation than leaving them in place.
1. Moving a building from its historic location will be approved only if all
other alternatives for preservation have been explored.
Staff Analysis (Item 2):
The applicant has requested to move the original 16 X 18 circa 1850 structure to
an adjacent lot located east of 150 First Street. The proposed structure will bet
setback 20’ from the front property line, and 18’ from both side lot line when
placed on the lot. This building has a direct relationship with the general location
as it once served as the servant’s house for a dwelling that has since been
demolished and replaced by the current structure at 150 East First Street
(c.1895). The Commission shall establish reason in following with the guideline
described above in exploring all alternatives for moving the structure.
ATTACHMENTS
A. Application and attachments
B. Location Map
1ST ST
MAPLE ST
E MAIN ST
PLETCHER ST
SELMA HWY
S WASHINGTON ST
S CHESTNUT ST
DOSTER ST
W MAIN ST
QUAIL RUN
OAK CREEK CIR
Aerial Map - 148 First Street - Historic Preservation Commission
±
Legend
Streets
Selected Parcel
Tax Parcels
0feet 100 200 400 600 800 1 inch = 200
Feet
1ST ST
MAPLE ST
SELMA HWY
S WASHINGTON ST
OAK CREEK CIR
Location Map - 148 First Street - Historic Preservation Commission
±
Legend
Streets
Selected Parcel
Tax Parcels
0feet 50 100 200 300 400 1 inch = 100
Feet
1ST ST
MAPLE ST
E MAIN ST
PLETCHER ST
SELMA HWY
S WASHINGTON ST
S CHESTNUT ST
DOSTER ST
W MAIN ST
QUAIL RUN
OAK CREEK CIR
B-2
R-2
R-2
R-3
B-2
R-6
O-1
Zoning Map - 148 First Street - Historic Preservation Commission
±
Legend
Streets
Selected Parcel
Tax Parcels
R-2
R-3
R-6
B-2
O-1
0feet 100 200 400 600 800 1 inch = 200
Feet