2.1-Community-ObjectivesPRATTVILLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
October 2009
PREPARED FOR: THE CITY OF PRATTVILLE
PREPARED BY: URBAN COLLAGE, INC. WITH: SAIN ASSOCIATES, MARKET + MAIN & CONTENTE CONSULTING, INC.
BOOK TWO : COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
City-wide Plans:
2.1 - Community Objectives
2.10 - Future Land Use Plan
2.19 - Transportation Plan
2.24 - Parks and Trail Network Plan
2.27 - Development Plan
2.34 - Community Facilities and Resource Plan
Planning Districts:
2.39 - Introduction
2.43 - District One - Cobbs Ford Road
2.45 - District Two - Old Farm Lane
2.49 - District Three - Silver Hills
2.53 - District Four - Prattmont
2.58 - District Five - Downtown East
2.63 - District Six - Highway 14 East
2.65 - District Seven - College Heights
2.69 - District Eight - McQueen Smith South
2.72 - District Nine - Dosterville
2.73 - District Ten - Washington Ferry
2.74 - District Eleven - Airport Area
2.75 - Additional Districts
BOOK 2: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PRATTVILLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
1
2
3
4
Inventory and
analysis
Implementation
Resource
Manual
Book Two: Comprehensive Plan
PRATTVILLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES
� � � � � � ����� � ������
����������������
P R O J E C T PRATTVILLE2.1
COMMUNITY OBJECTIVESS e c t i o n 2 . 1
Project Prattville is, at its core, a reflection
of the desires and aspirations of its authoring
community. No plan can be successful without
the support of the people who do business in the
city or those who call it home. Recognizing that
fact, Project Prattville has created a document
which represents a shared vision for the citizens
of Prattville, a guide map towards a future that
values and protects the distinct character of the
community, as well as one that intelligently and
proactively accommodates new neighbors and
new growth.
The Community Objectives in this section are
informed by a variety of sources: The professional
analysis of the consulting team; the existing and
anticipated conditions and associated constraints;
and, most importantly, the opinions and insights
of the public. Obtaining quality community input
was a running theme throughout Project Prattville,
and it worked along two axes: Input Groups and
Timeline. The Input Groups included:
Client Team. This small group provided direction
on the actual process and oversight of the
project.
Advisory Group. A core of approximately 20
individuals who represented a wide array of
interests within the broader community, and
who met reguarly to provide targeted input and
advice.
Stakeholders. A cross-section of over 30 local
citizens who, in one-on-one interviews with the
consulting team, offered detailed information
regarding the varying social and economic
conditions within the City.
General Public. Engaged through scheduled
workshops as well as on-line formats, Project
Prattville sought to hear as many voices and
opinions as possible.
A society grows great when men plant trees in whose shade
they know they shall never sit... Greek Proverb
� � � � � � ����� � ������
����������������
P R O J E C T PRATTVILLE2.2
COMMUNITY OBJECTIVESS e c t i o n 2 . 1
The Timeline presented regular meetings throughout
the process, including bi-monthly Client Team
and Advisory Group meetings, and four key Public
Workshops. These provided opportunities to share
information gathered and compiled by the consultants,
and offer a forum for the public to provide comments
and suggestions.
Among all the portals used to garner community input,
two of the most influential were the Prattville Compass
(conducted during the second public meeting, and on-
line) and the Design Workshop (which made up the bulk
of the third meeting). These two efforts captured a
range of information - from general feelings about the
quality of life in Prattville to specific notions of where
development types should occur – which formed the
basis for the final plan.
Community Input Process
The Prattville Compass was an interactive tool which
used a combination of graphic images and targeted
questions to help citizens give shape to their ideas for
the future of the City. The Compass was conducted at
the second workshop, and simultaneously posted on-
line for those who could not attend. The survey was
kept active for a full month, which allowed for a larger
sample of responses and therefore a good deal of input
for analysis.
In sifting through all of the replies, a picture of the
future began to take shape. Overall, the community is
very happy with the quality of life in Prattville – They
are proud of the schools, the neighborhoods and the
amenities. However, there is also an undercurrent of
concern that impending growth might affect the City
negatively.
Preferred images, clockwise from top left: Historic Prattville Home; High-End Retail; Multi-Use Trail; Wide Sidewalks
� � � � � � ����� � ������
����������������
P R O J E C T PRATTVILLE2.3
COMMUNITY OBJECTIVESS e c t i o n 2 . 1
Responding to some of the questions, residents
identified a number of priorities, all of which were
geared towards ameliorating the impact of (but not
discouraging) new development in Prattville. Adding
parks and open space, working with school growth and
maintaining Prattville’s identity – these were all very
high on the list of issues to be addressed. Similarly,
when shown images of higher densities typically
associated with contemporary redevelopment, the
respondents consistently marked them down. The
exceptions included retail centers similar to the
new development on Cobbs Ford Rd., and mixed-use
examples, which scored noticeably better than their
single-use counterparts.
In the end, the Compass showed that residents
still view their city as primarily a residential one
– specifically single-family residential – but that they
also desire access to goods, services and activities that
they currently have to leave town to get. There is also
the sense that the new retail development has met the
demand, but that other services (primarily health care)
are still in short supply. Finally, quality of life issues
often came back to the provision and maintenance of
greenspace and trails. Almost universally, the people
of Prattville are looking for more and better parks, and
a system of paths and trails to connect them. (A more
complete review of the Compass Results is provided in
Section IV – Resource Manual)
The Design Workshop, the focus of the third public
workshop, took much of the broader input from the
Compass, and used it to craft more targeted questions
for the attendees. In the Workshop, the participants
were asked to address four different categories of
issues: Locating specific new land uses within the city;
examining pressing transportation concerns; planning
land use in key areas of the city; and a ‘pot pourri’ of
quality-of-life questions.The aim of an argument or discussion should not be victory, but progress... Joseph Joubert
� � � � � � ����� � ������
����������������
P R O J E C T PRATTVILLE2.4
COMMUNITY OBJECTIVESS e c t i o n 2 . 1
The responses to the first category varied, obviously,
based on the specific land use type. Residents were
asked to find a place (or places) for each of the
following: Light industrial use; a regional recreation
center; professional office development; apartment
complexes; senior housing/active living; and, a
Westside neighborhood node. These uses had been
identified based on market projections and planning
metrics (see Section I - Inventory & Assessment) as
types that were currently lacking, or would be needed
in the future. Though the reactions to each were quite
different, a trend was clear. Most new development
was seen as occurring closer to I-65, and either to
the north or south of the main thoroughfare. All
of these uses, being significantly more intense than
single-family residential, were seen as appropriate for
areas around interchanges, and for the larger, as yet
undeveloped parcels to the south along 82, and to the
north beyond Highway 14 East. Old Farm Lane was
seen as a target for almost all of the uses, and many
were also envisioned as potential redevelopment
along South Memorial. This was by no means universal
(active living was seen as a good idea for the Historic
Downtown, and the Westside node clearly had to serve
the Westside), but was illustrative of where the vision
for growth was most often directed.
The transportation category focused on three key
issues: The creation of a trail network connecting
within and beyond the city; the location and
alignment of an ‘east/west connector’ between the
Highway 14 East interchange and US 31 North; and the
feasibility/location of a park-and-ride lot or shuttle
service. Input on the first of these was consistent with
previous comments – create a system that connects
the neighborhoods and popular destinations like parks,
schools and shopping. While the support was strongly
affirmed, the workshop also helped locate some of
the potential routes and desired connections. The
east/west connector was discussed, and the need for Workshop images, clockwise from top left: Light Industrial; Future Intersection; Creekwalk; Potential Trail Typology
� � � � � � ����� � ������
����������������
P R O J E C T PRATTVILLE2.5
COMMUNITY OBJECTIVESS e c t i o n 2 . 1
it was clearly noted by all. Some issues of alignment,
with regard to the intersection at Powell, were raised,
but the focus was on getting it implemented and
the actual layout (location and width of sidewalks,
travel and turn lanes, etc.). Finally, the park-and-
ride discussion suggested that there might indeed be
opportunities for limited transit within Prattville, or
between Prattville and Montgomery. This might be
in the form of a military shuttle between a point in
Prattville and the base downtown; a shuttle between
the commercial area around the interchange and
Historic Downtown Prattville; or a dedicated park-
and-ride lot for Montgomery commuters.
The future land use exercises identified three areas
that needed more attention from the community:
Old Farm Lane; the intersection of McQueen Smith
and East Main Street; and, Prattmont. Old Farm Lane
was selected due to its prime location and likelihood
for redevelopment. A multi-phase widening and
improvement effort is already scheduled for the
entirety of Old Farm Lane, improving the connection
between the two southernmost Prattville interchanges.
Pair the ease of interstate access with the location
between two developing commercial nodes, and there
is likely to be a high amount of growth pressure along
the route. Informed by the market analysis, this area
could support almost any use, excepting additional
retail.
The Silver Hills area was included in the Workshop
primarily because it has a fair amount of aging strip
centers and fast food outparcels, but also because it is
still a somewhat healthy area, economically speaking.
Most comments tended towards some level of targeted
redevelopment, potentially office and/or multi-family,
combined with beautification efforts. Not surprisingly,
similar suggestions were made for the Prattmont
area, especially the stretch of US 31 South. The
preponderance of very old (and low occupancy) strip Target areas, clockwise from top left: Downtown; Old Farm Lane (Highpoint Town Center); Silver Hills; Prattmont
� � � � � � ����� � ������
����������������
P R O J E C T PRATTVILLE2.6
COMMUNITY OBJECTIVESS e c t i o n 2 . 1
centers makes Prattmont a logical target for
redevelopment, but the amount of existing
retail (including much that is newer and
better-maintained) means that alternative
uses would likely need to be examined.
The last category looked at a few strategic
issues facing the City: How to attract folks
to Downtown Prattville; and, how to improve
the traffic around the schools. As part of the
market assessment, the Historic Downtown
was identified as an amenity unique to the
MSA, something that could, if done properly,
be leveraged into a major tourist attraction.
Ideas were solicited with regard achieving
this - they ranged from improved lighting
and new fountains to breaking up the dam
and running a shuttle from the Bass Pro Shop
– and the central notion that evolved was
that what the Downtown needs most is a
dedicated advocate. Whether this would be
through the formation of a DDA or as part
of a city/county position, it would require
full time staff to shepherd and advance
the priorities for Downtown. The schools
question was initially posited as a way to
improve bus service to the extent that
automotive traffic might be reduced. Upon
discussion, however, most folks felt like
better transportation management around
the schools would accomplish much more,
and do so more cost-efficiently. (A more
complete review of the Design Workshop is
provided in Book Four – Resource Manual)
As one final exercise from the workshop,
participants were asked to write a headline
for the local paper, the Prattville Progress…
the caveat being that it was to be for the
2030 edition. Each table was tasked with
providing one headline, though most tables
could hardly restrict themselves. The
headlines below are just a few highlights of
the responses, and they provide a very good
notion of the vision that residents have for
their city...
Prattville’s Trail System is Most Eco-Friendly in Nation
Shuttle from East Prattville to Downtown has its One Millionth Rider
Marathon Marks 20th Anniversary of Green Trail
Branson, MO Stars Relocate to New Prattville Ginn Theatre Complex
ABDXY2 Announces Plans to Open Prattville Plant, Employ 2,000
Prattville’s 2010 City Growth Initiative Proves Vital in 2030
� � � � � � ����� � ������
����������������
P R O J E C T PRATTVILLE2.7
COMMUNITY OBJECTIVESS e c t i o n 2 . 1
Based on all of the preceding information – the existing
conditions in and around Prattville; predictions for
future growth and development; and public vision
– Project Prattville seeks to create a comprehensive
plan for the future, one that supports and advances
the following Community Objectives.
The objectives are divided into five categories: Land
Use, Economic Development, Housing, Transportation
& Circulation, and Community Facilities. Within each
category are a number of statements that reflect both
the recommendations of the City staff and consulting
team, as well as the vision of the people of Prattville.
These objectives are designed to provide an overarching
set of guidelines for implementing this plan, and
for making future decisions and modifications. For
example, they can be used by planning officials for
evaluating future projects; they can be used as a guide
to creating local budgets and setting funding priorities;
and they can be used by developers to indicate what
sort of projects would be most acceptable to the
community at large. Among these potential uses and
many others, the Community Objectives represent
the principals by which all future growth and planning
efforts should be judged...
A good listener helps us overhear
ourselves.. Yahia Lababidi
� � � � � � ����� � ������
����������������
P R O J E C T PRATTVILLE2.8
COMMUNITY OBJECTIVESS e c t i o n 2 . 1
Land Use
• All residential neighborhoods should have
walkable access to parks and open space
• Large-scale commercial development
should cluster along major corridors and
intersections
• Support small-scale commercial nodes near
or within the neighborhoods they serve
• Support a variety of office growth types,
where appropriate
• Heavy industrial uses should be focused
along the southern Hwy. 82 corridor
• Preserve and protect existing single-family
neighborhoods from incursion by higher
density uses
• Encourage sustainable development in the
form of well-designed, well-constructed
and well-connected neighborhoods and
commercial nodes
• Infill development should be sensitive
in use, scale and style to its immediate
context, and should maximize the use of
existing infrastructure and resources
• Preserve and enhance the existing Historic
Downtown as a focal point for the City
Economic Development
• Expand employment opportunities for
residents
• Attract industries that employ a skilled
labor force
• Attract high-quality and community-
oriented businesses and industries
• Provide a stable and active business
environment
• Preserve the character and identity
of Prattville, and use it to inform new
development
• Create targeted studies to plan for
impending and predicted growth
Housing
• Provide a variety of housing options to
meet the needs of current and potential
residents
• Maintain a housing market that provides
product to a wide range of income levels
• Mandate quality design and construction
Transportation & Circulation
• Create an interconnected system of parks
and trails, using on- and off-street paths
that are safe and well-marked
• Plan and grow an interconnected, multi-
modal transportation network to preserve
and improve existing connectivity, and to
accommodate new development before it
happens
• Study a wide range of transit options, and
implement as feasible
Community Facilities
• Provide high-quality recreational facilities
• Provide high-quality public safety services
• Plan for and implement growth-supportive
infrastructure
• Create opportunities for cultural events and
programs
• Maintain a cooperative and transparent
environment between the City and its
citizens
• Actively seek and set aside land for additional
greenspace, especially in those areas that
have been identified as underserved
• Minimize the incursion and impact of new
development on existing greenspaces and
conservation areas
• Work in concert with the local schools
to maintain the high quality academic
resources in Prattville
These Objectives, much like the plan itself, are
both an end and a beginning. They mark the
culmination of identifying a shared vision for the
future of Prattville. A the same time, they also
form the basis for all that guides the efforts in
the subsequent portions of this plan, and in its
adoption and implementation as well.