Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2404 April 25 HPC Pkt (Draft)
102 West Main Street \ Prattville, AL 36067 \ 334. 595.0500 \ prattvilleal.gov BILL GILLESPIE, JR. MAYOR J. SCOTT STEPHENS, AICPDIRECTOR CITY OF PRATTVILLE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA April 25, 2024 4:30 p.m. Call to Order: Roll Call: Chairman Miller, Vice-Chairman Stewart, Mrs. Davis, Mr. Ferguson, Ms. Fritz, Mr. McKay, and Ms. Rollins. Minutes: February 22, 2024 Committee Reports: Old Business: None New Business: 1.COA2404-01 Certificate of Appropriateness Alterations & Rehabilitation 235 Wetumpka Street Phillip McKee, Petitioner Public Hearing 2.COA2404-02 Certificate of Appropriateness Alterations & Rehabilitation, Fence 248 1st Street Sandra Young, Petitioner Public Hearing 3.COA2404-03 Certificate of AppropriatenessNew Construction 102-124 W Main StreetCity of Prattville, Petitioner Public Hearing Miscellaneous: Expedited Approvals: Adjourn: DR A F T Draft Prattville Historic Preservation Commission February 22, 2024 Minutes Page 1 of 2 CITY OF PRATTVILLE 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 2 MINUTES 3 February 22, 2024 4 5 6 Call to order: 7 The Chairman called the regular meeting of the Prattville Historic Preservation Commission to order on Thursday, 8 February 22, 2024, at 4:30 p.m. 9 10 Roll Call: 11 The secretary called the roll. Chairman Tom Miller, Mr. Scott Ferguson, Mrs. Precious Fritz, Ms. Kristi Rollins, and 12 Mr. Chris McKay were present. Vice-Chair Taylor Pruett and Mrs. Jean Davis were absent. Chairman Miller 13 acknowledged and welcomed the newest member to the Commission, Mr. McKay. 14 15 Quorum present 16 17 Also present were Mr. Scott Stephens, City Planner; Mr. Joshua McKinney, Planner; Ms. Bria Hudson, Planner; and 18 Ms. Alisa Morgan, Secretary. 19 20 Minutes: 21 Mr. McKay moved to approve the minutes of the January 25, 2024 regular meeting. Ms. Rollins seconded the 22 motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously. 23 24 Committee Reports: 25 The staff provided draft resolutions at the Commission’s request as additional guides to review cases. The 26 Commission discussed holding a work session to further review the draft resolutions. 27 28 Old Business: 29 There was no old business to discuss. 30 31 New Business: 32 Certificate of Appropriateness 33 Alterations & Rehabilitation 34 109 S Court Street 35 Hill & Newton, Petitioners 36 37 Ms. Hudson provided the staff report for the Certificate of Appropriateness for alterations on property located at 109 38 S Court Street. The property is currently being used as commercial. She stated that the petitioners are requesting to 39 add white ½ round gutters and downspouts on the eaves of the structure. The Guidelines provided no guidance on 40 gutters or downspouts. She stated that the petitioners are requesting additional repairs that would fall under 41 expedited review. 42 43 Howard Hill, petitioner, presented the request for the Certificate of Appropriateness to make alterations on property 44 located at 109 S Court Street. He explained the reasons for the gutters is to reduce splash back from the water 45 coming from roof, damaging the wood on the house. He stated that they would possibly install the same on the 46 opposite side (Hunts Alley) in the future. 47 48 Chairman Miller opened the floor for public comments. There were none. the public hearing was closed. 49 50 Mrs. Fritz moved to approve the gutters and downspouts and to add gutter and downspout on the side (Hunts Alley) 51 as requested. Ms. Rollins seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously. 52 53 54 55 DR A F T Draft Prattville Historic Preservation Commission February 22, 2024 Minutes Page 2 of 2 Miscellaneous: 56 57 Expedited Review-none. 58 59 Chairman Miller allowed Matt Holtzscher, Chairman of the Historic Prattville Redevelopment Authority, to address 60 the Commission about upcoming rehabilitation project to the Picker House in the historic district. He introduced 61 Darin Phillips who will be undertaking the project. They asked for guidance and advice from the Commission. 62 63 Chairman Miller thanked them and encouraged them to follow the Historic District’s Guidelines and to work with 64 city staff during this process. 65 66 Adjourn: 67 With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 4:50 p.m. 68 69 Respectfully submitted, 70 71 72 Alisa Morgan, Secretary 73 Historic Preservation Commission 74 DR A F T Page 1 of 4 Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 235 Wetumpka Street– COA2404-01 DATE April 25, 2024 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Petitioner: Phillip McKee Property Owner: Phillip McKee Location: 235 Wetumpka Street Review Status and History Previous Approvals: N/A 1984/2007/2023 Historic Properties Inventory Details 1984: “c. 1905; one story, frame, combination hip and gable roof with projecting polygonal bay at E side; original porch replaced c. 1920 by present brick-pier porch with terrace extension. Built as Baptist pastorium.” 2007: c. 1905, contributing. “Built as a Baptist parsonage, this frame building is one-story in height and possesses a combination hip-and-gable roof. A polygonal bay projects from the east side, and the present circa 1920 brick pier porch replaced the original.” 2023: c. 1905, contributing. Originally built as a Baptist parsonage, this one story frame building has a combination hip-and-gable roof and a projecting polygonal bay on the east side. It also possesses a vented dormer over the center of the façade. C. 1920 a brick pier porch was added and is now screened DR A F T Page 2 of 4 Proposed Alteration, Renovation or Addition The following alterations have been requested by the applicant. 1. Roof and chimney removal PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION: Reviewed by: Bria Hudson, Planner Site Visits Conducted: April 2024 Evaluation: 1. Roof and chimney removal Historic District Design Guidelines referenced: ALTERATIONS AND REHABILITATION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES Alterations and rehabilitation of existing buildings in the Prattville Historic District shall follow the best practices as established by the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation of Historic Structures (found within the appendix). The overall goal of alterations to historic structures within the district is to enhance or preserve the integrity and character of the district. Alterations detracting from the integrity and character of the district are grounds for denial of a COA. Staff Comments/Evaluation: The petitioner proposes to reroof the house and install grey/black architectural shingles to replace all rotten and unstable materials. As a part of this re-roofing project, the petitioner also proposes to remove the brick chimney on the east side of the house. The reshingling request would fall under expedited review, but is listed below so the HPC is aware. DR A F T Page 3 of 4 Roof (Page 4) 1. The shape of a building’s roof is a defining characteristic of many historic buildings and shall be maintained and retained. Alterations and renovations shall not change the shape of a building’s roof. 2. Alterations or additions to roofs shall be compatible with the form of the original roof. New additions shall be secondary to and not overshadow the defining features of a roof. 3. Roof features such as chimneys, cornices, parapets, brackets, fascia boards, and other defining features shall be retained and maintained. Do not remove defining roof features when altering a building’s roof. 4. Additions such as chimneys, cornices, parapets, brackets, fascia boards, and other historical features shall not be added to a structure if they were not historically present. When being added to a structure, they should be of a simpler form as to not create a false sense of history. The public should be able to differentiate between the old and new. 5. Additions such as skylights, decks, balconies, and dormers are generally not appropriate if they were not historically found on the structure. They may be added on a case-by-case basis to the rear of a structure where they are not visible from the right of way and when they do not detract from the integrity of a building or damage historical features. 6. In the case of damage or deterioration of historic roofing, in-kind replacement of existing materials is encouraged before wholesale removal and replacement. 7. When wholesale removal and replacement of roof materials is required, the new materials shall be of a scale, color, and texture that is compatible with what is found nearby in the historic district in order to create a sense of cohesiveness. a. Wood, slate, and composition shingles mimicking the appearance of historic shingles are generally appropriate. b. Metal roofs, such as standing seam metal roofs are generally appropriate for replacing historic metal roofs. Recommendation: Disapprove – Based on Alterations and Rehabilitatioms of Exsiting Structures (Roof #3) on page 27, roof features such as chimneys should not be removed. DR A F T Page 4 of 4 View from Wetumpka Street: DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T Page 1 of 16 Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 2404-02: 248 1st Street MEETING DATE April 25, 2024 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Petitioner: Sandra Young Property Owner: Sandra Young Location: 248 1st Street Review Status and History Previous Approvals: N/A Historic Properties Inventory/Survey Details 248 East First Street . a) 1984: contributing. “c. 1900; one-story, frame (shiplap siding), gable roof, asymmetrical facade with advanced west bay abutted by porch.” b) 2007: c. 1900, contributing. “This one-story gable-roofed frame house with shiplap siding has an asymmetrical façade with a projecting west bay abutting its porch.” c) 2023: No entry DR A F T Page 2 of 16 Proposed Alteration, Renovation, or Addition The following alterations have been requested by the applicant: 1. Add 4ft white painted fence w/black painted steel gate 2. Replace front exterior door and storm door addition 3. Replace windows 4. Screen front porch/add handrail and enclose rear porch. 5. Replace Sidewalk 6. Painting brick steps and brick foundation (currently unpainted) STAFF EVALUATION: Reviewed by: Joshua McKinney, Planner Evaluation: Applicant has become familiar with the Historic Preservation Guidelines. Applicant has researched and taken steps to ensure that the architectural features and elements of the home be retained, maintained, repaired, and replaced. See below for individual evaluations. Attached are renderings of possible replacements to the windows, front and back porch doors, sidewalk, and fence. 1. Installation of 4ft white painted fence w/black painted steel gate (expedited and approved) Fences (pg 25) 1. Historic fences and walls shall be retained and maintained. 2. For new fences, wood and metal fencing is most appropriate for the district. 3. New fences shall not obscure or damage any defining landscaping or streetscaping elements such as historic sidewalks, lighting, and other elements that add to the character of the block. 4. Avoid erecting solid fences in the front yard or where there is street frontage. Choose instead wood or metal lattice fences, picket fences, spindle fences, and other fence types that provide some transparency. 5. All front yard and street frontage fences shall be 4 feet or less and shall not obscure historic elements of the property. 6. Privacy fences may be located in the side or rear of a lot, though they shall be setback from the front facade of the building to reduce their visual prominence. In the case of corner lots, they shall be setback from both building faces where there is street frontage. 7. Fences in the side and rear of a property may be constructed of alternative materials as long as they are not highly visible from the right of way and do not detract from the character of the district. 8. Rock and brick landscape retaining walls are generally appropriate for the district, though they shall be low in height and not obscure historic elements of the property. Recommendation: Approve. Installation of 4ft white painted fence w/black painted steel gate qualified for expedited review and was approved by the Planning Department. DR A F T Page 3 of 16 Example of fence Fence will have a steel gate DR A F T Page 4 of 16 DR A F T Page 5 of 16 2. Replace front exterior door and storm door addition Entrances and Doors (p33) 1. Historic doors and entryways shall be retained and maintained. 2. Features such as transoms, sidelights, and molding are defining features of entrances and shall be retained and maintained. 3. Replacement doors and entryway features shall replicate the original features as much as possible in appearance and design. 4. Openings and entrances that were not historically present shall not be added to existing structures. 5. An entrance or doorway may be added to an existing historic structure if there is evidence of an entrance or doorway existing there historically. a. When an entrance or doorway is to be added, it shall be of a compatible material and design to the structure’s historic architectural style. If the structure has no distinctive style, then a style compatible with the district’s character shall be used. b. New exterior entries to tertiary building faces or to non-historic structures may be appropriate and shall be considered on a case-by-case basis. 6. Wood is the most appropriate material for replacement doors. a. Materials such as aluminum and metal shall not be permitted unless there is evidence of the material historically being used on the structure. b. Other materials may be considered on a case-by-case basis if the entry door is not visible from the right of way and if it does not detract from the integrity of the historic structure. 7. Screen and storm doors shall be compatible with the style of the structure, have a wood frame, and not block visibility of historic doors and entryways. 8. Security doors shall not be added to primary and secondary building faces. Recommendation: Existing front doors should be retained, maintained, or repaired before attempting to replace. If existing door cannot be retained, the replacement of the door should be of a compatible style, configuration, or material of previous doors (i.e. wooden with windows). Proposed storm door should not obscure visibility. Current Door Front Door DR A F T Page 6 of 16 Proposed front storm door Proposed Doors Front Door DR A F T Page 7 of 16 Rear Porch Door DR A F T Page 8 of 16 Proposed Rear Porch Door DR A F T Page 9 of 16 3. Replace windows Windows (pg 30) 1. Historic windows and their frames shall be retained and maintained. 2. Damaged or deteriorated windows shall be repaired before they are replaced. 3. Historic window openings shall remain visible and shall not be obscured from view through paint, wood, or other materials and methods which may alter their transparency or appearance. 4. Stained glass and other decorative window elements shall be retained and maintained. Do not introduce these decorative window elements where there is no historical basis for them. 5. New and replacement windows shall be of a compatible style, configuration, and material of the historic windows found on the structure. a. Contemporary materials such as vinyl and other high gloss materials are generally discouraged. b. Reflective glass windows are generally discouraged. c. When replacement windows of the same original material cannot be found, the replacement window shall be of a compatible size, type, configuration, material, appearance and form as the original windows. d. Replacement windows shall match the appearance of the original window to the greatest extent possible. If the structure has no distinctive style, then window configuration and style shall be of a simple, compatible style with surrounding structures. e. Replacement windows shall make use of the existing window frame, it shall not be appropriate to remove the historic framing of window openings. f. For replacement windows on tertiary building faces that are not easily visible from the right of way, materials such as vinyl and reflective glass may be considered on a case-by-case basis. 6. The addition of window openings to tertiary faces may be considered on a case-by-case basis if they do not damage or detract from the integrity of the structure. Recommendation: Existing windows should be retained, maintained, or repaired before attempting to replace. If existing windows cannot be retained, then replacement of the windows should be of a compatible style, configuration, or material of previous doors. Consider making efforts to maintain existing windows on front façade first, prior to replacement. DR A F T Page 10 of 16 Current Windows DR A F T Page 11 of 16 Proposed Windows DR A F T Page 12 of 16 4. Screen front porch/add handrail and enclose rear porch. Porches (pg 28) 1. Porches are often a defining feature of many historic structures and shall be maintained and retained. 2. Architectural elements of porches shall be maintained and retained. 3. In the case of damage or deterioration of historic porch elements, in-kind replacement of existing elements shall be taken before wholesale removal and replacement. Replacement materials shall be compatible with the existing porch. 4. Alterations to porches shall not be appropriate when the alterations obscure or destroy defining features of the main structure. a. The enclosing of porches visible from the right of way is prohibited. b. Porches may be screened if the alteration makes use of minimal structure changes and maintains an open appearance. c. On a case-by-case basis, rear porches may be enclosed if they are not easily visible from the right of way, and if they do not detract from the integrity of the historic structure or damage historic materials. 5. New porches shall be oriented to be compatible with other porches along the block; in most instances porches will be oriented towards the street. 6. Porch shape, size, scale, form, and design shall be compatible with what was historically found within the structure’s architectural style. If the structure has no distinctive style, then a style compatible with the district’s character shall be used. 7. New and replacement porches shall be constructed of materials compatible with the building to which they are attached Recommendation: Approve. The screening of the front porch and adding handrail is appropriate if the alteration makes use of minimal structure changes and maintains an open appearance. The rear porch is not visible from the right of way and will not detract from the integrity of the historic structure or damage historic materials. Front Porch/wanting to add hand rail & screening DR A F T Page 13 of 16 5. Replace sidewalk Driveways and Sidewalks (pg21) 1. Historic driveways and sidewalks shall be retained and maintained. 2. New driveways shall not damage or destroy important landscaping features and shall be oriented to be compatible with the overall streetscape of the block. 3. New driveways shall be of a similar size and scale to what is found nearby within the historic district. 4. New driveways shall make use of existing curbcuts when possible. Avoid new curbcuts unless they are necessary for driveway access. New curbcuts shall match historic curbcuts along the street in size, profile, and configuration. 5. Driveways shall be located to the side of the main structure when possible. Unique or unusually shaped lots may warrant a driveway in a different location, though the applicant shall make a best faith effort to incorporate a driveway that is compatible with the streetscape. 6. Driveways shall be constructed of materials typically found within the historic district such as gravel, concrete ribbons, pavers, dirt, and concrete. 7. Larger driveways may be appropriate if they are located in the rear of the lot. 8. Materials such as blacktop and asphalt were not historically found within the residential part of the historic district and are prohibited. 9. New sidewalks and walkways shall follow historical trends set by the historic district. Many residential buildings have narrow concrete walkways leading from the sidewalk to the building entrance; construction of new walkways shall follow this historical precedent. Recommendation: Approve. The front yard sidewalk, leading to the front porch, is damaged. A concrete path or brick path would be an acceptable replacement. Note that in the Commercial Guidelines, sidewalk recommendations include “Brick pavers, stone walkways, and landscaping elements are encouraged if they do not disrupt access and are compatible with the character of the district” (page 43). DR A F T Page 14 of 16 Current Sidewalk Proposed Sidewalk Brick Path DR A F T Page 15 of 16 6. Paint front steps and brick foundation (currently unpainted) Painting (pg 32) 1. Painting of existing painted surfaces is an important facet of maintaining the integrity of the material and is encouraged. 2. Historically unpainted features and surfaces should remain unpainted. 3. In the case where a surface is mismatched or damaged, paint may be used to conceal the defect or maintain the surface. Recommendation: Disapprove. Historically unpainted features and surfaces should remain unpainted. If the surface is mismatched or damaged, paint could be used to conceal the defect or maintain the surface. DR A F T Page 16 of 16 DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T Page 1 of 5 Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Between 102-124 W Main Street – COA2404-03 DATE April 25, 2025 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Petitioner: City of Prattville Property Owner: City of Prattville Location: Between 102-124 W Main St. (between bank and City Hall annex) Review Status and History Previous Approvals: August 29, 2023 – HPC approved the concept design approved as submitted contingent upon further design review and approval 1984/2007 Historic Properties Inventory Details N/A Proposed Alteration, Renovation or Addition The following alterations have been requested by the applicant. 1. Create a venue with an outdoor green space, covered pavilion, stage, drive, and parking. PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION: DR A F T Page 2 of 5 Reviewed by: Scott Stephens, City Planner Site Visits Conducted: August 2023 Evaluation: 1. Create a venue with an outdoor green space, covered pavilion, stage, drive, and parking. Design Guidelines section referenced: New Construction (Commercial) (pp57-59): The construction of new buildings downtown is an important facet of maintaining the integrity of the Prattville Historic District. New construction should match the surrounding context, respecting the established pattern of historic buildings. New buildings should be compatible with surrounding historic structures, though they should not be so similar that they create a false sense of history or try to directly emulate historic styles. New Construction Design 1. The overall design of new commercial buildings shall be compatible with the architectural styles of nearby historic structures, though simpler. Avoid new construction that copies or creates a false sense of history. 2. New construction shall draw inspiration from historic architectural forms adjacent to the new building. Many historic commercial buildings in the Prattville Historic District are defined the two-block commercial form where there is a clear differentiation between the pedestrian oriented first floor, the second or upper stories, and the building cap. 3. Avoid architectural designs with no basis in the historic district. For instance, the Mission style has no precedent within the historic district and shall be avoided. 4. New buildings shall be oriented towards the street and areas of pedestrian activity. Corner lots may have a building orientation towards either street along which it has frontage. 5. Parking for new buildings shall be located in the rear of the lot. Alternative locations such as the side may be considered on a case-by-case basis when the circumstances of the lot do not allow for a rear parking lot. 6. New buildings shall follow the established setbacks of other commercial buildings along the block. 7. New construction shall maintain the human scale of buildings historically found in downtown Prattville. Avoid new construction that detracts from or disrupts the human scale of the historic district. 8. New construction shall incorporate a variety of roof heights. Flat roofs are the most common roof form in the historic district, though adjacent buildings often feature differing heights to differentiate each building from its neighbor. Size, Scale, Rhythm, and Massing DR A F T Page 3 of 5 1. New construction shall reflect the scale and rhythm of other historic commercial structures along the block by incorporating the following elements: a. Similar floor-to-floor heights. b. Similar foundation heights. c. Similar window locations and window proportions. d. Similar façade and entry elements such as storefronts. e. Similar roof forms. 2. Avoid new construction that creates large, voided, and blank areas or is monolithic or monumental in appearance. 3. With multi-story new construction that is significantly taller than adjacent buildings, setback the top floors from the main façade so the building does overwhelm nearby structures. Architectural Features and Elements 1. Roof forms, heights, and slope for new construction should be similar to other commercial buildings in the district. In Prattville, the flat roof form is the most common, though gable roofs are also found. New construction should use nearby buildings for reference. 2. Windows, doors, and other openings shall be compatible in size, spacing, pattern, configuration, and material construction with nearby structures in the historic district. Do not choose window and door configurations and styles with no historical basis in the district. 3. Storefronts and entries shall be compatible with surrounding commercial buildings and shall be of a compatible style with the new construction. 4. New construction shall incorporate traditional building elements such as open storefronts, cornices, and recessed entries. Materials 1. New construction shall make use of similar exterior materials to what is typically found on other commercial buildings in the district. Brick, masonry, and stone are the most common materials. 2. Use wood, engineered wood, and composition board sparingly. These shall not be the primary exterior material for new construction. 3. Metal may be appropriate for storefronts, entrances, and windows but otherwise use it sparingly. 4. Do not use vinyl for exterior materials. Signage (Commercial) (pp59-60) Historic commercial buildings typically included multiple sign types for a single business including signs located above the storefront on the façade, projecting wall signs, and window signs. Multi-story structures also commonly had signs painted onto the exterior of the building towards the cap. Today, these are often “ghost” signs, which have gained historical significance as they have faded over time. DR A F T Page 4 of 5 New signs should not be painted directly onto the exterior of historic buildings, but ghost signs should be preserved and repaired if needed. Historic Commercial Buildings 1. Historic signs shall be retained and maintained. 2. Historic “ghost” signs on the exterior cladding of commercial structures shall be retained and maintained. Ghost signs can be repainted to their original appearance, though adding new painted signs onto the sides of unpainted historic structures shall be prohibited. 3. Construct new signs with materials that mirror the appearance of historic sign materials such as wood, copper, or bronze. Vinyl signs are prohibited. 4. New signs shall be installed in locations historically used for signs such as awnings, above storefronts in the façade, storefront windows, and projecting wall signs on the façade. New signs shall not damage or obscure any architectural features of the main structure. 5. Signs anchored onto the building shall make use of existing fixtures; when new fixtures need to be added, mount them into mortar and other parts of the exterior so the sign does not damage or destroy the exterior of the main structure. 6. New signs shall be proportioned appropriately to their storefront. 7. Where ample ambient lighting is present, external signage shall not introduce new lighting fixtures. 8. Signs with lighting shall be externally lit, concealed, and shielded to avoid “spilling” over to adjacent storefronts, lots, and into pedestrian pathways. 9. Neon signage can be used when it is compatible with the architectural style of the existing structure. For example, neon lighting was utilized on modern movement commercial structures from about 1920 to 1960. 10. Any lighting equipment such as breaker boxes, wires, and outlets shall be obscured from view or concealed. Non-Historic Commercial Buildings 1. For non-historic commercial buildings, the general guidelines established for historic commercial buildings above shall be followed by the applicant. 2. Signage on non-historic commercial buildings shall be compatible with historic commercial signage within the historic district. 3. For commercial buildings with non-historic siding, brackets and other sign fixtures can be installed directly onto the non-historic siding. Staff Evaluation: This petition includes complete details on design and materials as requesting during the first review and conceptual approval (see August 29, 2023, HPC meeting). The Design Guidelines didn’t anticipate an outdoor venue like this, but the HPC may use the guidelines when applicable, and use nearby historic features for inspiration (e.g. the cupola, black DR A F T Page 5 of 5 metal circular steel elements), and keeping in mind size, scale, rhythm, and massing, this proposal may be evaluated. Attached to the petitioner’s application are detailed plans, elevations, and material spec sheets. Note also that signage details are included in the petition for review and approval. Exterior materials will include brick veneer, realistic woodgrain metal panels, and painted metal structural elements. Staff Recommendation: Approve DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T P R A T T V I L L E~~ H C R ERE TA E T O ERS I SG T A F AL B A M TA EC T I D A 23.307 03.25.2024 SHEET TITLE : MCKEE JOB # : DRAWN BY : DATE: SHEET NO. : M c K E E a n d A S S O C I A T E S A R C H I T E C T S , I N C . 63 1 S O U T H H U L L S T R E E T M O N T G O M E R Y , A L A B A M A 3 6 1 0 4 ( 3 3 4 ) 8 3 4 - 9 9 3 3 RBD REVISED DATE: REVISED DATE: REVISED DATE: No . 1 0 8 2 WA L T E R T . M c K E E , J R . MO N T G O M E R Y , A L A . - T h u r s d a y , A p r i l 1 1 , 2 0 2 4 6 : 5 8 : 3 6 A M Im p r o v e m e n t s t o H a n c o c k W h i t n e y P a r k fo r t h e C i t y o f P r a t t v i l l e , A l a b a m a A4.1 ELEVATIONS 1 ELEVATION-PAVILION SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"2 ELEVATION-PAVILION SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 3 ELEVATION-STAGE SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"4 ELEVATION-STAGE SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"5 ELEVATION-STAGE SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 6 ELEVATION-CABANA SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"7 ELEVATION- CABANA and FACADE SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 5 12 0'-0" FINISH FLOOR 14'-0" T.O.BEAM METAL FASCIA STEEL TRUSS- SEE STRUCTURAL CUPOLA BEYOND STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF METAL GUTTER DOWNSPOUT DOWNSPOUT DOWNSPOUT DOWNSPOUT METAL GUTTER 1 12 METAL FASCIA STEEL RAFTER- SEE STRUCTURAL METAL WALL PANEL RICK SOLDIER COURSE BORDER BRICK VENEER CUPOLA 0'-0" FINISH FLOOR 0'-0" FINISH FLOOR 0'-0" FINISH FLOOR PAINT ALL EXPOSED STEEL DECORATING STEEL BRACKET and RING PAINT ALL EXPOSED STEEL STEEL TRUSS- SEE STRUCTURALSTEEL MESH CUSTOM GRAPHICS- SEE ALLOWANCES STAGE LIGHTING- SEE ELECTRICAL METAL WALL PANELS BEYOND VIDEO WALL- SEE SPECS PAINT ALL EXPOSED STEELPAINT ALL EXPOSED STEEL BRICK STEPS METAL HANDRAIL RUBBED CONCRETE FINISH @ RAMP METAL WALL PANEL TPO MEMBRANE ROOFING 0'-0" FINISH FLOOR DOWNSPOUT TPO MEMBRANE ROOFINGMETAL GUTTER METAL WALL PANEL FACADE BRICK VENEER METAL WALL PANEL FACADE SCUPPER w/ LEADER HEAD and DOWNSPOUT EXISTING BUILDING METAL FASCIA BRICK VENEER ALUMINUM CANOPY DECORATING STEEL BRACKET and RING DECORATING STEEL BRACKET and RING DECORATING STEEL BRACKET and RING PAINT ALL EXPOSED STEEL PAINT ALL EXPOSED STEEL 21'-0" x 14'-8" MOTORIZED COILING STEEL DOOR-PAINT 103104 105 3 FT. WIDE x 7 FT. HIGH FLUSH HOLLOW METAL DOOR w/ HOLLOW METAL FRAMES-PAINT 4" 7'- 0 " ORNAMENTAL HANDRAIL DR A F T BUILDING SECTIONS A5.1 H C R ERE TA E T O ERS I SG T A F AL B A M TA EC T I D A 23.307 03.25.2024 SHEET TITLE : MCKEE JOB # : DRAWN BY : DATE: SHEET NO. : M c K E E a n d A S S O C I A T E S A R C H I T E C T S , I N C . 63 1 S O U T H H U L L S T R E E T M O N T G O M E R Y , A L A B A M A 3 6 1 0 4 ( 3 3 4 ) 8 3 4 - 9 9 3 3 RBD REVISED DATE: REVISED DATE: REVISED DATE: No . 1 0 8 2 WA L T E R T . M c K E E , J R . MO N T G O M E R Y , A L A . - T h u r s d a y , A p r i l 1 1 , 2 0 2 4 7 : 0 0 : 3 2 A M Im p r o v e m e n t s t o H a n c o c k W h i t n e y P a r k fo r t h e C i t y o f P r a t t v i l l e , A l a b a m a 4 BUILDING SECTION-CABANA SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 BUILDING SECTION-PAVILION SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 BUILDING SECTION-PAVILION SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 4 CUPOLA SECTION SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" 3 BUILDING SECTION-STAGE SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 1a BRACKET DETAIL-PAVILION SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" 4a BRACKET DETAIL- STAGE SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" Ø2'-0" Ø 2 ' - 0 " 2' - 6 " 7' - 3 " 11 " 1'-0" 5' - 2 " 1'-0" 5 12 0'-0" FINISH FLOOR 14'-0" T.O.BEAM CUPOLA BEYOND DECORATING STEEL BRACKET and RING STEEL TRUSS- SEE STRUCTURAL CEILING FAN- SEE MECHANICAL CEILING FAN- SEE MECHANICAL 5'-0" 5" HALF ROUND GUTTER P.T. WOOD BLOCKING STEEL DECKING- SEE STRUCTURAL INSULATION BOARD STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING 3/4 " BAR STOCK RING 2" x 2" TUBE STEEL BRACKET R 5 ' - 2 " 2" x 2" TUBE STEEL BRACKET PAVILION 101 PAVILION 101 CABANA 102 STAGE 105 1 12 0'-0" FINISH FLOOR 18'-0" T.O.BEAM 20'-0" T.O. GIRDER TRUSS 3'-0" STEEL DECKING- SEE STRUCTURAL INSULATION BOARD T.P.O. MEMBRANE ROOFING 5" HALF ROUND GUTTER P.T. WOOD BLOCKING METAL FASCIA METAL FASCIA 5a CORNICE DETAIL SCALE1" = 1'-0" 6a CORNICE DETAIL SCALE1" = 1'-0" URETHANE CROWN MOULDING - MLD371-16 11 " FLAT URETHANE TRIM URETHANE BRACKET BXT12 x 10 URETHANE CROWN MOULDING - MLD371-16 URETHANE MOULDING- MLD227-16 URETHANE MOULDING- MLD371-16 OVAL URETHANE LOUVER-OLVS5x37V PLYWOOD DECKING w/ VAPOR BARRIER STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING P.T. WOOD BLOCKING AS REQ'D. 2 x 4 STUDS @ 16" O.C.PLYWOOD SHEATHING w/ APPLIED VAPOR BARRIER SMOOTH CEMENT FIBER PANEL FLAT URETHANE TRIM PLYWOOD DECKING w/ VAPOR BARRIER STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING METAL FLASHING FLAT URETHANE TRIM SMOOTH CEMENT FIBER PANEL SMOOTH CEMENT FIBER PANEL METAL FLASHING PAINT ALL EXPOSED STEELPAINT ALL EXPOSED STEEL PAINT ALL EXPOSED STEEL 1/2 12 0'-0" FINISH FLOOR 11 ' - 0 " T. O . B E A M 2a GUTTER DETAIL SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" FYPON MODEL NUMBERS ARE REFERENCED FOR ALL DECORATIVE URETHANE MOULDINGS 2 x 4 STUDS @ 16" O.C. SMOOTH CEMENT FIBER PANEL R8'-6 " METAL FASCIA 4" DIA. DOWNSPOUT WHERE OCCURS LIGHT FIXTURE- SEE ELECTRICAL 3/4 " BAR STOCK RING DR A F T ™ DR A F T IMPRESSIONS™ You won’t believe this is steel. IMPRESSIONS™ steel deck, featuring realistic wood-grain finishes, opens a whole new world of design possibilities. Brought to life through a revolutionary coil-coated digital printing process, IMPRESSIONS steel deck enables architects and interior designers to achieve aesthetics once unattainable using steel alone. IMPRESSIONS is ideal for interior and exterior applications, including canopies, lobbies, and conference rooms, in office buildings, hotels and resorts. Available in two long-span Versa-Dek® profiles to help you achieve the structural requirements of your project. Together, let’s build it better. Structural steel roof deck with welcoming tones of nature Sustainable Solutions IMPRESSIONS uses up to 80% recycled steel, exceeding LEED minimums. Wood-printed steel products reduce the harvesting of natural resources and tracking FSC wood products. At the end of its service life, steel can be recycled. Beauty of wood, strength of steel Available in 6 coil-coated wood-grain finishes Select from Versa-Dek® 2.0 S ES or LS ES profiles DR A F T Versa-Dek® 2.0 LS ES Versa-Dek® 2.0 S ES 24˝ Coverage 2˝ 6˝ 85 ˝ 834 ˝ 6 24˝ Coverage 2˝ 85 ˝ 834 ˝ Cherry Oak Medium Oak Gray Rough-Sawn Cedar Light Oak Walnut Oak Natural Rough-Sawn Cedar The impressive span and overhang capacities of our signature Versa-Dek® profiles help open spaces with fewer supports. The dovetail design creates a clean, smooth, lineal plank ceiling appearance while concealing side-lap and fastener penetrations. It seamlessly integrates lighting and signage using the Versa-Wedge® hanger system. Versatile and visually appealing, Versa-Dek accommodates a wide range of roofing assemblies, from flat single-ply membranes to pitched standing seam systems. 20-gage steel, 2-inch Versa-Dek® S ES or LS ES profiles Standard 2-foot-by-25-foot deck sheets in 10-piece bundles Custom lengths available Product ships anywhere in the U.S. Mechanical attachments only LS ES type features an additional rib stiffener to create a tighter lineal plank ceiling aesthetic FM approved and ICC-ES certified Load tables available in Steel Roof and Floor Deck catalog: newmill.com/loadtables 6 FINISHES to achieve your aesthetic goals to meet your structural requirements 2 DECK PROFILES DR A F T newmill.com © 2023 New Millennium Building Systems, LLC All rights reserved. 23-NMBS-105 A division of Steel Dynamics Inc., we engineer and manufacture a full range of steel joist and deck for commercial construction projects. We work with you right from the start, resulting in the efficient selection, engineering and supply of the optimal system for your project.BUILDING SUCCESS TOGETHER 1 | Steel 2 | Galvanized/Galvalume® Cold Rolled 3 | Pretreatment 4 | Primer Coat 5 | Top Coat 6 | High Definition Printing 7 | Electron Beam Clear Coating Barrier Protection How we make lasting IMPRESSIONS™ Steel Dynamics is revolutionizing structural steel. Using its Tru-Steel HD® process, a digital print line incorporates an inline inkjet printer, roll coater, and electron-beam curing system to produce steel coils with image resolution up to 400 dpi. The result is a high-definition wood grain finish with unmatched depth and clarity. New Millennium roll forms the steel coils into our Versa-Dek® roof deck profiles at our Memphis facility and prepares bundles for shipping to your project site. DR A F T XX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G E E E E E E E OH U OH U OH U OH U OH U OH U OH U OH U OH U OH U OH U OH U OH U OH U OH U OH U OH U OH U OH U OH U OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OH U OH U OH U OH U OH U W W W W WW W W W W W W W W WWW W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WW W W WW SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SSSS SS SD SD SD E E E E E E E E E E E E E OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OH U OHU OHU OH U OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E OH U OH U OH U OH U OH U OH U OH U OH U OH U OH U OH U OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU U E OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU U E U E U E U E SS SS G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G SD SD SD SD SD S S S S SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD S D S D S D SD SD SD SD S D S D SD SD SD S D SD S D SD SD SD SD S D S D SD SD SD SD SD S D SD S D S D S D SD SD SD S D S D SD SD SD S D SD SD S D SD S D SD SD S D SD SD SD SD SD 183 184 184 18 4 184 1 8 4 184 183 18 4 18 3 184 182 182 182 182 18 2 1 8 2 182 18 2 183 18 3 183 18 2 1 8 2 182 18 3 183 184 184 183 183 184 184 18 4 18 3 183 18 4 1 8 4 184 184 183 182183 183 183 183 183 18 3 18 4 18 3 18 3 182 182 SSMHTOP: 183.4012"PVC INV.: 174.19 (N)12"PVC I N V : 1 7 4 1 6 ( S ) SSMHTOP: 183.5712"PVC INV.: 176.15 (N)12"PVC INV.: 176.12 (S) SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD X FFE:187.04 X FFE:177.07 X FFE:177.06 FFE:187.12X FFE:187.64 X XFFE:187.32 FFE:183.14 X FFE:182.94 X X FFE:183.67 X FFE:183.43 FFE:183.32 X XFFE:183.37 XFFE:183.81 XFFE:183.94 FFE:183.75 X FFE:183.31X FFE:183.25 X XFFE:184.50 XFFE:184.61 XFFE:183.68XFFE:183.75 XFE:184.75 SSMHTOP: 182.5112"VCP INV.: 172.58 (W)8"VCP INV.: 172.70 (E)12"VCP I N V 1 7 2 5 2 ( S ) T T SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD AC P A D SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD AC G G T 7"E 76.87' S86° 20' 19"E 10.72' N44° 29' 10"E 12.96' S84° 30' 26"E 35.74' N0 5 ° 0 7 ' 4 4 " E 1 3 2 . 6 5 ' N85° 30' 47"W 372.22' N0 5 ° 2 9 ' 3 8 " E 1 1 8 . 5 0 ' N0 5 ° 4 3 ' 5 5 " E 1 1 5 . 7 2 ' N84° 33' 07"W 198.47' N0 5 ° 2 8 ' 2 1 " E 1 2 2 . 9 7 ' N0 5 ° 4 1 ' 4 2 " E 1 2 2 . 5 3 ' 166.02'32.45' N84° 25' 27"W 548.59' IPF(MAG-NAIL) IPF(DRILL-HOLE) IPF(1/2"R&C-FADED)IPF(MAG-NAIL) IPF(MAG-NAIL)IPF(RR-SPIKE) IPF(RR-SPIKE) IPF(DRILL-HOLE) AC AC AC 198.94'349.65' SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD CH E S T N U T S T R E E T TICHNOR AVENUE BANK BUILDING (VACANT) CITY OF PRATTVILLE ANNEX BUILDING EXISTING PARKING LOT EXISTING PARKING LOT EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING IMPROVED PARKING IMPROVED PARKING IMPROVED PARKING EXISTING GENERATOR DUMPSTER PAD STAGE PAVILION CABANA GREEN SPACE FOOD TRUCK BAYS VIEWING/GREEN SPACE (5) ABE SHE (1) QUE SHU (63) LIR SBL (65) LIR SBL (1) QUE SHU (3) ABE SHE(3) ABE SHE (1) QUE SHU (65) LIR SBL (2) LAG N40 (3) LAG N40 (4) MUH CAP (14) ROS IMC (1) LAG N40 (4) MUH CAP 23.307 03.25.24 SHEET TITLE : MCKEE JOB # : DRAWN BY : DATE: SHEET NO. : M c K E E a n d A S S O C I A T E S A R C H I T E C T S , I N C . LMW REVISED DATE: REVISED DATE: REVISED DATE: - T h u r s d a y , M a r c h 2 8 , 2 0 2 4 1 : 0 8 : 0 8 P M Im p r o v e m e n t s t o H a n c o c k W h i t n e y P a r k fo r t h e C i t y o f P r a t t v i l l e , A l a b a m a NOT F O R B I D D I N G O R CON S T R U C T I O N P U R P O S E S NORTH SCALE: 1 IN = 20 FT 0' 20' 40'80' LANDSCAPE PLAN SCHEMATIC LANDSCAPE AND FURNISHINGS PLAN L1.0 DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T