Minutes 2021-07-061
PRATTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
TUESDAY, JULY 6, 2021
6:04 P.M.
The Prattville City Council met in regular session on Tuesday, July 6, 2021, at 6:04 p.m. in the
Council Chambers at City Hall. After the Pledge of Allegiance to the American Flag, Councilor
Jackson gave the invocation. Roll was called and all Councilors were present.
THE CHARACTER TRAIT OF THE MONTH IS FORGIVENESS: Releasing feelings of
resentment and not holding a grudge.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Public Hearing and Council Meeting June 15, 2021 and Special
Called Meeting June 28, 2021. Councilor Strichik made a motion to adopt the minutes and
Councilor Gornto seconded the motion. There being no discussion, the minutes were adopted
(7-0).
Council President Starnes acknowledged Autauga County School System Superintendent Tim
Tidmore; Autauga County Board of Education Members Jim Manderson, Eleanor Ballow and
Jeffery Keith; Autauga County Commissioner Larry Stoudemire; and Past City Council
President Dean Argo in attendance.
COMMENTS FROM PERSONS PRESENT REGARDING TONIGHT’S AGENDA:
Jeri Young, 641 Mimosa Road, Camellia Estates Subdivision, addressed the Council regarding
her opposition of verbiage in the proposed ordinances on agenda items 5, 6 (renewal of the
one-cent sales tax) and 13 (new General Funds Reserve Policy). She recited language from
City Code, specifically Division 2, Section 38-91 and requested that Council vote to amend the
ordinances to include terminology more in line with Section 38-91. Ms. Young wanted the one-
cent sales tax to sunset and perceived the language in the proposed ordinances to be
ambiguous, incomplete and inconcise. She stated her perception was that the proposed
ordinances levied an additional one-cent sales tax on citizens. Mr. Daniel Oakley, Finance
Director, advised that Section 38-91 referenced other taxes and in fact, Section 38-92 set the
additional one-cent sales tax, as he called the original one-cent sales tax. He explained the
proposed ordinances on agenda items 5 and 6 would replace the code sections where the
original one-cent sales tax was put in place. Mr. Oakley also advised that setting an expiration
date to the one-cent sales tax was not mandatory.
Jon Lee Finnegan, 211 Deer Trace, addressed the Council regarding concerns of verbiage in
the proposed ordinances on agenda items 6 (renewal of the one-cent sales tax) and 13 (new
General Funds Reserve Policy). She requested clarification on the proposal to collect the one-
cent sales tax and place a percentage into a general reserve fund while meeting the goal of
the $10 million savings since the projected receipt amount was cited at approximately $6.8
million per year. She asked if after meeting the proposed goal, would then the remainder of
the one-cent sales tax revenue be divided up for the projects discussed during the May and
June meetings. Ms. Finnegan was concerned that the collections would have no accounting
and be used for projects not vetted through the public. Council President Starnes advised that
it was the intention of the council to first pass an ordinance to renew the one-cent sales tax
with the proposed ordinance on agenda item 5 (general) or 6 (division to departments’ reserve
2
account), then decide on adopting a new policy to bolster the reserve with 10% of the one-cent
sales tax receipts. He also stated that a specific monetary goal would be met before
entertaining any economic development projects as proposed on the ordinance on agenda item
13. He confirmed that 10% of the one-cent sales tax receipts would be taken from the top and
placed into a general reserve fund. Council President Starnes advised that if an ordinance
passed allowing for the division of the remainder of the one-cent sales tax, an Education
Committee would be formed by the City Council to build a relationship with the Board of
Education and examine the needs and priorities of the school system. He advised that these
would be open meetings to the public and assured Ms. Finnegan that no monies received
would go to projects without first being aired by the Education Committee, the public and the
City Council. Ms. Finnegan stated that she opposed funding going strictly to traditional
education and was concerned that non-traditional education, like a children’s museum, would
not be considered. Ms. Finnegan echoed that she was very frustrated with the ambiguous
language used in the proposed ordinances and wanted to see more of a detailed plan when it
came to spending the one-cent sales tax revenue.
Richard Harrison, 121 Irma Lane, addressed the Council regarding initially favoring the
extension of the one-cent sales tax during the preliminary phases but since changed his mind
and now opposed the ordinances proposed on the agenda. He stated that although he did
agree there were some legitimate needs addressed, it appeared that greed had taken over and
the one-cent sales tax revenues would be spent haphazardly. Mr. Harrison reiterated that ten
years ago the original one-cent sales tax was levied on citizens with the premise that the
additional revenue would repay debt the City acquired because of financial decisions that did
not prove fruitful and that the original tax would expire after ten years. Mr. Harrison urged the
Council to show integrity and not renew the one-cent sales tax, rather allow it to expire and
then come together as a united body with structured ideas to present to citizens.
Dean Argo, 101 Auburn Road, addressed the Council regarding his opposition to renewing the
one-cent sales tax. He stated that while previously serving on the Council he was against
placing the burden to pay off City debt by taxing citizens. Mr. Argo expressed that making
government smaller by finding areas to cut within City government was a better solution. He
stated that if the one-cent sales tax was continued, it should be used to pay off debt as originally
passed. Mr. Argo stated that it was his opinion that collecting a tax from citizens and using it
for something other than planned was bad policy. He did agree with establishing structured
reserves so that if the City is faced with unforeseen economic downfalls, it would have a means
of recovery. However, Mr. Argo voiced that the tax be disposed of until the City Council can
bring forth a valid reason to resurrect with a solid plan to propose to citizens.
Jim Skelton, 122 Sycamore Drive, addressed the Council regarding his opposition to renewing
the one-cent sales tax as proposed in ordinances on agenda items 5 and 6. He stated that
while listening to prior meetings and reading an article in the June 15th edition of the
Montgomery Advertiser, it appeared the Council had unanimously decided to renew the tax
prior to an actual vote. Mr. Skelton argued that voting to end the tax could boost free publicity
on a regional scale and in turn create revenues for the City because industry and the public
would be more inclined to support a fiscally wise and competent elected body along with the
already thriving environment the City of Prattville offers.
3
MAYOR’S REPORT:
Mayor Gillespie stated the community and the City’s July 4th event received great reviews
and praise and included comments from citizens from other communities that attended
Prattville’s event over the holiday weekend. He thanked Council Pro Tempore Boone and
Councilor Strichik for welcoming citizens at Stanley Jensen Stadium as that was well
received and that there was a small-town Americana feel throughout the weekend. He
thanked the Lyons Club and all City staff for their hard work and diligent efforts to come
together and create an outstanding event.
Mayor Gillespie reported that the City received its first share of funding from the COVID-19
Recovery Funds totaling $4.2 million and the total estimated to be received in a two-year
span totaling $8.5 million. He stated the one-time premium payment to full-time employees
approved by Council would be issued via direct deposit on Friday, July 9, 2021, which would
be subject to all applicable taxes. Mayor Gillespie recommended the Council schedule a
series of work sessions to plan and direct the use of the additional funding.
Mayor Gillespie stated that the request for opinion to the Attorney General’s Office regarding
publication of legal advertisements was still being processed and there had been a
continuation of problems getting legal ads published on time by the Prattville Progress. He
reminded Council that some ordinances require publication prior to becoming effective and
that if problems continue, ordinances could take an extra week after a Council meeting to be
active.
Mayor Gillespie mentioned that sewer line projects on Washington and Easy Streets were
ongoing and the Engineering Department was able to combine some storm water projects
with the aforementioned road construction. He tied this point in to reference the City’s debt.
He reiterated the City did have bad debt from previous years’ projects and possibly because
of the budgeting process utilized. Mayor Gillespie stated that the Finance Department uses
line item budgeting now with much success. Mayor Gillespie stated the Economic
Development Coordinator and the Deputy Finance Director would begin employment next
week creating a new avenue of ideas to assist the City with plans and goals going forward.
Mayor Gillespie addressed the importance of the Finance Director’s reports made every other
Council Meeting stressing that information given to the Council and public was not always
readily available in the past. He mentioned that at the start of his tenor, the debt balance for
accounts payable was over $1 million and today it is current. Mayor Gillespie said the current
status influences the economy in positive ways. He stated that in 2011, the City did not have
reserve funds, but now they were in place. He advised that the employee healthcare fund
was overstated due to bad practices, but now was flourishing. He cited that the sewer and
storm water projects mentioned earlier were considered good debt and that some portions
were actually paid by user fees. Mayor Gillespie resonated this was good government in
place and it has created a different atmosphere. He attributed the turn to City employees and
4
citizens who have worked hard to make positive changes, a team effort to make Prattville
great.
Mayor Gillespie closed his report by emphasizing that although there are a small group of
individuals working to persuade others to believe the City’s budget numbers are inaccurate,
numbers from the reports do not lie. He asked the Council to take a close look at line items
to see for themselves and to make the best decisions possible for the City.
REPORT FROM COUNCIL ON SPECIAL COMMITTEES:
None.
CONSENT AGENDA
1. RESOLUTION: To Accept and Endorse Project Prattville 2040 as the Comprehensive
Master Plan of the City of Prattville. (Sponsored By: Councilor Chambers)
RESOLUTION BOOK 2021, PAGE 114
2. RESOLUTION: To Surplus Various Equipment from the Planning Department.
(Sponsored By: Council President Starnes)
RESOLUTION BOOK 2021, PAGE 115
3. RESOLUTION: To Surplus Five (5) Fleet Vehicles from the Police Department.
(Sponsored By: Council President Starnes)
RESOLUTION BOOK 2021, PAGE 116
4. RESOLUTION: To Declare Various Weeded Lots to be a Public Nuisance, Order Their
Abatement and Set a Public Hearing per Title 11, Chapter 67 of the Code of Alabama, 1975,
as Amended. (Sponsored By: Council President Starnes)
RESOLUTION BOOK 2021, PAGE 117
Councilor Gornto made a motion to place items #1-4 on a Consent Agenda and Councilor
Chambers seconded the motion. The items were placed on a Consent Agenda (7-0). Council
President Pro Tempore Boone made a motion to adopt the Consent Agenda and Councilor
Striplin seconded the motion.
There being no discussion, the Consent Agenda was adopted with the following results:
AYES : STRIPLIN, JACKSON, CHAMBERS,
STARNES, GORNTO, STRICHIK, BOONE 7
NAYS : NONE 0
ABSTAINED : NONE 0
ABSENT : NONE 0
5
AGENDA
1. RESOLUTION: To Authorize the Mayor to have Various Weeded Lots Abated per Title
11, Chapter 67 of the Code of Alabama, 1975, as Amended. (Sponsored By: Council
President Starnes)
RESOLUTION BOOK 2021, PAGE 118
Councilor Gornto made a motion to adopt the Resolution and Councilor Strichik seconded the
motion.
There being no discussion, the Resolution was adopted with the following results:
AYES : STRIPLIN, JACKSON, CHAMBERS,
STARNES, GORNTO, STRICHIK, BOONE 7
NAYS : NONE 0
ABSTAINED : NONE 0
ABSENT : NONE 0
2. ORDINANCE: To Pre-Zone Property Located Outside the City Limits at the South Side of
County Road 4 W between Highway 14 W and Echlin Boulevard to FAR (Forest, Agriculture,
Recreation) (Petitioner: SJT Properties, LLC) (Sponsored By: Councilor Jackson)
HELD FROM COUNCIL 06/01/2021
ORDINANCE BOOK 2021, PAGE 018
This Ordinance was introduced at the June 1, 2021 meeting. There being no discussion, the
Ordinance was adopted with the following results:
AYES : STRIPLIN, JACKSON, CHAMBERS,
STARNES, GORNTO, STRICHIK, BOONE 7
NAYS : NONE 0
ABSTAINED : NONE 0
ABSENT : NONE 0
3. ORDINANCE: To Amend City of Prattville Code of Ordinances, Chapter 50 – Offenses
and Miscellaneous Provisions, Article III, Division 2.- NOISE, Section 50-74. - Loud and
Unnecessary Noises—Prohibited, (a) (17) Pickup, Delivery of Waste Containers. (Sponsored
By: Council President Starnes)
HELD FROM COUNCIL 06/01/2021
ORDINANCE BOOK 2021, PAGE 019
This Ordinance was introduced at the June 1, 2021 meeting. There being no discussion, the
Ordinance was adopted with the following results:
6
AYES : STRIPLIN, JACKSON, CHAMBERS,
STARNES, GORNTO, STRICHIK, BOONE 7
NAYS : NONE 0
ABSTAINED : NONE 0
ABSENT : NONE 0
4. ORDINANCE: To Amend City of Prattville Code of Ordinances, Chapter 38 – Business
Licenses and Taxes, Article V, Section 38-515 – Outdoor Alcohol Service. (Sponsored By:
Council President Starnes)
HELD FROM COUNCIL 06/01/2021
TABLED TO 08/03/2021
This Ordinance was introduced at the June 1, 2021 meeting. Councilor Jackson raised
concerns over ADA compliance; unclear guidelines; implementation timeline for business
owners to comply; and requesting Historic Preservation Committee, Alabama Beverage
Control Board and Alabama Law Enforcement Agency input. Mayor Gillespie stated that during
the June 1st Council Meeting that several of the concerns voiced by citizens and Councilor
Jackson were addressed. Councilor Jackson stated that many constituents have contacted
him about the ordinance and he strongly felt that more time was needed to vet concerns for the
sake of the Council and the public. Councilor Jackson made a motion to table the ordinance
and Councilor Gornto seconded the motion.
The Ordinance was tabled until August 3, 2021, and a Work Session scheduled on July 20,
2021, at 5:30 p.m. with the following results:
AYES : STRIPLIN, JACKSON, CHAMBERS,
STARNES, GORNTO, STRICHIK, BOONE 7
NAYS : 0
ABSTAINED : 0
ABSENT : 0
5. ORDINANCE: To Amend City Code Division 2. Sales Tax, Section 38-92 Imposition of
Certain Sales and Use Taxes. (Sponsored By: Council President Starnes)
HELD FROM COUNCIL 06/15/2021
ORDINANCE BOOK 2021, PAGE 020
This Ordinance was introduced at the June 15, 2021 meeting. Council President Pro
Tempore Boone made a motion to amend the ordinance by adding a sentence after Section
38-92 (b) (2) that stated, “This ordinance shall be ratified and affirmed with an effective date
of July 1, 2021.” Council Pro Tempore Boone added that the motion was made simply due to
the fact that the effective date had passed prior to this meeting. Councilor Strichik seconded
the motion. The amendment was passed with a 5-2 result.
Councilor Striplin expressed his desire to continue discussions regarding the ordinance and
made a motion to lay the ordinance on the table to be held to the next regular meeting or if
not needed, be withdrawn or moved by vote giving the Council options. Councilor Jackson
7
seconded the motion. Council President Pro Tempore Boone stated that the ordinance had
been held for weeks and there had been plenty of time to study it by the Council and public.
The motion to lay the Ordinance on the table failed with a 2-5 result.
There being no other discussion, the amended Ordinance was adopted with the following
results:
AYES : CHAMBERS, STARNES, GORNTO,
STRICHIK, BOONE 5
NAYS : STRIPLIN, JACKSON 2
ABSTAINED : 0
ABSENT : 0
6. ORDINANCE: To Amend City Code Division 2. Sales Tax, Section 38-92 Imposition of
Certain Sales and Use Taxes. (Sponsored By: Council President Starnes)
HELD FROM COUNCIL 06/15/2021
ORDINANCE BOOK 2021, PAGE 021
This ordinance was introduced at the June 15, 2021 meeting. Council President Pro
Tempore Boone made a motion to amend the ordinance by replacing fifty percent with
twenty-five percent from Section 38-92 (2) (a); adding “(d) twenty-five percent shall be
deposited into a Public Facilities Reserves bank account and used only for Public Facilities
owned and/or operated by the City of Prattville within the corporate limits of the City of
Prattville” to Section 38-92 (2); and adding a sentence after Section 38-92 (b) (2) that stated,
“This ordinance shall be ratified and affirmed with an effective date of July 1, 2021.”
Councilor Chambers seconded the motion.
Councilor Striplin offered a substitute ordinance in writing encompassing several changes for
consideration. City Attorney Jonathan Wynn pointed out that prior to considering Councilor
Striplin’s substitute, the Council should vote on Council President Pro Tempore Boone’s
motion to amend. Council President Starnes stated that he was opposed to the amendment
because he wanted fifty percent to go to education and help Autauga County Board of
Education to move forward. Councilor Jackson requested clarification on splitting the
remaining ninety percent of the one-cent sales tax revenue between departments. Council
President Pro Tempore Boone advised that the amendment was to equally divide the
remaining proceeds into four buckets and more fairly appropriate funds to different projects or
groups. Council President Pro Tempore Boone stated that she was not set on any project
presented earlier in the year, but was open to appropriating funds to any project that made
sense and was vetted by the Council as worthy to pursue. Council President Starnes stated
he favored Councilor Striplin’s substitute but did not agree with the ten-year time limit.
Councilor Strichik stated that he agreed with Council President Pro Tempore Boone’s
proposed amendment to equally divide the remaining proceeds of the one-cent sales tax.
Councilor Strichik stressed that funds placed in the reserves were not tied to any one specific
project that may have been mentioned in previous work sessions or meetings as Ms.
8
Finnegan continued to point out. Councilor Strichik stated that the tax collections would be a
significant amount of money in the tune of $7 million for the City and the one-cent sales tax
was not an additional tax, merely a continuation. He reiterated the Council had tough
decisions to make, there were no backdoor deals brokered as speculated by public comment,
and the Council was here to make the best decisions for the City to move forward in a
positive light. Councilor Jackson questioned Councilor Strichik where Stanley Jenson
Stadium stood in the line of projects needed to be reviewed for funding. Councilor Strichik
replied that one quarter go to the Parks and Recreation Department to include upgrades to
the City’s five major parks and the stadium. Councilor Strichik believed that funds would
adequately pay for those projects. Councilor Strichik stressed the City needed the
renovations so the City’s athletic and leisure activities would not fall further behind. Councilor
Strichik stated that the projects were feasible and he would stand behind Ms. Cook, Director
of the Parks and Recreation Department, to champion the changes needed. Councilor
Striplin requested clarification about there being no specificity that the tax cited in the
proposed ordinances will simultaneously replace the original one-cent sales tax levied in
2012. He felt that to the public eye, if the multiple ordinances passed, it would be perceived
that multiple taxes were passed as well. Mr. Oakley asked Councilor Striplin if there was
sample language he wished to insert. Councilor Striplin noted that it was the same language
he suggested a week earlier, changing Section 38-92 (a) to read, “In addition to the taxes set
forth in Section 38-91, there shall be an additional one (1) percent (%) tax levied under
Section 38-91 (1) (2) (6) commencing on August 1, 2021, which simultaneously replaces the
expiring one-cent sales tax levied on October 16, 2012.” Mr. Oakley did not have issue with
the language except he felt the commencement date needed to read “July 1, 2021”.
Councilor Striplin did not have issue with a specific date, only that there was the impression
an extra tax being passed and no language to substantiate otherwise. Mr. Oakley stated that
he did not feel the extra language was necessary but if the public’s view would ease then he
saw no problem. Council President Starnes asked Mr. Oakley if the ordinance as stands
would levy another penny on the citizens of Prattville. Mr. Oakley stated no. Councilor
Strichik asked Mr. Wynn if there was any wording that needed to be placed in the ordinance.
Mr. Wynn stated that no additional wording was needed. Councilor Chambers noted that he
had been contacted by constituents regarding the misconception of the one-cent sales tax
being a raise in taxes to citizens. Councilor Chambers agreed that if wording needed to be
changed to ease fears from the public he was in favor of more direct language. The
amendment was passed with a 5-2 result.
Councilor Striplin proposed an amendment to the ordinance by inserting after July 1, 2021,
“which simultaneously replaces the expiring one-cent sales tax levied on October 16, 2012.”
Councilor Chambers seconded the motion. The amendment passed with a 7-0 result.
There being no other discussion, the amended Ordinance was adopted with the following
results:
9
AYES : STRIPLIN, CHAMBERS, GORNTO,
STRICHIK, BOONE 5
NAYS : JACKSON, STARNES 2
ABSTAINED : 0
ABSENT : 0
7. ORDINANCE: Petition for Annexation of South Side of County Road 4 W between
Highway 14 W and Echlin Boulevard. (Petitioner: SJT Properties, LLC) (Sponsored By:
Councilor Jackson)
ORDINANCE BOOK 2021, PAGE 022
Councilor Jackson made a motion to adopt the Ordinance and Councilor Strichik seconded
the motion. By point of order, it was necessary that the Council rules be suspended if
immediate action was to be considered. Council President Pro Tempore Boone made a
motion to suspend the rules and Councilor Gornto seconded the motion. A roll call vote was
conducted with a 7-0 result and the rules were suspended.
There being no further discussion, the Ordinance was adopted with the following results:
AYES : STRIPLIN, JACKSON, CHAMBERS,
STARNES, GORNTO, STRICHIK, BOONE 7
NAYS : 0
ABSTAINED : 0
ABSENT : 0
8. RESOLUTION: To Release Funds for the Purchase of One (1) MAHLE ArcticPro A/C
Service System from Durbin Auto Parts, Inc. for the Vehicle Maintenance Division of the
Public Works Department at a Cost Not to Exceed $7,250.00. (Sponsored By: Councilor
Gornto)
RESOLUTION BOOK 2021, PAGE 119
Councilor Gornto made a motion to adopt the Resolution and Councilor Chambers seconded
the motion.
There being no discussion, the Resolution was adopted with the following results:
AYES : STRIPLIN, JACKSON, CHAMBERS,
STARNES, GORNTO, STRICHIK, BOONE 7
NAYS : NONE 0
ABSTAINED : NONE 0
ABSENT : NONE 0
10
9. RESOLUTION: To Release Funds for the Purchase of One (1) London Fog 18-20
Mosquito Fogging Machine from UNIVAR Environmental Sciences for the Urban
Management Division of the Public Works Department at a Cost Not to Exceed $10,379.00.
(Sponsored By: Council President Pro Tempore Boone)
RESOLUTION BOOK 2021, PAGE 120
Councilor Boone made a motion to adopt the Resolution and Councilor Strichik seconded the
motion.
There being no discussion, the Resolution was adopted with the following results:
AYES : STRIPLIN, JACKSON, CHAMBERS,
STARNES, GORNTO, STRICHIK, BOONE 7
NAYS : NONE 0
ABSTAINED : NONE 0
ABSENT : NONE 0
10. RESOLUTION: To Release Funds for the Purchase of One (1) RU2 Fast Radar Dolly
from Jace Chandler & Associates, Inc. for the Engineering Department at a Cost Not to
Exceed $9,770.00. (Sponsored By: Councilor Jackson)
RESOLUTION BOOK 2021, PAGE 121
Councilor Jackson made a motion to adopt the Resolution and Councilor Gornto seconded the
motion.
There being no discussion, the Resolution was adopted with the following results:
AYES : STRIPLIN, JACKSON, CHAMBERS,
STARNES, GORNTO, STRICHIK, BOONE 7
NAYS : NONE 0
ABSTAINED : NONE 0
ABSENT : NONE 0
11. RESOLUTION: To Authorize the Mayor to Submit Applications to ADEM for Park
Surfacing Improvements to Lorenzo “Lo” Pickett Park, Miller Park, Overlook Park, Upper
Kingston Park, and Pratt Park in a Total Amount of $1,104,000.00 (Net Cost to City Not to
Exceed $90,000.00). (Sponsored By: Councilor Strichik)
RESOLUTION BOOK 2021, PAGE 122
Councilor Strichik made a motion to adopt the Resolution and Councilor Gornto seconded the
motion.
There being no discussion, the Resolution was adopted with the following results:
11
AYES : STRIPLIN, JACKSON, CHAMBERS,
STARNES, GORNTO, STRICHIK, BOONE 7
NAYS : NONE 0
ABSTAINED : NONE 0
ABSENT : NONE 0
12. RESOLUTION: To Authorize the Mayor to Submit an Application to USDOT for RAISE
Grant Funding for McQueen Smith Road Corridor Improvements in an Amount Not to Exceed
$17,500,000.00 (Net Cost to City Not to Exceed $5,250,000.00). (Sponsored By: Councilor
Gornto)
RESOLUTION BOOK 2021, PAGE 123
Councilor Gornto made a motion to adopt the Resolution and Councilor Strichik seconded the
motion.
There being no discussion, the Resolution was adopted with the following results:
AYES : STRIPLIN, JACKSON, CHAMBERS,
STARNES, GORNTO, STRICHIK, BOONE 7
NAYS : NONE 0
ABSTAINED : NONE 0
ABSENT : NONE 0
13. ORDINANCE: To Establish a New General Fund Reserves Policy for the City of Prattville.
(Sponsored By: Council President Starnes)
ORDINANCE BOOK 2021, PAGE 023
Councilor Chambers made a motion to adopt the Ordinance and Councilor Strichik seconded
the motion. By point of order, it was necessary that the Council rules be suspended if
immediate action was to be considered. Councilor Gornto made a motion to suspend the
rules and Councilor Chambers seconded the motion. A roll call vote was conducted with a 7-
0 result and the rules were suspended.
Councilor Striplin stated he had two areas of concern. The first being Section 2, the amount
of $10 million. He stated he feared to pass an ordinance that included policy that was
already being violated, citing the example that if only $680,000.00 was collected per year and
the threshold for the reserve was $10 million then the City would be in violation of the policy
for several years to come. Councilor Striplin felt that $10 million was not the appropriate
amount to start with. Councilor Striplin’s second concern surrounded Section 3, stating that a
recommended corrective action plan is to be brought to Council to bring the reserve balance
into compliance. He said that in this case, the Council would see several years of corrective
actions to get that balanced. Council President Starnes asked Councilor Striplin if he had a
recommendation. Councilor Striplin replied that the $10 million be something less as the
amount could always be revised upward with Council approval. Councilor Striplin did not
want a policy in place that was being violated making the policy void in his eyes. Councilor
Striplin recommended $6 million. Mayor Gillespie expressed that language in Section 2
involved unrestricted general fund balance of which is approximately $12 million. Councilor
Chambers requested feedback from Mr. Oakley. Mr. Oakley stated that the current General
12
Reserve Fund Policy is subjective. Mr. Oakley wanted to implement a more stringent policy
with detail and calculations to better serve the City. Mr. Oakley stated that he did not see a
reason to update a policy that the City was already in compliance with and wanted this
ordinance to set a higher standard for the Finance Department to work towards and have a
very robust General Fund Reserve. Mr. Oakley stated that he did not have any issue with
lower the amount to $6 million. Mr. Oakley reminded the Council that the ten percent in the
ordinance was the action plan for the time being. He also mentioned that in order to reach
the threshold he would be able to deposit other monies into the account to meet the
threshold. Mr. Oakley stressed that a strong policy would look good to bond raters when
going to the market to assist with future projects within the City. Mr. Oakley stated that the
City was following number 2, as the Mayor mentioned. Councilor Boone asked what other
sources were being deposited into the General Fund Reserves account. Mr. Oakley replied
this fiscal year there was money budgeted to go into the General Fund Reserve; the FDR
money, a program that began three years ago; and he could move surplus money when there
are adequate funds to do so. Councilor Striplin made a motion to amend Section 2 (1) to
read, “General Fund Cash Reserves equal to or exceeding the greater of (a) $6 million.”
Councilor Jackson seconded the motion. Council President Pro Tempore Boone stated that
she was in favor of lowering the threshold because like it was mentioned previously, the
amount could be changed with Council approval. Councilor Chambers agreed with Council
President Pro Tempore Boone’s comments. The amendment was passed with a 7-0 result.
There being no other discussion, the amended Ordinance was adopted with the following
results:
AYES : STRIPLIN, JACKSON, CHAMBERS,
STARNES, GORNTO, STRICHIK, BOONE 7
NAYS : 0
ABSTAINED : 0
ABSENT : 0
COMMENTS FROM PERSONS PRESENT:
Jon Lee Finnegan, 211 Deer Trace, asked Council President Pro Tempore Boone her definition
of a public facility. Council President Pro Tempore Boone stated that a public facility was a
facility owned and operated by the City of Prattville and serves the public. She also stated that
projects that fit that description would include the library. Ms. Finnegan asked if the theater
would be considered a public facility. Council President Pro Tempore Boone was undecided
because the theater may encompass aspects of a public facility from definition, but she would
entertain all projects that were presented to the Council. Ms. Finnegan asked about museums
and Council President Tempore Boone advised again that this could be a multi-use facility.
Council President Pro Tempore Boone reiterated that when the divisions to buckets were
made, she was not cemented to funding a certain project, all projects were going to be studied
prior to any approvals, and that boundaries would cross when defining what a public facility
included. Ms. Finnegan asked the Council why the decision was not made to go to fifteen
percent off of the top with the proceeds of the one-cent sales tax going to a general fund
reserve. Councilor Striplin stated that Ms. Finnegan was mistaken on her comparisons and
explained the fifteen percent was the percent of the total budget the City was attempting to
reach as a reserve amount in relation to the annual budget, but it was off of the table now.
13
Councilor Striplin explained there would be a percentage of a stream of revenue, ten percent,
applied to a reserve account.
Jeri Young, 641 Mimosa Road, Camellia Estates, thanked the Council for deciding on the one-
cent sales tax, but felt there was still an issue about the previous ordinance. Ms. Young asked
what will happen to the remaining balance on the bonds from 2011 and 2012. Mr. Oakley
stated there was maturity on some of the bonds and that in the coming weeks the Council
would have before it resolutions to authorize the Finance Director to call remaining maturities.
The resolution would also include setting up a trustee agreement to place funds in escrow so
the amounts would be removed from the City’s financial books.
Ell White, II, , addressed Council President Starnes regarding the need
for Council to sign nondisclosure agreements and asked what was being hidden from the
public. Council President Starnes stated that nondisclosure agreements would be executed
by request of prospective companies wishing to do business within the City of Prattville, merely
for economic development purposes. Mr. White mentioned that he previously requested to his
Councilor that the City do more things with diversity in mind and to perhaps include diversity
with the City’s motto, “The Preferred Community…”. Mr. W hite also requested that a line item
for income from the City’s ballpark concession stands and gate fees be presented in the future.
He stated it was his opinion that the citizens of Prattville would like to see how much money
comes from those avenues and also would like to see a detail of expenditures for each park.
Council President Starnes thanked Mr. White for his service.
Harry Kearley, 102 Bryan Street, addressed the Council about wreckless driving and speeders
he has witnessed around his residence, Shady Oak Lane and Poplar Street. He requested
that some sort of traffic control device be posted to deter the unwanted behavior. He suggested
that speed bumps be erected but was not sure if there was a legal reason not to have those in
neighborhoods. Mayor Gillespie advised Mr. Kearley that staff from the Engineering
Department would be notified and a resolution to his concerns about public safety would be
met.
Lenora White, 621 West 4th Street, addressed the Council regarding the resolution on agenda
item 11 to authorize the Mayor to submit applications for park surfacing improvements to
various parks in Prattville. Ms. White asked why no funds were allotted to North Highland
Community Center. Mayor Gillespie advised the City did not own the community center but
the Autauga County Board of Education did. Mayor Gillespie stated that the City was in talks
with the Board of Education about the community center and a future project to address sewer
lines on Cone Street, an access road to the center, was planned.
William Moody, 585 Marshall Drive, Lot Number 4, addressed the Council regarding the lack
of law enforcement presence in the area of Marshall Drive. Mr. Moody stated that there was
an influx of drug activity around his residence and was recently threatened by individuals while
walking his dog. He cited that since 2016 there had been four murders which he attributed to
a mix of drugs and gangs going unchecked by law enforcement. Mr. Moody stated that he was
previously told he did not reside within the city limits and that the county needed to be
contacted. Mr. Moody stated he contacted County Commissioner Bill Tatum, who advised that
the City Police Department should handle his claims. Mr. Moody stated he felt like he was
14
getting the run-around and only wanted more police posted in and around the area of his
residence to deter unwanted criminal activity.
CLOSING COMMENTS:
None.
ADJOURN:
There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilor Strichik made a motion
to adjourn and Councilor Gornto seconded the motion.
The meeting adjourned (7-0) at 8:10 p.m.
APPROVED:
___________________________
Lisa Byrd
Interim City Clerk
___________________________
Gerald “Jerry” Starnes, President
Prattville City Council
SUBMITTED BY:
Dawn Russell
Assistant City Clerk