Loading...
2201-Jan 27 HPC 102 West Main Street \ Prattville, AL 36067 \ 334. 595.0500 \ prattvilleal.gov BILL GILLESPIE, JR. MAYOR J. SCOTT STEPHENS, AICP DIRECTOR CITY OF PRATTVILLE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA January 27, 2022 4:30 p.m. Call to Order: Roll Call: Chairman Sanford, Vice-Chairman Stewart, Mr. Barker, Mrs. Davis, Mr. Ferguson, Mrs. Nettles, and Ms. Rollins. Minutes: December 7, 2021 Committee Reports: Old Business: 1. COA2110-02 Certificate of Appropriateness New Structure-Restroom 342 S. Chestnut Street (Creekwalk Area) City of Prattville, Petitioner Held 10/28, 12/7 New Business: 2. COA2201-01 Certificate of Appropriateness Alterations-Renovation, Demolition, Addition 132 Tichnor Ave. Gillespie Tire & Automotive, Petitioner Public Hearing 3. COA2201-02 Certificate of Appropriateness New Structure 148 1st Street Nelson Vincent, Petitioner Public Hearing 4. COA2201-03 Certificate of Appropriateness Alteration-Extending an exterior wall 326 S. Washington Street Autauga Baptist Association, Inc., Petitioner Public Hearing 5. COA2201-04 Certificate of Appropriateness Addition-Fence 319 S. Washington Street Lisa & James Sherrill, Petitioners Public Hearing 6. COA2201-05 Certificate of Appropriateness Addition-Gate 331 S. Chestnut Street Wesley Andrews, Petitioner Public Hearing Miscellaneous: Street Sign Toppers Election of Officers: Adjourn: Approved 2/24/22 Prattville Historic Preservation Commission January 27, 2022 Minutes Page 1 of 4 CITY OF PRATTVILLE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES January 27, 2022 Call to order: The Chairman called the regular meeting of the Prattville Historic Preservation Commission to order on Thursday, January 27, 2022 at 4:28 p.m. Roll Call: The secretary called the roll. Members present were Chairman Tim Sanford, Vice-Chair Taylor Stewart, Mrs. Jean Davis, Mr. Scott Ferguson, and Mrs. Teresa Nettles. Members Absent: Mr. Zack Barker and Ms. Kristi Rollins. Quorum present Also present was Mr. Scott Stephens, City Planner; Mr. Darrell Rigsby, Senior Planner; Mr. Tommie Williams, Planner; and Ms. Alisa Morgan, Secretary. Minutes: Mrs. Nettles moved to approve the minutes of the December 7, 2021 meeting. Mr. Ferguson seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Committee Reports: There were no reports to be made. Old Business: Certificate of Appropriateness New Structure-Restroom 342 S. Chestnut Street (Creekwalk Area) City of Prattville, Petitioner At the previous meeting (12/7/21), this agenda item was postponed at the petitioner’s request. Mr. Williams provided the staff comments for the public use restroom that is proposed by the City of Prattville. He stated that the proposed structure will be an Ozark 1 model restroom. The proposed wall textures will be Barnwood at the top and Napa Valley Rock at the bottom. Ms. Kellie Cook, petitioner’s representative, presented the request for a restroom located in the Historic District. She stated that the building is a prefabricated structure that will be fully assembled, pre-wired, and pre-plumbed. She also stated that the structure will be in a centralized location where the restroom will be open and visible from all directions along the creekwalk. After no further discussion, the vote was called. Mr. Ferguson moved to approve contingent that the finish be Board and Batten or horizontal lap with no Barnwood or Napa Valley (Rock). Mrs. Davis seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously. At the Chairman’s request, Mr. Ferguson moved to change the order that the agenda items were heard. Mrs. Nettles seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. *There were no public comments. Approved 2/24/22 Prattville Historic Preservation Commission January 27, 2022 Minutes Page 2 of 4 New Business: Certificate of Appropriateness New Structure-Fence Gate 331 S. Chestnut Street Wesley Andrews, Petitioner Mr. Rigsby provided the staff report for the Certificate of Appropriateness to allow a fence gate on property located at 331 S. Chestnut Street. He stated that the petitioner received approval for a 3ft fence at the December 2021 meeting. The petitioner is now requesting to install a decorative gate that will match the existing 4’ fence. He stated that the proposed gate will be black metal and stand approximately 42 inches in height with a 3+/- in clearance at the bottom. There would also be a pedestrian gate to the side. Wesley Andrews, petitioner, presented the request for a fence gate on property located at 331 S. Chestnut Street. He stated that the difference in the existing fence and the proposed gage will be aesthetically displeasing. Chairman Sanford agreed that the two different heights would look awkward and should consider if they should allow the gate that does not meet the guidelines but matches that which is existing. After their discussion, the vote was called. Mrs. Davis moved to approve the request as presented. Ms. Nettles seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously. Chairman Sanford opened the floor for public comments. There were none. The public hearing was closed. Certificate of Appropriateness Alterations-Renovation, Demolition, Addition 132 Tichnor Ave. Gillespie Tire & Automotive, Petitioner Mr. Rigsby provided the staff report for the Certificate of Appropriateness to make alteration on property located at 132 Tichnor Avenue. He stated that the petitioner is requesting the following alterations to the property as submitted. 1. Demolition of portions of existing building and awnings a) removing two existing canopies on the south (front bordering Tichnor) and southeast (front right) sides of the building b) removing stand-alone building on the northeast corner (right rear) of the property c) removing windows and doors on the front façade of the building retrofit as bay doors. He stated that staff recommends approval as this structure does not contribute to the historic character of the district. 2. Alter front façade He stated that the proposed alterations are appropriate per the historic guidelines because it brings it more into compliance with historic design compared to the existing state of the structures. The doors should be made of wood or dark anodized metal with a clear-glass single-light opening. He stated that staff recommends approval of alteration of front façade, conditioned that doors and windows follow historic guidelines. 3. Construct ramp on west side of building He stated that the petitioner is proposing to add a ramp to the west side elevation of the existing building. The proposed ramp will be constructed of concrete, with a painted metal railing. He stated that staff recommends approval of ramp addition as proposed. 4. New Signage He stated that the petitioner is proposing to add new wall signage to the new parapet of the existing block building on the left, the proposed lobby and customer entrance area. Also, new signage is proposed on the front façade of the new canopy on the right side of the building. He stated that the new signage appears appropriate per the historic guidelines and staff recommends approval of signage as proposed, contingent it meets requirements of zoning ordinance at time of construction. 5. Construct new shop building at rear. He stated that the petitioner is proposing to construct a new ~2,800 sqft (30’W x 93’L x 18’H) building at the northeastern corner of the current building and lot. The structure is proposed to sit back from Tichnor Street approximately sixty (60) feet, behind the existing buildings. Approximately half of the new building will be visible Approved 2/24/22 Prattville Historic Preservation Commission January 27, 2022 Minutes Page 3 of 4 from Tichnor Street due its relation to the existing building and the majority of the rear façade will be visible from West 3rd Street due to its relation to adjoining properties at the rear of Gillespie Tire, including Autauga County Rescue Squad building and an old storefront that both front West 3rd Street. He stated that the proposed materials for the building are vertical, ribbed metal on all four sides. He stated that staff recommends that the commission considers in their decision if this addition’s design, materials, and placement minimize the impact on the district’s historic character; is the proposed addition compatible with the original building in scale, proportion, rhythm, and materials; and is the proposed addition compatible with adjacent buildings in terms of height, width, materials, roof form, scale and proportions. Bobby Gillespie of Gillespie Tire and Automotive, petitioner’s representative, presented the request for the proposed alterations on property located 132 Tichnor Avenue. He addressed each item proposed. He also stated that the proposed interior alterations to the building on the left, future customer area, will be compliant with flood plain requirements. Chairman Sanford opened the floor for public comments. There were none. The public hearing was closed. Chairman Sanford opened the discussion for the board. After their discussion, the vote was called. Mr. Ferguson moved to approve the request as submitted. Mrs. Nettles seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously. Certificate of Appropriateness New Structure 148 1st Street Nelson Vincent, Petitioner Mr. Williams provided the staff report for the Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a two-story residence consisting of two executive suites on property located at 148 1st Street. The residential use was approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustment in December 2021. He stated that staff recommends approval. Nelson Vincent, petitioner, presented the request for a new structure to be constructed on property located at 148 1st Street. He stated that the proposed structure will be an upscale duplex which will occupy the owners on the second floor and the first floor will leased with the potential for business/office use. He also stated that the material will be similar to the material used on property on Washington St. and on Maple and Bridge Street. Chairman Sanford opened the floor for public comments. There were none. The public hearing was closed. Chairman Sanford opened the discussion for the board. After their discussion, the vote was called. Ms. Stewart moved to approve the request as submitted. Mr. Ferguson seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously. Certificate of Appropriateness Alteration-Extending an exterior wall 326 S. Washington Street Autauga Baptist Association, Inc., Petitioner Mr. Williams provided the staff report for the Certificate of Appropriateness to extend a wall on property located at 326 S. Washington Street. He stated that the interior storage closet wall will be extended 9’ to 18’ to be converted for office space. He stated that staff recommends approval. Mel Johnson, petitioner’s representative, presented the request for the Certificate of Appropriateness for property located at 326 S. Washington Street. Chairman Sanford opened the floor for public comments. Dr. Clark spoke in favor of the request. After no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Approved 2/24/22 Prattville Historic Preservation Commission January 27, 2022 Minutes Page 4 of 4 Chairman Sanford opened the discussion for the board. Ms. Stewart asked if the style of the doors (barndoors) were optional. Mr. Johnson stated that they are willing to make the look more consistent with the Historic District. After their discussion, the vote was called. Ms. Stewart moved to approve the request as submitted contingent that the barndoors shown are solid wood material. Mrs. Davis seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously. Certificate of Appropriateness Addition-Fence 319 S. Washington Street Lisa & James Sherrill, Petitioners Mr. Rigsby provided the staff report for the Certificate of Appropriateness to allow a fence on property located at 319 S. Washington Street. He stated that the proposed fence with a wrought iron gate will be near the back connecting with the neighbor’s fence. Lisa Sherrill, petitioner, along with Heaven Gilmore, presented the request for a fence on property located at 319 S. Washington Street. Chairman Sanford opened the floor for public comments. There were none. The public hearing was closed After their discussion, the vote was called. Mr. Ferguson moved to approve the request as submitted. Mrs. Nettles seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously. Miscellaneous: Street Sign Toppers Mr. Stephens stated the city’s Engineering Department will be placing new street sign toppers in the Historic District and has requested the Commission’s consideration on the sign preference as presented in the samples. The Commission agreed upon the black sign with white letters. Mr. Stephens also discussed plans for updating the HPC Guidelines. Bylaws The Commission reviewed the HPC Bylaws. Election of Officers Ms. Stewart moved to elect Tim Sanford Chairman. Mrs. Davis seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously. There were no other nominations. Mr. Sanford moved to elect Taylor Stewart as Vice Chair. Mrs. Davis seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously. There were no other nominations. Adjourn: With no further business, Ms. Stewart motioned to adjourn the meeting. Ms. Rollins seconded the motion. The meeting was adjourned at 5:43 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Alisa Morgan, Secretary Historic Preservation Commission CITY OF PRATTVILLE Historic Preservation Commission Planning Department Staff Report 1 CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 342 S. Chestnut Street (Creekwalk Area) – COA2110-02 DATE October 28, 2021 PROPOSED DEVLOPMENT Petitioner: City of Prattville Property Owner: City of Prattville Agent: N/A Location: 342 S. Chestnut Street Review Status and History Submission Status: First request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for this address. Previous Approvals: N/A 1984/2007 Historic Properties Inventory Details N/A. Proposed Alteration, Renovation or Addition The following alterations has been requested by the applicant. See the application included as Attachment A for a description of each element. 1. Deliver a public use restroom to be located on the creekwalk PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION: Reviewed by: Tommie Williams Site visit conducted on: October 2021 Recommendation: Approve CITY OF PRATTVILLE Historic Preservation Commission Planning Department Staff Report 2 Analysis This request is for delivering a public use restroom to be located on the creekwalk. To meet the historic culture of downtown the petitioner is requesting an Ozark 1 model restroom with the exterior wall color being buckskin and a roof color of Malibu taupe. The wall textures will be Barnwood at the top and Napa Valley Rock. This model restroom measures 10x12 and is delivered fully assembled, pre-wired, and pre- plumbed. The restroom will be ADA compliant and it will be a single user fully accessible flush restroom. Evaluation There is little to no guidance provided within the Commercial or Residential Prattville Design Review Guidelines Manual for a public use restroom. Any relevant content or guidelines from the manuals are provided. Item 1. Outbuildings (page 50) Outbuildings contribute to the historic and residential character of the district. Historic outbuildings should be retained and maintained. New outbuildings should use design, materials, and placement that support the district’s historic character. 1. New outbuildings should be smaller than the adjoining main building. 2. New outbuildings should be simple in appearance. 3. New outbuildings should use building and roof forms compatible to those used in the adjoining main building. 4. New outbuildings should use materials compatible to those used in the adjoining main buildings. Outbuildings that are not visible from public vantage points or have very limited visibility may use modern synthetic siding materials. CITY OF PRATTVILLE Historic Preservation Commission Planning Department Staff Report 3 LOCATION OF RESTROOM Example of Restroom Top will be Barnwood texture with buckskin CCCCCCOCOcolor Bottom will be Napa Valley Rock texture CITY OF PRATTVILLE Historic Preservation Commission Planning Department Staff Report 4 OZARK 1 MODEL CITY OF PRATTVILLE Historic Preservation Commission Planning Department Staff Report 5 BARNWOOD TEXTURE NAPA VALLEY ROCK 1ST ST MAPLE ST E MAIN ST BRIDGE ST W MAIN ST S CHESTNUT ST S WASHINGTON ST PLE T C H E R S T TICHNOR ST S COURT ST SELMA HWY OAKCREEKCIR DOSTERST 1ST ST MAPLE ST E MAIN ST BRIDGE ST W MAIN ST S CHESTNUT ST S WASHINGTON ST ±Legend Project Area Autauga Tax Parcels0500250 Feet Locations are approximate Location Map - Creek Walk Restroom Facility 1ST ST S CHESTNUT ST 1ST ST S CHESTNUT ST ±Legend Project Area Autauga Tax Parcels010050 Feet Locations are approximate Aerial Map - Creek Walk Restroom Facility 1ST ST MAPLE ST E MAIN ST BRIDGE ST W MAIN ST S CHESTNUT ST S WASHINGTON ST PLE T C H E R S T TICHNOR ST S COURT ST SELMA HWY OAKCREEKCIR DOSTERST 1ST ST MAPLE ST E MAIN ST BRIDGE ST W MAIN ST S CHESTNUT ST S WASHINGTON ST B-2 R-2 R-4 R-1 R-2 R-2 B-2 R-3 O-1 B-2 B-2 B-2 ±Legend Project Area Autauga Tax Parcels0500250 Feet Locations are approximate Zoning Map - Creek Walk Restroom Facility Page 1 of 5 Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 331 S. Chestnut – COA2201-05 DATE January 27, 2022 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Petitioner: Wesley Andrews Property Owner: Wesley Andrews Agent: N/A Location: 331 S. Chestnut Review Status and History (May not be exhaustive ) Submission Status: N/A Previous Approvals: Petitioner was approved for a 3ft fence at the Dec 2021 meeting 1984/2007 Historic Properties Inventory Details N/A Proposed Alteration, Renovation, or Addition The following alterations have been requested by the applicant. See the application included in Attachment A for a description of each element. 1. Construct a gate that will match the fence currently installed. Page 2 of 5 PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION: Reviewed by: Tommie Williams Site Visits Conducted: January 2022 Recommendation: Approval The proposed project is in keeping with the Historic Preservation Guidelines for Residential and Commercial buildings. The proposed project does not detract from the existing structure. Evaluation: The requested alterations were reviewed against the Commission’s Certificate of Appropriateness review policy and the standards contained in the Prattville Commercial Design Review Guidelines Manual and the Prattville Residential Design Review Guidelines Manual. The relevant sections of the manual are included. Staff comments/evaluations are summarized at the end of each section. 1. Construct a gate that will be 42 inches tall with a 3 +/- in ground clearance Fences and Walls (Residential Guidelines, page 46) Historically, fences and walls have been used to define ownership or function and separate public and private space. Historic fences and walls should be retained and maintained. New fences and walls should use design, materials, and placement that minimize their effect on the district’s historic character. 1. Historic fences and walls should be retained and maintained. 2. Wood and metal picket fences are appropriate for new construction. If wooden, they should be painted using colors complementary to the adjacent house. They should be less than three feet tall, and the pickets should be set less than three inches apart and be less than four inches in width. 3. Cast iron fences are appropriate for 19th and early 20th century dwellings. These fences should be less than three feet tall. 4. Wood board fences may be located in back yards and should be less than six feet tall. Flat tops, dog-ear tops, or pointed tops are all appropriate designs. Fences should be painted to blend with the building. 5. Free-standing brick or concrete walls may be located in back yards or, if not visible from the street, side yards. Page 3 of 5 6. Chain-link fences may be located in back yards or, if not visible from the street, side yards. Chain-link fences should be painted dark green or black, coated with green or black plastic, or screened with plants. 7. Split or horizontal rail, railroad ties, or timber fences may be located in rear yards but should be avoided on the fronts of houses. Analysis: The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) to allow for the installation of a decorative gate that will match the existing gate. The gate will be black metal and stand approximately 42 inches in height with a 3+/- in clearance. There is not currently a dwelling on the parcel. The applicant should be aware that the guidelines state the gate should be less than three feet tall. The existing fence is four feet tall and was installed by the City of Prattville several years ago when the City was leasing the lot for additional parking at City Hall. Until the proposed gate is constructed, the applicant proposes installing a temporary cable with an attached sign that reads “No Trespassing” across the entry. The staff is recommending that the cable be black to match the existing fence. Current Fence Page 4 of 5 Page 5 of 5 Example of Proposed Gate (provided by petitioner) 121 168 104 138 136 143 137123 127 135 131 133131 127 125 342 113 119 108 110 112 114 116 120 122 124 126 128 133 341 335 331 325 102 120 148 106 150 136 141 121 119 114 101 1ST ST E MAIN ST S CHESTNUT ST OAK CREEK CIR ±Legend Project Area Autauga_Parcels_Nov_20210250125 Feet Locations are approximate Location Map - 331 South Chestnut Street 335 331 325 S CHESTNUT ST ±Legend Project Area Autauga_Parcels_Nov_202105025 Feet Locations are approximate Aerial Map - 331 South Chestnut Street 121 168 104 138 136 143 137123 127 135 131 133131 127 125 342 113 119 108 110 112 114 116 120 122 124 126 128 133 341 335 331 325 102 120 148 106 150 136 141 121 119 114 101 1ST ST E MAIN ST S CHESTNUT ST OAK CREEK CIR B-2 R-2 ±Legend Project Area Autauga_Parcels_Nov_20210250125 Feet Locations are approximate Zoning Map - 331 South Chestnut Street Page 1 of 13 Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 132 Tichnor Avenue – COA2201-01 DATE January 27, 2022 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Petitioner: Gillespie Tire and Automotive Property Owner: William Gillespie Agent: N/A Location: 132 Tichnor Avenue – Existing Gillespie Tire and Automotive Review Status and History Submission Status: N/A Previous Approvals: N/A 1984/2007 Historic Properties Inventory Details None listed in inventory for this address. Autauga County Tax records indicate 132 Tichnor Avenue as being built in 1964. Page 2 of 13 Proposed New Construction The following alterations have been requested by the applicant. See the application included as Attachment A for a description of each element. 1. Demolition of portions of existing building and awnings 2. Alter front façade 3. Construct ramp on west side of building 4. New Signage 5. Construct new shop building at rear PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION: Reviewed by: Darrell Rigsby Site Visits Conducted: January 2022 Recommendation: See Analysis Details Page 3 of 13 Evaluation: Since the subject property/structure was initially developed as commercial property, the requested alterations were reviewed against the standards contained in the Prattville Commercial Design Review Guidelines Manual. Due to the complexity of this project, staff have separated the case into five (5) distinct items. The relevant sections of the design manual are included for each item. Staff analysis and recommendations are summarized at the end of each section. The following changes are proposed: 1. Demolition of portions of existing building and awnings. Demolition (page 50) Demolition of buildings that contribute to the historic character of the district results in an irreversible loss to the physical fabric of the community. Demolition of such buildings is an outcome to be avoided. 1. Demolition is appropriate if the building does not contribute to the historic character of the district. 2. Applications for demolition and the Historic Preservation Commission should explore possibilities for selling or reusing historic buildings, preferably onsite but also in other locations, as alternatives to demolition. 3. Demolition may be appropriate if the denial of the demolition will result in a demonstrable economic hardship on the owner. Item 1 Analysis: Applicant is proposing to demolish several portions of the existing Gillespie Tire and Automotive building and awnings to make space for various building alterations and additions to the property. Demolition work will consist of: a) removing two existing canopies on the south (front bordering Tichnor) and southeast (front right) sides of the building, b) removing stand-alone building on the northeast corner (right rear) of the property, and c) removing windows and doors on the front façade of the building retrofit as bay doors. See “Demolition Plan & Elevation Sheet No: D1” of the packet provided by applicant. Item 1 Recommendation: Demolition of the proposed awnings, buildings, and wall structures at 132 Tichnor is appropriate per the historic guidelines due to the fact that this structure does not contribute to the historic character of the district. Staff recommends approval of demolition as proposed. 2. Alteration of Front Façade. Door and Entrances (page 18) Doors are often central visual elements. Historic entrances and doors should be retained, visible, maintained, and if needed, repaired. Missing or severely deteriorated doors should be replaced Page 4 of 13 with historically appropriate doors. Screen, storm, and security doors should note detract from the historic appearance of their building. 1. Historic doors should be retained and maintained. 2. Primary entrances to commercial buildings should be universally accessible. If this is not possible, alternative entrances should be available, clearly marked, and maintained to the same standards as the primary entrance. 3. If historic doors do not allow for universal access, they should be retrofitted to provide it. 4. Deteriorated or damaged historic doors should be repaired using methods that allow them to retain their historic appearance and as much of their historic fabric as possible. Epoxy is helpful in strengthening and replacing deteriorated wood. 5. Owners are encouraged to replace missing or severely damaged historic doors with new doors that replicate the originals or other historic examples. 6. Clear-glass single-light painted wood doors with or without paneling are most appropriate for replacing primary doors in the district’s commercial buildings. The opening in secondary entrances may be smaller or doors may be solid wood. Dark or bronze anodized metal, though less appropriate, may be substituted for wood. Storefronts (page 32) Storefronts are defining elements of the commercial and historic character of the downtown business district. Historic storefronts should be retained, visible, maintained, and, if needed, repaired. 1. Historic storefronts and their component elements, such as display windows, bulkheads, transoms, doors, cornices, pillars, and pilasters, should be retained and maintained. Page 5 of 13 2. Historic storefronts and their component elements should remain visible. 3. Deteriorated or damaged storefronts or elements should be repaired so that the storefront retains its historic appearance. 4. Missing storefronts or elements should be replaced so that they replicate the historic storefront or other historic examples. Windows (page 34) Windows are prominent building components. They help to establish the rhythm of a building or streetscape. Sometimes, particularly in industrial buildings, they are the dominant visual element of a building exterior. Historic windows should be retained, visible, maintained, and, if needed, repaired. 1. Historic windows should be retained and maintained. 2. Historic windows should remain visible and their openings transparent. 3. Deteriorated or damaged windows should be repaired so that the windows retain their historic appearances. Epoxy is helpful in strengthening and replacing deteriorated wood. 4. Missing windows or elements should be replaced so that they replicate the historic windows or other historic examples. 5. Replacement windows should be of wood to match the original. The use of vinyl or aluminum clad windows may also be appropriate if they match the original window. 6. Historic shutters should be retained and maintained. Page 6 of 13 7. Shutters should not be added unless the building historically had them and replacements replicate historic shutters, fit the window opening when closed, and are constructed of painted wood. 8. Screen and storm windows should be constructed of painted wood, baked-on enamel, anodized aluminum, or painted-to-match-the-frames mill-finish aluminum. 9. Screen and storm windows should fit within the window frames. 10. Storm windows should be full-view design or have a central meeting rail that is placed in the same location as the windows. 11. If used, window bars should only appear on rear elevations. Demolition (page 50) Demolition of buildings that contribute to the historic character of the district results in an irreversible loss to the physical fabric of the community. Demolition of such buildings is an outcome to be avoided. 1. Demolition is appropriate if the building does not contribute to the historic character of the district. 2. Applications for demolition and the Historic Preservation Commission should explore possibilities for selling or reusing historic buildings, preferably onsite but also in other locations, as alternatives to demolition. 3. Demolition may be appropriate if the denial of the demolition will result in a demonstrable economic hardship on the owner. Item 2 Analysis: Applicant is proposing to significantly alter the front facades of the existing buildings. Primarily, windows and doors will be removed on the left front façade to create a new entry way into the future showroom. This new entryway will have a recessed entryway with double doors and display windows on the sides. The remainder of the front façade of this portion of the structure includes large picture windows flanking each side of the entry area. Additionally, windows will be removed to create roll-up garage door access on the right front portion of the existing building. New wall signage is proposed on the new parapet of the altered portion of the building and on the new canopy. (see signage assessment below). In addition to the building modifications, a large canopy is being proposed on the right front of the building to cover the existing work area. This new awning will align at the front with the existing canopy in the middle of the building. Approximate height of the new canopy is 16’. New signage is proposed on the street facing façade of the new canopy, similar to existing signage on the existing canopy of Gillespie Tire. In addition to the structural alterations, painted brick veneer is proposed on the front and west side of the existing building on the left, the proposed showroom and office building. The brick façade offers an historic appearance that is cohesive to other historic storefronts within the District. Item 2 Recommendation: Alterations of the current structure at 132 Tichnor is appropriate per the historic guidelines because it brings it more into compliance with historic design compared to the existing state of the structures. Gillespie Tire and Automotive is a structure that does not contribute to the historic character of the district. It is recommended that doors and windows meet the guidelines listed above. The doors should be made of wood or dark anodized metal with a clear-glass single-light opening. Page 7 of 13 Staff recommends approval of alteration of front façade, conditioned that doors and windows follow historic guidelines. 3. Additions of Ramp to West Side of Building. Ramps (page 38) Most commercial entrances meet ADA requirements and do not require ramps. If they are needed, simple concrete ramps are recommended for main entrances. Wood ramps may be used on rear elevations. 1. Ramps should be constructed of concrete or wood and painted in colors sympathetic to those of the building. 2. Ramps should be simple in design. 3. Ramps should be sited on rear elevations, if possible, rather than on primary façades. Item 3 Analysis: Applicant is proposing to add a ramp to the west side elevation of the existing building that will be the future showroom. Ramp extends to the west from the building approximately six feet and slopes to the rear of the property. Per plans submitted by applicant, ramp will be constructed of concrete, with a painted metal railing. Item 3 Recommendation: Addition of an access ramp on the west facing façade of the building is appropriate per the historic guidelines because it would not make sense on the rear of the building due to the layout. Staff recommends approval of ramp addition as proposed. 4. New Signage Signs (page 29) Signs are important elements in the historic and commercial character of the downtown business district, and historic signage should be retained and maintained. Signs are also important means of advertising and establishing business identities. 1. Historic signs should be retained, maintained, and, if needed, repaired. 2. New signs should be of traditional materials such as finished wood, glass, copper, or bronze. 3. New signs should be installed in locations historically used for signs such as on awnings, on upper façade walls covering five percent or less of the wall surface, inside windows, or projecting from the building façade or elevation. Signs should not cover or obscure architectural features. 4. New signs should be properly proportioned relative to their buildings. 5. Letters should be eighteen or less inches high and should cover sixty percent or less of the total sign area. Page 8 of 13 6. Colors used in signs should be coordinated with their buildings. Three colors or less should be used per sign. 7. Mounting equipment should be anchored in mortar, not bricks or stones, and should avoid damaging the building. 8. Lighting sources for signs should be external and concealed. The exception is if historic or replica neon signs are used. Item 4 Analysis: Applicant is proposing to add new wall signage to the new parapet of the existing block building on the left, the proposed lobby and customer entrance area. Proposed signage appears to be basic letter style with simple design and colors. Additionally, new signage is proposed on the front façade of the new canopy on the right side of the building. Per provided drawings, this signage appears to be basic words on the canopy façade. Item 4 Recommendation: Addition of new signage appears appropriate per the historic guidelines, including traditional materials, historically accurate location, properly proportioned relative to the building, and simple design. Additionally, all signage will have to meet requirements of zoning ordinance and permitting requirements at time of construction. Staff recommends approval of signage as proposed, contingent it meets requirements of zoning ordinance at time of construction. Page 9 of 13 5. Construction of New Shop Building at Rear Rear Additions (page 39) Rear and lateral additions provide owners with flexibility in their building use. Additions should use design, materials, and placement that minimize their affect on the district’s historic character. 1. Additions should cause minimal damage or removal of historic walls, roofs, and features from historic buildings. Existing openings should be used to connect the building and the addition. 2. Additions should have little or no visibility from the primary street façade. 3. Additions should be compatible with the original building in scale, proportion, rhythm, and materials. 4. Additions should be distinguishable from the historic building: they should be smaller and simpler in design. 5. Additions should not imitate earlier architectural styles, but should be contemporary in design but compatible with adjacent buildings. Infill Buildings (page 41) Page 10 of 13 Infill buildings are important to the district. If historic buildings are lost, infill construction enables land uses to follow historical patterns and provides for visual continuity of the downtown Prattville landscape. 1. New buildings should be compatible with adjacent buildings in terms of height and width. 2. New buildings should be compatible with adjacent buildings in terms of materials. 3. New buildings should be compatible with adjacent buildings in terms of setback. 4. New buildings should be compatible with adjacent buildings in terms of roof form. 5. New buildings should be compatible with adjacent buildings in terms of scale and proportions. 6. New construction should be oriented toward the major street. 7. New buildings should be contemporary but compatible in design to historic buildings. 8. New construction in close proximity to the Pratt industrial complex should particularly not attempt to appear historic, should be smaller and plainer than the complex’s historic buildings, and should not damage its buildings or obstruct access to them. Item 5 Analysis: Applicant is proposing to construct a new ~2,800 sqft (30’W x 93’L x 18’H) building at the northeastern corner of the current building and lot. This building will be an expanded garage facility with 10 roll up garage doors. Proposed materials for the building are vertical, ribbed metal on all four sides. New building is proposed to sit back from Tichnor Street approximately sixty (60) feet, behind the existing buildings. Approximately half of the new building will be visible from Tichnor Street due its relation to the existing building and the majority of the rear façade will be visible from West 3rd Street due to its relation to adjoining properties at the rear of Gillespie Tire, including Autauga County Rescue Squad building and an old storefront that both front West 3rd Street. The Autauga County Rescue Squad building is a large shop building with facades of primarily painted brick and block and metal awnings running the span of the building and the old storefront is primarily painted block. Item 5 Recommendation: The Commission must decide if this structure is compatible with the existing structures on the property and with the structures in the area. Staff recommend the Commission consider the following questions to make their determination: 1. Does this addition’s design, materials, and placement minimize the impact on the district’s historic character? 2. Is the proposed addition compatible with the original building in scale, proportion, rhythm, and materials? 3. Is the proposed addition compatible with adjacent buildings in terms of heigh, width, materials, roof form, scale and proportions? Page 11 of 13 Proposed Site Plan (Applicant Provided) Page 12 of 13 Elevation Drawing (Applicant Provided) Page 13 of 13 Existing Front Façade (photos taken by staff) Photo taken by staff S CHESTNUT ST W 3RD ST S COURT ST E 3RD ST E 4TH ST E MAIN ST W MAIN ST TICHNOR ST HUNTS ALY BRIDGE ST Location Map - 132 Tichnor Ave ±0 1,000500 Feet Locations are approximate Legend Project Area Elmore_Parcels_Nov_2021 Autauga_Parcels_2021_Nov Prattville City Limit Streets 132 TICHNOR ST Aerial Map - 132 Tichnor Ave ±0 10050 Feet Locations are approximate Legend Project Area Elmore_Parcels_Nov_2021 Autauga_Parcels_2021_Nov Prattville City Limit Streets S CHESTNUT ST W 3RD ST S COURT ST E 3RD ST E 4TH ST E MAIN ST W MAIN ST TICHNOR ST HUNTS ALY BRIDGE ST B-2 R-4 R-3 B-2 R-2 R-2 R-5 B-2 B-2 O-1 B-1 B-2 B-2 Zoning Map - 132 Tichnor Ave ±0 1,000500 Feet Locations are approximate Legend Project Area Elmore_Parcels_Nov_2021 Autauga_Parcels_2021_Nov Prattville City Limit Streets REMOVAL / ALTERATION ADDITION / ALTERATION REMOVAL / ALTERATION /ADDITION Page 1 of 9 Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 148 1st Street – COA2201-02 DATE January 27, 2022 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Petitioner: Nelson Vincent Property Owner: Nelson Vincent Agent: N/A Location: 148 1st Street Review Status and History Submission Status: N/A Previous Approvals: BZA approved a variance on December 14, 2021 1984/2007 Historic Properties Inventory Details 148 1st Street (1850, contributing) nucleus c. 1850 with 20th C. additions; an original portion is one-room, frame, a gabled structure erected as servant house for the dwelling which formerly stood on site of 1895 house at 150 First (site #150). Pre-cast concrete block addition to south side c. 1930. Page 2 of 9 Proposed New Construction The following alterations have been requested by the applicant. See the application included in Attachment A for a description of each element. 1. Construct a historic two-story residence in downtown Prattville. Consisting of two executive suites. The new construction will be a duplex. PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION: Reviewed by: Tommie Williams Site Visits Conducted: January 2022 Recommendation: Approval Evaluation: Since the subject property/structure was initially developed as a residence, the requested alterations were reviewed against the standards contained in the Prattville Residential Design Review Guidelines Manual. The relevant sections of the manual are included. Staff comments/evaluations are summarized at the end of each section. The following changes are proposed: 1. Construct a historic two-story residence in downtown Prattville. Consisting of two executive suites. Infill (page 41) New construction is welcome on vacant lots in the historic district. They enable land uses to follow historical patterns and provide for visual continuity of the district landscape. New dwellings should be designed to be contemporary but compatible with the district. 1. New buildings should be compatible with adjacent buildings in terms of height. 148 1st street is located next to a two-story apartment complex, that will be about the same height as the duplex. Structures in this area also must be elevated to comply with FEMA regulations. Page 3 of 9 2. New buildings should be compatible with adjacent buildings in terms of materials. The new building material will be compatible with adjacent buildings. The material being utilized will complement the existing structures in the surrounding area. The material will consist of a hardy board siding. 3. New buildings should be compatible with adjacent buildings in terms of setbacks. This particular structure will be setback about 126 feet from the property line and will not be adjacent in terms of setback. The previous structure that was demolished was also not adjacent in terms of setback. The applicant would like to have more of a view of the creek from their back porch. 4. New buildings should be compatible with adjacent buildings in terms of width, scale, and proportions. The new structure will be compatible with adjacent buildings in the surrounding area in terms of width, scale, and proportions. 5. New buildings should be compatible with adjacent buildings in terms of roof form. The new structure will be compatible with adjacent buildings in terms of roof form and gables. The new structure will have gables located on the front, side, and rear of the structure which is compatible with other structures in the area. 6. New construction should be oriented toward the major street. The new structure will face a public street and be consistent with other structures in the area. Page 4 of 9 CURRENT VIEW PROPOSED NEW STRUCTURE Page 5 of 9 Page 6 of 9 SITE PLAN Page 7 of 9 FLOOR PLAN SUITE A Page 8 of 9 FLOOR PLAN SUITE B 1ST ST MAPLE ST E MAIN ST DOSTER ST PL E T C H E R S T W MAIN ST S NORTHINGTON ST SELMA HWY S WASHINGTON ST S CHESTNUT ST COLLEGE STBRIDGE ST Location Map - 148 1st Street ±0 1,000500 Feet Locations are approximate Legend Project Area Elmore_Parcels_Nov_2021 Autauga_Parcels_2021_Nov Prattville City Limit Streets 1ST ST OAK CREEK CIR Aerial Map - 148 1st Street ±0 200100 Feet Locations are approximate Legend Project Area Elmore_Parcels_Nov_2021 Autauga_Parcels_2021_Nov Prattville City Limit Streets 1ST ST MAPLE ST E MAIN ST DOSTER ST PL E T C H E R S T W MAIN ST S NORTHINGTON ST SELMA HWY S WASHINGTON ST S CHESTNUT ST COLLEGE STBRIDGE ST B-2 R-2 R-2 R-3 B-2 O-1 R-6 O-1 B-2 Zoning Map - 148 1st Street ±0 1,000500 Feet Locations are approximate Legend Project Area Elmore_Parcels_Nov_2021 Autauga_Parcels_2021_Nov Prattville City Limit Streets Page 1 of 5 Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 326 S. Washington Street – COA2201-03 DATE January 27, 2022 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Petitioner: Autauga Baptist Association, Inc. Property Owner: Autauga Baptist Association, Inc Agent: N/A Location: 326 S. Washington Street Review Status and History Submission Status: N/A Previous Approvals: N/A 1984/2007 Historic Properties Inventory Details 326 S. Washington (Contributing) 1930; one story, frame (shiplap siding); bungalow-type with wide eaves and single front-facing gable covering the main block; secondary gable extension over off-center pier porch with lateral cross-gable over-attached carport. Page 2 of 5 Proposed Alteration, Renovation, or Addition The following addition has been requested by the applicant. See the application included in Attachment A for a description of each element. 1. Convert an existing storage closet located at the rear of the structure into a useable office. PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION: Reviewed by: Tommie Williams, Planner Site Visits Conducted: January 2022 Recommendation: Approve Evaluation: Since the subject property/structure was initially developed as a residence, the requested alterations were reviewed against the standards contained in the Prattville Residential Design Review Guidelines Manual. The relevant sections of the manual are included. Staff comments/evaluations are summarized at the end of each section. The following changes are proposed: 1. Addition Addition (Page 40) Additions to dwellings are appropriate as long as they are placed on rear elevations or non readily visible side elevations. Additions should be designed to complement the historic qualities of the dwelling. 1. Additions should cause minimal damage or removal of historic walls, roofs, and features from historic buildings. Existing openings should be used to connect the building and the addition. The addition will consist of extending the exterior wall by 9’. It will cause minimal damage to the historic wall. It will not utilize an existing opening to connect the addition. 2. Additions should have little or no visibility from the primary street façade. The addition will be located at the rear of the structure from Washington Street. It will have little visibility from the street. 3. Additions should be compatible with the original building in scale, proportion, rhythm, and materials. The addition will match the existing; standing seam metal roof, gable bracket, small 24’ diameter round louvered gable vent, architectural shakes, gutter & downspout style and color, horizontal vinyl siding profile and color, brick veneer, and mortar. Page 3 of 5 4. Additions should be distinguishable from the historic building: they should be smaller and simpler in design. The addition will be smaller and distinguishable while still maintaining similarity. 5. Additions should not imitate earlier architectural styles, but should be contemporary in design. LOCATION OF ADDITION Page 4 of 5 Page 5 of 5 WEST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION (Standing on Washington St) 1ST ST E 3RD ST E MAIN ST MAPLE ST DOSTER ST S NORTHINGTON ST S WASHINGTON ST W MAIN ST TICHNOR ST S CHESTNUT ST COLLEGE ST P L E T C H E R S T SELMA HWY S COURT ST BRIDGE ST D O S T E R R D Location Map - 326 S. Washington Street ±0 1,000500 Feet Locations are approximate Legend Project Area Elmore_Parcels_Nov_2021 Autauga_Parcels_2021_Nov Prattville City Limit Streets S WASHINGTON ST Aerial Map - 326 S. Washington Street ±0 10050 Feet Locations are approximate Legend Project Area Elmore_Parcels_Nov_2021 Autauga_Parcels_2021_Nov Prattville City Limit Streets 1ST ST E 3RD ST E MAIN ST MAPLE ST DOSTER ST S NORTHINGTON ST S WASHINGTON ST W MAIN ST TICHNOR ST S CHESTNUT ST COLLEGE ST P L E T C H E R S T SELMA HWY S COURT ST BRIDGE ST D O S T E R R D B-2 R-2 R-2 R-3 B-2 O-1 R-6 O-1 R-4 R-3 R-1 B-2 Zoning Map - 326 S. Washington Street ±0 1,000500 Feet Locations are approximate Legend Project Area Elmore_Parcels_Nov_2021 Autauga_Parcels_2021_Nov Prattville City Limit Streets Page 1 of 5 Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 319 South Washington Street – CA2201-04 DATE January 27, 2022 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Petitioner: Lisa and James Sherrill Property Owner: Lisa and James Sherrill Agent: N/A Location: 319 South Washington Street Review Status and History Submission Status: CoA 1703-01 Item 1 – Demolition of an existing structure on the rear of building – approved as requested Item 2 – construction of new addition on the rear of building (14’x30’, 420 sq ft) with a covered porch – approved as presented. Item 3 – Modifications to front façade and north façade. Front – remove one of the existing front doors to replaces with window. Side – replace existing single window with double window (master bedroom), relocate single window – approved contingent to modify the kitchen and master bedroom window according to the codes that the building department and planning department deems appropriate. Page 2 of 5 No changes to the window on the front of the house on either side of the dining room and sitting room. (Front doors will not be removed). COA 2007-04 Item 1 – Replace porch on north side of house – Approved as requested Previous Approvals: Approvals above 1984/2007 Historic Properties Inventory Details 319 South Washington Street, Walker House (1921, contributing) This one-story frame bungalow has a broad front gable breaking into an offset secondary gable that extends over its brick-pier and post porch. Proposed Alteration, Renovation or Addition The following alterations have been requested by the applicant. 1. Install fence in side yards PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION: Reviewed by: Darrell Rigsby, Senior Planner Site Visits Conducted: January 2022 Recommendation: Approval Proposed project is in keeping with the Historic Preservation Guidelines for Residential buildings. Proposed project does not detract from the existing structure. Page 3 of 5 Evaluation: Since the subject property/structure was initially developed as a residence, the requested alterations were reviewed against the standards contained in the Prattville Residential Design Review Guidelines Manual. The relevant sections of manual are included. Staff comments/evaluations are summarized at the end of each section. The following changes are proposed: 1. Install fence in rear yard Fences and Walls (Residential Guidelines, page 46) Fences and walls have historically been used to define ownership or function and to separate public and private space. Historic fences and walls should be retained and maintained. New fences and walls should use design, materials, and placement that minimize their effect on the district’s historic character. 1. Historic fences and walls should be retained and maintained. 2. Wood and metal picket fences are appropriate new construction. If wooden, they should be painted using colors complementary to the adjacent house. They should be less than three feet tall, and the pickets should be set less than three inches apart and be less than four inches in width. 3. Cast iron fences are appropriate for 19th and early 20th century dwellings. These fences should be less than three feet tall. 4. Wood board fences may be located in back yards and should be less than six feet tall. Flat tops, dog-ear tops, or pointed tops are all appropriate designs. Fences should be painted to blend with the building. 5. Free-standing brick or concrete walls may be located in back yards or, if not visible from the street, side yards. 6. Chain-link fences may be located in back yards or, if not visible from the street, side yards. Chain-link fences should be painted dark green or black, coated with green or black plastic, or screened with plants. 7. Split or horizontal rail, railroad tie, or timber fences may be located in rear yards but should be avoided on the fronts of houses. Item 1 Recommendation: Approval Applicant is proposing to construct a fence on both sides of the residence, near the rear of the building with wooden privacy fencing and a wrought iron gate. Proposed fencing will connect to neighbor fences on each side. The additions of the proposed fence will fully enclose the rear yard. Proposed fencing is consistent with other homes in the area and consistent with the Historic Guidelines. Page 4 of 5 PICTURES Staff Picture Staff Picture Page 5 of 5 Staff Picture 1ST ST E MAIN ST E 3RD ST DOSTER ST MAPLE ST PRATT ST S NORTHINGTON ST S WASHINGTON ST S CHESTNUT ST MONCRIEF ST P L E T C H E R S T W 3RD ST COLLEGE ST W MAIN ST TICHNOR ST SELMA HWY D O S T E R R D OAK CREEK CIR Location Map - 319 S. Washington Street ±0 1,000500 Feet Locations are approximate Legend Project Area Elmore_Parcels_Nov_2021 Autauga_Parcels_2021_Nov Prattville City Limit Streets 327 319 S WASHINGTON ST Aerial Map - 319 S. Washington Street ±0 10050 Feet Locations are approximate Legend Project Area Elmore_Parcels_Nov_2021 Autauga_Parcels_2021_Nov Prattville City Limit Streets 1ST ST E MAIN ST E 3RD ST DOSTER ST MAPLE ST PRATT ST S NORTHINGTON ST S WASHINGTON ST S CHESTNUT ST MONCRIEF ST P L E T C H E R S T W 3RD ST COLLEGE ST W MAIN ST TICHNOR ST SELMA HWY D O S T E R R D OAK CREEK CIR R-3 B-2 R-2 R-2 M-1 R-3 B-2 B-2 B-2 O-1 R-6 O-1 O-1 Zoning Map - 319 S. Washington Street ±0 1,000500 Feet Locations are approximate Legend Project Area Elmore_Parcels_Nov_2021 Autauga_Parcels_2021_Nov Prattville City Limit Streets 102 West Main Street \ Prattville, AL 36067 \ 334. 595.05 00 \ prattvilleal.gov BILL GILLESPIE, JR. MAYOR J. SCOTT STEPHENS, AICP DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM TO: Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Scott Stephens DATE: January 21, 2022 RE: Historic District Street Sign Toppers The Engineering Department has money budgeted specifically for signage for the Historic District. Please see attached designs for discussion and consideration. City of Prattville Historic District 02/DH 24”X8”WHITE/BLACK --------3/4”-------- 01-05-21 PRATTVILLE CHERYL HARRIS 24.00" 6.00" 8.00" City of Prattville Historic District 24.00" 6.00" 8.00" 02/DH 24”X8”WHITE/BROWN --------3/4”-------- 01-05-21 PRATTVILLE CHERYL HARRIS City of Prattville Historic District City of Prattville Historic District