ProjectPrattville2040_withAppendix_hiresCOMPREHENSIVEMASTER PLAN
Adopted: April 15, 2021
prepared by
Acknowledgments
i
Mayor and Council (2020-2024)
Bill Gillespie, Jr., Mayor
Jerry Starnes, Council President
Lora Lee Boone, President Pro Tempore
John Chambers
Blair Gornto
Marcus Jackson
Robert Strichik
Albert Striplin
Mayor and Council (2016-2020)
Bill Gillespie, Jr., Mayor
Albert Striplin, Council President
Denise Brown, President Pro Tempore
Lora Lee Boone
Richard Cables
Marcus Jackson
Jerry Starnes
Robert Strichik
Planning Commission
Tim Smith, Chairman
Reuben Gardner, Vice-Chairman
Richard Cables
Paula Carpenter
John Chambers
Ken Daniel
Bill Gillespie, Jr.
Seth Hayden
Martin Jackson
Dallis Johnson
Patrick “Mugs” Mullins
City Project Team
Robby Anderson, PE, City Engineer
Lisa Byrd, Mayor’s Executive Assistant
Dale Gandy, Public Works Director
Scott Stephens, AICP, City Planner
Planning & Development Department
Scott Stephens, Director
Shelby Hutcheson
Alisa Morgan
Leslie Redmond
Darrell Rigsby
Michelle Williams
Tommie Williams
Additional Contributors
Autauga County Board of Education
Autauga County Heritage Association
Autauga Creek Improvement Committee
Elmore County Board of Education
Historic Prattville Redevelopment
Authority
Prattville Area Chamber of Commerce
Prattville Fire Department
Prattville Historic Preservation
Commission
Prattville Housing Authority
Prattville Parks and Recreation
Department
Prattville Police Department
Prattville Water Works Board
Prattville YMCA
A very special thanks:
to all of the residents and property and
business owners who participated in
live and remote meetings, filled out plan
surveys and otherwise contributed to the
preparation of this plan
to Jamie Sutton, City of Prattville
Webmaster, for the graphic design,
marketing, and website for Project
Prattville 2040.
Plan Advisory Committee
Robby Anderson
Connie Bainbridge
Terry Brown
John Brown
Buddy Buckner
Lisa Byrd
Kellie Cook
Jerry Crosby
Richard Dennis
Greg Duke
Dale Gandy
Reuben Gardner
Bill Gillespie, Jr.
Skip Jones
Thea Langley
Jane Leatherwood
Teresa Lee
David Lewis
Jim Manderson
Eric Morgan
Mugs Mullins
Bradley Neave
Tom Newton
Darrell Rigsby
Cole Segura
Tim Smith
Scott Stephens
Garrett Strickland
Albert Striplin
Mark Thompson
Patrick White
Tommie Williams
Acknowledgments
Project Prattville 2040
ii
Acknowledgments
iii
Project Prattville 2040
iv
Table of Contents
v
INTRODUCTION 1
Using The Plan 3
CITY VISION 5
Visioning Session 6
Visioning Survey 10
GOALS 13
Education 14
Economy 15
Recreation and Culture 18
Enhancement 23
GROWTH STRATEGY 25
Major Elements 26
Natural Environment/Green Infrastructure 27
Infrastructure 28
Activity Centers 31
Housing 34
Community Image 36
Parks and Recreation 37
LAND USE + TRANSPORATION 39
Land Use Plan 40
Development Preferences 46
Housing Forecast 50
Focus Areas 52
Transportation Plan 59
FACILITIES + INFRASTRUCTURE 89
Infrastructure 90
City Facilities 93
IMPLEMENTATION 97
Community Priorities 98
Action Plan 99
Growth Management 104
Keeping the Plan Update 106
APPENDIX 107
Project Prattville 2040
vi
introduction
Project Prattville 2040
2
The Comprehensive Plan describes the overall strategy for how Prattville will shape itself, through public and
private investment, over the next twenty years. The
City prepared this plan as a guide to making decisions
regarding capital improvements, City services, growth
management and economic development efforts. The plan gives residents, property owners, merchants,
builders and developers a reasonable expectation
of the city’s future so that they may invest in the
community with confidence. The plan is long-range,
general, and focused primarily on the physical and economic development of the community. It will be a
living document whose relevance will continue even as
circumstances change over time.
Through the Comprehensive Plan, City officials wish to:
• Illustrate the ways in which the city should develop over time.
• Coordinate land use recommendations with those
for transportation and other infrastructure improve-
ments.
• Provide a guide to development decisions and a ba-sis for making and revising zoning and other regula-
tions.
• Ensure that as development occurs, the city’s most
significant natural and historic features will be
conserved and enhanced, while property values are protected.
• Provide a pattern for land use and development that
strives for a sustainable community with a diversified
tax base to support necessary and desired facilities
and services.
In response, the City of Prattville will continually refer to this document to:
• Visualize what can reasonably be expected to occur
in Prattville—to provide some assurance and security
regarding development investment decisions.
• Review and evaluate development proposals and rezoning requests in the context of Prattville’s vision.
• Provide guidance on improving and updating the
City’s development policies and regulations.
• Identify priorities and strategies for making infra-
structure investments.
The Prattville Comprehensive Plan recognizes the value
of the city’s underlying natural resources, history and
community values. The plan will guide development
to balance growth with the conservation of important
natural resources. For example, activity centers—where infrastructure is in place and private investment is
already occurring—function as magnets for economic
growth. This approach reinforces existing businesses,
optimizes use of existing roads and infrastructure,
while avoiding encroachment into neighborhoods and environmentally sensitive areas. And, development will
be supported and encouraged by the City of Prattville to
foster efficiency, stability, entrepreneurial activity and a
strong quality of life and community image.
Introduction
3
Using The Plan
• The Comprehensive Plan is a combination of vision,
maps, priority actions and policies—a framework for guiding public and private decisions that will
affect new development and reinvestment in exist-
ing neighborhoods and business areas. The plan is
based on the community’s vision for its future. The
plan looks ahead, focusing on the physical form of the city, and strives to shape Prattville’s future devel-
opment in a fiscally responsible pattern consistent
with the community’s vision.
• The plan is a general, long-range guide to assist
public officials and private citizens as they consider investments that may have long-term impacts on the
community. To do this, the plan must be continuously
reviewed and updated as changes occur in physical,
political and economic conditions.
• The plan will be implemented through actions by City staff, the City Council, the Planning Commission
and other boards and commissions and by those of
developers and private organizations and citizens.
Major public actions in support of plan implementa-
tion will include adoption, revision and enforcement of the city’s development regulations, capital im-
provement planning and budgeting, and decisions
regarding development proposals and annexation.
Guidance provided by this monitoring and renewal
process will assist the city refine the Comprehensive Plan through consideration of amendments as may
be needed over the years.
• The Prattville Comprehensive Plan is intended to be
a living document, to evolve and grow in response
to changes in community values and to market and
physical conditions. Only through continuing use, evaluation, detailing, and updating can the plan fully
serve Prattville.
• Prattville draws to it more people, businesses and
private investment every year. The underlying ques-
tion is how growth should be channeled. That is the role of Prattville’s continuing planning process
and the task of this Comprehensive Plan—to assure
growth and change is compatible with the vision the
people of Prattville have set for their community.
Project Prattville 2040
4
city vision
Project Prattville 2040
6
The following section describes the way residents,
property and business owners view Prattville, how it is changing and how they wish it to be in the future. This
“city vision” was documented through a live+online
Visioning Session and a community survey.
Visioning Session
On June 23, 2020 the City of Prattville hosted a public visioning session at the Doster Memorial Community
Center. Due to the need for social distancing caused
by the COVID-19 pandemic, the live session was
“broadcast” online to allow those unable to attend the
meeting in person to contribute virtually in real time to the discussion. The planning team gave an overview
of the ongoing planning process, presented highlights
from the First Impressions report and reviewed
preliminary results of the first survey (which are also
attached to this summary). Following the presentation, the planning team solicited input from live and virtual
participants to help understand how the community
views the city and how they would like to see it
improve in the future. The following is a summary of the
community’s responses:
ASSETS
Participants were asked to name a condition that meets
their standards for the way their community should be
or a unique characteristic the city can take advantage of as it plans for the future.
• Location
• Interstate access
• Best people around; involved community; civic orga-
nizations
• Downtown being revitalized; business owners in-
vesting in downtown
• Safe community, sense of security, low crime rate
• Small town feel but with amenities of a larger city
• History
• Natural resources and beauty, including Autauga
Creek and artesian wells
• Best value for education dollar
• Worship opportunities
• Good cost of living
• Autauga County Technology Center
• Opportunities for economic growth
• Relationship with military (i.e., Maxwell AFB)
• Airport
• Railroads
• Industrial parks
• Recreational opportunities
• YMCA
• Community arts; i.e., Way Off Broadway
• City employees (public works, urban management, sanitation) do a good job
• Senior services
• Tourism
City Vision
7
ISSUES
Participants were asked to name a condition that does
not meet their standards for the way their community
should be or a concern that the community must address as it plans for the future.
• Not enough awareness of downtown; inadequate
management of downtown development (i.e., com-
mercial overlay); inadequate parking downtown
• Traffic
• Over development
• Infrastructure (water and sewer)
• Library is too small and needs to be upgraded
• Low taxes for education, limited school funding,
need to create city school system
• Need larger auditorium, civic or community center
for concerts and events
• Not enough recreational activities associated with
natural resources
• Lack of public-private partnering
• Not pedestrian-friendly or walkable
• No bike facilities, need bike trails to parks
• No dog park
• Insufficient development of US 31/I-65 interchange
• Empty storefronts, High Pointe Town Center
• Need bolder leadership
• Need financial support/incentives to encourage
preservation of historic district
• Limited arts activities
• US 31 north of Prattmont needs to be widened
OUTSIDE FORCES
Participants were asked to name an external condition
or circumstance beyond the control of the City that will
likely have an impact on Prattville, for better or worse.
• COVID-19 – more people working from home and
not commuting
• Increasing internet usage, increased use of technol-
ogy (future of children)
• Increased online shopping, impact on brick and mortar retail
• Outside developers/investors building in Prattville
but leave, not long-term investment in city
• Employment with state government in Montgomery
• Military/Maxwell AFB
• Easy access to community can be positive and
negative
• Competition among nearby communities, marketing
quality of life
• Crime rate in Montgomery
• City limits in two counties, sales tax distribution
• Adjacent school systems (i.e., Montgomery)
• Outside perceptions about county and other school
systems
Project Prattville 2040
8
SACRED
Participants were asked to name a condition or feature
in Prattville that is considered sacred or that is an
essential element of the community that should be protected as the city plans for its future.
• Downtown
• The Gin Shop
• History
• Desire for excellence
• Small town feel
• Historic district, community of historic churches
• Safety
• Quality education for children
• Artesian wells
• People
• Parades and community events
• Recreational opportunities (Autauga Creek, Alabama
River and parks)
• High school, sense of community/team spirit
• Robert Trent Jones Golf Course
• Technology Center
• Two-year college
• Business opportunity
VISION – WHAT’S MISSING
After being given a moment to think about the way they
would like Prattville to be in the future, participants
were asked to name one difference between the community today and the way that they envision it in
the future.
• Expansion along US 31 south for industrial develop-
ment
• Job growth
• Youth/large scale entertainment amenity(ies)
• Balance of industry and small businesses
• Collaboration with County on development north
along US 31
• More focus on industrial growth, a business/industry incubator, high tech industry, green jobs
• Better community representation on Planning and
Zoning Commission
• Willingness within community to invest and do the
work to improve the community themselves
• More partnerships within the community
• Re-use of the Gin Shop completed
• High Pointe Town Center fully occupied with stores
• An interpretive center or museum
• Better education, a city-run school system
• Development guidelines to assure quality, not
cookie-cutter, development
City Vision
9
WOW QUESTION
Following up on the discussion of changes they would
like to see happen in the future, participants were asked
to name one accomplishment Prattville could make that would impress them the most.
• To be the Central Alabama leader in economic and
industrial growth that also focuses on family and
community
• Leadership in all areas
• For participation in all city boards to represent more
fully the community
• All top-level leaders working together to achieve a
common goal of making our community the best it
can be (city, both counties, boards of education, etc.)
• City school system
• Quadruple property taxes
• Interpretive center
• Unified leadership and vision
• Controlled development, don’t overdevelop
• Auditorium/meeting venue
To be the Central Alabama leader in
economic and industrial growth that
also focuses on family and community
Project Prattville 2040
10
Visioning Survey
An online survey was conducted at the beginning of
the planning process to understand the community’s impressions of how Prattville is doing, how it is
changing and how they want it to be in the future. 870
residents completed the survey. Complete results of the
survey are included in the Appendix.
State of the City
According to the community, life in Prattville is GOOD.
And, most agree that quality of life has improved in
recent years. Residents appreciate the convenient
access to shopping, restaurants and other businesses
and the sense of community, safety and cost of living. Asked what has not contributed positively to their
quality of life, survey respondents indicated increased
traffic as the top concern–followed distantly by schools,
economic issues, infrastructure and limited recreation
and cultural amenities.
Community Facilities and Services
Asked to rate community facilities and services,
respondents indicated strongest approval of the city’s
fire and police services, garbage collection and water
and sewer systems. Respondents also rated city parks and recreation, schools, stormwater management, road
conditions and the Autauga-Prattville library highly
(over 50% positive).
Responses indicated the community has concerns related to traffic management, limited bicycle and
pedestrian facilities and recycling services. The City
implemented a new recycling service as the survey
was rolled out—limited awareness of the changes likely
contributed to respondents’ scoring. Responses also indicated that the community have concerns over the
city’s management of growth.
Looking into the Future
Respondents were asked to select one or more issues
that are most important to the future of Prattville. The following list is in order of the percentage of
respondents who identified these as important “future
issues”:
• public schools 67.0%
• public safety 50.0%
• business development 32.5%
• downtown revitalization 26.2%
• industrial and workforce development 24.5%
• parks and recreation 23.6%
• utilities and infrastructure 18.5%
• community appearance or image 17.2%
• neighborhood revitalization 16.9%
• arts and cultural amenities 13.8%
• access to healthcare 12.5%
• housing 10.5%
• environmental protection 8.8%
• transportation 8.3%
City Vision
11
The community was asked to consider what improvement would have the most positive, long-term
impact on Prattville. The following graphic represents
the frequency with which key words and phrases
appeared among responses. More frequent responses
are indicated with a larger font:
Project Prattville 2040
12
goals
Project Prattville 2040
14
The following overarching goals were culled from input of residents, business and property owners,
City staff and officials and other stakeholders. These
topics represent the issues that the community
identified as most important for the City to focus on
to assure that Prattville develops and improves in ways that are consistent with the community vision
and that improves the lives of citizens. These goals
informed the development of the growth strategy and
land use, transportation, facilities and infrastructure
recommendations that detail the growth strategy.
Education
Prattville intends to support local schools in provide a
quality education to its school-aged children. Prattville
also intends to support workforce development
programs provided by schools and other organizations to increase economic opportunities for residents, young
and old, and to offer a skilled workforce to existing and
future industries.
Public Schools
For decades Prattville has attracted new residents by offering a strong local school system. However, as the
City has grown, the Autauga County school system
has struggled—with modest local funding—to keep
pace with the growth demands of its largest city. As
a result, the attractiveness of the school system to potential residents has waned. Over time it has become
increasingly important for the community to take
action to avoid any further decline and sustain quality
educational opportunities for area children, either
through increased local funding or creation of a city or city/county hybrid school system.
Because much of Prattville’s retail growth has
occurred—over the last 20 years—in the Elmore County
portion of the city, a disproportionate amount of the
city’s sales tax revenue goes to Elmore County Schools rather than Autauga County Schools, which the bulk of
Prattville children attend. While increasing property tax
contributions, as was favored by many in community
involvement meetings, would assist Autauga County
Schools, it would not resolve the imbalance in Prattville sales tax contributions between the Autauga and
Elmore County schools.
Aside from any state legislative remedies that might resolve the tax distribution issue, only creation of a city
school system would assure that sales tax revenues
generated in Prattville will be directed toward schools
serving only Prattville students. Without any change, as
Prattville continues to grow in size, most of which will occur in Autauga County, the school funding issue—and
thus school quality issue—will persist and will likely
worsen.
Prattville High School has an enrollment of over
2,000—making it the sixth largest high school in the state—comparable to high schools in cities
considerably larger than Prattville. At the pace Prattville
is growing, additional school facilities will be needed
to accommodate continued increases in student
enrollment at all levels. While that can be forestalled by redistributing grade levels among existing schools and
expansion of existing school facilities, inevitably new
schools will need to be constructed, likely to serve the
younger student population in Prattville’s growing east
side.
Workforce Development
Workforce development programs are helpful in
providing residents with skills training to increase the
economic competitiveness of individuals and the city
as an industrial recruiter. Such programs are available to high school students through the Autauga County
Technology Center. In addition, Central Alabama
Community College opened its fourth campus in
2018 in Prattville and; other workforce development
programs are available to Prattville residents in nearby Montgomery. Prattville’s economic development
efforts, including industrial recruitment, are led by the
Prattville Area Chamber of Commerce. The Chamber,
local industries and entities offering skills-training
must continue to collaborate on the types of workforce education that will be the most beneficial to residents
and industries, including those that are most likely to
locate in the Prattville area. The new community college
should be supported locally to encourage its growth
and diversification of programs.
Goals
15
Economy
Prattville intends to grow and diversify its economy
by pursuing continued business and industrial development and recruitment, revitalization of
downtown and expansion of tourism.
Business Development and Recruitment
Prattville has become a successful regional retail
hub due to a number of factors, including the city’s population growth, interstate accessibility to smaller
communities surrounding Prattville and strategic
efforts by the City and Chamber to attract retailers
and restaurants. Much of that growth has centered
on Cobbs Ford Road in east Prattville. Despite these successes, High Point Town Center, a 900,000-square
foot shopping center that opened in 2008, has never
been fully occupied; and several older business areas
in central Prattville, such as the Prattmont area, exhibit
vacancies and incremental decline in the types of businesses occupying older buildings. This latter
issue is emblematic of the historic pattern of retail
development in Prattville, with businesses moving into
new spaces constructed further and further east toward
the interstate while earlier business areas see less and less investment.
Continued population growth will be helpful in
attracting more retailers and restaurants to fill
vacancies, as will economic development efforts that
increase the buying power of residents. In parallel, the Chamber, City and other appropriate agencies
should develop and implement strategies to encourage
local entrepreneurship. Locally grown businesses are
more likely to invest in these areas; and locally-grown
businesses recirculate two to three times more of their revenue into the local economy compared to national
chain businesses.
The southwest quadrant of the intersection of US-
31 and Main Street, one of the more distressed
parts of the Prattmont area, has been designated an Opportunity Zone, which offers capital gains tax
incentives to investors. The Opportunity Zone program,
strategic public investments and focused marketing
of available sites and buildings by the Chamber could
be instrumental in revitalizing the Prattmont area. In some instances, it may be helpful to adapt older retail
buildings to other uses—offices, entertainment, public
facilities, etc.—that would complement the mix of retail
and other businesses in each area. It may be desirable,
in fact, to consider the accessible, centrally-located Prattmont area for development of the multipurpose/
civic center. Such a facility would draw traffic to the
area day and night to the benefit of adjacent retailers
and restaurants.
Because there is not an infinite supply of retail and service businesses, the City should be strategic in
designating new areas available for commercial
development to avoid further weakening of existing
business areas. Nonetheless, as neighborhoods
develop south along McQueen Smith Road and US 82 and other areas to the north and east, it will be
appropriate to enable development of neighborhood
business hubs in central, highly accessible locations
to serve them. The types of businesses that would be
appropriate to these locations would serve a limited market radius compared to those that will look for
locations along US-31 or Cobbs Ford Road, which seek
to serve a regional or citywide market.
Project Prattville 2040
16
Industrial Development and Recruitment
Industrial development is important to communities for
its ability to provide well-paying and dependable jobs.
While International Paper has been a long-standing, major employer in Prattville, up until recent years,
industrial development has been relatively modest in
Prattville. Prattville’s growth from the 1970s onward was
built on its attractiveness as a bedroom community to
Montgomery, the River Region’s employment center. With continued industrial recruitment successes, it
is transitioning away from being mostly a bedroom
community and becoming more economically
independent, as it was when the city was founded.
Prattville’s major road system and easy access to I-65, rail access and airport are important advantages for
industrial development. The construction of the bridge
for access over the railroad to the South Industrial
Park from US-82 will prove to be critical in bringing
additional industries to the park and surrounding area. Large sites are available within the park as well as
undeveloped land south of County Road 4 for continued
industrial development with convenient access to US-31
and US-82.
The Prattville Area Chamber of Commerce facilitates recruitment on behalf of the city and obtained
AdvantageSite designation for the South Industrial
Park, which increases its marketing potential through
statewide economic development organizations. The
Chamber also markets available land adjacent to the airport, in the West Industrial Park and locations in and
around Prattville for industrial, office and retail use.
Downtown Revitalization
Downtown Prattville, centered around its historic main
street, has seen an ongoing uptick in investment and
business activity for the last twenty or more years. Despite its less than central location, downtown’s
unique businesses and character continue to draw
residents from all over the city on a daily basis.
Downtown businesses benefit from their proximity
to city and county offices that draw regular traffic as well as Autauga Creek, the Creekwalk and several
community facilities nearby. The long-proposed re-use
of the Daniel Pratt Cotton Gin for housing appears to
finally be underway and will generate considerable
activity in downtown to support local businesses.
Efforts that will help to make downtown more
successful include improving parking, strengthening
connections between downtown and other tourism
destinations and enhancing gateways into downtown
(through both public and private investment). Despite the community’s obvious appreciation for Prattville’s
history as the state’s birthplace of industry, more can be
done to turn that into a tourism asset that would directly
benefit downtown business activity. Likewise, extending
the Creekwalk will create more local and tourist activity downtown, especially if it is interconnected with other
trails and with other destinations.
Downtown’s business area could be intensified so that it
offers more variety in dining and shopping, and perhaps
even lodging—thus creating an even stronger draw for residents and visitors. There are opportunities, for
example, north along Court Street and east along Main
Street toward Washington Street to expand downtown’s
footprint. Any new development or redevelopment in
these areas should follow the original pattern along Main Street, with buildings lining the sidewalk and
parking located to the side and rear of buildings,
possibly involving shared parking to make the most
efficient use of property. Reducing the size and number
of driveways would help to provide convenient on-street parking in front of businesses and improve continuity
of downtown sidewalks. And, constructing buildings
closer together (without side yards) makes greater use
of available land and increases walkability, a key feature
of downtown.
Goals
17
Tourism
The great value in tourism is that it generates sales and
lodging tax revenues from visitors, with considerably
less or no expenditure toward fire, police, schools, sewer and other public facilities and services. Prattville
has very strong opportunities to create a robust tourism
economy built upon its history and Downtown Prattville,
its natural environment—particularly its waterways,
and amenities such as the Robert Trent Jones Golf Course and Cooter’s Pond. To develop a truly successful
tourism industry, all of these assets must be connected
and leveraged together.
Tourism should be built around Prattville’s many
existing assets and not depend on creating attractions from scratch. Prattville should avoid “Build it and they
will come” endeavors and, instead, adopt a “Build it for
those who are here and others will come” philosophy.
City investments should generally be for the benefit of
its residents and businesses. If a project also supports tourism, that is a bonus. There are several projects
envisioned in this plan that are intended to better
serve residents and businesses, but that would also
help to leverage more tourism activity, such as the
multipurpose/civic center, streetscape improvements and beautification, new parks and trails. Public
A workshop was held in February 2021 to assess opportunities to develop an interpretive
center to tell the story of Daniel Pratt, the
city’s namesake and a key figure in the birth
of industry in Alabama. The city’s planning
team met with representatives of the Autauga County Historical Association, the University
of Alabama Center for Economic Development
and the Central Alabama Regional Planning
and Development Commission. The work
session focused on reuse of the R&D Building, which housed the company’s engineering
and design operations. Noting Prattville’s
multifaceted tourism opportunities, workshop
participants recommended local partners:
1) conduct a feasibility study to estimate the proposed center’s costs and economic
benefits, 2) optimize pedestrian access to the
downtown business district, and 3) develop
a tourism plan that embraced the cotton gin
complex and all downtown sites connected to Pratt with the R&D Building serving as a key
component.
Project Prattville 2040
18
Recreation and Culture
Prattville intends to strengthen its recreational and
cultural facilities and programs to offer a quality of life to residents beyond that of peer communities.
Parks
Prattville has developed a well-rounded parks system,
which the City will continue to develop to meet the
needs of the growing population, including planning future parks facilities in developing areas. In 2015 the
Parks and Recreation Department prepared a master
plan to guide investment in existing and future facilities.
The recommendations of that plan were reinforced
by public input during the comprehensive planning process. The community desires a well-distributed
parks system—parks are located conveniently in
relation to Prattville’s neighborhoods—and a balance
among parks facilities between passive recreational
uses and organized sports and other active recreational uses.
Because most parks are west of Memorial Drive, in
the coming years the City will develop additional
parks to better serve the growing east side. This can
be facilitated through coordination with residential developers, who may donate or sell land in strategic
locations for public park spaces, which would add value
to their developments. Prattville will also make use of
land along area creeks that is difficult to develop due
to flooding. Such areas are appropriate for passive park space, including the extensive floodway area in
west Prattville along US-82. Such a park would not
only serve west Prattville residents, but if connected to
future recreational trails and the Autauga Creek canoe
trail, would create a recreational tourism draw.
investments that would be appropriate primarily for tourism purposes include marketing and installation of
a wayfinding system—both of which represent much
more limited costs.
Many communities around Alabama over the last
decade have been pursuing sports tourism strategies and building large sports complexes to draw travel
ball and other tournaments. Because of this, Prattville
should be cautious in investing in this way—the more
such facilities are developed in the state, the less
likely each will be successful in attracting visitors and generating income for a community. Yet, because of
Prattville’s many existing tourism assets, in combination
with its successful shopping and restaurant areas, if
such a facility were to be developed, it may be more
successful in drawing revenue-generating visitation.
Shopping, dining and lodging should be available close
by, preferably in walking distance, of major tourism
destinations to optimize revenue generation potential.
When that is not possible, wayfinding signage helps
make the connection between tourism attractions and shopping, restaurants and hotels and can also alert
visitors to attractions and businesses that might not
have been on their itinerary.
Goals
19
Existing parks, as well, will need to be maintained over time, improvements made for ADA accessibility and, in
some cases, substantially renovated or re-programmed.
The Parks and Recreation Department should keep
its master plan updated at least every ten years, if
not more frequently, to help assess and prioritize investments in existing parks and future park projects
and project funding needs.
Recreation
A multipurpose facility with a large space for
performances and citywide events, meeting spaces and indoor recreation activities is a top priority though, due
to the high cost of such a facility, will likely take time
to plan and develop. This facility could contain or be
located on a site with several community facility needs
identified in the Parks and Recreation and Facilities Long Range Plans, such as a new theater, creative arts
center and/or library. These functions are currently
located in Downtown Prattville. To relocate these
functions elsewhere could be detrimental to downtown
activity, and so a site for the multipurpose center in or adjacent to downtown would be ideal. However, there
are no large or vacant sites in the downtown area to
accommodate a large facility. Finding a site downtown
would likely involve acquisition and consolidation of
multiple properties and demolition of existing buildings. An undeveloped site of sufficient size is more likely
to be found in east Prattville (as suggested in the
Parks and Recreation Plan along with a sports field
complex). Land costs are going to be higher because
of development interests in the area; and, shifting all
of these activities to the far east end of the city could be detrimental to downtown. An alternative the City
should evaluate is locating the facility in the more
central Prattmont area either along US-31 or Main
Street. This would most likely involve redevelopment of
existing buildings, though due to the decline in the area, acquisition costs may be better. And, the facility would
undoubtedly be a significant catalyst for revitalization.
As Prattville grows, there will be increased demand
for an indoor recreation facility for basketball,
volleyball, gymnastics, fitness programs and similar indoor activities. Currently, the YMCA provides the
only indoor recreation facilities in Prattville. Indoor
recreation activities can be included in a gymnasium
and associated indoor recreation space in the future
multipurpose/civic center. Development of the multipurpose facility would enable the Doster Center to
be re-programmed and adapted for indoor recreation
activities, rather than, or in addition to, including indoor
recreation in the multipurpose facility. If a community
park, including sports fields, is built in east Prattville, as envisioned in the Parks and Recreation Plan, an
indoor recreation facility could be included as this
area is relatively far from the Doster Center (if it were
re-programmed for recreational use). It is also possible
that the community park—with or without indoor
Project Prattville 2040
20
network of paths alongside streets, would enable residents to walk or bike to nearby parks, schools and
other nearby destinations. Hiking and biking trails could
also provide connections between tourist amenities and
to shopping, dining and lodging areas, while acting as
attractions in their own right.
Arts and Culture
Prattville operates several arts and cultural facilities
for residents, including a creative arts center and
performing arts theater, both of which are located
downtown. Both programs, located in historic buildings designed for other uses, need more space and/or space
better suited to program needs. Previous planning
efforts suggested consolidating the programs on
the theater site, which would include a new building
adjacent to the theater. Another option is housing the programs in the proposed multipurpose/civic center.
The Autauga-Prattville Library is another cultural facility
that has outgrown its building. It is owned and operated
by an independent Library Board. The city’s Long-
facilities—could be designed for tournament use, thus providing a facility for sports tourism. This would
provide convenient access to nearby shopping, lodging
and dining along Cobbs Ford Road.
Stanley-Jensen Stadium is owned and maintained by
the City of Prattville but is primarily used by Autauga County Schools. The aging facility is in need of
renovation, including pressing needs for restroom
renovations. Because the school system is the primary
user, the City should develop a cost-sharing agreement
with the school system for renovation of the facility. This can be supplemented through private fundraising, given
the community importance of the stadium and the high
school football program.
Pedestrian and bicycle mobility emerged as an
important community issue during development of the plan. These interests can be addressed, in part,
through development of trails in strategic locations
throughout the community. As noted in previous city
plans, Prattville’s numerous streams offer opportunities
for construction of greenway trails. In addition to recreational use, a trail system, combined with a
Goals
21
INFRASTRUCTURE
Prattville intends to maintain, enhance and expand its
infrastructure proactively to efficiently and effectively meet the needs of future growth.
Water System
The community’s water system is operated by the
Prattville Water Works Board. Priorities for the water
system include ongoing repair, replacement and upgrading of water lines, primarily in older parts of the
city as well as a long-term effort to expand its local
water resources so that water does not have to be
purchased from elsewhere to meet the needs of the
growing city. In addition, as industrial development continues in south Prattville, the water system will
need to enhanced to meet increased industry needs,
including storage capacity and adequate flows for fire
protection.
Sewer
Prattville’s sanitary sewer system is operated by the
City of Prattville. The bulk of the city’s developed area
is connected to the sewer system, with the exception
of the lower density far west side of Prattville. New
development typically ties on to the sewer system, expanding the system’s footprint. To accommodate
continued development the City will need to make
upgrades to the interceptor system on the city’s east
side, which transports effluent to the Pine Creek
Treatment Plant. Having recently upgraded the Pine Creek facility, the Autauga Creek Treatment Plant in
southwest Prattville will be modernized to improve
efficiency and reduce long-term operational costs.
Range Facilities Plan recommended placing a new, larger library building on the same site, which would
require a temporary space for the library to operate
from during construction. A new library building could
also be incorporated into the proposed multipurpose/
civic center or collocated with the facility in a separate building.
In considering relocation of any of these facilities, the
potential negative effects to downtown—diverting their
visitors to other parts of the city, and thus reducing
“foot traffic”—must be considered. Undoubtedly, theater goers, arts class participants and others are likely to
patronize downtown businesses during their visits.
The theater and art gallery also offer other reasons for
tourists to visit and linger downtown.
Another community proposal is development of an interpretive center that would feature the city’s unique
industrial heritage and the story of Daniel Pratt and
the founding of the city. Ideally, an interpretive center
would either be located on or near the Gin complex,
which a part of is being renovated for residential use. Typically, such a facility would be operated by a non-
profit organization, though many are supported by their
host cities.
Project Prattville 2040
22
Pedestrian and Bicycle Mobility
During the planning process, the community indicated
a clear desire to become more walkable and to have
safe ways for people to get around Prattville by bike. While the City requires sidewalks (on one side of the
street) in most residential subdivisions, many areas
of Prattville developed without pedestrian facilities.
Bicycle accommodations are extraordinarily limited.
To improve these conditions will require a strategic effort to retrofit certain streets with sidewalks, shared
use paths or other facilities, in combination with off-
street paths and trails. To determine the most cost-
effective strategy for phasing in such improvements,
the City should prepare an in-depth Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan that builds on the conceptual
recommendations of this plan.
In updating the City’s Subdivision Regulations,
standards can be put in place to assure new
development includes sidewalks and, where appropriate, bicycle accommodations. As the City
widens existing roads and builds new ones—such
as the connection from Fairview to US-31 North,
pedestrian and bicycle facilities can be incorporated
from the outset.
Fire Protection
The Prattville Fire Department maintains an excellent
level of service for fire protection to the community,
which also lowers insurance costs for property owners. Priorities for the department include improvements
to two fire stations. A long-term objective may be
construction of a fifth fire station in south Prattville,
depending upon the amount of industrial growth that
occurs in that area over the next several years.
Vehicular Transportation
As a result of Prattville’s continued development, traffic
has increased on several major roads, particularly on
Cobbs Ford Road. Though significant improvements have been made in recent years, major capacity
improvement projects, such as the widening of
McQueen Smith Road and US-82, are still at early
stages of design and construction. These projects often
take considerable time to implement once planned due to their high cost and delays in obtaining federal
or state funding. However, once completed, existing
congestion will be lessened and additional capacity
will be available to handle additional traffic as the city
continues to grow. A major focus for the coming years will be to design and construct a connector road from
Fairview Avenue in east Prattville to US-31 North, to
alleviate congestion on Fairview Avenue, US-31 and
local streets around the junior high and high schools.
Access management improvements on East Main Street and Cobbs Ford Road—to create more separation
between driveways accessing the roadway—will help to
smooth traffic and increase motorist safety.
Street connections, realignments and intersection
improvements in strategic locations will also help to disperse more traffic more evenly, improve traffic flow
and increase safety. As new development occurs, the
City must manage the development of the street system
to assure adequate connectivity to reduce potential
congestion, provide convenient ways to move about the city and assure effective routes for emergency
response.
Goals
23
Enhancement
Prattville intends to improve the physical attractiveness
of major corridors, business hubs and neighborhoods to support economic development, augment the city’s
unique sense of place and strengthen pride throughout
the community.
Image and Appearance
Prattville has a positive reputation and generally projects a good image to visitors, particularly
Downtown Prattville and the regional shopping area
on Cobbs Ford Road. During the planning process,
the community indicated a desire to improve some
aspects of the city’s physical appearance. Improving the image of the community involves public and private
efforts. The city addresses this through investment
and maintenance of streets, landscaping, gateways
and signage and adopting and enforcing building
maintenance, nuisance abatement and development regulations. The private sector contributes to
community image by investing in development that
creates a sense of place, that projects a sense of quality
and permanence and that is well-maintained over time.
The City must be strategic, focusing on investments that will have the highest cost-to-benefit ratio, to
make substantive improvements in the community’s
image. Its gateways and image corridors should be the
primary focus of image enhancement efforts. This will
encourage property owners in these critical areas to invest compatibly in their buildings and grounds.
The city has installed gateway signage, typically,
where major roads enter the city. Gateway signs help
create a positive impression for visitors and are part
of the city’s overall branding and wayfinding systems. They are more symbolic than literal (compared to a
sign indicating that you are entering or exiting the
city limits). It is not necessary for them to be placed
at city boundaries. Ideally, locations are strategically
chosen to afford the best first impression, such as sites with pleasant natural scenery or where surrounding
development and the street environment are
particularly attractive. Over time, as existing signs are
improved or replaced, locations should be evaluated
to determine if a change would better support the arrival experience—taking into account how well the
surroundings contribute to a positive impression.
Cobbs Ford Road/Main Street, US-31, US-82 and Fairview Avenue are the most traveled roads in
Prattville. These are primary routes for locals,
commuters and visitors. And, they are home to much of
the city’s commercial development. For these reasons,
the design and upkeep of these roadways, as well as the development alongside them, have a profound
impact on the way that residents and visitors view
Prattville. The degree to which traffic flows smoothly
along these “image corridors” also leaves an impression
on motorists. To manage and improve the image of the community within the rights-of-way of image corridors,
the city should invest in streetscape improvements,
gateways, lighting, banners and wayfinding signage.
This should be viewed as a long-term strategy to be
implemented in phases. Access management and other traffic improvements may also be necessary to address
congestion and operational factors that negatively
impact community impressions.
To enhance the image of these areas through private
development along major corridors, the city could adopt zoning rules and/or design guidelines that establish
standards for site, building, signage, landscaping and
lighting. This can be done through overlay regulations
that apply only to development in these areas. To
ensure that property is well-maintained, cities often use property maintenance codes and/or ordinances on
weed and nuisance abatement.
Project Prattville 2040
24
Revitalization
While there is considerable private investment in
Prattville’s growing east side, some of Prattville’s older
commercial districts and neighborhoods suffer from a lack of investment—new development, reinvestment in
existing development and maintenance. This affects the
lives of neighborhood residents and, in some instances,
can negatively affect residents’ and visitors’ impression
of the community. Enforcing property maintenance codes and weed and nuisance abatement ordinances
will have some limited benefits, but are not likely to
have a sustained, transformative impact. A concerted
effort that encourages private investment in these areas
will be necessary. A collaborative and comprehensive strategy should be developed for each district and/or
neighborhood, involving public, nonprofit and for-profit
initiatives, which might include some combination
of the following, depending on the particular
characteristics of the area:
• Citywide efforts to improve the economy of the city
and economic opportunities of all citizens
• Overall enhancements to the school system to at-
tract private investment in all housing sectors
• Strategic city investments in infrastructure, streetscapes, parks and other facilities
• Marketing new development/redevelopment sites
• Connecting potential investors to available incen-
tives (housing tax credits, historic tax credits, Op-
portunity Zone incentives, etc.)
• Housing development and rehabilitation programs
through public agencies, community housing devel-
opment organizations and philanthropic groups
• Land banking and clearing title to abandoned, tax
delinquent properties
• Waiving or reducing city liens and development fees
for private investment in distressed areas
• Flexibility in land use and density controls to facili-
tate quality investment
growth strategy
Project Prattville 2040
26
The following citywide growth strategy is intended to manage growth and improve quality of life in a
manner reflecting the strong value system expressed
by residents during the visioning process. It is based
fundamentally on the city’s natural landscape, its
activity centers and its transportation network. It builds on the overall image of the city and the values
inherent in its unique, diverse natural environment. The
strategy supports commerce, industry and recreation in
locations that are highly accessible. It protects the city’s
traditional neighborhoods and streets while upgrading pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular networks. And, the
strategy emphasizes patterns of growth that optimize
the use of existing infrastructure, thus avoiding the
short and long-term costs of sprawling, inefficient city
infrastructure.
This is a general, long-range plan. The locations of
certain proposed activity centers and community
facilities shown on the Growth Strategy maps are not
meant to be precise. Rather, each of these should be
considered “placeholders” until more specific planning may be undertaken to determine detailed needs and
locations for each.
Major Elements
• The city’s “green infrastructure” will be conserved
and respected. Intensive development is directed away from areas with critical environmental features.
• Public and private investment along major roadways
will create positive experiences for residents, inves-
tors and visitors. Prattville’s gateways will be well-
defined and project an attractive image to visitors.
• Commercial and other activity centers will be com-
pact, legible and designed for accessibility. Continu-
ous strip development along major roads will be
avoided.
• Intensive industrial development will be directed toward the edges of the city in locations with ready
access to the interstate.
• New streets will interconnect parts of the commu-
nity to provide alternative routes for moving about
the city and help alleviate congestion along major streets and at major intersections.
• Access to all arterial and collector streets will be
managed carefully to conserve their capacity.
• The park and recreation system will be enlarged
as the city grows, capitalizing where possible on environmentally-constrained areas to create new
parks, trails and other recreational facilities.
• The city’s pedestrian and bicycle network, including
an off-street path system, will interconnect neigh-
borhoods with schools, park and recreation facilities and other important destinations.
• Residential density and street connectivity will in-
crease with proximity to activity centers.
Growth Strategy
27
Natural Environment/Green Infra-
structure
Prattville has an enviable natural landscape that is enjoyed for its scenic beauty and the opportunities it
provides for recreation and tourism. In combination with
man-made open spaces and landscape features, it also
performs “green infrastructure” functions, supporting
stormwater drainage, flood protection, air quality, water quality, managing temperatures that result from land
development and providing habitat for wildlife. Natural
features should be incorporated into the design of
new development so that they continue to serve these
functions while also forming amenities that add value to neighborhoods and business areas.
Flood prone areas, steep slopes and other natural
features are often viewed as obstacles to development,
because they take up land area that might otherwise
be built on. Grading to create flatter development sites, to elevate building sites above flood levels and
to deal with increased stormwater resulting from new
development also increases construction costs. But,
Prattville can encourage more environmentally-friendly
development practices by promoting “conservation
development.” This means clustering buildings and streets into the most developable portions of a site
while retaining those areas that contain valuable natural
features. This requires flexibility from zoning limits
on density, minimum lot areas and yard setbacks. By
clustering development, not only are natural features protected—and the functions they serve—the amount of
infrastructure necessary to the development decreases.
This reduces construction costs and the public’s costs
for the long-term maintenance of that infrastructure.
Natural areas retained through conservation development can become amenities that add value and
enjoyment to new neighborhoods and business areas.
Waterways
Area creeks function as drainageways for stormwater
runoff, provide wildlife and fish habitat and contribute to Prattville’s rich, natural landscape. Channelization
of natural drainageways should generally be avoided
as it increases the velocity of stormwater flows, which
may then exacerbate erosion, sedimentation and
downstream flooding.
Figure 1 Green Infrastructure
Project Prattville 2040
28
Floodplains
Floodplains, such as those along the Alabama River,
Autauga Creek, Noland Creek, Pine Creek and other
area streams, fall into three basic categories: floodways, 100-year floodplains and 500-year floodplains. Because
of the potential for flood damage to structures and
exacerbating flooding in other areas, most types of
development are prohibited in floodways. 100-year
floodplains—areas with an annual 1% chance of flooding—straddle the floodway and are available for
development, subject to some restrictions, including
raising buildings above flood elevation and flood
insurance requirements. 500-year floodplains—areas
with an annual 0.2% chance of flooding—tend to be relatively small and are available for development with
little or no restriction. When development occurs in the
100-year floodplain, it should be planned and designed
carefully to avoid increasing flood hazards, including
limiting the amount of buildings, streets, pavement and other impervious surfaces and using “low-impact”
development techniques. Otherwise, these areas should
be reserved for open space and planned and designed
as part of Prattville’s citywide green infrastructure.
Wetlands
Conserving wetlands can help ease flooding problems,
support better water quality and protect fish and wildlife
habitat.
Steep Slopes
Prattville’s topography is often hilly. Steeper slopes may provide opportunities for views, but they also
are difficult to build on and are subject to erosion.
When slopes are graded, natural drainage systems are
altered, which can have impacts well beyond the site.
Development on slopes of more than fifteen percent is often avoided or done with great care due to the
potential for increased erosion and higher costs of
construction, in addition to the loss of tree cover and
wildlife habitat.
Infrastructure
The infrastructure services the City provides should
be used to manage the location, type and intensity of growth in accordance with Prattville’s vision. By
coordinating infrastructure planning with citywide land
use and economic development planning, the City can
maintain high levels of service and achieve a desirable
balance between the costs of public investment and the benefits of private development in desired new growth
areas. Likewise, land use and economic development
planning must take into account the cost to build and
maintain infrastructure and to provide and operate
public services and facilities. Infrastructure investments, in combination with appropriate land use and economic
development policies, can also encourage private
reinvestment in aging or declining neighborhoods and
business areas.
Standards for public improvements required as part of private development—street networks, pedestrian and
bicycle facilities and stormwater drainage—should be
set to create physical environments commensurate with
Prattville’s vision for its neighborhoods and business
and industrial activity centers.
Prattville’s desirability for new housing development
remains strong. But if growth exceeds the City’s
infrastructure and other public services, all of what
makes Prattville attractive to current residents and to
prospective development will be damaged. The more growth outpaces infrastructure, the more complicated
and costly it is to correct those deficiencies. This
is being experienced, to a degree, in increasing
congestion on some major roads and a few local
streets.
Growth Strategy
29
Sewer System
One of the most powerful tools the City has to shape
growth is the municipal sewer system. For all but
the lowest densities of residential development, access to the sewer system is a necessity. This is why
Prattville’s west side, historically without access to the
sewer system, is only sparsely developed. To facilitate
business or industrial development in areas beyond the
sewer coverage area, the City may opt to extend the system or assist financially in extending the system,
where there are clear economic benefits of such an
investment.
Telecommunications Infrastructure
Strong, dependable broadband services have increasingly become a necessity as the daily needs of
households and businesses have become increasingly
dependent on internet access. This became even
more apparent during the planning process, which
took place during the COVID-19 pandemic as many residents found themselves working remotely through
the internet. The City must continue to work with
telecommunications providers to increase coverage,
access and quality of broadband services in Prattville to
assure its economic competitiveness and the quality of life of its residents.
Street Network
Residents have expressed concern over mounting
congestion in a few key areas of the city. While adding
capacity to existing streets is an obvious response, it does not address an underlying issue that will continue
to contribute to congestion—a disconnect between the
street network and the location and intensity of land
uses. Congestion along Cobbs Ford Road, for example,
is the result of a concentration of businesses that rely almost exclusively on one road for access, rather than
a network of streets with multiple routes for accessing
businesses. As Prattville continues to grow, the citywide
street network must be developed to provide a high
level of street connectivity in areas that generate large volumes of traffic.
Greater connectivity must be developed between the
residential growth occurring in northeast Prattville and
the schools that serve the areas, all of which are west
of US 31. Widening of McQueen Smith Road and US-82 (west of US-32) will improve local traffic flow on the
east side and through traffic flow on the south side,
respectively. Eventually, the two-lane portion of US 31
north of Prattville should be expanded to enable greater
access to Exit 186.
Figure 2 Transportation Strategy
Project Prattville 2040
30
Pedestrian Facilities
Prattville residents desire a more walkable community.
For a community to achieve meaningful “walkability,”
three conditions must be present: businesses, schools, parks and other destinations within proximity of
neighborhoods; pedestrian facilities to connect them;
and compact, pedestrian-friendly design of business
areas, schools and other destinations.
Downtown Prattville, surrounding historic neighborhoods and many newer residential areas
have at least some sidewalks, but most major roads,
which interconnect the various parts of the city, do
not. Over time, the City should invest strategically in
major roadways to add pedestrian facilities, where appropriate, to connect between neighborhood
sidewalk networks and other parts of the community.
Several such locations, selected to create connections
between neighborhoods, parks, schools and business
areas, are shown in the conceptual map above.
The layout of existing development along most major roads hinders installation of sidewalks and limits the
safety and convenience of walking. Such limitations
need to be taken into account when considering
pedestrian improvements in existing development
areas. Plans should be in place to add or require sidewalks along major streets as they see new
development or redevelopment. Along major streets
that are not yet fully developed, shared use paths for
pedestrians and bicyclists, may be placed on one side
of the street and a sidewalk on the other.
As an alternative to, or in combination with, adding
pedestrian facilities along major roads, Prattville
has many creeks and linear natural areas that may
be appropriate for development of off-street shared
use paths (shown in green in the map above). A citywide bicycle and pedestrian master plan should
be developed to identify the most effective routes and
priorities to create meaningful walkability throughout
Prattville.
Figure 3 Bicycle-Pedestrian Concept
Growth Strategy
31
Bicycle Facilities
In addition to becoming more walkable, many residents
expressed a desire to make Prattville more “bikeable.”
Bike facilities can be added within roadways in the form of marked “sharrows”—like those added to Old Farm
Lane—shared use shoulders or dedicated bicycle lanes.
Shared use paths, as described above, can be added
alongside major streets or along creeks and linear open
spaces. Sharrows and bicycle lanes are appropriate for more experienced cyclists whereas paths that are
physically separated from vehicular traffic are more
appropriate for children and less-experienced cyclists.
Activity Centers
Significant nodes or concentrations of commercial, industrial and mixed-use development are designated
in this plan as activity centers. These include continued
development and reinvestment in existing nodes—
local and regional commercial centers, Downtown
Prattville, and industrial centers as well as desired new development areas. The Growth Strategy identifies
several opportunities for new neighborhood-serving
activity centers, which would open up additional
business development opportunities close to
where people live. These are generally located at major intersections or the confluence of multiple
neighborhoods. Businesses areas should be planned
and designed to suit their target customers and their
location within the community. Business areas tend to
have a primary function or focus based on who they are marketed toward. This helps determine where they are
located and designed. Each center should be accessible
and have a relatively high concentration of business
activity at their core. Each should also project a positive
image for the community.
Activity Center Principles
Prattville’s activity centers vary in function and size, but
most should display at least several of the following
characteristics:
• Anchor or focus of activity: Regardless of its type,
every center contains some activity or function with
which it is primarily associated in the region, com-
munity or neighborhood.
• Intensively developed core: There is a relatively high concentration of those uses for which the center ex-
ists, toward the center and less toward the edges.
• Vehicular accessibility: The center is readily acces-
sible by vehicle. Regional commercial centers have
the highest degree of access due to their location near interstate interchanges and along major arteri-
als while smaller centers tend to be located on minor
arterials and collector streets.
• Internal vehicular circulation: A motorist may easily
access other locations within the center on the same side of a major street without having to re-enter that
street.
• Pedestrian and bicycle accessibility: With some
exception, activity centers are accessible by pedes-
trians and cyclists from surrounding areas. Centers are planned and designed with the overall needs
of pedestrians in mind. Downtown Prattville and
neighborhood centers reflect the highest integration
of pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Industrial centers
will tend to have the least.
• Positive sense of place: The visitor has a good feeling
about the overall character of the center—overall im-
age of the place and its relation to its surroundings,
feelings of safety, and sense of arrival and departure.
• Legibility: Things fit together—signage, landscaping, the locations of buildings and parking areas rein-
force one another.
• Well-defined edges: The arrangement of uses and
the design of the streetscape, buildings and land-
scaping make it clear where the center begins and ends.
Project Prattville 2040
32
Highway Commerce
Interstate or highway commercial areas tend to serve
travelers and commuters, who make choices primarily
based on convenience in the context of their traveling or commuting agenda. These areas offer a range of goods
and services, such as gas stations, fast food restaurants
and hotels. Prattville already has an array of businesses
easily accessible from I-65 that are targeted toward
travelers and commuters. Design standards should be employed to assure that new development creates a
strong image for Prattville at its major gateways along
I-65.
Regional and Community Shopping
Regional and community shopping areas are
destinations—residents from throughout the community
(and beyond) often plan their visits to these areas in advance—and offer the greatest variety of goods and
services. Currently, Prattville’s regional and community
shopping areas are located along Cobbs Ford Road,
Main Street and Memorial Drive. These areas are
externally accessible but have limited “internal accessibility,” the ability to get from one business to
another without re-entering the highway. Stretching
such shopping areas along major arterials, without
internal accessibility afforded by side streets and cross
streets, increases congestion as through traffic is mixed with and slowed by local shopping traffic.
Design standards should be employed in regional
and community shopping areas to assure that new
development projects a positive image for Prattville
along its most heavily traveled corridors.
Figure 4 Activity Centers
Growth Strategy
33
Downtown Prattville
Historic downtown Prattville represents the
quintessential American Main Street and is well-
loved by the community. Due to the multi-faceted efforts of the City, property and business owners and
others, Downtown Prattville has seen considerable
improvement over the last twenty years. The proposed
re-use of the Gin Shop is expected to have a positive
impact on downtown by adding more downtown-adjacent residents, who are likely to frequent downtown
restaurants and retailers. Additional opportunities to
develop more downtown-adjacent housing should be
pursued to optimize downtown activity day and night.
Care should also be taken to assure that investment in new and existing buildings is done appropriately to
reinforce downtown’s historic, small-town urban appeal
and promote walkability.
Neighborhood Business
Neighborhood business areas offer everyday goods
and services near where their customers live. Currently,
most Prattville businesses are concentrated on major arterials with only a tangential relationship to nearby
neighborhoods. However, there is considerable
potential for neighborhood activity centers to develop in
strategic locations, generally at intersections.
Neighborhood activity centers should be limited in size, including only a handful of businesses, but can
also include or be anchored by parks, schools or
churches. Businesses should be limited in size and have
limited hours (i.e., 7am to 9pm) so they do not create
large amounts of traffic and pose other nuisances for nearby residents. Businesses should be designed so
that they are easy to get to on foot, which reduces
how much traffic they generate and reduces parking
needs. Parking should be located to the side or rear of
buildings rather than the front so that entrances are accessible from sidewalks.
Project Prattville 2040
34
Housing
To maintain the welcoming, small town environment
that draws people to Prattville, efforts to manage
housing growth should focus on creating authentic,
family-friendly neighborhoods rather than sprawling,
generic neighborhoods. Neighborhoods feature a varied housing stock—different sizes and styles. They are
designed to be safe and comfortable for people of all
ages, including having slow-traffic streets, sidewalks
and a common open space or public park in walking
distance. Today’s residential developments tend to be inward-focused, lacking any visual or physical
connection to adjacent residential areas, much less
parks or neighborhood business areas. But, individual
subdivisions can form neighborhoods when meaningful
connections are made between them.
Community input indicated that Prattville should
provide housing choice for people in all stages of
life—married couples with children and without, young
singles and older ones, empty nesters and so on. This would mean that someone who grows up in Prattville
would be able to find financially appropriate, quality
housing options throughout their life. At the same
time, there is concern in the community that allowing
more multifamily housing would mean an influx of poorly maintained rental housing. However, there are
options between multifamily housing development and
conventional detached single-family homes. Detached
single-family homes on small lots, townhouses
(attached homes) and cottage housing are just a few of these “in-between” housing products.
Based on a residential demand analysis conducted
during the planning process, Prattville has the market
potential to see between 1,090 to 1,535 new housing
units over the next five years. Of this, only about one-third is likely to include conventional single-family
homes. One key to integrating mid- and higher density
Growth Strategy
35
housing successfully in Prattville—while respecting existing neighborhoods and the community’s desired
character—is directing it to transitions between activity
centers and lower density, single-family neighborhoods.
Housing density should be highest near activity centers,
where infrastructure, particularly street capacity, is the greatest. Further from these centers, density should
dissipate.
Another important strategy is encouraging “infill”
development in locations where infrastructure is
already in place, but that for various reasons, have been skipped over in the past. This can add vitality to existing
residential and business areas nearby. It can also help
to avoid the long-term infrastructure and services costs
associated with ongoing outward expansion.
The design of residential developments should be suited to their density. In denser housing areas, there
should be a greater emphasis on street connectivity,
so that traffic can be dispersed. Streets should have
sidewalks and street trees to provide shade and
greenery. On-street parking may be appropriate and provides a buffer between traffic and sidewalks, while
also calming traffic and reducing the need for large
parking areas. Garages and common parking areas
are located away from the street. With denser housing,
green space on individual lots tends to be smaller. But this is offset with more common open spaces or parks.
In less dense areas, streets are less interconnected and
narrower. Sidewalks may be fewer and private yards
make up the bulk of open space.
Prattville has the market potential
to see between 1,090 to 1,535 new
housing units over the next five years.
Project Prattville 2040
36
Community Image
Gateways and Image Corridors
During the visioning process, participants expressed a desire for improving the city’s image. Prattville’s major
gateways include two interchanges with Interstate 65,
two entrances north and south along US 31 and two
minor gateways along US 82 on the city’s west side.
The city’s major streets are also critical parts of the community’s image. US 31, US 82, Fairview Avenue,
Cobbs Ford Road, Main Street, and State Road 14 are
Prattville’s image corridors.
The economy of the city is tightly linked to its
physical character, and its image must be enhanced to remain competitive. Prattville’s gateways and
image corridors should be treated as irreplaceable
assets to be enhanced and taken advantage of. At
each gateway, the city’s image is a result of private
development along the corridor and public investments in signage, the roadway, landscaping and lighting. By
managing development along these corridors and at
major gateways, encouraging private reinvestment
and maintenance, and making strategic public
improvements, Prattville will make itself more attractive to outside investment.
Wayfinding
The city should support visitation to local attractions
by developing public wayfinding signage at key points
along major roads to assist visitors in finding their destinations easily. This should include signage along
the interstate. Attractively designed wayfinding signage
used with consistency can integrate city branding in
high visibility locations and promotes a strong image for
Prattville.
Wayfinding systems are primarily directed at visitors
who are unfamiliar with Prattville. Destinations
that should be considered for inclusion in a future
wayfinding system include, among others:
• Major parks, recreation and trail facilities
• Downtown Prattville
• Robert Trent Jones Golf Course and conference
center
• Museums, historic districts and sites
• Regional commercial centers
To implement a wayfinding system for Prattville, a
master plan should be developed identifying wayfinding
routes and decision points; the types of signs to be
used and their design; destinations to be listed on
signage; and a phasing strategy.
Figure 5 Gateways Figure 6 Image Corridors
Growth Strategy
37
Parks and Recreation
Prattville has developed and maintains a quality parks
and recreation system. During the visioning process, community participants indicated their desires for
enhancing Prattville’s parks and recreation system,
including taking greater advantage of the community’s
natural assets for recreation and to support tourism.
Community suggestions included developing a large community or civic center capable of holding cultural
and entertainment programs and other citywide events,
and building on existing sports programs and facilities
to create a stronger sports tourism draw.
Most current parks and recreation facilities are located in central and west Prattville. As more residential
development occurs in east and northeast Prattville,
additional parkland—particularly smaller neighborhood
park spaces, as mentioned above—should be pursued
to create an equitably distributed system convenient to all Prattville neighborhoods.
Prattville’s waterways, and the floodplain areas that surround them, represent a significant and unique
opportunity to create additional passive green spaces,
some of which may include paths that connect to
neighborhoods and schools (as described previously).
The extensive floodplain and wetland complexes along Autauga Creek west of downtown and along Pine
Creek north of Fairview Avenue makes these areas
less suitable for development, but ideal for passive
recreational use. Using these waterways as links
between open spaces can create an interconnected system of local parks and attractions offering residents
and visitors a host of outdoor activities that takes
advantage of one of Prattville’s key assets.
Figure 7 Future Park System
Project Prattville 2040
38
land use +
transporation
Project Prattville 2040
40
The following land use and transportation strategies result from analysis of existing land uses, environmental
and man-made conditions, and the principles
embedded in the Growth Strategy. Plans for land use
and transportation, included together in this chapter,
reinforce that they are integral to one another and must be evaluated and planned for simultaneously. Simply
put, different land uses and densities require different
levels and types of transportation infrastructure.
Conversion of one type of use or density to another
will have direct impacts on street design and capacity, property access, connectivity and pedestrian facilities.
Land Use Plan
Purpose
The purpose of the Land Use Plan is to identify the
range of uses, densities and development patterns that may be allowed in a given area—should changes
occur in the future—to support orderly growth and
avoid incompatibility between neighboring uses that
can harm property values. The Plan represents a
desired pattern of land uses. It is not intended that existing uses, which differ from the land use plan, must
change. But, if they do change, then changes should
be consistent with the overall pattern established in the
Land Use Plan.
The Land Use Plan is used by the City for a variety of purposes. One of the most common of these
is in reviewing the appropriateness of zoning and
subdivision applications. The Future Land Use map
(Figure 8) is not a zoning map but a guide for the
Planning Commission and City Council in considering changes to the zoning map as development proposals
are made. It is to be consulted in planning for expansion
and new development of public facilities and utilities to
serve the growing community because it represents a
reasonable picture of the future state of the community.
Interpreting the Map
The boundaries of land use categories shown on the
Future Land Use map should not be interpreted rigidly,
but the general pattern should be observed to support
comfortable transitions between uses. That intended pattern is reflected in the Growth Strategy, which
should be referenced as a foundation of the Land Use
Plan. The Future Land Use map is not intended to be
static and unchanging. There will likely be instances when otherwise appropriate development requests will
not conform exactly to the Future Land Use map. At
those times it may be necessary for the City to consider
amending the Land Use Plan (and/or map).
The designation of land uses on the Future Land Use map should not be interpreted to propose, approve,
deny nor preclude any specific action without full
31
31
82
82
65
65
57
10
85
4
29
29
27
86
3
12
39
14
14
143
Cobbs Ford RdMain St
Gin Shop Hill Rd
Selm a Hwy
D
oster Rd
W a s hington Ferry Rd
Martin Luther King Dr
Mc
Q
u
e
e
n
S
m
i
t
h
R
d
Upper Kingston Rd
Old F
a
rm Ln
Old Ridge Rd
Bridg
e Creek Rd
G
olson Rd
Rock
y Mount Rd
Dosterville Rd
Ridgewood Rd
Sheila Blvd
Jasmine Trail
W righ t St
Wetumpka St
E. Sixth St
Durden Rd
Lower Kingston Rd
Breakfast Creek Rd
Red Field Rd
Fairvie w A v e
Cobbs Ford RdMain St
Gin Shop Hill Rd
Selm a Hwy
D
oster Rd
W a s hington Ferry Rd
Martin Luther King Dr
Mc
Q
u
e
e
n
S
m
i
t
h
R
d
Upper Kingston Rd
Old F
a
rm Ln
Old Ridge Rd
Bridg
e Creek Rd
G
olson Rd
Rock
y Mount Rd
Dosterville Rd
Ridgewood Rd
Sheila Blvd
Jasmine Trail
W righ t St
Wetumpka St
E. Sixth St
Durden Rd
Lower Kingston Rd
Breakfast Creek Rd
Red Field Rd
Fairvie w A v e
PRATTVILLE
BOOTH
MONTGOMERY
MILLBROOK
International
Paper
Grouby
Field
RTJ atCapitol Hill
Maxwell AFB
AU
T
A
U
G
A
C
O
U
N
T
Y
EL
M
O
R
E
C
O
U
N
T
Y
AUTAUGA COUNTY
MONTGOMERY COUN
T
Y
ELMORE COUNTY
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
A L A B A M A R I V E R
JacobsSwamp
C
o
b
b
s
L
a
k
e
Gun Islan d C h u t e
CootersPond
Future Land Use 2020 Revised: Jan 18, 2021
Very Low Density Res.
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
Conservation/Greenspace
Institutional
Commercial
Mixed Use - Commercial
Mixed Use - Residential
Light Industrial
General Industrial
Land Use+Transportation
41
31
31
82
82
65
65
57
10
85
4
29
29
27
86
3
12
39
14
14
143
Cobbs Ford RdMain St
Gin Shop Hill Rd
Selm a Hwy
D
oster Rd
W a s hington Ferry Rd
Martin Luther King Dr
Mc
Q
u
e
e
n
S
m
i
t
h
R
d
Upper Kingston Rd
Old F
a
rm Ln
Old Ridge Rd
Bridg
e Creek Rd
G
olson Rd
Rock
y Mount Rd
Dosterville Rd
Ridgewood Rd
Sheila Blvd
Jasmine Trail
W righ t St
Wetumpka St
E. Sixth St
Durden Rd
Lower Kingston Rd
Breakfast Creek Rd
Red Field Rd
Fairvie w A v e
Cobbs Ford RdMain St
Gin Shop Hill Rd
Selm a Hwy
D
oster Rd
W a s hington Ferry Rd
Martin Luther King Dr
Mc
Q
u
e
e
n
S
m
i
t
h
R
d
Upper Kingston Rd
Old F
a
rm Ln
Old Ridge Rd
Bridg
e Creek Rd
G
olson Rd
Rock
y Mount Rd
Dosterville Rd
Ridgewood Rd
Sheila Blvd
Jasmine Trail
W righ t St
Wetumpka St
E. Sixth St
Durden Rd
Lower Kingston Rd
Breakfast Creek Rd
Red Field Rd
Fairvie w A v e
PRATTVILLE
BOOTH
MONTGOMERY
MILLBROOK
International
Paper
Grouby
Field
RTJ atCapitol Hill
Maxwell AFB
AU
T
A
U
G
A
C
O
U
N
T
Y
EL
M
O
R
E
C
O
U
N
T
Y
AUTAUGA COUNTY
MONTGOMERY COUN
T
Y
ELMORE COUNTY
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
A L A B A M A R I V E R
JacobsSwamp
C
o
b
b
s
L
a
k
e
Gun Islan d C h u t e
CootersPond
Future Land Use 2020 Revised: Jan 18, 2021
Very Low Density Res.
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
Conservation/Greenspace
Institutional
Commercial
Mixed Use - Commercial
Mixed Use - Residential
Light Industrial
General Industrial
consideration of all policies, principles, standards or intentions expressed in this plan and the city’s
development regulations. Specific site conditions,
such as topography, geology, soils and hydrology,
must be considered when choosing sites for new
developments, especially those of larger scale, and planning and designing their uses and densities. These
realities, plus attitudes toward development on the
part of public officials, other agencies, area residents, property owners and developers will play a large part
in determining appropriate development location and
design. Similarly, adequate community facilities and
infrastructure – streets, parks, fire protection services,
and water and sewer systems, should be assured before making any significant development proposals
or decisions.
Figure 8 Future Land Use Map
Project Prattville 2040
42
Land Use Types and Characteristics
The following land use types are depicted on the Future
Land Use map. Land use categories include street
design guidance appropriate to the type and intensity of development that should be applied to development
involving the construction of new streets or changes
to existing streets. For categories without such
information, street design should be consistent with the
broader land use context.
Conservation and Green Space
Includes land permanently reserved as open space
and/or recreation including public parks, land trust
properties and cemeteries. Flood prone areas are also
included to encourage conservation of these areas and reduce development impacts on area waterways.
Residential
Includes varying densities of primarily detached
single-family residential development. Low intensity
institutional uses, parks and open spaces are also included in each of three residential categories—very
low density, low density, and medium density (refer also
to illustrations). Higher density residential uses—small
lot housing, townhouses and multifamily development—
are included within the Mixed-use Residential category and may also occur in transitional areas where medium
and lower density residential areas border commercial
and mixed-use development areas.
Very Low Density Residential and Agriculture
Includes single-family housing, crop farming, timbering, raising of livestock and some agriculturally-
related business uses that produce little traffic, do
not require access to the sanitary sewer system and
involve a low ratio of building to land area. Lot sizes
for residential development are at least 15,000 square feet. Lot sizes for agricultural uses will tend to be
much larger, comprising multiple acres.
Street-side stormwater drainage is handled by
swales rather than curb and gutter. Sidewalks are not
provided but off-street paths may be desirable for pedestrian, bicycle, horse or all-terrain vehicle use.
Land Use and Development Principles
The integrated land use and transportation concept is
built around the following principles:
• Arrange uses to avoid incompatibility that can harm property values.
• Provide comfortable transitions between uses of
different types, densities and intensities.
• Arrange uses so that traffic from industrial, com-
mercial and other traffic generators is not funneled through residential areas.
• Treat commercial areas as centers or hubs around
which residential, institutional and other commu-
nity elements are arranged.
• Locate higher density residential uses close to commercial hubs and major roads and lower den-
sity residential areas further out from commercial
hubs and major roads.
• Designate environmentally sensitive areas for
recreational uses or development types with low impact on flood plains, steep slopes, etc.
• Face similar uses across streets. Arrange uses so
that land use transitions occur mostly along rear lot
lines and man-made and natural barriers (railroads,
highways, streams, etc.). Land use transitions along side lot lines should be considered on a case by
case basis and may require buffers between some
uses.
Land Use+Transportation
43
Low Density Residential
Includes single-family detached houses on relatively
large lots, generally 3-4 homes per acre. Low density
residential areas are typically located where the street network is relatively sparse and access to other
public infrastructure and services is more limited.
Green space is incorporated through generously-
sized yards. Sidewalks should be provided, at a
minimum, along collector streets and set back from the road edge. Alternatively, low density subdivisions
can be connected to community destinations through
trails. Streets may include vegetated swales, valley
gutters or raised curbs for stormwater purposes.
Medium Density Residential
Include single-family detached homes with moderate
lot sizes, generally 4-5 units per acre. These areas are
typically located convenient to business areas and
public facilities and services and where the existing
and planned street network and other infrastructure are more robust.
Green space is provided in common open spaces and
in the streetscape (primarily in front lawns). Sidewalks
are provided on at least one side of the street (on
both sides of collector streets). Sidewalks are set back from the curb by a buffer strip planted with
street trees. Streets are generally lined with raised
curbs for stormwater purposes.
Commercial and Mixed-Use Areas
Shopping and dining uses should be concentrated at
the heart of each commercial or mixed-use center with
offices and other business uses located in upper stories of buildings (if applicable) or flanking the core uses.
High density residential uses may be appropriate at the
edges of commercial and mixed-use areas and in upper
floors of buildings.
New commercial and mixed-use development should feature sidewalks on both sides of the street to provide
pedestrian access throughout each district and to
connect to adjoining neighborhoods. Sidewalks should
be buffered from streets, as appropriate to the location,
by a tree-lined buffer strip. With the exception of some highway segments, streets should generally have raised
curb and gutter. Parking areas of adjacent businesses
should be connected and the number and size of curb
cuts, particularly along major roads, minimized.
In higher density residential areas included within mixed-use areas, green space is provided in common
open spaces and within the streetscape. Alleys or
shared driveways provide access to the rear of lots,
which provides a discrete location for parking, utilities
and garbage pick-up. Due to the narrowness of townhouse lots, front driveways would take up most
of the front yard and so are discouraged. Parking can
be provided in common parking areas or at the rear
of individual lots. Mid-block alleys or private drives
provide access to parking areas, which should be located internal to developments rather than in front of
buildings.
Commercial
Includes a wide range of commercial activity—retail,
business and personal services, dining, entertainment and lodging accommodations—as well as some office
and institutional uses. Shopping and dining activity
typically serves regional/commuter and citywide
markets. Therefore, these areas are primarily located
along Cobbs Ford Road, Memorial Drive and other arterial corridors where the existing and planned
street network is capable of absorbing high traffic
demand.
Project Prattville 2040
44
Mixed-Use Commercial
Includes a wide variety of commercial uses as well
as recreational, institutional and higher density
residential uses. This category is intended to optimize opportunities for reinvestment in Downtown Prattville,
Prattmont and other already developed areas.
Shopping and dining activity typically serves citywide
and more localized markets. These areas should have
a higher level of walkability than the “Commercial” category through more compact development
patterns, smaller block sizes and generous pedestrian
infrastructure.
Mixed-Use Residential
Includes a wide variety of commercial uses as well as recreational, institutional and higher density
residential uses. These areas will tend to include a
higher percentage of office, service and other non-
retail business activity, compared to the “Commercial”
and “Mixed-Use Commercial” categories, as well as higher density residential uses. As with the Mixed-
use Commercial category, use flexibility is intended
to optimize reinvestment opportunities in already
developed areas. Mixed-use residential areas also
serve as transitions from more intensive commercial and mixed-use areas and adjoining neighborhoods.
These areas should have a high level of walkability
through more compact development patterns, smaller
block sizes and generous pedestrian infrastructure.
Neighborhood Business
Existing and potential neighborhood business areas
are also indicated in the Growth Strategy and on the
Future Land Use Map, typically at key intersections or along major local streets. Neighborhood business
areas are limited in size; and the scale, type and
operating hours of businesses must be carefully
managed to maintain compatibility with adjoining
neighborhoods and prevent traffic congestion. Auto-oriented businesses (businesses with drive-throughs,
car washes, auto repair businesses and gas stations)
should be considered on a case-by-case basis and
only when designed to minimize traffic, light, noise
and other characteristics incompatible with adjacent residential areas. Drive-through elements should
be located away from streets and from adjoining
housing.
In new development, parking areas should be located
to the side or rear of buildings rather than along the front. These areas should have a high level of
walkability through more compact development
patterns, smaller block sizes and generous pedestrian
infrastructure.
Land Use+Transportation
45
Industrial
These areas are located to optimize accessibility,
particularly to railroads and to US Highway 31, US
Highway 82 and I-65, and where incompatibility with residential and other uses can be mitigated. Industrial
areas require a high level of electrical and other
infrastructure as well as relatively flat land. Industrial
areas need not have sidewalks except as determined
by context. For example, sidewalks may be desirable to connect industries to an adjacent commercial area
so that employees can walk to nearby restaurants
and other businesses. Context should also determine
whether streets are lined with swales, valley curbs or
curb and gutter.
Light Industrial
Includes warehousing and distribution, light
manufacturing, and research and technology-
focused, clean industries. Light industrial uses tend
to be less land intensive and more compatible with non-industrial uses than “heavier” industrial uses.
However, they must be located with consideration to
how truck access would affect neighboring uses and
buffered from less intensive uses, especially housing
areas.
General Industrial
Includes light industrial uses and “heavier”
manufacturing uses, which are more likely to produce
noise, odor, fumes or other impacts on adjoining land
uses and must be located, planned and designed accordingly to limit impacts on other use areas.
Institutional
Includes government facilities, schools, places of
assembly and worship, medical, and community service
uses and lands. NOTE: Only existing institutional uses are shown. Large churches and schools, hospitals and
other higher intensity institutional uses, which tend to
comprise larger buildings and draw larger amounts
of traffic, should generally be located in high visibility
places where access is suitable and adjacent land uses are compatible. Less-intense institutions, which range
from small churches to elementary schools, may be
appropriate in or adjacent to neighborhoods provided
there is sufficient transportation access that does not
interfere with the enjoyment of the neighborhood.
The development pattern—building heights, setbacks,
parking location, street and sidewalk design—of
institutional uses should be consistent with the pattern
of the dominant use in the area (i.e., residential,
commercial, mixed-use, etc.).
Project Prattville 2040
46
Development Preferences
During the development of this plan, an online survey
was conducted to gauge the community’s preferences for residential and commercial/mixed-use development
and other community design elements. The results of
the survey guided the preparation of the land use plan
and should be referred to as the City updates its zoning
and subdivision regulations.
Housing and Neighborhoods
Prattville residents place more importance on
neighborhoods featuring homes made of quality,
durable materials more so than large homes. Tree cover,
streams and other natural features should be conserved as neighborhoods are developed. 84% of respondents
agreed or strongly agrees that Prattville should offer
housing choices for different stages of life (i.e., young
couples, families with children, empty nesters, military
and other retirees, young singles and senior singles). Half of respondents expressed support for having
places to shop and eat within walking distance of their
neighborhoods.
Street Design
Residents placed great importance on sidewalks being properly lighted so that they feel safe walking or jogging
in their neighborhoods at night. Respondents felt it
was very important that streets be designed so that
residents can walk safely within their neighborhood
and fairly important that streets be designed to allow residents to walk safely from one neighborhood to
another.
Sidewalks should be included in new residential and business developments, particularly near parks
and schools. About 70% of respondents also agreed
or strongly agreed that Prattville should have safe
accommodations for getting around the community on
bikes and that some streets should have marked bicycle lanes or bike paths along them.
Community Image
72% agreed or strongly agreed hat excessive signage
can take away from the image of business areas. 80%
of respondents also indicated that parking areas should include landscaping and shade trees.
Parks
Over 90% of respondents support the notion that parks
should be distributed throughout Prattville that there is
a park in a reasonable distance of most neighborhoods. About 65% of respondents would like to see more
sports accommodations in the city’s park system, 75%
indicated a desire for more passive recreational space.
The second half of the Development Preferences
Survey included photos of different types of residential and commercial/mixed-use development to assess
respondents’ inclination toward various design
characteristics. Below is a summary of the survey
results highlighting the images that received the
highest and lowest scores in each category.
Land Use+Transportation
47
Medium Density Housing (detached homes on medium-sized lots)
The most favored images include curb-lined streets
with sidewalks and shade trees. While the top-rated
image includes on-street parking, this was preferred
over neighborhoods where driveways and garages were prominent along the streetscape. During a review of
the survey results in a community meeting, participants
also noted their preference toward the historic “feel”
of several of the housing images, which reflects on the
community’s image of itself and residents’ appreciation for Prattville’s historic neighborhoods.
High Density Housing(detached homes on small lots)
The most favored images included both historic homes
and modern homes with historic architecture, sidewalks
and modest lawns. As with the medium density images,
respondents felt that garages and parking in front of homes detracted from the curb appeal of the lower-
ranked images.
Image 31/Score=1.57
Image 38/Score=1.77
Image 36/Score=4.05
Image 24/Score=3.78
Project Prattville 2040
48
Higher Density Housing (attached homes/townhouses)
The highest-rated images included sidewalks and,
either the historic character Prattville residents favor
or trees and open space, or a combination of these.
The lowest-ranked images lacked sidewalks and landscaping, and the architecture tended to be viewed
as “cookie-cutter.
Multifamily Housing
The most favored images included sidewalks,
landscaping and both historic multifamily developments
and modern ones that reflected historic styles. Lower ranked images tended to be more conventional “garden
apartment” buildings with minimal landscaping and a
more “cookie-cutter” appearance.
Image 41/Score=2.32
Image 45/Score=2.45
Image 48/Score=3.92
Image 42/Score=4.07
Land Use+Transportation
49
Commercial/Mixed-Use
The highest-ranked images featured commercial and
mixed-use buildings in a more walkable environment,
where buildings fronted on wide, shaded sidewalks. As seen throughout the survey, images with an historic
character also tended to be ranked higher. Conventional
highway-oriented retail images were generally ranked
the lowest. During the community review of the survey
results, participants connected these images with traffic congestion.
Image 56/Score=1.78
Image 60/Score=4.08
Recommendations
Based on the results of the Development Preferences
Survey, both the written and image-based portions, it is
clear that most respondents intend for Prattville to be a more walkable city, both in its neighborhoods and its
business areas. That includes not only sidewalks, but
buildings “enfronting” streets. This means that buildings
are placed relatively close to and face the street so that
they are easily accessible from sidewalks. Downtown Prattville is a prime example of a walkable development
pattern. This will vary in different land use contexts:
• In neighborhood business areas, buildings may have
a modest setback from the street, but parking lots
should be placed to the side and/or rear of buildings.
• In regional and other highway-oriented business
areas, walkability is difficult to achieve, particularly in
already developed “strips” along major arterials. Op-
timally, walkability would be created internally within
larger developments, although sidewalks should still be provided along major roads to connect between
individual developments.
• In residential areas, garages and driveways should take up as little of the front of the lot as possible,
particularly in higher density, small lot develop-
ments, where parking and garages should be placed
to the side or rear. “Lanes,” or residential alleys, at
the rear of narrower lots can provide access to ga-rages or parking areas.
• In multifamily and attached single-family (town-
house) developments, each residential building
should line the street with parking provided inter-
nally, accessed by a common driveway or alley. Townhouses may be served by a common parking
area or have individual parking or garages at the rear
of homes.
There is a significant preference towards retaining
existing natural features as well as incorporating trees and landscaping wherever development occurs. New
development should be designed to reflect the best
aspects of Prattville’s image of itself — a unique small
town with highly valued historic character.
Project Prattville 2040
50
Housing Forecast
During the development of the Comprehensive Plan
update, Volk & Associates developed a forecast of the demand for new residential development over the
next five years. The forecast was based on Prattville’s
own housing development trends as well patterns of
population growth and movement within the River
Region. The analysis indicated that Prattville would likely absorb between 218 and 307 additional housing
units annually over the next five years. This would result
in a total of about 1,100 to 1,500 new homes in Prattville
by 2025.
Market Segments and Housing Preferences
The analysis went further to determine the demand
for various types among those forecasted to emerge
in Prattville in the next several years. This portion of
the study considered housing type preferences among
the different market segments—family and non-family households at different life stages and income levels—
that would most probably locate in new housing in
Prattville. 44% of new households would be families, 37% young singles and childless couples and 19%
empty nesters and retirees. Due to the makeup of
those likely to seek new housing in Prattville, only
about 36% of the forecasted housing units are likely
to be detached single-family homes, while roughly half are predicted to be for-rent multifamily units. The
remainder of housing units that will be in demand in
Prattville over the next five years include townhouses
(attached single-family—7%) and for-sale multifamily
(condominiums—4%).
The housing analysis further broke down the detached
single-family market into a range of size ranges, again,
based on preferences of the various household types
and income levels. The findings, shown in the table
below, indicate that 60% of the market for detached single-family homes include smaller lot sizes and
the remaining 40% in the medium and lower density
ranges, as described in this plan.
Table 1: Market Potential for Single-Family Detached For-Sale House Types and Lot Widths
House Type Typical Lot
Width (ft)
Market
Potential Future Land Use Category
Sideyard House 25 to 45 6.8%Mixed-Use Commercial, Mixed-Use Residential
Cottage 30 to 40 11.3%Mixed-Use Commercial, Mixed-Use Residential
Bungalow 35 to 40 15.9%Mixed-Use Commercial, Mixed-Use Residential
Village House 45 to 55 17.1%Mixed-Use Commercial, Mixed-Use Residential
House 50 to 70 20.8%Medium Density Residential, Low Density Residential
Large House 65 to 75 11.6%Medium Density Residential, Low Density Residential
Mansion 75 and up 7.0%Low Density Residential, Very Low Density Residential
Land Use+Transportation
51
Conclusions
Given these findings, the community will deal with
continued and significant pressure to accommodate
multifamily housing development. As explained in the study, this is due to a large number of households
of a type and income level that tend toward rental
housing, which includes young singles, childless
couples, widowers, retirees and military personnel.
Future multifamily development, as described in this plan, should be directed to accessible locations with
adequate street infrastructure to accommodate traffic.
This includes the Mixed-Use Commercial and Mixed-
Use Residential categories of the Future Land Use Plan.
Preferably, new multifamily developments would be better integrated into their contexts, compared to the
insular design of past apartment complexes. This can
be encouraged through adjustments to development
regulations to produce more walkable development
patterns and incentivize or require preferred design elements identified in the results of the Development
Preferences Survey.
Also, Prattville has seen little small lot housing,
townhouse and condominium development in the
past, though there has been an ongoing demand for these. This is likely due to a combination of limited
local developer experience with these housing types,
limited size of the market in each category and local
policies and regulations that further deter investors
from pursuing such developments. With the demand
for smaller lot single-family homes being relatively high in Prattville, which is driven by higher percentages of
empty nesters, retirees and childless couples, the City
should examine its development regulations to help
facilitate the development of these housing types, while
assuring quality design. While resistance to denser residential development has been voiced during the
planning process, most of the community agrees that
Prattville should offer a range of housing types that
meet the needs of different stages of life. Smaller lot
housing will be essential to achieving this, while also supporting homeownership.
It should be noted that many of these housing types
are closely related to historic precedents, which have
re-emerged over the last thirty years in neotraditional
developments. This is a relevant factor for Prattville due to the community’s clear preference for historic design
characteristics. In the United States, including in several
locations throughout Alabama, these developments
have typically been enabled through special zoning
tools such as planned unit development regulations and form-based codes, as conventional residential
zoning districts require larger lot widths and setbacks.
Examples of contemporary neighborhoods in Alabama
that feature neotraditional, small lot housing include
The Preserve and Ross Bridge (Hoover), Mt. Laurel and Edenton (Shelby County), Hampstead (Montgomery),
The Waters (Pike Road), The Ledges and Providence
(Huntsville), Gorham’s Bluff (Pisgah), Trussville Springs
(Trussville) and Hillsboro (Helena).
Project Prattville 2040
52
Focus Areas
The following focus area studies describe how new
development and reinvestment in existing areas might occur in accordance with the land use and
transportation policies and other of this plan’s
recommendations. The illustrations are conceptual in
nature and are not intended as specific requirements
for development in these locations.
Powell Road - East-West Connector
The proposed East-West Connector will support new
development around the intersection of Powell Road
and US-31, including a potential neighborhood center. The neighborhood center is shown on the east side
of US-31 due to the presence of the creek on the west
side. Limiting commercial to one side of the highway
will help to create a more walkable business area
along the connector road (and any side streets) and manage acces along US-31. Old Ridge Road would be
reconfigured to intersect with the new connector. Its
intersection with US-31 could remain as a side street
connecting into the realigned Old Ridge Road.
POWELL RD
RIDGEWOOD RD
GREENCREST LN
GR
E
E
N
C
R
E
S
T
S
T
MA
R
T
I
N
L
U
T
H
E
R
K
I
N
G
J
R
D
R
GARDNER RD
PI
N
E
C
R
E
E
K
OLD RIDGE RD
MEMORIAL DR
MAC GRAY
PARK
JUNIOR
HIGH
SCHOOL
POWELL RD
RIDGEWOOD RD
GREENCREST LN
GR
E
E
N
C
R
E
S
T
S
T
MA
R
T
I
N
L
U
T
H
E
R
K
I
N
G
J
R
D
R
GARDNER RD
PI
N
E
C
R
E
E
K
OLD RIDGE RD
MEMORIAL DR
MAC GRAY
PARK
JUNIOR
HIGH
SCHOOL
realign Gardner Rdto connect to PowellRd @ MLK Jr Dr
street improvementsincluding curb andgutter, sidewalk and shared use path
street connectivityincreases withdensity andmix of uses
preserve floodwayas coomon openspace amenity
“walkable”neighborhoodcenter
realign Old RidgeRd to connect to futureconnector street
future connectorstreet to Fairview Avew/ sidewalk andshared use path
connect futurestreet to Greencrest St
off-streetpath underMemorial Dr
roundabout at northend of Junior HighSchool traffic zone
off-street pathto park and school
residential densitydecreasesaway from center
Figure 9 Powell Road - East-West Connector: Growth Opportunities
Land Use+Transportation
53
Figure 11 East-West Connector cross section through future neighborhood center
Figure 10 East-West Connector cross section through residential areas
The future street network should be well interconnected in and around the neighborhood center. Residential
density should dissipate away from the neighorhood
center; correspondingly, the level of street connectivity
may decrease. The connector road would be designed
differently within the neighborhood center, compared to the surrouding residential areas, to help create
a safe, attractive environment for local business activity. The “furnishing zone” at the road edge would
accommodate lighting, banners and street trees that
provide shade and a buffer between the roadway and
sidewalks. Within adjacent residential portions of the
corridor, the connector road would include a planted median with turn lanes at intersections and a shared
use path on one side that might
transition to bicycle lanes within
the neighborhood center. Where
residential density is lowest, including areas constrained by
topography and flood hazards,
the design of the connector road
might include swales for drainage
purposes, rather than curb and gutter.
Powell Road, as a segment of
the connector road, would be
redesigned similarly. These
improvements might occur as part of development along Powell.
Subdividers, for example, would
provide any additional right-
of-way, and either install the
sidewalks and shared use path or provide funding to the City to
construct the improvements.
Project Prattville 2040
54
OVERLOOK MEMORIAL PARK
HEDGEFIELD DR
JAY ST
AMA
N
D
A
L
N
MC
Q
U
E
E
N
S
M
I
T
H
R
D
31
82
HEDGEFIELD DR
JAY ST
AMA
N
D
A
L
N
MC
Q
U
E
E
N
S
M
I
T
H
R
D
Overlook
Park (underdevelopment)
(plannedchurch)
(underdevelopment)
residential densitydecreasesaway from center
Extend Jay Steast to McQueen Smith Rd
include bicycle-pedestrian facilitywhen widening US 82
walkableneighborhoodcenter
highwaycommercial node
include bicycle-pedestrian facilitywhen widening road
connection toexisting street stub
widen McQueen Smithto five lanes from CobbsFord Rd to US 31
realign intersection ofMcQueen Smith Rd andUS 31 to improve safety
US-82 and McQueen Smith Road
Residential development is underway in southeast
Prattville adlong McQueen Smith Road and US-
32. This plan proposes a potential neighborhood-oriented business area at the intersection of the two
thoroughfares. To create a safe, walkable business area,
the center should be focused on McQueen Smith, which
will have a lower speed limit. This would also help
manage access along faster moving US-82. Widening of
McQueen Smith Road is proposed to include pedestrian and bicycle accommodations.
The future street network should be well interconnected
in and around the neighborhood center. Residential
density should dissipate away from the neighorhood
center; correspondingly, the level of street connectivity may decrease. Through the neighborhood center.
McQueen Smith Road would be improved to help
create a safe, attractive environment for local business
Figure 12 McQueen Smith Rd+US-82: Growth Opportunities
Land Use+Transportation
55
walk
5 ft min
multiuse
path
10 ft min
median/
turn lane
10 ft min
travel lane
11 ft
travel lane
11 ft
travel lane
11 ft
travel lane
11 ft
tree
lawn
5 ft
tree
lawn
5 ft
ROW
85 ft min
McQUEEN SMITH ROAD
5-lane cross section with median, multiuse path and sidewalk
McQUEEN SMITH ROAD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER
5-lane cross section with parallel parking both sides
sidewalk w/
tree well
15 ft min
sidewalk w/
tree well
15 ft min
turn lane
10 ft
ROW
90 ft min
travel lane
10 ft
travel lane
11 ft
travel lane
10 ft
travel lane
11 ft
Figure 13
McQueen Smith Road
cross section through
future neighborhood
center
Figure 14
McQueen Smith Road cross section through residential areas
walk
5 ft min
multiuse
path
10 ft min
median/
turn lane
10 ft min
travel lane
11 ft
travel lane
11 ft
travel lane
11 ft
travel lane
11 ft
tree
lawn
5 ft
tree
lawn
5 ft
ROW
85 ft min
McQUEEN SMITH ROAD
5-lane cross section with median, multiuse path and sidewalk
McQUEEN SMITH ROAD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER
5-lane cross section with parallel parking both sides
sidewalk w/
tree well
15 ft min
sidewalk w/
tree well
15 ft min
turn lane
10 ft
ROW
90 ft min
travel lane
10 ft
travel lane
11 ft
travel lane
10 ft
travel lane
11 ft
activity. The “furnishing zone” at the road edge would accommodate lighting, banners and street trees that
provide shade and a buffer between the roadway and
sidewalks. Within adjacent residential areas, McQueen
Smith Road would include a planted median with
turn lanes at intersections (if adequate sopacing is
maintained between intersections. A shared use path would be provided on one side of the road. These
improvements might occur as part of development
along the road. Subdividers, for example, would either
install the sidewalks and shared use path or provide
funding to the City to construct the improvements.
Project Prattville 2040
56
FIRE STATION 1
MAIN ST
WETUMPKA ST
FAI
R
V
I
E
W
A
V
E
Gillespie St
Newton St
Gaddis Ave
Win
g
a
r
d
S
t
Smith Ave
Pe
a
c
h
t
r
e
e
S
t
D
a
v
i
s
S
t
Lo
d
e
r
S
t
Thom
a
s
A
v
e
Dozie
r
A
v
e
Wright St
Gipson St
S
p
e
n
c
e
r
S
t
Ni
c
h
o
l
a
s
S
t
Wi
l
d
w
o
o
d
D
r
MAIN ST
WETUMPKA ST
Gillespie St
Newton St
Gaddis Ave
Win
g
a
r
d
S
t
Smith Ave
Pe
a
c
h
t
r
e
e
S
t
D
a
v
i
s
S
t
Lo
d
e
r
S
t
Thom
a
s
A
v
e
Dozie
r
A
v
e
Wright St
Gipson St
S
p
e
n
c
e
r
S
t
Ni
c
h
o
l
a
s
S
t
Wi
l
d
w
o
o
d
D
r
FAI
R
V
I
E
W
A
V
E
31
shared use path onNorth Memorial
work with owners torecruit new businessesand/or other uses orredevelop aging retailcenters for new uses
office or otherlimited commercial
sidewalk orshared use path
access managementand streetscapeimprovements
high density residential
as transition to detachedsingle-family residential
access managementand streetscapeimprovements
transition frommixed-use commercial tooffice/limited commercialto residential
bike lanes onSouth Memorial
Hospital
IntermediateSchool
Fire Station
neighborhoodpreservation
Prattmont
Prattmont is an important, high-visbility link between
east Prattville and downtown. At one time, the
intersection of Main Street and Memorial Drive was an important retail center. Despite a few new businesses
locating in the area—mostly attracted to trafic counts—
as the city’s growth moved eastward, the overall rate
of reinvestment has declined. The three retail centers in the area will continue to struggle to maintain quality
retailers if competing against the newer retail centers
near the interstate. Property owners, merchants, the
Chamber and City should explore different ways older
retail spaces can be adaptively reused or redeveloped for other non-retail uses that would add vitality to the
area. The hospital, for example, could be the anchor for
Figure 15 Prattmont: Revitalization Opportunities
Land Use+Transportation
57
Figure 16 Main Street cross section
Figure 17 Memorial Drive (south of Main) cross section
development of medical offices, healthcare services and other related uses. Perhaps one of the retail
centers could be redeveloped to become the site of the
proposed multipurpose/civic center or a campus for the
community college. These functions would generate
customers to help re-grow retail activity in the area.
The southwest quadrant of the intersection is eligible
for New Market Tax Credits and is in an Opportunity
Zone, which provides additional tax incentives for
private development. Streetscape improvements along
Main Street and Memorial Drive (in coordination with the ALDOT), including attractive lighting, landscaping,
and banners, could also spur private reinvestment
in Prattmont. Streetscape improvements are not dependable as initial catalysts but can help sustain and
maximize revitalization once the process has begun
through some key reinvestment projects.
Streetscape projects should include, to the extent
practicable, access management improvements and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Main Street, in
particular, from Memorial Drive toward downtown,
has sufficient right-of-way for a shared use path on at
least one side. Memorial Drive also has considerable
right-of-way to accommodate improvements, including installation of bike lanes on existing pavement south of
Main Street.
shared
use path
10 ft
mediantravel lanesdrainage
swale
right
turn
lane
right
turn
lane
plant
ing
strip
left turn
lane
travel lanes shared
use path
10 ft
ROW
190+/- ft
MemorialCommercialCenter
LISENBY’SMUSIC SHOP
bicycle
lane
6 ft
bicycle
lane
6 ft
travel lane
13 ft
travel lane
12 ft
median travel lane
12 ft
travel lane
13 ft
ROW
100+/- ft
Project Prattville 2040
58
Development Opportunities at Exit 186
During the planning process, many residents voiced
their support for the City pursuing development
opportunities around Exit 186, the northernmost interchange along I-65 serving the Prattville area. Today,
the interchange is developed with a small handful of
commuter-oriented businesses. The primary benefit of
new development here would be revenue-generation
for the City within Autauga County, meaning any sales tax revenue generated would support Autauga County
schools. This would be advantageous since so much of
Prattville’s thriving shopping and restaurant activity is
concentrated along Cobbs Ford Road in Elmore County.
To accomplish this objective would involve considerable annexation and extension of the sewer system roughly
four miles beyond its northernmost point.
Though the costs of extending the sewer system would
be substantial, as a long-term objective, supporting
additional development around the interchange to capture additional tax revenue is a reasonable
strategy. However, there are other issues that must be
considered and that suggest the City exercise caution
in pursuing this effort. In addition to the up-front
investment in sewer necessary to further develop land around the interchange, the City would also take on the
long-term costs of providing fire and police services
to the area. The soon to be completed Fire Station #4
will be Prattville’s northernmost fire station, but will
nonetheless be almost five miles from the interchange. Moreover, the terrain around the southern side of the
interchange is rough, dropping precipitously on the
west side of US-31—about 80 ft within 500 ft. The east
side of US-31 nearest the interchange is more forgiving,
but the terrain rises quickly. These grade differences relative to the highway pose severe constraints for any
large-scale commercial development. Topographic
conditions on the north side of the interchange are
similarly problematic in terms of siting any large-scale
development.
Without sewer access, a substantial increase in
business development is not feasible. With sewer
access, large-scale development would become
possible, but site preparation costs may deter private
interest. The City and County, should further evaluate the interchange’s development potential, including
studying what quantity and mix of retail development
could reasonably be supported by the population within
the surrounding areas, and weigh those opportunities
against the short-term and long-term costs associated with extending sewer and other services to the area.
Though there are challenges and limits to developing
the interchange, it should not be dismissed out of hand.
Should Prattville’s residential growth move further north
along US-31, the gap between city sewer and services and the interchange will get smaller and smaller over
time.
Land Use+Transportation
59
Transportation Plan
The primary goals for maintaining and improving
Prattville’s transportation infrastructure in the coming years are:
• Maintain and increase connectivity in the citywide
street network to disperse traffic
• Maintaining traffic flow and safety on Cobbs Ford
Road, Main Street, Fairview Avenue, Memorial Drive, US-82 and other major corridors
• Enhancing mobility for pedestrians, bicyclists and
those with disabilities
• Correcting capacity and safety deficiencies among
existing streets and intersections
• Maintaining streets in good condition over time
Existing Conditions
Regional vehicular access provided by I-65 and federal
highways, US-31 and US-82. I-65 and US-31 provide
north/south access from Prattville to Birmingham and Montgomery. US-82 extends westward and connects
Prattville to I-20/59 in Tuscaloosa, and it also extends
eastward toward Georgia. Additional regional access
is provided by SR-14 which connects eastward to
Wetumpka and westward to Selma.
Access to I-65 is provided by three interchanges:
US-82/Cobbs Ford Road (Exit 179), Fairview Avenue
(Exit 181), and US-31 (Exit 186). Overall, Prattville has a
well-connected system of arterial and collector streets.
North of Main Street, however, there are few east/west routes which makes travel in those directions
challenging.
Major Roads
• Interstate 65 is a six-lane, divided, north-south
interstate
• US Highway 31 (SR-3), north of 6th Street, is a two-lane, undivided, north-south primary arterial.
• US Highway 82 (SR-6) is an east-west primary arte-
rial containing two-lane, undivided and four-lane,
divided segments.
• State Route 14 is collocated along I-65 (between Ex-its 179 and 181), Cobbs Ford Road, US-82, and Selma
Highway. These roadways are interstate and primary
arterial functional classes, respectively.
• Fairview Avenue is a northeast-southwest primary
arterial.
• Cobbs Ford Road is a five-lane, undivided, east-
west primary arterial.
• East Main Street is an east-west roadway with
segments classified as primary arterial and minor
arterial.
• Martin Luther King Drive (North Chestnut Street)
is a two-lane, undivided, north-south minor arterial.
• Upper Kingston Road is a two-lane, undivided,
north-south roadway, with segments classified as a
minor arterial and a major collector.
Congestion Status
The Montgomery MPO regional travel demand model
was used to identify congested roadways in Prattville.
The travel demand model volume/capacity ratio
was used to illustrate areas currently experiencing congestion. It should be noted that the Montgomery
MPO travel demand model’s current base year is 2010.
Additional analysis was conducted on historical traffic
counts between the years 2010 and 2018 to account for
recent growth, and the travel demand model volumes were factored accordingly to more accurately reflect
more recent conditions.
Project Prattville 2040
60
Some congestion is present during the peak periods near Prattville High School and Prattville Junior High
School on Upper Kingston Road and Martin Luther
King Jr. Drive, respectively. This increased congestion is
generally seen during the school drop-off and pick-up
times.
• As shown in Figure 19, approximate locations of
roadway segments exhibiting heavy to severe con-
gestion based on analysis of the 2018 factored model
volumes include:
• 4th Street, between Lower Kingston Road and South Washington Street
• East Main Street, between South Washington Street
and New Moon Drive
• Fairview Avenue, between US-31 and Jasmine Trail
• Fairview Avenue/SR-14, on the eastbound and west-bound approaches to the I-65 interchange
• Cobbs Ford Road, on the eastbound and westbound
approaches to the I-65 interchange
• East Main Street, between Sheila Boulevard and
McQueen Smith Boulevard
• McQueen Smith Road, northbound approach to East
Main Street
• US-82, between Selma Highway and US-31
• US-31, south of US-82
• I-65, north of SR-14
• I-65, south of Cobbs Ford Road
Figure 18: Road Classifications
Land Use+Transportation
61
Improvements since the Previous Plan
Since the previous transportation plan, several
transportation improvements have been implemented:
• The addition of protected left turn phases for both McQueen Smith Road approaches at its intersection
with the US-82 Bypass
• The installation of left turn lanes along both US-82
Bypass approaches at Gin Shop Hill Road, along the
westbound US-82 Bypass approach at Indian Hills Road, and along both US-82 Bypass approaches at
Northington Road
• The widening of the US-82 Bypass to a four-lane, di-
vided section between Selma Highway and Malone
Court
• The addition of a second northbound through lane
on the McQueen Smith Road approach to East Main
Street
• Completion of the widening of Old Farm Lane to a four-lane, divided section with bike lanes and
sidewalks between Cobbs Ford Road and Fairview
Avenue
• Extension of Old Farm Lane north of Fairview Av-
enue with installation of a roundabout at North Old Ridge Road.
• Installation of an Automated Traffic Signal Perfor-
mance Measures (ATSPM) system on Cobbs Ford
Road which implemented an advanced detection
system and also gives the City the ability to collect traffic count data at intersections.
• Realignment, widening, and bridge construction
of US-82 at its crossing of Pine Creek, just west of
US-31
• Construction of an industrial access road from US-82 to CR-4 East
Figure 19: Current Traffic Conditions
Project Prattville 2040
62
Ongoing transportation projects include:
• Addition of turn lanes at the intersection of US-82
and US-31
• Widening McQueen Smith to five lanes from US-31
to Cobbs Ford Road (with bike lanes and sidewalk
on one side)
• Widening of Fairview Avenue (currently proposed to
include three lanes from US-31 to Diane Drive with
sidewalks, right turn lanes at select intersections and
new signal at Jasmine Trail)
• Widening of US-82 between US-31 and SR-14 is planned for construction under the Rebuild Alabama
Act; completing the four-lane expansion of the US-
82 bypass.
Transit
Transit service is provided by Autauga County Rural Transportation. This is a demand response service that
provides transportation to the Montgomery Cancer
Center and doctors in the Montgomery area. There is
currently no fixed-route transit service in Prattville.
Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities
Sidewalks are present on most streets in Downtown
Prattville and surrounding historic neighborhoods
and near some, but not all, of the local schools. Most
neighborhoods that developed in the central part of the
city, along US Hwy 31 have few if any sidewalks. Further east, neighborhoods that developed later typically
include sidewalks on one side of residential streets. In
addition, the City has constructed a walking trail along
Autauga Creek in the downtown area.
Sharrows on Old Farm Road in east Prattville are the only marked bicycling facilities in Prattville.
Intersection Evaluation
Site Description
Twelve unsignalized, stop-controlled intersections
were selected for more detailed analysis. The intersections are located along three main corridors
connecting the northernmost I-65 exit to the
downtown area. These roadways also serve as
connections for much of the city to access Prattville
High School and Prattville Junior High School. The twelve study intersections are shown in Figure 20 and
include:
A. US-31 at Camellia Drive
B. US-31 at Ridgewood Road/Henderson Lane
C. US-31 at Powell Road
D. US-31 at Old Ridge Road
E. Martin Luther King Jr Drive at Ridgewood Road/
Wilberforce Ave
F. Martin Luther King Jr Drive at Greencrest Lane
G. Martin Luther King Jr Drive at Gardner Road
H. Martin Luther King Jr Drive at Powell Road
I. Martin Luther King Jr Drive at Moses Road
J. Upper Kingston Road at Moses Road
K. Upper Kingston Road at Bridge Creek Road
L. Upper Kingston Road at Gardner Road
Land Use+Transportation
63
Existing Traffic Volumes
Streetlight Data was utilized to determine the average
turning movement count volume for each study
intersection approach. AM and PM peak hours were found to be between 7-8am and 5-6pm, respectively.
The afternoon school peak hour used was between
3-4pm. The peak hour turning movement counts used
in the analysis are illustrated in Figure 5.
Capacity Analysis and Levels of Service
In accordance with the Highway Capacity Manual,
traffic capacities are expressed as levels of service
(LOS) ranging from “A” to “F”. Generally, LOS “C” is
considered desirable, while LOS “D” is considered
acceptable during peak hours of traffic flow. Existing LOS for the study intersections are shown in Figure
20.
Observations
Significant queuing often occurs during peak hours
at the study intersections near the schools. This is
associated with drop-off and pick-up times at the high school and junior high schools.
Most of the study intersections experience significant
delay along the side-street approaches during the
AM peak hour due to a combination of school and
commuter traffic. Undesirable side-street approach delay occurs, but to a lesser extent, in the mid-
afternoon school peak hour. The PM peak hour
exhibits much better side-street approach LOS. It is
not uncommon for a side-street at a stop-controlled
intersection to have an unacceptable LOS during peak hours when volumes on a two-lane road are
high.
Figure 20 Study Intersections Level of Service
Project Prattville 2040
64
Future Conditions and Recommendations
Prattville has a strong and well-connected system of
roadways to support the transportation demands of
residents and businesses. The City has actively sought to enhance transportation infrastructure through new
and improved facilities. The biggest challenge of recent
years has been the scarcity of funding to pay for needed
projects. An awareness of current and future funding
limitations has and should continue to influence the vision for future transportation goals. Emphasis should
be placed on maintaining existing facilities so they
provide the best possible efficiencies for transportation
users. New capacity-building projects should be
carefully chosen to augment and connect with the existing system, and they should have broad support
within the community.
During the development of this plan, several concerns
were repeatedly expressed by citizens and City leaders:
• Prattville’s east/west roadway corridors need im-provement and additional connectivity
• Congestion on arterials such as US-31, Fairview Av-
enue, and Cobbs Ford Road needs to be addressed
• More pedestrian and bicycle facilities are needed to
encourage other modes of travel
• New or improved roadways are needed in the north
and northeast sectors of the city to support future
growth and development
• Street connectivity is very important to support bal-
anced and evenly dispersed traffic demand
• Street design and operation should be consistent
with the adjacent land uses.
These concerns seem to reflect a desire among citizens
that Prattville maintain its residential “home town”
character while still providing efficient travel options that support growth.
Future Base Conditions
The future conditions assessment was conducted
to evaluate the future transportation impacts of the
Land Use Plan and to develop recommendations that would support future growth and improve mobility and
safety for all modes of transportation. The assessment
was conducted at both the city-wide level and at the
intersection-level at strategic locations. Roadway
segments exhibiting heavy to severe congestion in 2018 include:
• 4th Street, between Lower Kingston Road and South
Washington Street
• East Main Street, between South Washington Street
and New Moon Drive
• Fairview Avenue, between US-31 and Jasmine Trail
• SR-14, on the eastbound and westbound approaches
to the I-65 interchange
• Cobbs Ford Road, on the eastbound and westbound
approaches to the I-65 interchange
• East Main Street, between Sheila Boulevard and
McQueen Smith Boulevard
• US-82, between Selma Highway and US-31
• US-31, south of US-82
• I-65, north of SR-14
• I-65, south of Cobbs Ford Road
The 2040 regional travel demand analysis was based
on the demographic and highway network assumptions
used in the Montgomery MPO regional planning
process. As such, this analysis represents the base future condition scenario to which alternative land use
and highway network scenarios were compared.
Land Use+Transportation
65
As shown on Figure 21, projected 2040 traffic conditions illustrate that existing congested areas will continue
to experience congestion in the future. Overall
congestion is forecasted to increase as a function
of future population and employment growth. One
notable exception to this trend is the segment of US-82 between US-31 and SR-14, which is forecasted to
have lower congestion levels in 2040, though it is still
projected to be heavily congested. ALDOT has been
widening this section of US-82 in recent years with
future improvements planned to add capacity and improve traffic flow. The US-82 widening is captured in
the future regional travel demand model, which leads
to some improvement in congestion levels. Additional
roadway segments projected to be under heavy to
severe congestion by 2040 include:
• US-31, on the northern approach to 6th Street
• I-65, on the northbound and southbound approach-
es to the Prattville interchanges.
Future Intersection Evaluation
The twelve intersections evaluated in the existing
conditions analysis were also evaluated for the future
year 2040 conditions.
Future Traffic Volumes
Streetlight Data was used to determine the turning
movement count volume for each study intersection.
The AM and PM peak hours were determined to
be between 7-8am and 5-6pm, respectively. The afternoon school peak hour used was between
3-4pm.
Figure 21 2040 Traffic Projections
Project Prattville 2040
66
To estimate and project traffic conditions in 2040,
future growth rates were developed and used to grow the existing traffic volumes at the study intersections.
The growth rates along the three studied mainline
corridors were developed using the Montgomery
MPO regional travel demand model. Traffic
projections at the study intersections were based on annual growth rates ranging from 1.0% to 1.2% for
Upper Kingston Road, 2.3% to 2.8% for Martin Luther
King Drive, and 2.1% to 2.3% for US-31. An annual
growth rate of 1.4% was used for Bridge Creek Road.
Following analysis of the ALDOT traffic data, the side-streets for the study intersections, predominately
those running in the east-west direction, were
assigned a growth rate of 0.75% per year. While
ALDOT traffic count data was generally not available
for these local roadways, growth rates for other similar east-west running roadways in the area were
analyzed for these projections. The projected 2040
future volumes are shown in Figure 22.
Capacity Analysis and Levels of Service
Using the methods described in the Highway
Capacity Manual (6th Edition), 2040 traffic conditions
were analyzed within the study area. Traffic capacities are expressed as levels of service (LOS) ranging from
“A” to “F”. Generally, LOS “C” is considered desirable,
while LOS “D” is considered acceptable during peak
hours of traffic flow.
Under existing conditions, most of the study intersections were shown to experience significant
delay along the side-street approaches during the
AM peak hour due to a combination of school traffic
and work commuter traffic. Undesirable side-street
approach delay was present, but to a lesser extent in the mid-afternoon school peak hour. The PM peak
hour exhibited much better side-street approach LOS.
Projected future volumes were used to evaluate
future year 2040 traffic conditions for the
intersections. Traffic conditions worsened with the increase in projected traffic. Most of the side-street
approaches at study intersections show undesirable
delay during both the AM and school peak hours.
The only mainline approach forecast to have an
undesirable LOS is the southbound Martin Luther King Jr Drive approach to Powell Road during the
school peak hour. This occurs because of the high
volume of southbound left turning vehicles projected
for this approach. It is not uncommon for a side-street
stop-controlled intersection to have an unacceptable LOS during peak hours when volumes on a two-lane
road are high.
Land Use+Transportation
67
Figure 22 2040 Traffic Projections at Study Intersections
Project Prattville 2040
68
Global Transportation Strategies
The previous Comprehensive Plan outlined global
transportation strategies that could be implemented
to address existing transportation deficiencies and position the City for future growth. These global
transportation strategies are still valid in today’s
environment and include the following:
Maintain System Integrity
In a climate of limited transportation funds and many competing interests, maintenance and preservation of
existing facilities is a top priority. If you can’t construct
new roadways, then it is imperative that you get the
highest possible performance out of the existing
roadway network. System maintenance includes managing items associated with roadway performance
such as pavement, drainage, markings, signage, and
traffic signals. A regular assessment of operational
performance on major roadways would be an excellent
way to identify low-cost improvements as well as higher-cost projects that may take years to plan and
implement. The analysis completed as part of this plan
provides such an operational performance assessment.
It is recommended that the City update that analysis
in approximately five-year intervals and add to it an assessment of crash patterns so that needed safety
improvements can be identified.
Develop Streets in New Growth Areas
This plan outlines several major growth areas for
Prattville: the US-31 corridor in the Prattmont area and around Powell Road on the north side of the city,
the SR-14 corridor near I-65 and McQueen Smith
Road, the Cobbs Ford Road corridor, and the Old
Farm Lane corridor. In a few of these areas, like the
northern sector along US-31, there are large amounts of undeveloped land with very little street network. As
these areas develop, it will be important to plan for and
construct a local street system to provide access as well
as to disperse traffic in a balanced, less concentrated
fashion. As these areas begin to develop, it would be wise for the City to require a master plan that
designates a hierarchy of streets (alley, local, collector,
and major collector) that is sufficient to support the
vision for land use and density.
Connectivity within the street network is important for safety. When poorly connected
street systems funnel local trips onto major
roads, it unnecessarily exposes local drivers
to accidents on roads with higher design
speeds, which increases the severity of injuries and the potential for fatalities when crashes
do occur. Connected street systems also
support emergency response by police, fire
and paramedics because they provide shorter
routes to calls and alternative routes if primary routes are clogged.
Because interconnected streets inherently
see more traffic than cul-de-sacs, residents—
and the developers who design and build
subdivisions for them—may oppose the connection of streets internally and from one
neighborhood to another. But, a balance must
be struck between accommodating residents’
desires for minimal traffic and the general
welfare and safety of the community overall.
Greater connectivity in street networks
increases walkability—regardless of whether
or not there are sidewalks—by providing
connected walking routes. By contrast, in a
subdivision with a large number of cul-de-sacs, a person must walk (or bike) a greater
distance to reach another part of the same
neighborhood.
Street connectivity can be ensured in new
development through the City’s development regulations through maximum block sizes and
other connectivity standards based on the type
and intensity of development.
Land Use+Transportation
69
Be Sensitive to Roadside Contexts
Throughout the community involvement process,
citizens expressed concerns about maintaining quality
of life in their community. Perceptions about quality of life and aesthetics are often heavily influenced by
transportation facilities. Throughout the United States
one can find numerous examples of roadways that
were “improved” in a way that increased capacity
and travel speed, but did significant damage to the appearance and quality of the adjacent community. An
alternative approach is to consider the roadside context
when making transportation decisions. Mobility,
typically measured as capacity or level of service, is
not the only important consideration for transportation improvements. Instead, transportation decision making
should consider a wide range of issues, including but
not limited to safety, community values, environmental
impacts, aesthetics, cost, and mobility for all modes.
Prattville has some streets that will have deficient capacity and less than desirable traffic operations
in the coming years. For some of those streets,
adding capacity would mean a significant trade-off
for adjacent land uses. As Prattville considers future
projects and priorities, it is strongly recommended that a collaborative public process be used to encourage
broad consideration of the impacts and opportunities
created by those projects.
Consider All Transportation Users
The City has been proactive in pushing for
consideration of pedestrian accommodations on state-
funded projects within the city; and the City adopted a Complete Streets resolution in 2010. It is recommended
that City leaders use the existing Complete Streets
resolution to guide developers on the appropriate
typical sections (including number and width of vehicle
lanes, bicycle facilities, buffer zones, sidewalks, and/or parking lanes) required for future development
based on the magnitude, location, and land use of
the proposed development. “Complete Streets” is
a name adopted by the National Complete Streets
Coalition to describe a process of planning and design that considers the entire roadway area (travel way,
shoulders, and adjacent space) and all potential users.
Complete Streets cross section
Project Prattville 2040
70
Implement Access Management
Access management is the planning, design, and
implementation of various land use and transportation
strategies to maintain traffic flow and safety along primary roadways, while still considering access
needs of different land uses and development
types. Allowing unlimited or unrestricted access
to development eventually degrades the carrying
capacity and safety of a roadway. By managing roadway access however, a governing agency can
increase safety, extend the functional life of a major
road, reduce traffic congestion, support alternative
modes of transportation, and improve the appearance
and quality of the built environment. The Montgomery MPO is currently sponsoring the development of an
Access Management Policy for local and county roads.
When complete, the City of Prattville should consider
adopting the guidelines to assist with subdivision and
site plan approval processes. It is also recommended that the City designate important roadways as “access
management corridors” where the City would either
retrofit access management where feasible or enforce
access management principles during the course of
redevelopment. A list of the recommended access management corridors is provided in the recommended
projects subsection of this report.
Support Alternative Modes of Travel
The City of Prattville is currently quite limited in
availability of choices for travel. There is a modest network of sidewalks, even fewer acceptable bicycle
routes and no fixed route transit service. Encouraging
the design and construction of new bike and
pedestrian facilities is an excellent way to support and
encourage citizens to make alternative choices for their transportation. Establishment of park and ride lots for
commuters to Montgomery would help to encourage
carpooling. Within the next decade, it may even be
feasible to start a small transit or rideshare initiative to
provide service to Maxwell Air Force base since it is a major employer of Prattville residents.
Access management optimizes spacing between intersections, between driveways
and between driveways and intersections
to maintain traffic flow and safety. Access
management standards are typically higher
on roads where the amount of traffic and driving speeds are higher. ALDOT applies
access management rules on state roads and
US highways under its purview. The City of
Prattville is responsible for these issues on local
streets.
The following strategies can be incorporated
into the City’s development regulations to
manage access on Prattville’s major streets:
• Separate conflict points The distance be-
tween intersections of arterials and collec-tors and driveways should be regulated.
• Restrict turning movements Where drive-
ways and unsignalized side streets intersect
major streets, turning movements may need
to be limited, such as the use of right-in, right-out access points.
• Design standards Design standards that
address access spacing, the length of turn
lanes and tapers and driveway dimensions
should be developed for Prattville’s major streets and applied through zoning and
subdivision regulations.
• Traffic signal spacing Signals should only be
installed when appropriate studies indicate
their spacing and interconnection can be accomplished without significant impacts
on corridor capacity.
• Turn lanes Left and right turn lanes should
be required for developments on major
streets. In some cases, acceleration lanes may be required.
• Shared driveways and access Joint use
driveways and inter-parcel interconnec-
tions, including alleys, should be required
to reduce the proliferation of driveways to preserve the capacity of major streets.
Land Use+Transportation
71
Study Corridor Recommendations
Analysis of the twelve study intersections showed that
significant queuing often occurs during peak hours near
the schools, especially on the east-west minor street approaches. This is consistent with a lack of east-west
connectivity on the north side of the city.
Recommended improvements include overall signing
and marking improvements, signalization, non-
conventional intersections, bicycle and pedestrian improvements, system management and ITS
improvements, street connectivity and capacity
improvements. These are high level recommendations
that should only be considered for implementation
after more detailed engineering studies are conducted. Concepts of recommended improvements are included
in the Appendix.
Traffic Signalization
Unsignalized intersections can be evaluated to assess
the feasibility of installing traffic signals to improve safety and operations. Traffic signals promote the
orderly movement of vehicular and pedestrian traffic
and prevent excessive delay to traffic. Although
installing traffic signals may increase rear end crashes
by 50 to 60%, angle and left turn crashes may be reduced by 60 to 70%. Traffic signals are expected to
reduce fatal and injury crashes by 30 to 40%, which
is reasonable as left turn and angle crashes typically
involve injuries whereas rear end crashes are usually
limited to vehicle damage.
Traffic signals should not be installed unless one of the
warrants specified by the MUTCD has been satisfied.
Further, the satisfaction of a warrant is not in itself
justification for a signal. When traffic volumes return to
normal levels after the COVID-19 pandemic, conduct a complete signal warrant analysis at the following
intersections:
• Powell Road at US-31
• Powell Road at Martin Luther King Jr. Drive (also
evaluate the need for dual left turn lanes on south-bound and westbound approaches which would
require widening each roadway to four lanes in
proximity to the intersection).
Non-Conventional Intersections
Roundabouts/Mini-Roundabouts
Roundabouts reduce vehicular speeds, improve
safety at intersections through eliminating angle collisions, help traffic flow more efficiently, and
reduce operational costs compared to signalized
intersections. Single-lane roundabouts can reduce
approximately 80 percent of injury crashes compared
to a stop-controlled intersection. Roundabouts also help create gateways indicating entry a special
district or area. The inscribed diameter of a single-
lane roundabout is typically 100 to 130 feet.
Similar to the roundabout, a mini-roundabout can
Figure 23 Roundabout
Project Prattville 2040
72
be used in place of stop-controlled or signalized intersections to help improve safety problems and
reduce excessive delays at minor approaches. A mini-
roundabout may be used as an alternative to a larger,
single-lane roundabout due to a desire to minimize
impacts outside of the existing intersection footprint. The mini-roundabout features an inscribed diameter of
45 to 90 feet and has lower construction costs than a
typical roundabout since the footprint is usually within
existing travel way boundaries. Roads with speeds
of 35 mph or lower and total entering intersection volumes from all approaches less than 1,600 veh/hr are
good candidates for mini-roundabouts. The safety and
operational benefits of a mini-roundabout are similar to
that of roundabouts.
Roundabouts and mini-roundabouts can be used in the vicinity of schools to improve traffic safety and
operations. The photo at right shows an example of a
roundabout near Windermere Elementary School in
Windermere, Florida. It has an inscribed diameter of 100
feet and school crosswalks at all approaches.
Figure 24 Mini-Roundabout
Land Use+Transportation
73
Potential installation of roundabout/mini-roundabout should be evaluated for the following intersections:
• Bridge Creek Road at Upper Kingston Road: in
addition to the safety and operational benefits, a
roundabout/mini-roundabout at this study intersec-
tion would create a gateway to the area north of the intersection that includes residential neighborhoods
and Prattville High School. The roundabout/mini-
roundabout would also reduce speeds prior to the
school zone. Further, a roundabout/mini-roundabout
would improve the existing intersection design, a skewed intersection that might cause drive confu-
sion.
• Moses Road at Upper Kingston Road: a mini-
roundabout at this study intersection would improve
safety, operations, and reduce speeds at the Prat-tville High School zone that begins just south of the
intersection.
• Wilberforce Avenue/Ridgewood Road at Martin
Luther King Jr. Drive: in addition to the safety and
operational benefits, a mini-roundabout at this study intersection would improve the existing alignment
of both minor roads and reduce speeds. The speed
reduction is important as the Prattville Junior High
School zone begins just north of the intersection.
• Greencrest Lane at Martin Luther King Jr. Drive: a mini-roundabout at this study intersection would
improve safety, operations, and reduce speeds at the
Prattville Junior High School zone that begins just
south of the intersection.
Other Intersection Considerations
• Old Ridge Road at US-31: a signal would most likely
not be warranted at this intersection. Delays are
acceptable except during the AM peak hour when westbound left turns are high. Because of the high
approach speed at this intersection, a mini-round-
about might not be a good alternative. Further evalu-
ate crash data and operations to determine the most
feasible alternative to improve safety and operations at this intersection.
• Ridgewood Road/Henderson Lane at US-31: east-
bound right turn volumes are high; however, there
already is a channelized right turn lane with an
acceleration lane at the intersection. A signal is not likely to meet the warrants at this intersection. No
improvements are recommended at this intersection.
Conduct further evaluation of crash data to assess
the need for safety improvements.
• Gardner Road at Upper Kingston Road: a signal is not likely to meet the warrants at this intersection
during off-peak hours. Conduct turn lane warrant
analysis at the intersection.
• Moses Road at Martin Luther King Jr. Drive: although
eastbound volumes are high, the northbound and southbound conflicting volumes are low. Conduct
turn lane warrant analysis at the intersection.
• Gardner Road at Martin Luther King Jr. Drive:
although the AM peak hour and School peak hour
traffic volumes might meet signal warrants, the off-peak traffic volumes are not likely to meet the
warrants. Conduct turn lane warrant analysis at the
intersection. If delay at the minor road approach
becomes critical, traffic may shift from Gardner Road
to other roads that could also provide access to Prat-tville High School, Prattville Junior High School, and
downtown Prattville.
Project Prattville 2040
74
Other Recommendations
System Management and Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Projects
• Traffic Signal Optimization. Update traffic signal timing at the following locations: US-31 system
from East Main Street to Fairview Avenue; Down-
town traffic signals; SR-14 @ I-65 ramps
• School Traffic Management Plans. Conduct a
detailed traffic study and traffic management plan for each public school within the City of Prattville.
Fund and develop Safe Routes to Schools Plans
for City of Prattville elementary schools
• Neighborhood Traffic Management Plans. Conduct
neighborhood traffic management plans for neigh-borhoods with documented traffic concerns.
• Install fiber optic cable for traffic signal com-
munication and other ITS applications along the
following corridors. McQueen Smith Road from
SR-14 to US-31 (the section from East Main Street to US-31 is planned to be accomplished as part of
the McQueen Smith Road widening project)
Street Connectivity Projects
• Construct a bridge to connect Poplar Street across
Pine Creek (this could be a connection for bicycle and pedestrian traffic only).
• Extend Jay Street from Chantel Drive to McQueen
Smith Road.
Capacity Projects
A. US Highway 82
• Complete widening to a four-lane median divided
cross section for all portions of US-82 between US- 31 and SR-14. This project is being construct-
ed by ALDOT as part of the Rebuild Alabama First
Year Plan 2020.
• Add a second left turn lane to the northbound and
westbound approaches at US-82 and US-31.
B. McQueen Smith Road
• Widen the southern portion of McQueen Smith
Road between East Main Street and US-31 to a
four-lane median divided cross section.
• In the area just south of East Main Street, provide a center turn lane instead of a median in order to
accommodate access to the adjacent commercial
businesses.
• Include a multi-use path on the west side of
McQueen Smith Road throughout the limits of the project.
• Modify the intersection at East Main Street to
provide two through lanes for the southbound
movement on McQueen Smith Road.
• If traffic volumes meet the necessary warrants, install a traffic signal at Tara Drive at McQueen
Smith Road and coordinate its timing with all other
signals between East Main Street and US-31.
• Modify the existing traffic signal at US-82 to ac-
commodate additional travel lanes on McQueen Smith and include a protected left turn phase for
McQueen Smith Road.
• Modify the intersection at US-31 to provide dual
left turn lanes from McQueen Smith Road to
southbound US-31 and install a traffic signal (cur-rently under design).
Land Use+Transportation
75
C. Fairview Avenue. Add left-turn lanes on Fair-view Avenue at its intersections with Edgewood
Avenue, Sycamore Drive, Brookhaven Drive, and
Diane Drive.
D. East-West Connector. Construct a new roadway
to extend from existing SR-14 near Jasmine Trail to US-31 at Powell Road. A conceptual drawing of
this improvement is shown in the Appendix.
E. Cobbs Ford Road @ I-65. Commission an inter-
change modification study to identify appropriate
measures for improving capacity and operations.
F. US-31 north of 6th Street to I-65. Conduct a cor-
ridor study to evaluate the potential to widen to a
four-lane median divided cross section with bike/
pedestrian accommodations.
G. US 31 @ Pine Level Interchange. In conjunction with planning for additional development near this
interchange, conduct a detailed traffic evaluation
to assess capacity and safety improvements.
H. Old Ridge Road. Improve the curvature and cross
section of this existing two-lane rural road from SR-14 to US-31. The number of future travel lanes
will depend on intensity of development in the
sector north of SR-14. One option would be to
construct a two-lane median divided facility within
right-of-way that is sufficient to contain an ulti-mate build-out of four travel lanes with median.
I. New Connector road between Martin Luther King
Drive & US-31. Evaluate the feasibility of a new
east/west local street south of Greencrest Lane
to improve east-west mobility on the north side of the city.
J. Realign the Gardner Road and Powell Road
intersections along Martin Luther King Jr Drive to
consolidate these into one intersection. A concep-
tual drawing of this improvement is shown in the Appendix.
Park & Ride Lots
Coordinate with the Central Alabama Regional Planning
Commission to designate one or two park and ride lots
at locations to be determined.
Access Management Corridors
Evaluate the following corridors to identify opportunities
for access management improvements and/or new
access standards for development or re-development.
• SR-14 between CR-4 & US-82
• US-31 between US-82 and Fairview Avenue
• East Main Street between US-31 and Jeanette Drive
• Cobbs Ford Road between US-82 and Silver Hills
Drive
• Old Farm Lane
• McQueen Smith Road
Implement policies to promote access management
consideration as part of subdivision and site plan
approval processes.
Project Prattville 2040
76
Scenario Analysis
An alternative scenario was evaluated for the future
2040 conditions, which included modeling the impacts
of improved east-west roadway connectivity north of downtown. Specifically, a road connection between
Fairview Avenue and US-31 was included in the regional
travel demand model to determine the overall changes
in travel demand in the city.
The travel demand results indicated that a connector road extending from US-31 at Powell Road to Fairview
Avenue would carry approximately 8,000 ADT for a
two-lane roadway and approximately 15,000 ADT
for a four-lane roadway, illustrating that this is a
feasible alignment from a travel demand perspective. The forecast volumes for the four-lane roadway are
approaching the 20,000 ADT thresholds normally used
to justify a four-lane cross section. The roadway would
also improve traffic conditions on US-31 north of Main
Street and on Fairview Avenue west of the proposed connector. The regained capacity on US-31 would allow
additional development along US-31.
Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements
This plan outlines the future vision for Prattville and
is underpinned by technical analysis and community
and stakeholder input. Both the technical analysis and public/stakeholder input indicated that the city has
opportunities to support future economic development
by improving the city parks and recreation centers.
Improving pedestrian and bicycle accessibility between
these attractions and the surrounding neighborhoods is a key aspect of improving the overall parks and
recreation system. Connecting these attractions to
Downtown Prattville, commercial areas, and schools
was also identified as a priority by the public and
stakeholders.
Figure 25 Recommended Transportation Improvements
Land Use+Transportation
77
Pedestrian, bicycle and transit accommodations in Prattville are very limited. There are no current striped
or designated bicycle facilities outside of sharrows on
Old Farm Lane., and beyond the Creekwalk, Prattville
does not have a path/trail system. Opportunities exist to
develop a path/trail system to connect parks, schools, downtown and other local attractions. Off-street trail
options include multi-use paths, greenway trails and
bicycle paths. Sidewalks and on-street bicycle lanes
and sharrows can be used to complete the path/trail
network.
General and policy recommendations to support multi-
modal travel include:
A. Develop path system as described in Figure 26.
An initial feasibility analysis of the proposed trail
system should be conducted to identify challenges related to steep grades around waterways, envi-
ronmental impacts, and overall constructability.
B. Connectivity for non-motorized travel needs to be
improved. Large gaps occur between areas devel-
oped with sidewalks, and bicycle facilities do not exist beyond the sharrows along Old Farm Lane.
Gaps in existing sidewalks exist along Main Street,
Cobbs Ford Road, McQueen Smith Road, Old
Ridge Road, US-82, and the neighborhoods south
of the downtown area. It is recommended that the city work to reduce the gaps in the network by
funding and conducting a comprehensive bicycle
and pedestrian plan for the city and adjacent
areas.
C. Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) data was processed for Maxwell Air Force
Base. This data illustrated that the highest con-
centrations of workers at Maxwell Air Force Base
live in census tracts located in the Prattville area.
Given the number of city residents who com-mute to Maxwell Air Force Base, the city should
coordinate with the Montgomery MPO to explore
implementing carpool and/or shuttle service be-
tween Prattville and Maxwell Air Force Base. Refer
to Figure 27.
Off-Street Greenway Trail
Off-Street Shared Use Path
On-Street Bicycle Path
On-Street Shared Lane
Project Prattville 2040
78
Figure 27 Maxwell AFB Commuting Patterns
Figure 26 Bicycle-Pedestrian Concept (with parks and schools)
Land Use+Transportation
79
Junior High and High School Areas
Prattville High School and Prattville Junior High
School (as well as nearby Mac Gray Park) should be
a focus for evaluating possible pedestrian and bicycle improvements in greater detail. A distance of 0.25 to
0.50 miles is often used as typical walking distances,
which correspond to 5-minute and 10-minute walks,
respectively. Students that live within 1.0 mile from the
school may also choose to bike (6-minute bike ride) to school.
Prattville High School
To improve safety conditions for pedestrians and
bicycles in the vicinity of the high school, the
following are recommended:
• Reduce speeds within the school zone with round-
about/mini-roundabout on Upper Kingston Road
at the Moses Road intersection.
• Build sidewalk(s) on Upper Kingston Road from
Parkview Drive to Moses Road.
• Add School Crossing assembly; designate school
crossings on Upper Kingston Road at Parkview
Drive and at Kingston Oaks Drive.
• Evaluate the feasibility of marked crosswalks on
Upper Kingston Road at Parkview Drive and at Kingston Oaks Drive.
• Add Share the Road assemblies along Upper
Kingston Road from Bridge Creek Road to Crows
Pass: Upper Kingston Road has narrow lanes with
no shoulders, which represent hazardous condi-tions for bicyclists.
Prattville Junior High School
To improve safety conditions for pedestrians and
bicycles in the vicinity of the junior high school, the
following are recommended:
• Reduce speeds within the school zone with mini-
roundabouts on Martin Luther King Jr. Drive at the
Wilberforce Avenue/Ridgewood Road and at the
Greencrest Lane intersections.
• Extend sidewalk on the west side of Martin Luther King Jr. Drive from Hughes Street to Gardner Road.
• Add School Crossing assembly: designate school
crossings on Martin Luther King Jr. Drive at the
proposed mini-roundabouts at Wilberforce Av-
enue/Ridgewood Road and at Greencrest Lane. Install assembly on northbound, southbound, and
westbound approaches.
• Remove existing crosswalk and associated signs
in front of the Prattville Junior High School: the
crossing location does not connect the school to any pedestrian generators or sidewalks.
• Add Share the Road assemblies along Martin Lu-
ther King Drive from 6th Street to Powell Road to
alert the motorists of unexpected entries into the
roadway by bicyclists, and other crossing activities that might cause conflicts.
Project Prattville 2040
80
Downtown Parking
A parking analysis was performed for Downtown
Prattville. This study included analysis of the existing
parking patterns to determine the occupancy and turnover characteristics. The study area includes both
public on-street parking and usable parking lots.
The weekend parking inventory was conducted on
Saturday, March 14, 2020 during two strategic periods
of time during the day. These times were from 11:30am – 1:30pm and 6:00pm – 8:00pm, to obtain data and
observations from the primary lunch and dinner time
periods for businesses located in the area. The data
collection process included an inventory of the total
number of parking spaces and the number of parked vehicles. Vehicles were identified and distinguished
using video to note the general vehicle description
(color and model) along with the last three digits of
the license plate. This information helped to note the
occurrence of vehicle turnover. The inventory was conducted in 30-minute intervals for the duration
of the two hour study periods. None of the parking
spaces inventoried were metered or had specified time
restriction signage.
The data collected from the parking inventory was used to determine the occupancy and turnover rates for the
parking areas. The occupancy rate can be defined as
a percentage, resulting from the number of vehicles
recorded in a specified parking area at a given time
in relation to the total number of spaces contained within the parking area. Turnover can be defined as
the average number of vehicles which occupied given
parking spaces in a parking area over a specified period
of time. For example, a turnover value of zero would
imply that there was no change in which vehicles were occupying a given parking space during the study
period, while a turnover of four would imply that four
different vehicles occupied the parking space during
the study period. For on-street parking occupancy,
85% is generally considered to be the optimal occupancy rate. Anything less than this is thought to
be underutilized, while rates above 85% are considered
to be over-utilized. Total parking availability is shown in
Table 2. On-street and off-street parking occupancy and
turnover characteristics are shown in Table 3 and Table 4, respectively. Public and private parking and turnover
characteristics are shown in Table 5. Graphs showing
parking occupancy for both on-street and off-street
parking in relation to the total parking supply in the area
are shown in Figures 28-31.
Land Use+Transportation
81
Table 2: Total Parking Availability
Parking Type On-Street Parking Public Off-street Parking Private Off-street Parking Total Parking
Total Spaces 148 (39%)109 (39%)120 (32%)377
Table 3: On-Street Parking
Location Supply Occupancy Rate Turnover Rate
Saturday Lunch Saturday Dinner Saturday Lunch Saturday Dinner
Main St 87 66%74%1.3 1.4
Court St 42 43%43%0.9 0.9
Chestnut St 19 26%16%0.3 0.2
Total On-Street Spaces 148 54%57%1.1 1.1
Table 4: Off-Street Parking
Location Supply
Occupancy Rate Turnover Rate
Saturday
Lunch
Saturday
Dinner
Saturday
Lunch
Saturday
Dinner
South of Main St & West of Chestnut St 67 22%24%0.5 0.5
East of Chestnut St 42 2%0%0.0 0.0
Total Public Off-Street 109 14%14%0.3 0.3
Mid-Block South of Tichnor Ave*67 53%44%0.7 0.5
Mid-Block between Main St and Tichnor Ave*24 18%31%0.2 0.5
Corner of Chestnut St and Tichnor Ave*29 25%24%0.3 0.2
Total Private Off-Street 120 39%37%0.5 0.4
Total Off-Street Spaces 229 27%26%0.4 0.4
* Private parking lot
Table 5: Combined Occupancy and Turnover Rates
Parking Type Occupancy Rate Turnover Rate
Saturday Lunch Saturday Dinner Saturday Lunch Saturday Dinner
Public Parking Areas 37%39%0.8 0.9
Private Parking Areas 37%37%0.5 0.4
Total Parking 38%38%0.7 0.7
Project Prattville 2040
82
For the studied weekend lunch and dinner peak periods in Prattville, the occupancy rates for both the on-street
and off-street parking were generally observed to be
well below the 85% threshold of utilization. This implies
that sufficient parking is available in the downtown area
for these peak weekend periods.
One concern is that some of the private parking lots
were being used by drivers who should be utilizing
public parking areas. For this reason, additional analysis
was performed to determine the effects of potentially
restricting access to the private parking lots north of Main Street. For the purposes of this analysis, since
parked vehicle counts were performed on a Saturday,
the total number of occupied spaces in private parking
lots was added to the total occupied public parking
spaces. It was determined that even with the added parking volume to the public parking network, the
occupancy rate for the public parking network during
both the Saturday lunch and dinner time periods would
only be 56%, still well below the utilization threshold.
With the added volume to the public parking system, it would be expected that a higher occupancy rate
than what was observed would be present for the on-
street parking facilities under these conditions. This
is important to note as the occupancy rates on Main
Street were 66% and 74% during the Saturday lunch and dinner time periods respectively. Increasing parking
demand on Main Street could lead to the possibility of
Main Street becoming over-utilized in the future without
mitigation measures.
Figure 28 Saturday Lunch – Public on- and off-street parking demand
Figure 29 Saturday Lunch – Private off-street parking demand
Land Use+Transportation
83
The previously referenced average on-street parking turnover rate of 1.1 signifies healthy turnover conditions
along the streets. A lower turnover rate is present for
the off-street parking lots. This shows that a majority
of the vehicles parking for only a short period are able
to use on-street parking options, which is desirable. Maps showing the number of vehicles that used each
individual on-street parking space during each two-
hour period surveyed for this study, including the rate
at which turnover for each parking space occurred are
shown in Figure 32 and Figure 33.
Due to the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic
and the associated changes in travel and life patterns
for the City’s residents, the parking inventory was
unable to be conducted in March 2020 as planned for a typical weekday as it was for Saturday, as previously
shown. Aerial photos from November 2020 showed
the parking areas located within the study area for two
intervals during the peak weekday lunch period, at 11:30
AM and 12:00 PM. This data was used to determine an occupancy rate for each of the studied parking
areas. On-street and off-street parking occupancy and
turnover characteristics are shown in Table 6 and Table
7, respectively. Public and private parking and turnover
characteristics are shown in Table 8.
Figure 30 Saturday Dinner – Public on- and off-street parking demand
Figure 31 Saturday Dinner – Private off-street parking demand
Project Prattville 2040
84
Figure 32 Parking Turnover Map - Weekend Lunch
Figure 33 Parking Turnover Map - Weekend Dinner
Land Use+Transportation
85
Overall, there is approximately 6.5% more parking demand in the study area during the peak periods on
Friday than on Saturday. One notable change between
the two days is the closure of the two city government
buildings on weekends, which accounts for a majority
of the difference between overall parking demand in the study area. The increased demand on Fridays is still
expected to result in acceptable occupancy rates for
parking locations within the study area.
For the weekday lunch peak period, occupancy rates for on-street and off-street parking were generally
observed to be well below the 85% threshold of
utilization. This implies that sufficient parking is
available in the downtown area for the peak weekday
lunch period. When comparing the weekday lunch peak periods to the weekend lunch period, it is noteworthy
that, with the exception of the Main Street on-street
parking, each of the counted parking areas revealed
a higher rate of occupancy during the weekday lunch
period than the weekend lunch period.
Additional analysis was conducted to identify potential
worst-case scenario parking needs and to determine
a standard expected relationship between weekday
and Saturday evening parking needs. For the purpose
of analyzing the parking conditions under typical peak usage conditions, the Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation Manual (5th
Edition) was used to create rough parking estimates for
weekday and Saturday conditions. Table 9 shows the
results of the parking generation when comparing the weekday and Saturday peak parking periods.
Table 6: On-Street Parking Weekday Midday
Location Supply Occupancy Rate
Main Street 87 55%
Court Streeet 42 69%
Chestnut Street 19 47%
Total On-Street Spaces 148 58%
Table 7: Off-Street Parking Weekday Midday
Location Supply Occupancy Rate
South of Main St &
West of Chestnut St 67 25%
East of Chestnut St 42 26%
Total Public Off-Street 109 26%
Mid-Block South of Tichnor Ave*67 54%
Mid-Block between
Main St and Tichnor Ave*24 19%
Corner of Chestnut St and Tichnor Ave*29 41%
Total Private Off-Street 120 44%
Total Off-Street Spaces 229 35%
* Private parking lot
Table 8: Combined Occupancy Rates
Weekday Midday
Parking Type Occupancy Rate
Public Parking Areas 44%
Private Parking Areas 44%
Total Parking 44%
Project Prattville 2040
86
Figure 34 Weekday Lunch – Public on- and off-street parking demand
Figure 35 Weekday Lunch – Private off-street parking demand
Overall, there is approximately 6.5% more parking demand during the peak periods on Friday than on
Saturday. One notable change between the two days
is the closure of the two city government buildings
on weekends, which accounts for a majority of the
difference between overall parking demand in the study area. The increased demand on weekdays is
still expected to result in acceptable occupancy rates
for parking locations. However, the estimated 79% weekday evening occupancy rate on Main Street
is approaching the threshold of 85% which implies
parking demand is approaching capacity on Main
Street. Specifically, the Main Street corridor is currently
estimated to be 5 parking spaces away from exceeding the optimal parking threshold of 85%
Land Use+Transportation
87
Table 9: Parking Trip Generation
Location Supply Peak Time Periods Parking Demand
Saturday Lunch Saturday Dinner Saturday Lunch Saturday Dinner
Government Office Building (LU 730)29,000 9:00am – 2:00pm Closed 80 0
Shopping Center (LU 820)56,500 12:00pm – 6:00pm 11:00am – 5:00pm 140 197
Drive-In Bank (LU 912)35,000 11:00am - 4:00pm 9:00am -12:00pm 128 107
Fast Casual Restaurant (LU 930)56,500 12:00pm –
1:00pm
2:00pm &
6:00pm 507 495
Totals ---855 799
Table 10: On-Street Parking Weekday
Evening Estimate
Location Supply Occupancy Rate
Main St 87 79%
Court St 42 73%
Chestnut St 19 50%
Total On-Street Spaces 148 74%
Table 11: Off-Street Parking Weekday
Evening Estimate
Location Supply Occupancy Rate
South of Main St & West of Chestnut St 67 27%
East of Chestnut St 42 28%
Total Public Off-Street 109 28%
Mid-Block South of
Tichnor Ave*67 58%
Mid-Block between
Main St and Tichnor Ave*24 20%
Corner of Chestnut St
and Tichnor Ave*29 44%
Total Private Off-Street 120 47%
Total Off-Street Spaces 229 37%
* Private parking lot
Table 12: Combined Occupancy Rates
Weekday Evening Estimate
Parking Type Occupancy Rate
Public Parking Areas 47%
Private Parking Areas 47%
Total Parking 47%
Project Prattville 2040
88
Recommendations
The parking analysis illustrates there is sufficient
parking supply to meet the demand in Downtown
Prattville. While the analysis indicates there is sufficient parking supply, there are a number of strategies and
improvements the City could consider to improve
the visibility of parking to local residents and tourists
as well as accommodate future parking demand as
downtown Prattville continues to grow and revitalize:
• Add signage at parking lot entrances to delineate
whether specific lots are intended for public or pri-
vate use.
• Add wayfinding signage along Main Street, South
Court Street, and South Chestnut Street to direct drivers to available on and off-street parking
• Implement access management and clearly stripe
parking spaces on Tichnor Avenue between South
Court Street and South Chestnut Street
• Construct a mid-block pedestrian path between South Court Street and South Chestnut Street to
connect the Main Street businesses to on and off-
street parking on Tichnor Avenue
• Purchase and pave the existing gravel parking lot
on the southeast corner of South Court Street and Tichnor Avenue; paving and striping parking spaces
in this lot would improve the parking capacity and
circulation at this location
facilities +
infrastructure
Project Prattville 2040
90
The following section describes investments in facilities and infrastructure that the City of Prattville will pursue,
in partnership with other public authorities, to address
current needs, support economic development
and prepare for continued growth in the city—all
in accordance with the goals and growth strategy of the Comprehensive Plan. Most of these efforts
will need to be incorporated into the city’s capital
improvements program. To give City officials a sense of
the community’s priorities on these future investments,
a survey was conducted, the results of which informed the preparation of the Implementation Strategy and are
included in the appendix to the plan.
Infrastructure
Water System
Prattville Water Works provides water service to about 11,500 residential and 950 commercial customers.
The system operates 15 deep artesian wells in the
Tuscaloosa Aquifer, 11 storage tanks and over 500
miles of distribution line. To accommodate the City’s
growth, it was necessary for the Water Works to have an additional water source. In 2001 the Five Star Water
Supply District was formed by Prattville, Wetumpka,
Millbrook, Holtville and the Tri-Community Water
Authority as a surface water supply.
• The City of Prattville will support the Water Works in expanding the local supply to reduce costs and
the inefficiency and potential for problems in trans-
mitting water from Five Star’s supply in Wetumpka,
about 15 miles away.
• The south side of Prattville is served by a stor-age tank adjacent to the South Industrial Park. As
industries continue to develop in the area, there will
soon be a need to increase water storage capacity
to serve the area. Investments will also be needed
to increase water flows to better serve industrial growth and meet fire protection demands.
• The Water Works, in conjunction with the Public
Works department, will continue to upgrade wa-
ter lines in older parts of the City to improve water
flows, eliminate leaks and increase the longevity of the system.
Facilities+Infrastructure
91
Sewer System
Prattville’s sanitary sewer system is operated by a
division of Prattville Public Works. The system, which
includes over 11,500 residential and about 860 business customers, covers most of the city limits with the
exception of the more rural western parts of the city,
where residential development is of a density that
does not require sewer access. As new residential and
business areas are built at the edges of the community, private developers install sewer facilities, which expand
the sewer coverage area. The system has enough
treatment capacity—about 9.7 million gallons per
day—to accommodate growth for several more years.
The following investments have been identified by the Public Works Division to better prepare for continued
growth, improve efficiency and maintain the integrity of
the sewer system.
• The Autauga Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant,
one the city’s two sewer treatment plants, is located in southwest Prattville between Washington Ferry
Road and CR-4. The facility has a treatment capac-
ity of four million gallons per day. The Public Works
Department intends to invest in technology and
other upgrades to modernize the older plant so that it functions safely, effectively and efficiently.
• To accommodate continued development expected on the city’s east side, the Public Works Department
will improve the interceptor system to collect and
transport increasing sewage volumes to the Pine
Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant.
• As described in the Land Use and Transportation Section, achieving any substantial development
potential at the northernmost I-65 interchange (Exit
186) will require a significant extension of the sewer
system, about four miles from the current sewer
coverage area. Because the interchange is outside the city limits, a partnership with Autauga County
should be considered in extend sewer service to
the area. However, it is recommended the City and
County evaluate sewer extension and other associ-
ated costs against the potential for development surrounding the interchange, which is constrained
by the area’s hilly terrain.
• The Public Works Department will continue to
upgrade sewer lines in older parts of the City to
improve sewage flows, eliminate leaks and increase the longevity of the system.
Project Prattville 2040
92
Transportation System
Street Improvements
Projects recommended to reduce congestion and
improve mobility are described in the Land Use and Transportation Plan. Key projects include:
• Construction of connector road from Fairview Av-
enue to US-31
• Capacity improvements at the intersection of US-31
and US-82
• Widening of US-82 between US-31 and County Road
4
• Creation of school traffic zones around the Junior
High and High Schools
• Widening of McQueen Smith Road south of Cobbs Ford to US-31
• Realignment of the intersection of McQueen Smith
Road with US-31
• Extension of Ridgewood Road (western portion) eastward to US-31
• Extension of Jay Street to McQueen Smith Road
Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements
Efforts to increase “walkability” in Prattville, as well
as proving safe accommodations for bicycle travel within the city are described in the Land Use and Transportation Plan. Key projects include:
• Preparation of a Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
• Construction of a trail or shared use path along Pine
Creek
• Inclusion of bicycle and/or pedestrian accommo-dations on existing roads as they are widened (i.e.,
US-82 and McQueen Smith Road)
• Inclusion of bicycle and/or pedestrian accommoda-
tions on the proposed connector road from Fairview Avenue to US-31
Figure 34 Recommended Transportation Improvements
Facilities+Infrastructure
93
City Facilities
In 2015 the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Arts (PRCA)
Department conducted an analysis of the programs and facilities it operates and established priorities for
the department. In 2016 the City conducted a study of
city facilities to identify capital improvements needs.
That process resulted in a Long Range Facilities Plan, of
which several investments have since been completed. The following recommendations carry forward many
of the remaining projects from those plans along with
additional projects that arose from the comprehensive
planning process.
Parks, Recreation and Cultural Arts
The City of Prattville has long placed importance on
providing its residents with quality parks, recreational
and cultural arts facilities. Public parks, recreation and
cultural arts offerings benefit not only residents but can
also be an important component in Prattville’s efforts to bolster tourism. The 2015 and 2016 plans included an
in-depth assessment of existing facilities, comparisons
against national standards and peer communities, and
a robust community engagement process to help focus
future spending. Several of the major projects identified in that plan have not yet been completed and remain
priorities, based upon public input. Refer also to Figure
X.
Civic Center
A civic center or similar multipurpose facility—able to
host performances, graduation ceremonies and other
community events larger than the performing arts center or Doster Center can handle—was identified as
a priority in the capital improvements long range plan
and remains a project with considerable community
support. Ideally, the proposed facility would be located
as close to Downtown Prattville, as possible, though potential sites are limited due to the likely size of
the facility and attendant parking. The PRCA plan
recommended an alternate location in east Prattville,
where larger sites are available. Locating the civic
center in or near downtown would help generate nighttime activity for downtown restaurants and could
spur additional private investment around it. Addressing
other cultural facility space needs, such as a new
library, larger Creative Arts Center and/or interpretive
center, should be evaluated when planning for this project.
Senior Center
As the city’s population has grown, so has its senior
population. The Gillespie Senior Center is in need of
additional space to accommodating the increasing number of seniors participating in the program. The
Long Range Facilities Plan recommends, at a minimum,
an addition that could increase the size of the main
room to handle larger group activities and meals.
Cultural and Performing Arts Center
The performing arts center is located in a former
church on the west side of Downtown Prattville. The
existing facility, which features the 80-seat Way Off
Broadway Theater and meeting space for community
organizations, has space limitations, circulation challenges and other building issues. The Long Range
Facilities Plan recommends constructing a new facility
on the site over two phases and relocating the Creative
Arts Center’s classroom activities there. The proposed
facility would combine all arts administrative functions on site and feature a 250-seat theater, whereas the
future civic center would be capable of hosting much
larger events and performances.
Project Prattville 2040
94
Creative Arts Center
The Creative Arts Center is located in a small, historic
building in Downtown Prattville. The building has
limited space for arts classes and associated storage. The Long Range Facilities Plan recommends arts
instruction activities be moved to the Performing
Arts Center, when the new facility is constructed. The
existing building would be renovated for use as gallery
space and for special events.
Library
The Prattville Library, operated by the Library Board,
is undersized for the city’s population and has some
building issues, including small restrooms, roof leaks
and wall and window cracks. The Long Range Facilities Plan recommends the current 12,000 sf building be
replaced with an 18,000 sf facility, either on the same
site or another central location. Relocating the library to
another location, either in an existing building or a new
one, would eliminate the need for finding temporary space for the library during construction. This would
also allow the existing library site to be used to create
additional parking for the Doster Center and other
adjacent facilities. This effort would be led by the
county Library Board but may involve support from the City of Prattville.
Doster Center
Doster Memorial Community Center is a widely used
meeting and event space located near Pratt Park, the
stadium and library. While various repairs have been completed over the years, additional investment is
needed to address building needs and optimize the
function and efficiency of the center.
Stanley-Jensen Stadium
Stanley-Jensen Stadium is in need of significant
renovations, including new restrooms and locker room
facilities. The stadium is operated by the Autauga County Schools and located on City of Prattville
property. The PRCA plan recommends greater financial
participation by the school system in capital and other
costs since the school system is the primary user of the
facility. Improvements to the stadium could be funded jointly between the City and county school system, as
well as business and community fundraising.
Recreational Trail
The City is currently evaluating the construction of a
recreational trail on land adjacent to Mac Gray Park. The trail would be primarily for hiking and biking, but
if connected to other bicycle and pedestrian facilities,
including those described conceptually in this plan, the
trail could also serve a transportation function.
Facilities+Infrastructure
95
Future Parks
The previous citywide plan, as well as the PRCA
plan, recommended additional parks be created to
keep pace with population growth. Community input during this planning process reinforced previous
recommendations, agreeing that parks should be
distributed so that there is a park in a reasonable
distance of the city’s neighborhoods. Because most
parks facilities are located west of US-31, additional parks facilities should be considered in east and
northeast Prattville, where residential growth has been
focused for some time and is expected to continue in
the coming years. This includes two new community
parks—larger park sites that typically include both passive recreational space and sports facilities—in the
Old Farm Lane and Old Ridge Road areas.
Development of a sports complex was also suggested by residents during community meetings and surveys. Several noted that such a facility could be planned to
leverage sports tourism activity.
In addition, undeveloped, flood-prone land between
Lower Kingston Road and US-82 west of downtown, presents an opportunity to create a large park with natural areas and trails. Such a park would be a
citywide amenity, connected into the Autauga Creek
Canoe Trail and other recreational tourism amenities,
as well as providing park space convenient to the neighborhoods on Prattville’s far west side.
Figure 35 Recommended Parks, Recreation and Cultural Arts Capital Projects
Project Prattville 2040
96
Public Safety Facilities
Since the development of the Long Range Facilities
Plan, the City has opened a new Public Safety Center
adjacent to downtown, which resolved space needs for the police department and opened up space to
be reconfigured at City Hall. The City is also nearing
completion of its fourth fire station, which is located in
east Prattville. Additional capital projects the City will
need to pursue to better accommodate public safety functions as those needs grow with the city’s expanding
population and footprint include the following (refer
also to Figure 2):
Fire Station 1
Fire Station 1 is located on Main Street one block east of US-31. While it is an ideal site for the area it serves,
there is inadequate parking and some interior space
limitations. Also, pulling out directly onto this heavily
traveled portion of Main Street can be a safety concern
when responding to emergency calls. Eventually, additional property will need to be acquired adjacent to
the station to allow it to be reconfigured and improved
or completely relocated to a larger site nearby.
Fire Station 2
Fire Station 2 in Downtown Prattville is considered undersized. Because of the building’s size, only small
shifts can be accommodated and several spaces
are cramped. The site also does not have adequate
parking. The Long Range Facilities Plan recommended,
as an option, the acquisition of adjacent property to accommodate a building addition and larger parking
area.
Fire Training Center
The Fire Training Center is located on a 10-acre site
on County Road 4. The Long Range Facilities Plan
recommends construction of a permanent building for the full-time administrative staff on site.
New Fire Station: South Prattville
With the recent addition of the James Hardie plant
and prospects for other industries locating in south
Prattville, a new fire station to serve the southern portion of the city will eventually be needed.
Police Training Facilities
During the planning process, the need for outdoor
training facilities for the police department was
indicated. A possible location for this is adjacent to the Fire Training Center.
Other City Facilities
Other remaining capital projects identified in the
Long Range Facilities Plan include construction of
a permanent building for the street department and various improvements at the Doster Road Public Works
Yard, including constructing a trail along Autauga Creek
at the rear of the property.
implementation
Project Prattville 2040
98
The major theme of this Comprehensive Plan is to support and encourage responsible growth and
maintain the character of the city. The City has
prepared this plan to guide decisions regarding land
use, development and conservation, zoning and capital
improvements. The plan is also intended to help residents, property owners, merchants, builders, and
developers invest in Prattville by providing a reasonable
expectation of its future physical layout and character.
The Comprehensive Plan is to be carried out through
a combination of public and private investment, decisions by the City Council, Planning Commission
and other public boards and commissions. The plan’s
recommendations will continue to be translated into
action through revision and enforcement of the city’s
development regulations; through transportation improvements and access management programs
in cooperation with County roads and transportation
departments (county roads) and the Alabama
Department of Transportation (US and state highways);
through city budgeting and capital improvement programming and through public and private decisions
in support of planned, cost-effective annexation.
Prattville is a municipal corporation, formed under
powers granted by the State of Alabama. The City
uses this police power to enforce local ordinances and development regulations. And, the City uses its taxation
power to plan for and implement a budgeting system
that includes capital investments for infrastructure
and other city facilities and services that it uses to
help shape growth and development. All of these tools will continue to be used together to shape Prattville
in accord with the community’s vision for itself as
embodied in this Comprehensive Plan.
Community Priorities
As plan strategies and projects were identified, the
community was asked for their input on the relative importance of these recommended efforts through a
community meeting and an online survey. Input from
these engagement efforts, as well as the initial survey,
was synthesized to prepare an action plan consistent
with community opinion.
Capital Projects
Noted in the following Action Plan are capital projects
ranked most highly during development of the plan,
and, in particular through the final survey. Because the
survey reflected only a small sample of the population, it should not be interpreted to represent a citywide
consensus but a rough indicator of the community’s
attitudes toward plan objectives.
Implementation
99
Action Plan
The following matrix categorizes recommended
actions according to the plan’s five main goals and an infrastructure category. Each action is assigned a phase
based on its importance to the community, sense of
urgency, cost considerations, expediency and other
considerations. Low-hanging fruit—projects that are
inexpensive and relatively simple to accomplish—are typically assigned early timeframes. Accomplishing
these tasks shows progress and helps build confidence.
Major projects can be complicated, expensive and
take considerable time to complete but they may have
initial steps that need to be taken early on to avoid unnecessary delays.
TIMEFRAME This represents a combination of the
relative importance of the task to the community and
the likely duration necessary to complete related
actions: short (1-5 yrs), mid (6-10 yrs), and long (11+ yrs). Tasks referred to as “long-term” may be
extraordinarily important to the community but will
likely take a considerable amount of time to complete
because of costs or other complicating factors. Initial
steps for some mid- and long-term tasks may need to be taken relatively soon to assure they can ultimately be
accomplished within a ten or twenty year horizon.
LEAD - PARTNERS These are local and state entities
whose involvement—which may vary from political
support to technical assistance—may be essential in pursuing and completing the task. The lead
organization is listed first followed by potential partner
organizations. Additional partners, such as private
foundations, may also be available depending on the
nature of the action.
POTENTIAL RESOURCES These are organizations
and programs that offer funding, technical assistance or
other types of assistance relevant to the particular task.
Project Prattville 2040
100
TRANSPORTATION
Action Timeframe Lead - Partners Potential Resources
Develop plan and begin right-of-way acquisition for East-West
Connector
Mid-Term City ATRIP
Construct East-West Connector Long-Term City ATRIP
Expand intersection of US-82 and US-31 Short-Term City - ALDOT ATRIP
Widen US-82 west of US-31 Short-Term ALDOT - City ATRIP
Build roundabouts adjacent to Junior High School Mid-Term City ATRIP
Build roundabouts adjacent to High School Mid-Term City ATRIP
Widen McQueen Smith Road Short-Term City ATRIP
Realign intersection of McQueen Smith Road and US-31 (in con-junction with widening project)Short-Term City - ALDOT ATRIP
Extend Ridgewood Rd (west) to US-31 Long-Term City ATRIP
Extend Jay Street to McQueen Smith Road Mid-Term City ATRIP
INFRASTRUCTURE
Action Timeframe Lead - Partners Potential Resources
Expand water source/supply Long-Term Prattville Waterworks ADEM, EPA, ADECA, EDA
Improve water system in south Prattville to support industrial
growth
Long-Term Prattville Waterworks ADEM, EPA, ADECA,
EDA
Upgrade aging water lines Ongoing Prattville Waterworks ADEM, EPA, ADECA
Upgrade aging sewer lines Ongoing City ADEM, EPA, ADECA
Improve sewer interceptor system in east Prattville Short-Term City ADEM, EPA, ADECA, EDA
Modernize Autauga Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Short-Term City ADEM, EPA, ADECA,
EDA
Support extension of sewer to Exit 186 Long-Term Autauga County - City ADEM, EPA, ADECA, EDA
Construct permanent building for street department Short-Term City
1
1
1
3
3
1
2
2
3
Implementation
101
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES
Action Timeframe Lead - Partners Potential Resources
Prepare Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Short-Term City
Build recreational trail adjacent to Mac Gray Park Short-Term City ADECA Recreational Trail
Program
Plan and build greenway trail along Pine Creek (between East Main Street and US-31, may be done in phases)Mid-Term City ADECA Recreational Trail Program
Install bicycle-pedestrian facilities when widening streets Ongoing City ATRIP
Install bicycle-pedestrian facilities on future East-West Con-nector Mid-Term City ATRIP
RECREATION AND CULTURE
Action Timeframe Lead - Partners Potential Resources
Plan and build multipurpose/civic center Mid-Term City State Council on the Arts
Expand Senior Center Short-Term City
Build new Performing and Cultural Arts center (may be in-cluded in multipurpose center)Mid-Term City State Council on the Arts
Build larger space for Creative Arts program (may be included
in multipurpose center or Performing and Cultural Arts center)
Mid-Term City State Council on the Arts
Build new, larger library (may be included in multipurpose center)Short-Term Library Board - City Federal funding, private foundations
Acquire land and build new park in Old Farm Lane area (con-
sider park development for community use and sports tourism purposes)
Mid-Term City LWCF, NPS, private foun-
dations
Acquire land and build new park in Old Ridge Road area Long-Term City LWCF, NPS, private foun-dations
Acquire land and build nature park in west Prattville Mid-Term City LWCF, NPS, private foun-
dations
Renovate stadium Short-Term City - Autauga Co Schools private foundations, com-munity and corporate
fundraising
Develop indoor recreation center in East Prattville (possibly on-site of future park in Old Farm Lane area)Long-Term City
Complete renovations of Doster Center (may include re-pur-
posing if mulltipurpose center developed)
Ongoing City
1
1
3
1
2
2
3
Project Prattville 2040
102
PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITIES
Action Timeframe Lead - Partners Potential Resources
Expand or relocation Fire Station #1 Mid-Term City FEMA
Expand Fire Station #2 Short-Term City FEMA
Build permanent structure for Fire Training administrative offices Long-Term City FEMA
Acquire land and build fire station in south Prattville (contingent
on rate of industrial growth)
Long-Term City FEMA
Develop police training facility (may be adjacent to Fire Training Facility)Mid-Term City Department of Justice
ECONOMY
Action Timeframe Lead - Partners Potential Resources
Continue recruitment, retention and expansion of local busi-nesses and industries Ongoing Chamber - City US SBA, Opportunity Zone
Develop tourism master plan, marketing campaign Short-Term Chamber - City Alabama Tourism De-
partment
Develop strategy for revitalization of Prattmont business area Short-Term Chamber - City, prop-erty and business
owners
US SBA, Opportunity Zone incentives
Continue revitalization of Downtown Prattville Ongoing Redevelopment
Authority - City
US SBA, Main Street
Alabama
Encourage participation in and expansion of workforce develop-ment programs of Central Alabama Community College Short-Term Chamber - City, CACC, local indus-
tries
1
2
3
Implementation
103
COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT
Action Timeframe Lead - Partners Potential Resources
Develop and implement design standards for new develop-
ment on selected image corridors
Short-Term City
Enhance gateway signs (lighting and landscaping)Mid-Term City - Chamber
Develop wayfinding master plan for and install signage sys-
tem
Mid-Term City
Develop plan for and install landscaping, banners, lighting (as appropriate) on image corridors Long-Term City
Develop and implement strategies to encourage reinvestment
in distressed business and residential areas
Ongoing City - Chamber, non-
profit organizations
Opportunity Zone incen-
tives
EDUCATION
Action Timeframe Lead - Partners Potential Resources
Evaluate opportunities to increase funding for Autauga County
Schools (property tax increase, sales tax revenue agreement with Elmore County)
Short-Term City - Autauga
County Schools, Elmore County
Conduct feasibility study for creation of City or City-County School System Short-Term City - Autauga County Schools ALSDE
Plan for development of future school in east-northeast Prat-
tville
Mid-Term Autauga County
Schools - City
Encourage participation in and expansion of workforce devel-opment programs of Central Alabama Community College Short-Term Chamber - City, CACC, local indus-
tries
Project Prattville 2040
104
Growth Management
The city’s growth management system includes the
zoning ordinance, subdivision regulations and flood damage prevention ordinance. These regulations
address land use, density, the size and location of
buildings and other structures, street standards and
signage. They are intended to protect the health, safety
and welfare of the community. Each must also respect the principles of due process, non-discriminatory
application, profitable use of land, freedom of
speech, and the balancing of individual costs against
anticipated public benefits.
Zoning Ordinance
Prattville enforces a Zoning Ordinance to regulate the
types of uses that may be permitted within various
zoning districts, as well as, building heights and
setbacks, residential densities, parking and other
development characteristics. The Comprehensive Plan and its Future Land Use Map should not be confused
with the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map. The
Comprehensive Plan has been prepared as a guide to
public and private investment in land development and
infrastructure. In contrast, the Zoning Ordinance is a regulatory tool used by the city to influence and direct
development in ways that reflect the desired direction
and form of growth described in the Comprehensive
Plan.
There is an important relationship between the land use plan and zoning ordinance. The following is a list
of the land use categories in the land use plan together
with the existing zoning districts to which they are
most comparable. It should not be assumed that a
property designated within a particular future land use category is automatically eligible for rezoning to one
of the “comparable” zoning districts. Rather, the city, in
reviewing development requests, will consider all other
related policies and practices in this plan, together
with the Future Land Use map and an evaluation of the particular site and its surroundings, to make decisions
regarding rezoning and other types of permitting.
Future Land Use
Category Comparable Zoning District
Very Low Density
Residential and Agriculture
R-1 Single-family Residential District
FAR Forest, Agricultural, Recreation
Low Density
Residential
R-1 Single-family Residential District
R-2 Single-family Residential District
Medium Density
Residential
R-2 Single-family Residential District
R-3 Residential District
Neighborhood
Business
B-1 Local Business District
Mixed-Use Residential B-1 Local Business District
B-2 General Business District
O-1 Office District
R-4 Multifamily Residential District
R-6 Townhouse District
Mixed-Use Commercial B-1 Local Shopping District
B-2 General Business District
O-1 Office District
R-4 Multifamily Residential District
R-6 Townhouse District
Commercial B-3 Community Shopping District
B-4 Highway Commercial District
O-1 Office District
Light Industrial M-1 Light Industry/Manufacturing
District
General Industrial M-2 General Industry/Manufacturing District
Institutional varies
Conservation and
Green Space
FAR Forest, Agricultural, Recreation
Implementation
105
Prattville intends to revise the Zoning Ordinance to better respond to current development practices and
to align with the policies of this plan. The following
recommended changes will improve the functionality of
the Zoning Ordinance and better align it with this plan’s
land development policies:
• Update use regulations to address uses not identi-
fied in the current ordinance, resolve conflicts and
vagueness
• Create an institutional district
• Modify PUD District to establish planning objectives and public benefits a proposal must meet to obtain
the flexibility available through PUD designation
• Include a “conservation subdivision” option in
residential districts to allow density-averaging to
encourage preservation of steep slopes, flood-prone areas, etc.
• Include a “cottage subdivision” option in higher
density residential districts to allow detached
single-family dwellings on smaller lots to be oriented
around common open space (rather than requiring all to front on street)
• Establish screening standards for waste containers
and outdoor work and storage areas
• Establish buffer standards for separation between
incompatible uses
• Create a stand-alone article addressing parking and
loading; update parking requirements
• Create a stand-alone article addressing uses that
pose specific impacts or that require specialized
standards, i.e., townhouses, home occupations, bed and breakfast inns, short-term rentals, etc.
• Update sign regulations to comply with First Amend-
ment case law
• Waive or provide alternate foundation landscaping
standards when business and mixed-use buildings extend to the sidewalk in more urban, walkable pat-
tern
Subdivision Regulations
The Land Use Plan recommends standards for public
improvements suited to the land uses, densities and
locations within the city – whether the development is centrally located and relatively “urban” like Downtown
Prattville or whether it is further out and relatively
rural. For example, in the case of street networks,
the right-of-way width, alignment, number and size
of the travel lanes and edge treatments – including drainage improvements, lighting, sidewalks and planted
buffers between the sidewalk and street – should vary
according to differences in land use, intensity and
location. Similarly, street connectivity may be assured
in new development through standards calibrated to the type of development and its location within the
community.
The following elements are recommended to enhance
the Subdivision Regulations to better implement the
land development policies of the Comprehensive Plan:
• Encourage street connectivity in new development
to disperse traffic and assure adequate routes for
emergency response
• Conserve natural drainage patterns to reduce the
need and added costs of earthwork, clearing and drainage improvements
• Require sidewalks in commercial activity centers
and medium or higher density housing develop-
ments and in development close to parks, schools or
other community destinations.
• Require subdividers install or contribute to the cost
of bicycle and pedestrian facilities planned in areas
embraced by subdivisions
• Plan and design streets to discourage speeding
• Address access management concerns to preserve street capacity and improve safety
Project Prattville 2040
106
Keeping the Plan Update
Comprehensive planning is often viewed as an
occasional activity overseen by the Planning Commission, while preparing the city budget is an
annual responsibility of the City Council. As a result, the
comprehensive plan can become less useful as a guide
to city budgeting if not reviewed and updated over time.
This can be avoided by coordinating plan updates with budgeting processes every year or so.
Coordinated updates may help the Mayor and Council
better determine capital budget priorities, consider
plan and development regulation amendments, and
coordinate public investments toward reaching the vision set out in the plan. To coordinate plan policies
and their implementation, each city department, board
and commission (and non-city groups that may be
eligible for city funding assistance) should review the
comprehensive plan and submit a report to the city that would include the following:
• All tasks essential for accomplishing elements of the
comprehensive plan during the coming year that are
or should be the responsibility of the respondent.
• Suggested changes in city programs – including but not limited to regulations, capital investments,
operation and maintenance, and intergovernmental
coordination – that the respondent feels to be in the
best interests of overall plan implementation.
• Suggested changes in city policy toward growth and development as described in the comprehensive
plan.
• Suggested changes in the respondent’s responsibil-
ity or authority that would better enable implementa-
tion of any parts of the comprehensive plan.
• A preliminary budget proposal, including capital
equipment and investments needed to deal with the
above, and the portion of those costs it is requested
that the city bear.
The mayor’s office would collect this information for consideration in drafting a capital budget and
suggested plan amendments for the coming year. After
discussions with department heads and others, the
mayor’s office would forward a draft capital budget
and suggested plan amendments to the Planning Commission, who would review it in light of the
comprehensive plan. The Planning Commission would
report to the mayor’s office the findings of its review of
proposed capital investments, recommendations for
plan amendments, and adjustments to development regulations.
The mayor’s office would prepare and present a
proposed capital budget and revenue forecast to the
City Council. The Planning Commission would take
action regarding any recommended changes to the comprehensive plan and/or subdivision regulations and
suggest zoning ordinance amendments, as needed, to
the Council.
appendix
Project Prattville 2040
108
APPENDIX: First Impressions
A-1
LOCATION
Figure 1 Location within the River Region
The City of Prattville is in Autauga and Elmore Counties in south-central Alabama, just north of the Alabama
River. South of the river is Montgomery County and the
state capital, Montgomery.
Prattville is the largest city in both Autauga and Elmore
Counties. Prattville is bounded on the east by Millbrook. Immediately southeast of Prattville is Maxwell Air Force
Base with a working population of 12,500 active duty,
reserve, civilian and contract personnel. Montgomery
Airport, which provides military and civilian air service
to the region, is just over 15 miles south by way of US Highway 31.
Prattville’s eastern border is along Interstate 65, which provides convenient access to Montgomery, the
regional center, as well as to Birmingham (80 miles
north), the state’s largest city. Interstate 85, only 7.5
miles south along I-65, provides access to Atlanta (175
miles northeast), the third largest metropolitan area in the Southeast.
Project Prattville 2040
A-2
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS Topography
Prattville lies within the East Gulf Coastal Plain region
of Alabama, with the southern portion of the city along
the Alabama River in the Alluvial-Deltaic Plan and the rest of the city in the Fall Line Hills District. In essence,
Prattville and its greater river region are at a transition
point between the Appalachian Mountains and the Gulf
Coast. As a result Prattville exhibits varied topography
with the lowest elevations on the south side of the city nearest the Alabama River at about 130 feet above sea
level. These low-lying areas are part of the Alluvial-
Deltaic physiographic region and follow the river
eastward, curving northward in Elmore County.
A complex of hills and valleys run throughout much of the city. Steep slopes line the valleys through which
Prattville’s major streams flow south toward the
river. This is typical of the Fall Line Hills District, the
physiographic region representing most of Prattville’s
developed areas. Elevation increases to the north, reaching between 400 and 450 feet in the northernmost
parts of the city. Gin Shop Hill, just south of Autauga
Creek near downtown also rises above 400 feet.
Continuing west, immediately south of Highway 82, the
terrain is rugged and hilly with hilltops reaching 440 feet.
Figure 3 USGS Topographic Map
Figure 2 Physiographic Regions of Alabama
APPENDIX: First Impressions
A-3
Figure 4 Floodplains
Hydrology
Water is a key feature of Prattville’s natural environment
and is integrally related with its topography. There are
three major streams—Autauga Creek, Noland Creek and Pine Creek—that traverse the community, all
flowing south into the Alabama River. Other notable
waterways include Breakfast Creek, which drains into
Autauga Creek in northwest Prattville, and Fay Branch
which flows southward from Cobbs Ford Road and joins Pine Creek before it empties into the river.
Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam in nearby Benton keeps
the river at a minimum depth of nine feet. The reservoir
along the river between the Henry Dam and the Bouldin
Dam in Wetumpka is referred to as R.E. “Bob” Woodruff Lake. Cooter’s Pond just west of Interstate 65, is
Prattville’s largest body of water.
There are extensive floodplains along the Alabama
River. The 100-year floodplain extends nearly three
miles inland near International Paper, over one mile inland near Lipscomb Court and well over one mile
inland near Cooter’s Pond and I-65.
floodway: the channel of a watercourse and
the adjacent land areas reserved to discharge
the base flood without cumulatively increas-
ing the water surface elevation more than a
designated height.
100-year floodplain: land area that has a
1-percent chance of being flooded in any
given year.
500-year floodplain: land area that has a
0.2-percent chance of being flooded in any
given year.
Project Prattville 2040
A-4
Floodplain areas of varying width follow Prattville’s major streams. Floodways, shown in dark blue, are
notably wide along Autauga Creek west of downtown,
Noland Creek as it approaches the river and along Bear
Creek west of Prattville. The floodplain complex along
Autauga Creek from the nearby Booth community to just south of downtown is wide. Most of Downtown
Prattville falls within a 100-year floodplain; and the
business and residential areas immediately east fall
within the 500-year floodplain.
The City of Prattville has been proactive in acquiring property in areas that have experienced repeated
flooding using funding assistance from the Federal
Emergency Management Administration (FEMA).
Numerous wetland areas occur throughout the planning area, generally along Autauga Creek, Noland Creek and
Pine Creek and Fay Branch. Other major wetland areas
are located between Grouby Field and Old Autaugaville
Road in west Prattville, between Noland and Autauga
Creeks south of County Road 84 and south of the bluff near Lipscomb Court. These larger wetland complexes
tend to fall within flood prone areas associated with
Prattville’s waterways. However, there are isolated
wetlands among the low-lying southern portions of the
city.
Figure 5 Wetlands
wetland: land or areas, such as marshes or
swamps, that are covered often intermittently
with shallow water or have soil saturated with
moisture
APPENDIX: First Impressions
A-5
Figure 6 Commercial Development
DEVELOPMENT
Prattville was settled in the 1830s by its namesake industrialist, Daniel Pratt. The city initially developed
around Pratt’s gin complex along Autauga Creek.
The downtown business area and surrounding
neighborhoods were laid out similarly to those Pratt
knew from his early life in New England. Prattville became host to a diverse industrial economy in a mostly
agricultural region, producing goods from locally-grown
cotton as well as cotton gins that were sold throughout
the world.
Up to the 1940s Prattville’s development had extended east from downtown only to the Norfolk Southern
railroad. By the 1950s Prattville had expanded east of
the railroad to Memorial Drive (US 31) into the area
known as Prattmont. This initial eastward expansion
occurred along Wetumpka Street and along Memorial Drive south Main Street. Over the next twenty years
residential development continued east of Memorial
Drive, north along the highway in the Camellia Estates area and southward on Gin Shop Hill and along Doster
Road. By this time, Memorial Drive had become the new
spine for business development. As the city continued
to grow in the 1980s and 1990s, commercial and
residential development moved eastward along Cobbs Ford Road east of Pine Creek.
By the 2000s Cobbs Ford Road had become the
primary business corridor for the city; and the business
areas that developed in the Prattmont area had begun
to decline. Regional shopping amenities developed near the interstate in the 2000s as well as a Robert
Trent Jones Golf Course and convention center. Today,
Prattville is growing northward in the Old Ridge Road
area as farming land is developed for housing and new
highway-oriented businesses have sprung up along Fairview Avenue near Exit 181.
Project Prattville 2040
A-6
Prattville’s development beyond the original downtown area has been greatly influenced by the eastern area’s
rolling topography and network of creeks. And, like
most city development over the last seventy years,
Prattville’s development has been anchored to its
major roads, particularly Main Street/Cobbs Ford Road, Memorial Drive and more recently McQueen
Smith Boulevard. While the downtown business area
has experienced considerable reinvestment, older
commercial areas have not fared well in competing
with the new business areas on the east side of the community.
Industrial Development
While Prattville was a burgeoning industrial city in the
1800s, there was only modest industrial growth for
most of the next century, with the notable exception of the Union Camp paper mill in south Prattville in
1967 (purchased by International Paper in the 1990s).
However, in recent decades industries have located in the West and South Industrial Parks, both south of
the US Highway 82 Bypass. Existing tenants include
Medline distribution center and Pearson Industries, a
rope manufacturer. Construction of an 850,000 sf facility
for James Hardie, a building materials manufacturer, is underway.
While the parks are not located with immediate access
to the interstate, the construction of the bypass has
greatly improved interstate access to the parks. A
cluster of industries located further east along the bypass take advantage of available rail access there.
The recent construction of a bridge over the railroad
serving International Paper, improving access between
the bypass and the South Industrial Park, is expected to
accelerate growth in the park.
The Prattville Area Chamber of Commerce assists the
community in attracting new industries to the area.
Figure 7 Industrial Development
APPENDIX: First Impressions
A-7
Figure 8 Residential Development
Infill housing development adjacent to Downtown Prattville
Housing Development
According to data collected by City-Data.com, single-
family home construction took off in the early 2000s
and peaked in 2006 with over 300 new homes before the national recession curbed housing construction
throughout most of the country. Housing construction
slowed to just over 100 new homes per year in the
next several years but has continued at a steady but
lighter pace. In 2019 the City approved 242 single-family housing permits.
Prattville’s housing stock is overwhelmingly single-
family detached, with a small percentage of multifamily
and attached single-family housing development.
However, there has been increasing pressure to develop more multifamily housing. Most recent multifamily
housing has developed along McQueen Smith Road
north of Cobbs Ford Road. There are also several
manufactured home communities in Prattville, including
subdivisions along Doster Road and manufactured home parks in south Prattville.
Project Prattville 2040
A-8
Figure 9 Median Housing Values by Census Tract
Based on US Census estimates, median values of owner-occupied homes varied in 2018 from just
under $80,000 to over $300,000. The highest median
values occur in Census Tract 208.01 in the mostly rural
southwestern portion of Prattville where single-family
properties contain multiple acres. The lowest median housing values were in Census Tract 207 in south
Prattville east of Autauga Creek, which includes most
of the manufactured housing areas in the city. Newer
neighborhoods in east Prattville (Census Tract 205)
reflected relatively high values with a median of about $180,000.
APPENDIX: First Impressions
A-9
Major Institutions
Prattville’s major institutions include the Prattville
Baptist Hospital, Autauga County government, Autauga
County Schools and the Prattville city government. There are a number of churches in Prattville, including
several large churches in Downtown Prattville.
Though located in nearby Montgomery, Maxwell Air
Force Base is an important part of Prattville as many
residents work or have worked on the air base. While there are a number of colleges and universities in
neighboring Montgomery, there have been no colleges
or universities in Prattville, until in 2018, when Central Alabama Community College opened a satellite campus
in a shopping center at the intersection of Fairview
Avenue and Old Farm Lane.
The Prattville YMCA is also an important institution
and is considered a partner to the City in providing recreational opportunities to residents through its three
locations throughout the community.
Built in 1952 Prattville Baptist Hospital is located at the corner of North Memorial Drive and Wetumpka Street
Autauga County Courthouse, built in 1906, is located on Court Street just a few blocks north of Downtown Prattville
Project Prattville 2040
A-10
Historic Areas
Much of the downtown area, including adjoining
residential areas, are within the Daniel Pratt Historic
District, which was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1984. Prattville’s Historic Preservation
Commission was created in 2008 to promote historically
sensitive investment in the district. While the district
is locally designated by the City of Prattville and a
design review process is in effect, a Certified Local Government program has not been established, which
could provide additional technical resources to the
Preservation Commission from the Alabama Historical
Commission (AHC). The Preservation Commission
plans to update the design guidelines established in 2008.
The downtown commercial district is made up of
historic storefronts mostly along West Main Street
between Court Street and Chestnut Street. The
streetscape was improved in the early 2000s with brick pavers, curb extensions, street trees, planting
beds and decorative lighting. Since then the downtown business area has made a significant comeback; and
features a number of successful restaurants and other
businesses today. To accommodate increased demand
for parking, several early homes on the south side of
Tichnor Avenue were demolished to create parking lots for the businesses fronting Main Street. Despite this
and the angled parking on Main Street, there is still a
concern there is not adequate parking for the bustling
downtown. Parking needs for the downtown area will be
studied during the planning process.
The Daniel Pratt gin complex, which served as the
economic foundation of the town’s early development,
remains largely in place, although Pratt’s original home,
some mill housing and other individual structures have
been lost over time, including, sadly the loss in 2002 of the Gurney Cotton Factory building to fire. A private
investor intends to adapt five remaining structures in
the complex into housing.
Figure 10 Daniel Pratt Historic District
APPENDIX: First Impressions
A-11
Further east from Prattville’s original settlement, the Prattmont community that developed in the first part of
the 20th Century represents another important period
in the city’s history. As the community’s business
activity continued eastward, the business areas along
Memorial Drive, particularly south of Main Street have declined. Today, the City and business owners have
initiated discussions on how they might work together
to revive the area.Lower Left: Historic Downtown Prattville
Lower Right: 1911 Sanborn Map of Downtown Prattville
Law office in historic home on Chestnut Street
Project Prattville 2040
A-12
TRANSPORTATION
Prattville has a well-developed street network featuring several major transportation corridors, including
Interstate 65, US Highway 31, US Highway 82, Fairview
Avenue and Selma Highway. Major local roads include
Main Street/Cobbs Ford Road, Old Farm Lane,
McQueen Smith Road, Sheila Boulevard, Doster Road, East Sixth Street, Upper Kingston Road, Martin Luther
King Drive and others.
As the city has grown, the emerging street system has
maintained a relatively high level of connectivity despite
limitations posed by terrain, streams and railroads. A well interconnected street network provides route
choices to drivers, rather than forcing most trips on to a
limited number of major roads.
Neighborhoods
In Prattville, most residential developments connect
to one another by way of local streets except where
streams and other obstacles make street connections more difficult. Most have multiple access points to
surrounding streets, while a few have cul-de-sac street
layouts. Very few residential areas have grid patterns for
the street layouts, though there are a few grid sections
near the Main Street corridor.
Though neighborhood streets are largely
interconnected, much of Prattville’s commercial
development over the last forty years has occurred
along Cobbs Ford Road and a few other major arterials.
Because these corridors are essential for traveling across the city and beyond, accommodating traffic for
businesses along the roadway is a competing need.
This has resulted in greater congestion, uneven traffic
flow and greater potential for accidents at higher
speeds.
Figure 11 Street Network
APPENDIX: First Impressions
A-13
Figure 12 Road Classifications
Accessibility
Regional vehicular access to Prattville is provided
by I-65 and two federal highways, US-31 and US-
82. I-65 and US-31 provide north/south access from Prattville to Birmingham and Montgomery. US-82
extends westward and connects Prattville to I-20/59
in Tuscaloosa, and it also extends eastward toward
Eufaula and then into Georgia. Additional regional
access is provided by SR-14 which extends in an east/west direction, connecting Prattville with Wetumpka
and Selma. Access to I-65 is provided by three
interchanges: one at US-82/Cobbs Ford Road (Exit 179),
one at Fairview Avenue (Exit 181), and one at US-31 (Exit
186). Overall, Prattville has a well-connected system of arterial and collector streets. North of Main Street,
however, there are few east/west routes which makes
travel in those directions challenging.
Roadway Characteristics
Roadways within the study boundary exhibit the
following characteristics:
• I-65 is a six-lane, divided, north-south roadway that is classified as an interstate. It has a posted speed
limit of 70 mph. In 2018, the AADT for the portion of
the interstate adjacent to Prattville was approximate-
ly 62,600 vehicles.
• US-31 (SR-3), north of 6th Street, is a two-lane, undi-vided, north-south roadway. South of 6th Street, US-
31 expands to become a four-lane, divided roadway.
US-31 is lined by various land uses, including com-
mercial, residential, wooded, and agricultural. US-31
is classified as a minor arterial north of Wetumpka Street. South of Wetumpka Street, US-31 is classi-
fied as a primary arterial. It has a posted speed limit
of 45 mph. In 2018, the Average Annual Daily Traffic
(AADT) for this roadway ranged from approximately
10,900 to 24,700 vehicles.
Project Prattville 2040
A-14
• US-82 (SR-6) is an east-west roadway containing segments of two-lane, undivided and four-lane,
divided roadway. US-82 is classified as a primary ar-
terial. US-82 is lined by various land uses, including
commercial, residential, wooded, and agricultural.
It has a posted speed limit of 55 mph to the west of the US-82 junction with Cobbs Ford Road. A posted
speed limit of 45 mph is present to the east of that
junction. In 2018, the AADT for this roadway ranged
from approximately 6,400 to 17,400 vehicles for the
segment west of the US-82 junction with Cobbs Ford Road. East of this junction, the AADT increased
to approximately 35,100 vehicles.
• SR-14 is collocated along I-65 (between Exits 179
and 181), Cobbs Ford Road, US-82, and Selma
Highway. These roadways are interstate and primary arterial functional classes, respectively. SR-14 is
lined by various land uses, including commercial,
residential, wooded, and agricultural. Posted speed
limits along SR-14 include posted speed limits of 55
mph to the west of the US-82 junction with Cobbs Ford Road, 45 mph to the east of that junction, and
posted speed limits ranging from 45 to 55 mph along
the Selma Highway segment. In 2018, the AADT for
this roadway ranged from approximately 7,600 to
35,100 vehicles.
• Fairview Avenue is a northeast-southwest roadway
that is classified as a primary arterial. It has seg-
ments consisting of a two-lane, undivided roadway
and a five-lane roadway which includes a two-way
left turn lane. Fairview Avenue is lined by various land uses, including commercial, residential, and
wooded areas. It has a posted speed limit rang-
ing from 40 to 45 mph. In 2018, the AADT for this
roadway ranged from approximately 13,900 to 32,200
vehicles.
• Cobbs Ford Road is a five-lane, undivided, east-
west roadway that is classified as a primary arterial.
Cobbs Ford Road is surrounded by commercial land
uses. It has a posted speed limit of 45 mph. In 2018,
the AADT for this roadway ranged from approxi-mately 25,700 to 35,100 vehicles.
• East Main Street is an east-west roadway with seg-ments classified as a primary arterial and a minor
arterial. East Main Street includes two-lane, three-
lane, four-lane, and five-lane undivided segments,
along with a four-lane divided segment. East Main
Street is lined by commercial and residential land uses. It has a posted speed limit ranging from 15
mph in the downtown area, increasing to 45 mph
as it proceeds to the east. In 2018, the AADT for this
roadway ranged from approximately 14,200 to 20,700
vehicles.
• Martin Luther King Jr. Drive (North Chestnut Street)
is a two-lane, undivided, north-south roadway that is
classified as a minor arterial. The roadway is lined by
various land uses, including residential, wooded, and
agricultural. It has posted speed limits ranging from 35 to 40 mph. In 2018, the AADT for this roadway
ranged from approximately 2,400 to 3,400 vehicles.
• Upper Kingston Road is a two-lane, undivided,
north-south roadway, with segments classified as
a minor arterial and a major collector. The roadway is lined by various land uses, including residential,
wooded, and agricultural. It typically has a posted
speed limit of 35 mph. In 2018, the AADT for this
roadway ranged from approximately 2,200 to 3,700
vehicles.
Congestion Status
The Montgomery MPO regional travel demand model
was used to identify congested roadways in Prattville.
The travel demand model volume/capacity ratio was
used to illustrate existing areas that are currently experiencing congestion. It should be noted that the
Montgomery MPO travel demand model’s current
base year is 2010. Additional analysis was conducted
on historical traffic counts between the years 2010
and 2018 to account for recent growth, and the travel demand model volumes were factored accordingly to
more accurately reflect existing conditions.
APPENDIX: First Impressions
A-15
Some congestion is present during the peak periods near Prattville High School and Prattville Junior High
School on Upper Kingston Road and Martin Luther
King Jr. Drive, respectively. This increased congestion
is generally seen during the school drop-off and
pick-up times due to an increase in traffic and delay from student drop-off and pick-up, school bus entry
and exit, and student and faculty commuters. A traffic
study being produced in conjunction with this Plan
analyzes selected intersections and locations within the
Prattville area, studying the current and projected traffic conditions at these locations. The results of this study
are located in the Appendix.
As shown in Figure 13, roadway segments exhibiting
heavy to severe congestion based on analysis of the
2018 factored model volumes include:
• 4th Street, between Lower Kingston Road and South
Washington Street
• East Main Street, between South Washington Street
and New Moon Drive
• Fairview Avenue, between US-31 and Jasmine Trail
• Fairview Avenue/SR-14, on the eastbound and west-
bound approaches to the I-65 interchange
• Cobbs Ford Road, on the eastbound and westbound
approaches to the I-65 interchange
• East Main Street, between Sheila Boulevard and McQueen Smith Boulevard
• McQueen Smith Road, northbound approach to East
Main Street
• US-82, between Selma Highway and US-31
• US-31, south of US-82
• I-65, north of Fairview Avenue
• I-65, south of Cobbs Ford Road
Figure 13 Congestion Status
Project Prattville 2040
A-16
Updates since the Previous Plan
Since the previous transportation plan, several
transportation improvement projects have been
implemented. These include:
• Addition of protected left turn phases for both Mc-
Queen Smith Road approaches at its intersection
with the US-82 Bypass
• Installation of left turn lanes along both US-82 By-
pass approaches at Gin Shop Hill Road, along the westbound US-82 Bypass approach at Indian Hills
Road, and along both US-82 Bypass approaches at
Northington Road
• Widening of the US-82 Bypass to a four-lane, divided
section between Selma Highway and Malone Court
• Addition of a second northbound through lane on
the McQueen Smith Road approach to East Main
Street
• Completion of the widening of Old Farm Lane to
a four-lane, divided section with bike lanes and sidewalks between Cobbs Ford Road and Fairview
Avenue
• Extension of Old Farm Lane north of Fairview Av-enue with installation of a roundabout at North Old
Ridge Road.
• Installation of an Automated Traffic Signal Perfor-
mance Measures (ATSPM) system on Cobbs Ford
Road which implemented an advanced detection system and also gives the City the ability to collect
traffic count data at intersections.
• Construction of an industrial access road from US-
82 to CR-4 East
Current Transportation projects
• An ongoing construction project to add turn lanes at
the intersection of US-82 and US-31
• Realignment, widening, and bridge construction
of US-82 at its crossing of Pine Creek, just west of
US-31
• US-82 widening between US-31 and SR-14 is
planned for construction under the Rebuild Alabama
Act; this project will complete the four lane expan-
sion of the US-82 bypass in Prattville.
Opening of the South Industrial Park bridge
APPENDIX: First Impressions
A-17
Transit
Transit service in Prattville is provided by Autauga
County Rural Transportation. This is a “first come, first
serve” paratransit service that provides transportation to the Montgomery Cancer Center and doctors in the
Montgomery area for Autauga County residents only. A
24-hour advance notice is required. Fares range from
$3-$6 with discounts available for seniors, disabled, and
riders under the ages of 16. There is currently no fixed-route transit service in Prattville.
Pedestrian Facilities
Sidewalks are present downtown and in adjacent
historic neighborhoods. For many periods of the
city’s growth—beyond the downtown area, sidewalks were not included along streets. Most neighborhoods
that developed prior to about the 1980s do not have
sidewalks. As subsequent residential growth extended
east of Pine Creek, neighborhoods began to once again
include sidewalks, typically on one side of the street or both sides of a subdivision’s collector street. Sidewalks
are not present on major roads such as East Main
Street, Cobbs Ford Road, Memorial Drive and McQueen
Smith Road.
Sidewalks are present near some, but not all, of the local schools. No sidewalks are present along Upper
Kingston Road near Prattville High School or near
Autauga County Alternative school. A sidewalk is
present along the northbound approach to Prattville
Junior High School, located on Martin Luther King Jr.
Drive. There is no buffer between the roadway and the sidewalk, however, which decreases the safety
of sidewalk usage. Sidewalks are also present on the
northern and western sides of Daniel Pratt Elementary
School, connecting the school to many neighborhoods
in the area. Sidewalks are present along Old Farm Lane approaching Prattville Christian Academy.
The City constructed a walking path along Autauga
Creek near downtown in 2006. The path was extended
eastward to Chestnut Street in 2014; and the City plans
to continue extending the path along the creek.
The City has begun the process to improve existing
sidewalks around Prattville to meet Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) standards by installing curb
ramps at intersections.
Bicycle Facilities
There are no designated on-street bike lanes or off-
street bicycle paths in Prattville, though there appears
to be increasing interest for these. The City has marked
sharrows—travel lanes intended to be shared by
motorists and bicyclists—on Old Farm Lane in east Prattville. Prattville’s street design standards require
new local streets to be 27 feet wide curb to curb.
This width would accommodate marking of sharrows
depending on whether on-street parking occurs along
streets.
Natural surface trail along Autauga Creek
Project Prattville 2040
A-18
Utilities and Infrastructure
Sanitary Sewer
The City of Prattville Public Works Department operates
the city’s wastewater (sanitary sewer) system. Sanitary
sewer service is widely available throughout the city and a few small areas just beyond the city limits.
Unsewered areas are primarily those that have either
not developed yet or that developed at a density
below that which requires sanitary sewer service.
As development of commercial and residential areas continue in the Old Farm Lane and Old Ridge Road
areas, for example, unsewered areas will be tied to the
city’s sanitary sewer system.
The City is replacing older sanitary sewer lines, such as in the downtown area, and upgrading undersized
main sewer lines. Parts of the sanitary sewer system in
areas developed over the last 30-40 years are generally
considered to be in good condition. The City recently
upgraded the Pine Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant, using green infrastructure and new technologies to
enhance treatment and increase design flow from 3.0
to 5.7 mgd. The Public Works Department’s Wastewater
Division intends to upgrade the Fay Branch interceptor
line to add capacity and to modernize the Autauga Creek wastewater treatment plant.
Figure 14 Sewer Coverage Area
APPENDIX: First Impressions
A-19
Stormwater Management
The Public Works Department oversees management
of stormwater drainage, a relatively new responsibility
for the department. Due to the city’s topography and as development has increased, the velocity of runoff
as it flows downstream along areas creeks is causing
erosion along the waterways. The department is
preparing an overall plan to address these issues,
including re-routing some storm sewer lines, and to respond to tighter rules on stormwater management
issued by the Environmental Protection Agency.
Water System
Prattville Waterworks operates the local water system.
The water system extends north to Exit 186, roughly three miles north of the city, and south to the Alabama
River, and from I-65 on the east to Bear Creek Swamp in
the west. The system has a storage capacity of 11 million
gallons per day (GPD) and purchases four million GPD from Five Star in Wetumpka. Water usage varies from
about 4.5 million GPD to just under nine million GPD
during peak periods. The water supply comes from
wells generally on the west side of the community.
Geologic conditions on the north and east sides limit potential for tapping ground sources in these areas.
The waterworks continues to upgrade aged and
undersized lines in older developed areas. Because
the water from Five Star must travel up to 20 miles,
increasing the potential for transmission problems, the waterworks plans to move large transmission
mains to be able to move water from the west to east
side to enable the system. This will allow the system
in the future to become independent of Five Star. The
waterworks also foresees the need to increase storage capacity to serve industries on the south side of
Prattville as industrial development grows.
New headworks added as part of the Pine Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant upgrades
Project Prattville 2040
A-20
City of Prattville Facilities
The City of Prattville owns about 1,300 acres of land, which includes Prattville-Grouby Field (227 acres), West
Industrial Park (40 acres) and South Industrial Park (490
acres). 208 acres are used for parks, recreation and
cultural facilities (this does not include city parks and
recreation facilities at Cooter’s Pond, which are on US Army Corps of Engineers property). In addition to these
functions, city properties include the City Hall and City
Hall annex, a public works facility, three fire stations,
a public safety center, a fire training facility, a 16-acre
cemetery and two wastewater treatment plants. In addition, the city has acquired considerable flood prone
land throughout Prattville.
City Hall
City governmental offices are located in the City Hall
building and City Hall annex, both on Main Street in Downtown Prattville.
Parks, Recreation and Cultural Arts
Prattville’s parks, recreation and cultural facilities
include fifteen parks, the Pratt Pool, the Stanley-
Jensen Stadium, the Gillespie Senior Center, Doster Community Center, Upper Kingston Community
Center, the Prattauga Museum and Way-off Broadway
Theater/Cultural Arts Building. Due to considerable
growth in sports programs, the department took
over management of many of these from parent-run associations. The city prepared a parks and recreation
master plan in 2015, which identified priority actions
and investments for the department over a six year
period.
Parks
Parks are reasonably distributed throughout the
city, except that there are relatively few parks in east
Prattville where considerable residential growth has
occurred and will continue for the foreseeable future.
The city’s sports complexes (excluding the football stadium) are located on the far north and south ends
of the community. Cooter’s Pond Park, a regional park
featuring a dog park, boat launches and other passive
recreational elements is located along the Alabama Figure 15 City Parks
APPENDIX: First Impressions
A-21
River in southeast Prattville. In support of the work done by the Autauga Creek Improvement Committee, who
has worked to develop a 13-mile canoeing trail along
the creek, the City developed and maintains a park
space at the south end along Reuben Road.
An Olympic-sized community pool is part of Pratt Park, which also includes a splash pad, pond and playground.
Several parks, recreation and cultural arts facilities
are located next to the park, including the Doster
Community Center and Gillespie Senior Center.
The City is in the process of adding a softball complex and is planning hiking and biking trails, both adjacent
to Mac Gray Park. The department also sees a need
for additional soccer fields. The City also acquired
flood prone land on the west side of US 31 near Pine Creek and the Candlestick Park manufactured home
community that is being considered for hiking and
biking use.
Recreation and Cultural Facilities
All of Prattville’s cultural and recreational facilities, with the exception of the Upper Kingston Community Center,
are located in Downtown Prattville. According to the
department participation in programs has outgrown
the city’s available recreation and cultural facilities; and
there is a need for a larger event venue, such as a civic center.
An Olympic-sized community pool is part of Pratt Park, which also includes a splash pad, pond and playground. Several parks, recreation and cultural arts facilities are located next to the park, including the Doster Community Center and Gillespie Senior Center.
Doster Memorial Community Center
Project Prattville 2040
A-22
PUBLIC SAFETY
Fire Department
The Prattville Fire Department maintains an Insurance
Service Office (ISO) rating of “1,” the best possible score
offered under the ISO system, which evaluates fire departments based on staffing, training, equipment,
response time and related criteria. The department’s
exceptional level of service and strong ISO rating help
keep property insurance costs low. The department’s
facilities currently include three fire stations, a training facility and administrative offices in the Public Safety
Building. Existing stations are located: downtown, in the
Prattmont area and on McQueen Smith Road near Wal-
Mart. A fourth fire station will be soon be constructed
on the far east side of the city to help ensure adequate response times as the area continues to develop.
Police Department
The police department is housed in the Public Safety
Building near downtown and has an unmanned
substation in the Prattville Town Center shopping development on the city’s east side. A manned
substation will be incorporated into the soon-to-be-built
Fire Station #4. The department has approximately 90
officers and estimates additional officers will need to be
added as the city continues to grow. According to the police department, property crimes (theft, burglary) is
the most prevalent issue the department deals with.
The City adaptively reused the former Continental Eagle Building for city police and fire department administrative functions, the City’s informa-tion technology offices and Autauga County EMA
The overall crime rate in Prattville has trended
down significantly, having dropping from 309 in
2005 to 232 in 2018 (US average is 274).
APPENDIX: First Impressions
A-23
PRATTVILLE AREA SCHOOLS
Prattville is one of the few cities in Alabama of its size that has not established a city school system. Prattville
children attend Autauga County or Elmore County
Schools. There are eight Autauga County Schools and
four Elmore County Schools serving Prattville students.
Roughly three-quarters of the students in Autauga County Schools in Prattville are from Prattville. Only
about 350 students from Prattville attend school in the
Elmore County system.
Elmore County Schools serving Prattville
• Coosada Elementary (grades pK-2)
• Airport Road Intermediate School (grades 3-4)
• Millbrook Middle School (grades 5-8)
• Stanhope Elmore High School (grades 9-12)
Figure 16 Autauga County Schools (blue) and Elmore County Schools (green)
Autauga County Schools in Prattville
• Prattville Kindergarten
• Prattville Primary School (grades 1-2)
• Prattville Elementary School (grades 3-4)
• Daniel Pratt Elementary School (grades 1-6)
• Prattville Intermediate School (grades 5-6)
• Prattville Junior High School (grades 7-8)
• Prattville High School (grades 9-12)
• Autauga County Technology Center
Project Prattville 2040
A-24
According to Alabama State Department of Education (ALSDE) annual report cards, the two school systems
are comparable in academic achievement (mid- to
upper- 80s). Having risen out of proration, Autauga
County Schools made notable progress in terms of
student achievement with the state score increasing from 80 to 88. With level enrollment from year to year,
the system is not experiencing overcrowding and
does not project a need for new school construction
within the system. The Elmore County School system
is experiencing more growth, partly as a result of population shifts in the Montgomery metro area. The
system is targeting capital funding at the Coosada,
Millbrook and Airport Road schools to accommodate
increasing enrollment.
In addition to the Autauga and Elmore County schools serving Prattville, there are also two private schools:
Autauga Academy and Prattville Christian Academy.
Autauga Academy is a PK-12 school with just under
300 students located in far west Prattville on Golson
Road. Prattville Christian Academy is a PK-12 school with about 670 students located in east Prattville on Old
Farm Road. Ivy Classical Academy is a proposed charter
school now seeking approval to open in Prattville.
School Funding
Property and sales tax revenue are the main sources
of local school funding. Because property tax rates in
Alabama are relatively low, sales tax revenues often make up the bulk of local school funds. With much
of the city’s sales tax revenue generated in shopping
centers located in the Elmore County portion of
Prattville, Autauga County Schools do not benefit from
it. Instead, those revenues go to Elmore County Schools where only a small number of Prattville students attend.
According to the ALSDE local funding per pupil among
Autauga County Schools is $668, compared to $981 in
Elmore County. The chart below illustrates the levels
of federal, state and local funds per student for the two school systems serving Prattville in comparison
to three peer cities in Alabama—Alabaster, Athens and
Trussville—and the Town of Pike Road, a relatively new,
but rapidly growing, suburb of Montgomery.
APPENDIX: First Impressions
A-25
SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS
For the following analysis, socioeconomic indicators for Prattville were compared to two other Montgomery suburbs—Millbrook and
Pike Road, three peer cities in other parts of the state and the State
of Alabama overall. Millbrook was selected because of its proximity
to Prattville and similar location within the metro area. Pike Road
is a relatively new suburb of Montgomery, but it is growing quickly in part due to it becoming a community of choice for those leaving
the larger city. Alabaster, Athens and Trussville were chosen for the
comparison because of their comparable size, interstate access
and relationship to the large cities and employment centers in their
respective metro areas.
Population Growth
Prattville has continued to grow steadily over the last fifty years.
The 1960s and 1970s were a time of tremendous growth, nearly
tripling the size of the city. While the 1980s
were a period of slow growth in the state
and throughout the river region, Prattville
began to accelerate again in the 1990s. By 2018 Prattville had nearly doubled its 1980
size. Athens was larger than Prattville in
1970 but has grown at a much slower pace.
Millbrook, Alabaster and Trussville started
the 1970s at similar sizes—considerably smaller than Prattville; and while they have
all grown substantially, only Alabaster has
come close to catching up to Prattville.
Millbrook saw the greatest population
gain between 1990 and 2010, but its growth rate had slowed by 2018. Pike
Road incorporated just before the 2000
US Census but has grown rapidly over the
last twenty years, largely due to aggressive
annexation.
Prattville’s annual percentage growth has
been considerably higher than average
growth rates of the US and the state
at different times over the last several
decades. As can be seen in the chart above, Prattville’s growth rate dropped
considerably from 1970 to 1990 but
rebounded over the next two decades
until the national recession in 2008. More
recently, housing development has picked back up in Prattville and so its population is
likewise increasing.
Project Prattville 2040
A-26
Household Size
Prattville has a slightly higher percentage of smaller
households (1- and 2-persons, total 59.9%) in 2018
compared to several peer communities but is generally consistent with national trends. While just over
60% of Millbrook households are 1- and 2-persons,
Millbrook has a higher percentage of 4-or-more person
households than Prattville. Athens had the smallest
household sizes, while Pike Road had the largest. This reflects a higher percentage of empty nesters,
retirees and widowers in Athens compared to the
larger percentage of Pike Road family households with
children present.
Median Age
Prattville’s median age has increased over the years as
has occurred in the state and the nation. According to
the American Community Survey, Prattville’s median age had increased to just 36.9, while most peer
communities experienced slightly greater aging, with
the exception of Millbrook, with a 2018 median age
of 34.5. Fluctuations in median age indicate whether
a community is retaining and growing families with children, retaining and attracting young workers or
losing families and young workers.
Racial Diversity
Like the peer communities evaluated, Prattville has a
high proportion of White residents (73.4%). Trussville has the highest percentage of White residents at 87.4%.
Just under one in five Prattville residents are Black or
African American, compared to one in 16 in Trussville
and one in three in Pike Road. While the Hispanic and
Latino population has increased in different parts of Alabama, there are still relatively few Hispanic or Latino
residents in Prattville (3.7%). Of the peer communities,
Alabaster had the highest proportion of Hispanic or
Latino residents (9.5%).
APPENDIX: First Impressions
A-27
Economic Indicators
Income
The median household income in
Prattville was estimated at $59,822 and the median family income
$73,726 in 2018. As can be seen in the
following chart, Pike Road has the
highest household incomes among
Prattville’s peer communities with Trussville following close behind.
While Millbrook’s income levels were
similar to Prattville’s in 2018, Prattville’s
median income grew slower in the
2010s than that of Millbrook.
Cost of Living
Like most communities in Alabama,
Prattville is an affordable place to live.
In 2019, the cost of living index (COLI)
for Prattville was estimated at 85.8—the COLI for the United States is 100.
Trussville had the highest estimated
COLI at 89.2 and Athens the lowest at
81.8.
Poverty Level
The percentage of the population
below the poverty level in Prattville in
2018 was estimated at 15%, similar to
that of Athens (14.7%) but below that
of the state (16.8%). Pike Road had the lowest percentage of residents below
poverty level at 3.9%.
Project Prattville 2040
A-28
Employment Characteristics
Roughly 15,500 people in Prattville
aged 16 and older were employed
according to the 2018 ACS.
The largest percentage of those
workers were employed in health care, education and social services
(19.6%); manufacturing (11.8%); and
public administration (11.7%). A large
proportion of the population working
in health care, education and social services is common in the state and is
no different among Prattville’s peers.
Along with Millbrook and Pike Road,
Prattville has a higher proportion of
works in public administration due to the cities’ proximity to the state
capital. Both Prattville and Athens
had slightly higher percentages of
workers in the arts, entertainment
and recreation sector, which includes accommodations and food services.
The average commute of Prattville
workers is about 22.5 minutes, slightly
shorter than peer communities, with
the exception of Athens (21.4). Like Prattville, the communities selected
for peer analysis are suburbs to larger
cities with more abundant employment
opportunities.
APPENDIX: First Impressions
A-29
Unemployment Rate
The unemployment rate according
to the 2018 American Community
Survey for Prattville was estimated at 5.2%, only slightly higher than peer
communities, other than Athens,
which had the highest estimated
unemployment rate of 9.6% in
2018. Pike Road had the lowest unemployment rate at 2.2%. According
to the Alabama Department of Labor,
Prattville’s had dropped to around 3%
by the beginning of 2020, as did the
rate in all other cities.
Educational Attainment
Prattville residents 25 years and older
have education levels consistent with
that of the nation but less than that
of some of its peer communities. Just under a third of Prattville residents
have either a bachelor’s or higher
college degree. In contrast, 57% of
Pike Road residents obtained college
degrees. About 11% of Prattville residents 25 years and older did not
complete high school, and 29.2% had
obtained a high school diploma or
equivalency but no further education.
Project Prattville 2040
A-30
Housing Indicators
Renter and Owner Occupancy
Based on the 2018 American
Community Survey, Prattville had a higher percentage of renter-occupied
housing units (34.6%) than peer
communities, followed by Athens
(33.5%). Pike Road and Trussville had
the least amount of rental housing, 13.8% and 10.6% respectively.
Prattville also has a higher percentage
of manufactured housing than its peer
communities.
APPENDIX: First Impressions
A-31
Housing Occupancy
Prattville’s overall housing vacancy
rate (7.3%) in 2018 was estimated to be similar to that of peer communities,
with Alabaster having the tightest
market with only 5.3% of its stock
vacant. Athens had the largest
percentage of vacant housing at 9.5%. To put this in perspective, the
vacancy rate statewide is over 18% and
nationwide 12.3%.
More revealing is the low percentage of
vacant owner-occupied housing (1.4%) and the high percentage of rental
housing (7.8%) in Prattville compared
to other communities. This indicates
that either rental housing is in poor
condition, too expensive or most likely a combination of these factors. Another
variable in rental housing availability
and demand for Prattville and nearby
communities is the number of renters
stationed at Maxwell Air Force Base, since they enter and leave the housing
market more abruptly than other
residents.
Project Prattville 2040
A-32
Housing Costs
Prattville’s housing costs are
comparable to those in nearby
Millbrook and Athens except that rental rates are much higher. Housing costs in
Pike Road and in the two Birmingham
suburbs are considerably higher than
in Prattville. It is interesting to note
how small a gap there is between monthly rental costs ($1,013) compared
to monthly owner costs for homes
with a mortgage ($1,167) in Prattville.
As can be seen in peer communities,
there tends to be a greater difference between monthly mortgage costs and
monthly rental costs.
Housing Age
While Prattville has added a significant
number of new homes in the last twenty years, the city is over 150
years old, and so the housing stock
includes more older homes than in
other communities, with the notable
exception of Athens, which was founded twenty years before Prattville.
As seen in the chart at right, Pike Road
has seen the largest percentage of its
housing stock built in the last ten years.
The age of housing stock factors into Prattville’s modest housing prices.
APPENDIX: First Impressions
A-33
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
The City of Prattville administers a zoning ordinance, subdivision regulations, stormwater regulations and
flood prevention ordinance. The following is only a
cursory assessment of these regulations. Deeper
analysis and recommendations will be provided in later
phases of the process.
Zoning Ordinance
The zoning ordinance includes a total of 17 districts:
five residential zones, three zones for manufactured
housing, five commercial zones (including one office
zone), one agricultural zone, two industrial zones and a planned unit development district.
Several uses that are often specially regulated are
not addressed, such as bed and breakfast inns, adult
entertainment, payday loan/check-cashing stores, mini-
storage facilities, short-term rentals (Air BnB), etc.
The ordinance does not have screening requirements,
such as for dumpsters and outdoor work or storage
yards. Requirements for buffering between higher
intensity and lower intensity uses are not clearly
addressed.
The zoning ordinance includes sign regulations that
are content-based and therefore in conflict with the US
Supreme Court ruling in Reed v. Town of Gilbert, 2015.
Application fees are included in the ordinance requiring
amendment to change fees over time.
Subdivision Regulations
The subdivision regulations apply within the city limits
and up to three miles beyond the city limits.
Access management, such as separation between adjacent driveways and between driveways and street
intersections, is not adequately addressed.
Standards do not adequately address street
connectivity in new development, an important strategy
supporting traffic management and emergency access.
Design standards establish minimum pavement widths
based on roadway type but not lane assembly. Local
street pavement widths are relatively high (29 ft face of
curb to face of curb). The allowable length of cul-de-
sacs is very generous (1,000 ft). Sidewalks are required on both sides of arterial and collector streets and on
one side of all other streets. Curb and gutter is required
on all streets except those with large lots. Whether
different types of curb and gutter (valley or rollover
curb, for example) may be permitted on certain roadway types or in different land use contexts is not addressed.
Project Prattville 2040
A-34
COMPREHENSIVEMASTER PLAN