2006-June HPC Pct - Draft
1 0 2 W e s t M a i n S t r e e t \ P r a t t v i l l e , A L 3 6 0 6 7 \ 334. 5 9 5 . 0 5 0 0 \ p r a t t v i l l e a l . g o v
BILL GILLESPIE, JR.
MAYOR
J. SCOTT STEPHENS, AICP
DIRECTOR
C I T Y OF P R A T T VI LL E
H I S T OR I C P R E SE R VA T I O N C O M M IS S ION
AGENDA
June 25, 2020
4:30 p.m.
Call to Order:
Roll Call:
Chairman Langley, Mr. Barrett, Mrs. Davis, Mr. Ferguson, Mr. McCord, Ms. Musgrove and Ms. Teresa Nettles.
Minutes:
May 28, 2020
Old Business:
1. CA2005-03 Certificate of Appropriateness
Alteration- Rooftop solar panels
115 Maple Street
Thomas Miller, Petitioner
Tabled 5/28
New Business:
2. CA2006-01 Certificate of Appropriateness
Demolition-Removal of existing outbuilding
New Structure-Construct a new outbuilding
225 Wetumpka Street
David & Kim Williams, Petitioners
Public Hearing
3. CA2006-02 Certificate of Appropriateness
New Structures
Intersection of Northington Street and East 6th Street
Steve Till, Petitioner
Public Hearing
4. CA2006-03 Certificate of Appropriateness
Sign
119 South Court Street
Cortney Jones, Petitioner
Public Hearing
Miscellaneous:
Adjourn:
DRAFT
Draft
Prattville Historic Preservation Commission
May 28, 2020 Minutes
Page 1 of 6
CITY OF PRATTVILLE 1
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 2
MINUTES 3
May 28, 2020 4
5
6
Call to order: 7
The regular meeting of the Prattville Historic Preservation Commission was called to order on Thursday, 8
May 28, 2020 at 4:32 p.m. 9
10
Roll Call: 11
The secretary called the roll. Members present were Chairman Thea Langley, Mr. Will Barrett, Mr. Scott 12
Ferguson, Mr. Joel McCord, Ms. Kate Musgrove, and Mrs. Teresa Nettles. Members Absent: Mrs. Jean 13
Davis. 14
15
Quorum present 16
17
Also present was Mr. Darrell Rigsby, Senior Planner, Mr. Tommie Williams, Planner, and Ms. Alisa 18
Morgan, Secretary. 19
20
Chairman Langley introduced the two new planners of the City of Prattville, Mr. Darrell Rigsby and Mr. 21
Tommie Williams who recently joined the Prattville Planning Department. 22
23
Minutes: 24
Mr. Barrett moved to approve the minutes of the January 23, 2020 meeting. Mr. McCord seconded the 25
motion. The motion passed unanimously. 26
27
Old Business: 28
There was no old business to discuss. 29
30
Chairman Langley changed the order that the agenda items were heard. 31
32
New Business: 33
Certificate of Appropriateness 34
Demolition-Removal of existing building 35
New Structure-Construct a new building 36
Intersection of West 4th Street and Gin Shop Hill Road 37
City of Prattville, Petitioner 38
39
Dale Gandy, petitioner’s representative, presented the request for the demolition of an existing lift station 40
to be removed and construction of a new lift station located on property at the intersection of West 4th Street 41
and Gin Shop Hill Road. 42
43
Mr. Rigsby provided the staff report. The structure is non-contributing to the historic district. 44
45
Chairman Langley opened the floor for public comments. There being none, the public hearing was closed. 46
47
After no other discussion, the vote was called. Ms. Musgrove moved to approve the request as submitted. 48
Mr. Barrett seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously. 49
50
Certificate of Appropriateness 51
New Structure-Fence 52
335 South Chestnut Street 53
Reuben Stephens, Petitioner 54
55 DRAFT
Draft
Prattville Historic Preservation Commission
May 28, 2020 Minutes
Page 2 of 6
The application for Certificate of Appropriateness was submitted for request to place a fence at the height 56
of 8 feet with a taper located at 335 South Chestnut Street. There was no one present to represent the 57
petitioner. 58
59
Mr. Barrett stated that the guidelines maximum height for privacy fence is 6 feet. 60
61
Chairman Langley opened the floor for public comments. 62
63
Jon Lee Finnegan, 211 Deer Trace asked questions about the proposed location of the fence. The location 64
as proposed was shown as indicated in the application. 65
66
After no further comments, the public hearing was closed. 67
68
After no further discussion, the vote was called. Mr. McCord moved to approve the request for fence 69
contingent that the material is wood and the height is no higher than 6 feet. Ms. Musgrove seconded the 70
motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously. 71
72
Certificate of Appropriateness 73
Sign-New 74
123 First Street 75
Brandi Rhodes, Petitioner 76
77
Brandi Rhodes, petitioner, presented the request to place the sign on property at 113 First Street. She stated 78
that the sign is already on the building. 79
80
Chairman Langley opened the floor for public comments. There being none, the public hearing was closed. 81
82
After no further comments, the vote was called. Mr. Barrett moved to approve the request as submitted. 83
Mr. McCord seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously. 84
85
Certificate of Appropriateness 86
Alteration-Replace windows, replace bell tower louvers & replace roof shingles. 87
100 E Fourth St. 88
First United Methodist Church, Petitioner 89
90
Andy Davis of Marshall Design Build, petitioner’s representative, presented the request for a Certificate of 91
Appropriateness for alterations to replace windows, replace bell tower louvers, and replace architectural 92
shingles on roof on property located at 100 East Fourth Street. 93
94
Chairman Langley opened the floor for public comments. There being none, the public hearing was closed. 95
96
Mr. McCord stated that two commission members met on-site with the petitioners before this meeting to 97
get a closer look at existing conditions. He stated that the application submission reflects the guidelines. 98
The shingles are like for like as well as the material. 99
100
After no further comments, the vote was called. Mr. McCord moved to approve the request as submitted. 101
Ms. Musgrove seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously. 102
103
Certificate of Appropriateness 104
Alterations-Install vinyl siding; replace gutters, paint shutters, install awning; replace windows 105
128 Oak Creek Circle 106
Amee Carr, Petitioner 107
108
Amee Carr, petitioner, presented the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for alterations at property 109
located at 128 Oak Creek Circle. She stated that some of the work has already started. 110 DRAFT
Draft
Prattville Historic Preservation Commission
May 28, 2020 Minutes
Page 3 of 6
111
Darrell Rigsby provided the staff report for the alterations at 128 Oak Circle. He stated that the proposed 112
alterations does not detract from the non-contributing structure. 113
114
Chairman Langley opened the floor for public comments. There being none, the public hearing was closed. 115
116
Mr. McCord moved to separate the requested items and to make vinyl siding a separate request. Mrs. 117
Nettles seconded the motion. The motion to separate passed unanimously. 118
119
Mr. McCord moved to approve the request for items 1-4 to include the windows. The motion failed for a 120
lack of a second. 121
122
Mr. McCord moved to approve the request for items 1-5 as submitted. Mrs. Nettles seconded the motion. 123
1. Install white vinyl fascia, soffit and other exposed exterior wood areas 124
2. Replace gutters with matching gutter and downspouts 125
3. Install 2 copper colored awnings over doors 126
4. Paint shutters to match siding 127
5. Install vinyl replacement windows 128
129
After no further discussion, the vote was called. The motion to approve passed by 4/2 vote as recorded. 130
Favor: Mr. McCord, Mrs. Nettles, Mr. Ferguson, and Chair Langley. Opposed: Mr. Barrett and Ms. 131
Musgrove. 132
133
Mr. McCord moved to approve the request for item 6 to install/replace vinyl siding-contingent that the 134
material is wood or hardi board material. Mrs. Nettles seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed 135
unanimously. 136
137
Certificate of Appropriateness 138
New Structure-Deck and Pool 139
216 First Street 140
Eva Butler, Petitioner 141
142
Audrey, petitioner’s representative, presented the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for a new 143
pool and deck at 216 First Street. She stated that they were not aware that they need the commission’s 144
approval for a pool. She stated that the existing above ground pool replaced the in-ground pool that was 145
there previously. She stated that they can place vegetation like pampas grass to hide the pool and deck 146
from street view. 147
148
Mr. Williams provided the staff report for the Certificate of Appropriateness for 216 First Street. He stated 149
that the petitioner is proposing a 12x8 deck, steps, and a 10x32 deck. He stated that the handrails and lattice 150
around the bottom of the pool with a gate are for safety. 151
152
Chairman Langley opened the floor for public comments. There being none, the public hearing was closed. 153
154
After no further comments, the vote was called. Mr. Ferguson moved to approve the request as submitted 155
contingent that a screening with vegetation as proposed (Pampas grass) in front of a chain link fence to be 156
completed within 60 days. Mr. Barrett seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously. 157
158
Certificate of Appropriateness 159
Alteration- Rooftop solar panels and home batteries 160
115 Maple Street 161
Thomas Miller, Petitioner 162
163
Tom Miller, petitioner, presented the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to place solar panels on 164
the rooftop of property located at 115 Maple Street. He stated that the exact configuration is to be 165 DRAFT
Draft
Prattville Historic Preservation Commission
May 28, 2020 Minutes
Page 4 of 6
determined by remote home assessment which will be based on estimates for average energy utilization and 166
solar system generation. 167
168
Mr. Rigsby provided the staff report for the Certificate of Appropriateness for property located at 115 Maple 169
Street. He stated that approval may be appropriate if the petitioner is able to place the panels to blend into 170
the roof or building materials well enough so that it is not visible from the street. 171
172
Chairman Langley opened the floor for public comments. 173
174
Jon Lee Finnegan, 211 Deer Trace, spoke in opposition to the request stating that solar panels on the rooftop 175
are not appropriate for the historic district. 176
177
Jeremy Day, 141 W. Main Street, business owner in the historic district, spoke in support of the request. 178
179
After no further comments, the public hearing was closed. 180
181
Mr. Ferguson stated that there is difficulty to determine if the request is appropriate without having an 182
estimate of the number of panels to be used. 183
184
Chairman Langley suggested that the item be tabled until the petitioner can provide more details about the 185
placement and number of panels to be used. 186
187
After no further discussion, Ms. Musgrove moved to table the request until the next meeting. Mr. McCord 188
seconded the motion. The motion to table passed unanimously. 189
190
Certificate of Appropriateness 191
New Structure-Fence, outdoor entertainment, driveway 192
231 E Main Street 193
Shawn & Ashley Smith, Petitioners 194
195
Ashley Smith, petitioner, presented the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for a fence, outdoor 196
entertainment space and a concrete driveway on property located at 231 E. Main Street. 197
198
Mr. Rigsby provided the staff report for the Certificate of Appropriateness for property at 231 E. Main 199
Street. He stated that the fence is already constructed. It is 8’ at the peak of its height. He stated that the 200
outdoor entertainment area was reviewed under the guidelines as a gazebo and it essentially meets the 201
guidelines as well as the proposed driveway. 202
203
Chairman Langley opened the floor for public comments. 204
205
Jon Lee Finnegan, 211 Deer Trace, offered suggestions on the paint color of the fence. 206
207
After no further comments, the public hearing was closed. 208
209
Mr. Barrett moved to separate the requested items. Ms. Musgrove seconded the motion. 210
211
Item 1-Fence 212
Mr. McCord suggested that the fence can be cut down to meet the guidelines. 213
214
After no further discussion, the vote was called. Mr. McCord moved to approve the fence as submitted 215
contingent that it is modified not to exceed 6 feet in height and is painted white. Mr. Barrett seconded the 216
motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously. 217
218
Item 3-Driveway 219
Mrs. Smith stated that the proposed driveway is a single concrete driveway. 220 DRAFT
Draft
Prattville Historic Preservation Commission
May 28, 2020 Minutes
Page 5 of 6
221
After no further discussion, Mr. McCord moved to approve the request as submitted and approved by the 222
city. Ms. Musgrove seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously. 223
224
Item 2-Outdoor entertainment area (gazebo) 225
Mr. Smith stated that the height of the structure would be approximately 16 feet. 226
227
After no further comments, Ms. Musgrove moved to approve the request as submitted. Mr. Ferguson 228
seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously. 229
230
Certificate of Appropriateness 231
Alterations-Replace siding; re-pitch roof; adding columns, rear porch concrete slab 232
311 South Washington Street 233
Ronald & Martha Pinckard, Petitioners 234
235
Ronald and Martha Pinckard, petitioners, presented the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for 236
alterations as submitted for property located at 311 South Washington Street. 237
238
Mr. Williams provided the staff report for the Certificate of Appropriateness for alterations to re-side the 239
exterior, re-pitch and extend the roof line to cover back porch and add support columns; add a gable and 240
support columns to front porch; and pour concrete slab on back porch. 241
242
Chairman Langley opened the floor for public comments. 243
244
Jon Lee Finnegan, 211 Deer Trace, spoke in favor of the request. 245
246
Tom Miller, 115 Maple Street, spoke in favor of the request. 247
248
The petitioners requested that their application be amended to include replacement of windows and garage 249
extension. 250
251
Mr. McCord moved to amend the application to include the replacement of windows and garage extension 252
to the rear. Mr. Barrett seconded the motion. The motion to amend passed unanimously. 253
254
After no further discussion, the vote was called. Ms. Musgrove moved to approve the request as submitted 255
and amended. Mrs. Nettles seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously. 256
257
Election of Officers: 258
Mr. McCord moved to nominate Thea Langley as Chairman of the HPC. Mr. Ferguson seconded the 259
motion. 260
261
There were no other nominations. The vote was called. The motion to approve passed unanimously. 262
263
Mrs. Nettles move to nominate Joel McCord as Vice-Chairman of the HPC. Mr. Ferguson seconded the 264
motion. 265
266
There were no other nominations. The vote was called. The motion to approve passed unanimously. 267
268
Miscellaneous: 269
270
Adjourn: 271
With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 6:36 p.m. 272
273
Respectfully submitted, 274
275 DRAFT
Draft
Prattville Historic Preservation Commission
May 28, 2020 Minutes
Page 6 of 6
276 Alisa Morgan, Secretary 277
Historic Preservation Commission 278 DRAFT
Page 1 of 4
Historic Preservation Commission
Staff Report
CERTIFICATE OF
APPROPRIATENESS
225 Wetumpka Street – CA2006-01
DATE
June 25, 2020
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Petitioner: David and Kim Williams
Property Owner: Same
Agent: N/A
Location: 225 Wetumpka Street
Review Status and History
Submission Status: No known requests for a Certification of Appropriateness for
this address
Previous Approvals: No known CoA requests
1984/2007 Historic
Properties Inventory
Details
225 Wetumpka Street, (circa 1905, contributing) -
story and a half, frame, modified California bungalow
style with broad sloping roof terminated by hipped-roof
"California room" (second-floor sunroom); front slope of
roof extends over brick-pier porch. Later alterations
include removal of original sash in solarium. Built for
William T. Northington.
DRAFT
Page 2 of 4
Proposed Alteration, Renovation or Addition
The following alteration has been requested by the applicant. See the application included
as Attachment A for a description of each element.
1. Construction of Accessory Structure
2. Demolition of existing accessory structure
PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION:
Reviewed by: Darrell Rigsby, Senior Planner
Site Visits Conducted: June, 2020
Recommendation: Approve
Evaluation:
Since the subject property/structure was initially developed as a residence, the requested alterations
were reviewed against the standards contained in the Prattville Residential Design Review Guidelines
Manual. The relevant sections of manual are included. Staff comments/evaluations are summarized at
the end of each section. The following changes are proposed:
1. Construction of Accessory Structure
Outbuildings (page 50)
Outbuildings contribute to the historic and residential character of the district. Historic outbuildings
should be retained and maintained. New outbuildings should use design, materials, and placement that
support the district’s historic character.
1. Historic outbuildings should be retained and maintained.
2. New outbuildings should be smaller than the adjoining main building.
3. New outbuildings should be simple in appearance.
4. New outbuildings should use building and roof forms compatible to those used in the
adjoining main building.
5. New outbuildings should use materials compatible to those used in the adjoining main
buildings. Outbuildings that are not visible from public vantage points or have very limited
visibility may use modern synthetic siding materials.
2. Demolition of existing Accessory Structure
Demolition (page 55)
Demolition of buildings that contribute to the historic character of the district results in an irreversible
loss to the physical fabric of the community. Demolition of such buildings is an outcome to be avoided. DRAFT
Page 3 of 4
1. Demolition is appropriate if the building does not contribute to the historic character of the district.
2. Applicants for demolition and the Historic Preservation Commission should explore possibilities
for selling or reusing historic buildings, preferably onsite but also in other locations, as alternatives
to demolition.
3. Demolition may be appropriate if the denial of the demolition will result in a demonstrable
economic hardship on the owner.
Analysis:
The petitioner would like demolish an existing outbuilding that borders the home and faces Wetumpka
Street. Additionally, the petitioner would like to construct an 800 square foot (20 ft x 40 ft) accessory
structure at the rear of the property, bordering the railroad tracks. The proposed accessory structure will
be a metal frame and metal roof building with wood lap siding.
DRAFT
Page 4 of 4
DRAFT
E 6 T H S T
E 3RD ST
WETUM PK A S T
E 5TH ST
E 4TH ST S NORTHINGTON STN NORTHINGTON STPINE STN WASHINGTON STS WASHINGTON STOAK HILL CEMETARY
Location Map - 225 Wetumpka St
±
Legend
Subject Area
Address Points
Streets
Autauga Tax Parcels
0 1,000500
Feet Locations are approximateDRAFT
WETUM PK A S T
Aerial Map - 225 Wetumpka St
±
Legend
Subject Area
Address Points
Streets
Autauga Tax Parcels
0 10050
Feet Locations are approximateDRAFT
WETUM PK A S T
R-2
R-2
Zoning Map - 225 Wetumpka St
±
Legend
Subject Area
Address Points
Streets
Autauga Tax Parcels
R-2
0 10050
Feet Locations are approximateDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
CITY OF PRATTVILLE
Historic Preservation Commission
Planning Department Staff Report
CERTIFICATE OF
APPROPRIATENESS
Northington & East 6th Street – CA2006-02
DATE
June 25, 2020
PROPOSED DEVLOPMENT
Petitioner: Steve Till
Property Owner: Steve Till
Location: Northington & East 6th Street
Review Status and History
Submission Status: N/A
Previous Approvals: N/A
1984/2007 Historic
Properties Inventory
Details
Northington & East 6th Street
The property was not included in the 1984 or 2007
Historic Properties inventories.
Proposed Alteration, Renovation or Addition
The following alteration has been requested by the applicant. See the application
included as Attachment A for a description of each element.
1. New construction of four single family residences.
PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION:
Reviewed by: Tommie Williams, Planner
Site Visits Conducted: June 2020
Recommendation: Approval, see analysis below
DRAFT
Page 2 of 9
Evaluation:
Since the subject property/structure was initially developed as and remains a residential
structure, the requested alterations were reviewed against the standards contained in the
Prattville Residential Design Review Guidelines Manual. The relevant sections of manual
are included. Staff comments/evaluations are summarized at the end of each section.
1. New construction of four single family residences.
Infill Buildings (page 41)
New construction is welcome on vacant lots in the historic district. They enable
land uses to follow historical patterns and provide for visual continuity of the district
landscape. New dwellings should be designed to be contemporary but compatible
with the district.
1. New buildings should be compatible with adjacent buildings in terms of
height.
2. New buildings should be compatible with adjacent buildings in terms of
materials.
3. New buildings should be compatible with adjacent buildings in terms of
setbacks.
4. New buildings should be compatible with adjacent buildings in terms of
width, scale, and proportions.
5. New buildings should be compatible with adjacent buildings in terms of
roof form.
6. New construction should be oriented toward the major street.
Analysis:
The proposed new construction of four single-family residences would meet the infill
building guidelines. The single-family dwellings will be constructed of fiber cement
siding. Guideline 3 varies from dwelling to dwelling but the required setback for an R-2
zoned district is 35ft front, 40ft back, and 10 sides.
Doors and Entrance (page 18)
Doors are often buildings’ central visual elements and are particularly important
features. Historic entrances and doors should be retained, maintained, and, if
needed, repaired. Missing or severely deteriorated doors should be replaced with
historically appropriate replacements. Screen, storm, and security doors should
not detract from the historic appearance of their building.
DRAFT
Page 3 of 9
6. New screen doors should be sympathetic to the style of the house, have a
wood frame, and be full view or have structural members that align with
those of the door.
7. Storm doors should be full view and of baked-on enamel or anodized
aluminum.
These and other historic doors should be retained and maintained.
They are also appropriate models should replacement doors be
required. Replacement doors should be of wood, may be with or
without glass lights, and should be sympathetic to the style of the
house.
Analysis:
The proposed new construction of four single-family residences will have a front door
constructed of solid wood, ¼ lite with panels. The side and rear will be solid doors to
match the panel style front door. Garage doors will be aluminum and painted to match
the trim.
Gutters and Downspouts (page 21)
Using well-maintained gutters and downspouts helps to protect buildings from water
damage. If new gutters are required, half-round designs are the most appropriate.
4. If new gutters are needed, the most appropriate design for hanging gutters
is half round. For buildings dating from or influenced by designs from the
1940s or later, ogee gutters are also appropriate.
5. Downspouts should be located away from architectural features and on
the least public building elevation.
Analysis:
The proposed new construction of four single-family residences will not have gutters
unless otherwise stated by the purchaser.
Lighting (page 22)
Remaining historic light fixtures should be retained and maintained. New light fixtures
should be unobtrusive in design, materials, and placement.
4. If modern light fixtures are desired as replacements or where light fixtures
previously did not exist, they should be unobtrusive and constructed of
traditional materials. DRAFT
Page 4 of 9
5. Light fixtures should not damage or obscure architectural features or other
building elements.
Analysis:
The proposed new construction of four single-family residences will be historically
correct for exterior ceiling and wall mounted fixtures. There will be no landscape
lighting.
Roofs (page 31)
Roofs help to determine building style and are important elements of historic
appearance. Historic roof shapes and, when feasible, materials, should be
retained and maintained. Public visibility of modern features should be very
limited.
4. If historic roofing materials are severely damaged or deteriorated or are
missing and are prohibitively expensive to replace, dark grey, black,
brown, dark green, or dark red asphalt or fiberglass shingles may be used
Analysis:
The proposed new construction of four single-family residences will have a roof coating
of 30 year architectural, asphalt, and a fiberglass composition.
Driveways, Sidewalks, and Walkways (page 44)
Driveways, sidewalks, and walkways are common district features. Historic
examples should be retained and maintained, and new construction should follow
historic examples.
2. Driveways should be of gravel, concrete ribbons, grass and dirt, or
concrete. Blacktop and asphalt driveways were not historically features of
the district, and should be avoided. Driveways should be located to the
side of the house.
3. Residential parking areas larger than one car width should be screened
and located behind the house or out of view from the sidewalk.
5. Many district residences have narrow concrete walkways connecting the
sidewalk or street to the main entrance. New walkways should follow
these historic models.
Analysis:
DRAFT
Page 5 of 9
The proposed new construction of four single-family residences will have driveways
located in the rear with a light broom finish. A walkway will be from the front elevation to
the street.
Fences and Walls (page 46)
Fences and walls have historically been used to define ownership or function and to
separate public and private space. Historic fences and walls should be retained and
maintained. New fences and walls should use design, materials, and placement that
minimize their effect on the district’s historic character.
2. Wood and metal picket fences are appropriate new construction. If
wooden, they should be painted using colors complementary to the
adjacent house. They should be less than three feet tall, and the pickets
should be set less than three inches apart and be less than four inches in
width.
4. Wood board fences may be located in back yards and should be less than
six feet tall. Flat tops, dog-ear tops, or pointed tops are all appropriate
designs. Fences should be painted to blend with the building.
Analysis:
The proposed new construction of four single-family residences will have a 3 feet front
picketed fence that will be 50% opaque. If wooden, the fence should be painted using
colors complementary to adjacent houses.
Utilities
Utilities such as trash containers and mechanical systems are important to the
functionality of buildings and the district. They should be located out of public view, have
minimal physical effect on historic buildings, and be accessible for pick up, reading, or
servicing.
4. Meters, conduits, and other equipment should be located on rear
elevations.
Analysis:
The proposed new construction of four single-family residences will have meters located
at the rear of the dwelling.
DRAFT
Page 6 of 9
Examples provided by petitioner:
Board & Batten Siding
Front Door
DRAFT
Page 7 of 9
Lap Siding
Shingle Shake Siding
DRAFT
Page 8 of 9
Ykk Style view 1
Ykk Style view 2
DRAFT
Page 9 of 9
Ply Gem 100 Series
DRAFT
E 6 T H S T
WE T U MPKA STN COURT STE 3RD ST
BOOTH ST
WOODVALE RD7TH ST N NORTHINGTON STW 6TH ST
8TH ST
9TH ST COSBY CTW 5TH ST
W 4TH ST BENT TREE DRE 5TH ST
E 4TH ST PINECREST ST
JU N IPE R CT
W 3RD ST
NEWBY ST
MARTIN LUTHER KING JR DRS COURT STPINE STRUSSELL LNTICHNOR ST N CHESTNUT STS NORTHINGTON STS CHESTNUT STE A S Y ST
GARDENIA CT
S WASHINGTON STKNOB HILL RDN WASHINGTON STBOOTH LNOAKLAND DRHARLEM STDOUGLAS CI
RRAILROAD ST
N COURT STLocation Map - N Northington Street
±
Legend
Subject Area
Streets
Autauga Tax Parcels
0 2,0001,000
Feet Locations are approximateDRAFT
E 6 T H S T BOOTH STN NORTHI
NGTON STR-2
R-3
Zoning Map - N Northington Street
±
Legend
Subject Area
Streets
Autauga Tax Parcels
R-2
R-3
0 500250
Feet Locations are approximateDRAFT
E 6 T H S T BOOTH STN NORTHI
NGTON STAerial Map - N Northington Street
±
Legend
Subject Area
Streets
Autauga Tax Parcels
0 500250
Feet Locations are approximateDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
LOT 1
FINCH (ALT)
LOT 2
HUMMINGBIRD
LOT 3
HUMMINGBIRD
(ALT)
LOT 4
FINCH
Date
Drawn By
Project Number
PAGE #
A001Steve TillNORTH NORTHINGTON STREETJSR
05/31/2020
2020.04NORTH NORTHINGTON STREET, PRATTVILLE, ALPRELIMINARY REVIEW
COVER
1 STREET VIEW
Sheet List
Sheet Number Sheet Name
A001 COVER
A002 SITE PLAN
A101 HUMMINGBIRD FLOOR PLANS
A102 HUMMINGBIRD ELEVATIONS
A201 FINCH FLOOR PLANS
A202 FINCH ELEVATIONS
NORTH NORTHINGTON STREET DEVELOPMENT
PRATTVILLE, AL
DRAFT
227.70226.50225.23223.78224.43228.75244.31242.31239.13242.09244.31243.99242.24237.85234.25228.45227.94224.90227.53S 78°33'46" W 189.59'N 79°36'55" E 195.56'N 80°27'23" E 201.68'N 81°14'52" E 207.84'N 87°28'38" E 191.72'S 78°33'46" W 332.54'N 07°18'07" W 309.47'N 54°36'24" E25.40'35' BUILDING LINE68.33'77.37'77.37'77.37'77.36'0.33 Ac±14,519 sq. ft.0.35 Ac±15,055 sq. ft.0.36 Ac±15,540 sq. ft.0.32 Ac±FIP-1" REBARFIP-1" CRIMPTOP4"X4"CONCRETEMONUMENTPUBLIC PAVED ROAD75.00'75.00'74.47'N 02°31'22" W 510.80'S 78°33'46" W 142.98''30' PRIVATE ACCESS &UTILITY EASEMENTDN
LOT 1
FINCH (ALT)LOT 2
HUMMINGBIRD LOT 3
HUMMINGBIRD
(ALT)
LOT 4
FINCH
Date
Drawn By
Project Number
PAGE #
A002Steve TillNORTH NORTHINGTON STREETJSR
05/31/2020
2020.04NORTH NORTHINGTON STREET, PRATTVILLE, ALPRELIMINARY REVIEW
SITE PLANDRAFT
UP
DN
DN
GARAGE
MUD ROOM
CLOSET
MASTER BATH
MASTER BED
FAMILY
OFFICE
POWDER
CLOSET
DINING
KITCHEN
PORCH
PORCH
LAUNDRY
30' - 9 1/2"84' - 8"BED #4
BED #3
HALL
CLOSET
BED #2
BATH
STORAGE
CLOSET CLOSET
LINEN
CLOSET
ATTIC
Date
Drawn By
Project Number
PAGE #
A101Steve TillNORTH NORTHINGTON STREETAuthor
05/31/2020
2020.04NORTH NORTHINGTON STREET, PRATTVILLE, ALPRELIMINARY REVIEW
HUMMINGBIRD
FLOOR PLANS
1/4" = 1'-0"1 HUMMINGBIRD -LEVEL 1
1/4" = 1'-0"2 HUMMINGBIRD -LEVEL 2DRAFT
Date
Drawn By
Project Number
PAGE #
A102Steve TillNORTH NORTHINGTON STREETJSR
05/31/2020
2020.04NORTH NORTHINGTON STREET, PRATTVILLE, ALPRELIMINARY REVIEW
HUMMINGBIRD
ELEVATIONS
3/16" = 1'-0"1 HUMMINGBIRD -WEST ELEVATION
3/16" = 1'-0"2 HUMMINGBIRD -NORTH ELEVATION
3/16" = 1'-0"3 HUMMINGBIRD -SOUTH ELEVATION
3/16" = 1'-0"4 HUMMINGBIRD -EAST ELEVATIONDRAFT
DN
DN
32' - 0"75' - 11 3/4"CLOSET
MASTER BATH GARAGE
MASTER BED
Room
LAUNDRY
PORCH
KITCHEN
LIVING
POWDERPANTRY
DINING
FOYER
CLOS.
PORCH
STORAGE
HALL
BED #2
BED #3
BED #4
BATHCLOSETCLOSET
CLOSET
Date
Drawn By
Project Number
PAGE #
A201Steve TillNORTH NORTHINGTON STREETJSR
05/31/2020
2020.04NORTH NORTHINGTON STREET, PRATTVILLE, ALPRELIMINARY REVIEW
FINCH FLOOR
PLANS
1/4" = 1'-0"1 FINCH -LEVEL 1
1/4" = 1'-0"2 FINCH -LEVEL 2DRAFT
5' - 0"Date
Drawn By
Project Number
PAGE #
A202Steve TillNORTH NORTHINGTON STREETJSR
05/31/2020
2020.04NORTH NORTHINGTON STREET, PRATTVILLE, ALPRELIMINARY REVIEW
FINCH
ELEVATIONS
3/16" = 1'-0"1 FINCH -WEST ELEVATION
3/16" = 1'-0"2 FINCH -NORTH ELEVATION
3/16" = 1'-0"3 FINCH -SOUTH ELEVATION
3/16" = 1'-0"4 FINCH -EAST ELEVATIONDRAFT
Windows
Wood ‐ Ply Gem 100 Series Wood single hung Windows
Vinyl ‐ YKK Styleview Single Hung Windows
Doors
Front ‐ Solid wood 1/4 lite with panels
Side, rear ‐ paint grade solid doors to match panel style of front.
Gargage ‐ Solid door, aluminum construction. Painted to match trim.
Overhangs
Boxed confriguration. All wood construction. Painted.
Porches
Raised front porch elevation, open configuration. Masonary underpinning, solid or pier type. Steps from grade to porch floor.
If porch over 30" from grade, wood railings with square wooden ballusters to be constructed. All paint grade.
Columns to be colonial style, solid wood or craftsman style wood square, tapered or straight.
Beam to be cased in paint grade lumber.
Flat wood ceiling, painted.
Exterior Cladding
All fiber cement construction. Lap siding with a 7" exposure with accent of a shingle shake style.
Windows and doors trimmed with 1"x4" flat casing. Square configuration. 1"x4" frieze board.
Roof Coating
30 year architectural, asphalt & fiberglass composititon.
Lighting
Historically correct for exterior ceiling and wall mounted fixtures. No landscape lighting.
Landscaping
Finish graded for proper drainage, sod over entire lot, ample plantings.
Mechanical systems hidden from public view through plantings
Driveways/Sidewalks
All concrete construction, light broom finish. Walkway from front elevation to street.
Hummingbird and Finch Exterior Finish Schedule
DRAFT
BUILDER SERIES 100
3
Technical Drawing
(Double hung unit shown)
Unit Dimension (width)
Brick-face Opening (width)
Rough Opening (width)Unit Dimension (height)Rough Opening (height)Brick-face Opening (height)HORIZONTAL
V
E
R
T
I
C
A
L
Unit Dimension (width)Unit Dimension (height)Rough Opening (width)Rough Opening (height)HORIZONTAL
V
E
R
T
I
C
A
L
Wood Siding
Brick Siding
Unit Dimension (width)Unit Dimension (height)Rough Opening (width)Rough Opening (height)HORIZONTAL
V
E
R
T
I
C
A
L
Vinyl Siding
3DRAFT
CITY OF PRATTVILLE
Historic Preservation Commission
Planning Department Staff Report
CERTIFICATE OF
APPROPRIATENESS
119 South Court Street – CA2006-03
DATE
June 25, 2020
PROPOSED DEVLOPMENT
Petitioner: Cortney Jones
Property Owner: Old Gin Properties, LLC.
Location: 119 South Court Street
Review Status and History
Submission Status: First request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for this
address.
Previous Approvals: N/A
1984/2007 Historic
Properties Inventory
Details
119 South Court Street
The property was not included in the 1984 or 2007
Historic Properties inventories.
Proposed Alteration, Renovation or Addition
The following alteration has been requested by the applicant. See the application
included as Attachment A for a description of each element.
1. Add two attached signs to the building. One sign will be in front of the
business and the other sign will be located on the side of the building.
PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION:
Reviewed by: Tommie Williams, Planner
Site Visits Conducted: June 2020 DRAFT
Page 2 of 2
Recommendation: Approval, see analysis below
Evaluation:
Since the subject property/structure was initially developed as and remains a commercial
structure, the requested alterations were reviewed against the standards contained in the
Prattville Commercial Design Review Guidelines Manual. The relevant sections of manual
are included. Staff comments/evaluations are summarized at the end of each section.
1. Add two attached signs to the building. One sign will be in front of the business
and the other sign will be located on the side of the building.
Signs (page 29)
Signs are important elements in the historic and commercial character of the
downtown business district, and historic signage should be retained and
maintained. Signs are also important means of advertising and establishing
business identities.
1. Historic signs should be retained, maintained, and, if needed, repaired.
2. New signs should be of traditional materials such as finished wood, glass,
copper, or bronze.
3. New signs should be installed in locations historically used for signs such
as on awnings, on upper façade walls covering five percent or less of the
wall surface, inside windows, projecting from the building façade or
elevation. Signs should not cover or obscure architectural features.
4. New signs should be properly proportioned relative to their buildings.
5. Letters should be eighteen or less inches high and should cover sixty
percent or less of the total sign area.
6. Colors used in signs should be coordinated with their buildings. Three
colors or less should be used per sign.
7. Mounting equipment should be anchored in mortar, not bricks or stones,
and should avoid damaging the building.
8. Lighting sources for signs should be external and concealed. The
exception is if historic or replica neon signs are used.
Analysis:
DRAFT
W 4TH ST
S COURT STW 3RD ST
W MAIN ST
TICHNOR ST HUNTS ALYN COURT STBRIDGE STN COURT STLocation Map - 119 South Court St
±
Legend
Subject Area
Streets
Autauga Tax Parcels
0 500250
Feet Locations are approximateDRAFT
S COURT STHUNTS ALY
Aerial Map - 119 South Court St
±
Legend
Subject Area
Streets
Autauga Tax Parcels
0 10050
Feet Locations are approximateDRAFT
S COURT STHUNTS ALY
B-2
B-2
R-5
B-2
Zoning Map - 119 South Court St
±
Legend
Subject Area
Streets
Autauga Tax Parcels
R-5
B-2
0 10050
Feet Locations are approximateDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT