2412 November~December 12 HPC Pkt (Draft)102 West Main Street \ Prattville, AL 36067 \ 334. 595.0500 \ prattvilleal.gov
BILL GILLESPIE, JR.
MAYOR
J. SCOTT STEPHENS, AICP
DIRECTOR
CITY OF PRATTVILLE
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
AGENDA
December 12, 2024
4:30 p.m.
Call to Order:
Roll Call:
Chairman Miller, Vice-Chairman Pruett, Ms. Davis, Mr. Ferguson, Ms. Fritz, Mr. McKay, and Ms. Rollins.
Minutes:
October 24, 2024
Committee Reports:
Old Business:
None
New Business:
1.COA2412-01 Certificate of Appropriateness
Replace Door and Windows
243 S Court Street
Darin Phillips, Petitioner
Public Hearing
2.COA2412-02 Certificate of Appropriateness
Replace Windows
135 E Main Street
Alfred and June Booth, Petitioners
Public Hearing
Miscellaneous:
Expedited Review:
Adjourn: DRAFT
DRAFT 12/09/2024
Draft
Prattville Historic Preservation Commission October 24, 2024 Minutes Page 1 of 2
CITY OF PRATTVILLE 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 2 MINUTES 3 October 24, 2024 4 5 6 Call to order: 7 The Chairman called the regular meeting of the Prattville Historic Preservation Commission to order on Thursday, 8 October 24, 2024, at 4:30 p.m. 9 10 Roll Call: 11 Mr. Stephens called the roll. Chairman Tom Miller, Vice-Chair Taylor Pruett, Mr. Chris McKay, Mr. Scott Ferguson, 12 Ms. Jean Davis, Ms. Precious Fritz, and Ms. Kristi Rollins were present. 13
14 Quorum present 15 16
Also present were Mr. Scott Stephens, City Planner; and Mr. Joshua McKinney, Planner. 17 18 Minutes: 19 20 Ms. Rollins moved to approve the minutes of the July 25, 2024 regular meeting. Ms Pruett seconded the motion. 21 The motion to approve passed unanimously. 22 23 Committee Reports: 24 There were no reports to be made. 25 26 Old Business: 27 There was no old business to discuss. 28 29 Dr Miller explained that he was the applicant for the agenda item, so he would be recusing himself and stepping 30
down from the dais. He passed the gavel to Ms Pruett to preside over the new business. 31 32 New Business: 33 Certificate of Appropriateness 34 Additions-Accessory Structure 35 115 Maple Street 36 Thomas Miller, Petitioner 37 38 Mr Stephens provided the staff report for the Certificate of Appropriateness for a greenhouse on property located at 39 115 Maple Street. 40 41 Tom Miller, property owner, appeared for the request. He explained it would be metal framed with tempered glass 42 panels. 43 44 Vice Chair Pruett opened the floor for public comments. There were none. The public hearing was closed. 45 46 Mr Ferguson moved to approve the request as submitted. Ms Davis seconded the motion. The motion to approve 47 passed unanimously. 48 49 Miscellaneous: 50
51 Dr Miller took his seat again on the dais. 52 53
Mr Stephens mentioned that the regularly scheduled meetings (fourth Thursdays) in November and December may 54 have conflicts with holidays and that the commission may want to consider rescheduling. 55
DRAFT
DRAFT 12/09/2024
Draft
Prattville Historic Preservation Commission October 24, 2024 Minutes Page 2 of 2
56 The commission discussed dates and decided to combined the November and December meetings into one and to 57 hold their next meeting on December 12, 2024, at 4:30pm, in the council chambers. 58 59 Further discussion was held and the commission decided to go ahead and combine the November 2025 and 60 December 2025 meetings into one to be held on December 11, 2025. 61 62 63
Adjourn: 64 With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 4:52 p.m. 65 66
67 Respectfully submitted, 68 69
70 71 J. Scott Stephens, Acting Secretary 72 Historic Preservation Commission 73
DRAFT
DRAFT 12/09/2024
Page 1 of 8
Historic Preservation Commission
Staff Report
CERTIFICATE OF
APPROPRIATENESS
243 South Court Street – COA2412-01
DATE December 12, 2024
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Petitioner: Kimberlia’s LLC dba 243 South
Property Owner: Darin Phillips
Location: 243 South Court Street (note different address in survey)
Review Status and History
Previous
Approvals:
N/A
1984/2007/2023
Historic Properties
Inventory Details
176 West Main Street, former Prattville Mercantile Company
a) 1984: contributing. “c. 1855; two stories, brick, rectangular, four-bay facade to south, west elevation marked by slightly advanced blind end pavilions; corbeled and denticulated beltcourse above second-floor windows, surmounted by raised attic; shallow hipped roof sloping back from corbeled brick cornice; original twelve-over-twelve sashing. Architecturally one of most significant antebellum commercial structures surviving in central Alabama. Historically important as company store (commissary) built by Daniel Pratt for mill operatives. First-floor bays replaced c. 1900 by iron-and-glass commercial front; this in turn replaced c. 1960. Upper floor largely unaltered.” b) 2007: c. 1855, contributing. “Daniel Pratt has this rectangular, two-story brick building with a shallow hipped roof constructed as a commissary for mill operatives. Historic details include a corbelled brick cornice, original upper twelve-over-twelve windows, and a corbelled belt course with lentils above the second story. The current storefront dates from circa 1960.” c) 2023: c. 1855, contributing. Daniel Pratt had this rectangular, two-story brick building
with a shallow hipped roof constructed as a commissary for mill operatives. Historic details include a corbelled brick cornice, original upper twelve-over-twelve windows,
and a corbelled belt course with lintels above the second story. The current storefront dates from circa 1960.
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
Page 2 of 8
.
Proposed Alteration, Renovation or Addition
The following changes have been requested by the applicant.
1. Front Door
2. Windows
3. Roof
4. Paint
PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION:
Reviewed by: Bria Hudson, Planner
Item #1: Front Door (Restaurant Entrance)
Design Guidelines section referenced:
Doors, Entrances, and Storefronts (p48)
1. Storefronts and their elements such as display windows, transoms, doors, pillars, pilasters, and bulkheads shall be retained and maintained.
2. Elements of the storefront shall be visible and not obscured from view by alterations.
3. When removing non-historic elements from storefronts, the applicant shall make a best faith effort to
preserve and restore any existing historic elements or those that may be recovered during the renovation.
4. Deteriorated or damaged storefronts and their elements shall be repaired before they are replaced.
a. When replacement is necessary, only the damaged portion of the detail should be removed and replaced.
b. Original replacement materials should be utilized if they are available, though alternative materials may
be used if the original material cannot be found.
5. When storefronts or their elements need to be fully replaced, the replacement shall be designed to match the original as much as possible.
a. When the details cannot be replicated, a simplified version of the original shall be used instead.
b. When full scale replacement is necessary, the replacement materials shall match the original as much
as possible. Alternative materials may be used if the original material cannot be found.
6. For storefront doors, the historic appearance of existing doors shall be retained and maintained. When replacement is necessary, the new door shall be of a similar style and material to what was historically found on historic commercial structures such as clear glass, single light, and wooden doors with or without
paneling.
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
Page 3 of 8
7. Do not use highly reflective glass on storefronts. New or replacement glass to storefronts shall be clear and transparent.
8. Storefronts, doors, and entrances shall not be added to historic structures where none was previously
present. If there is evidence of a historic storefront or entrance, then the added feature shall be of a
compatible style and material to the building’s architectural style.
Item #1 Staff Evaluation: Approve
Note that this door has already been replaced with the proposed, wooden door.
The applicant is requesting to replace the existing glass and aluminum store front door with metal
framing with a solid oak wood door featuring panel windows. According to the applicant, the previous
door had become a fire hazard due to its poor functionality and lack of regular maintenance.
Based on the surveys, the doors have been changed multiple times from what was orginal.
Previous door:
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
Page 4 of 8
Newly installed door:
Item #2: Windows (All Windows)
Design Guidelines section referenced:
Windows (p50)
Windows
1. Historic windows and their openings shall be retained and maintained.
2. Damaged or deteriorated windows shall be repaired before they are replaced.
3. Historic window openings shall remain visible and shall not be obscured by paint, wood, or other materials and methods that alter their transparency or appearance.
4. Stained glass and other decorative window elements shall be retained and maintained. It shall not be appropriate to introduce these decorative window elements where there is not a historic basis for them.
5. New and replacement windows shall be of a compatible style, configuration, and material of the historic
windows found on the structure.
a. Materials such as vinyl are generally discouraged.
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
Page 5 of 8
b. The greatest scrutiny shall be directed towards first floor windows which are easily visible from the right of way.
c. Metal clad wood and other similar window materials may be used on the first floor if they match the
profile of historic windows.
d. For second story or higher, windows of alternative materials such as metal or fiberglass may be used if they match the profile of historic windows.
e. Replacement windows shall match the appearance of the original window the greatest extent possible; if the structure has no distinctive style, then window configuration and style shall be of a simple, compatible
style with surrounding structures.
f. Replacement windows shall make use of the existing window frame. Do not remove the historic framing of window openings.
g. For replacement windows on tertiary building faces, materials such as vinyl may be considered on a case-by-case basis.
6. Do not add window designs or configurations with no historical basis.
7. Do not add window openings where none were previously present on primary or secondary faces of historic structures.
8. The addition of window openings may be considered on a case-by-case basis to tertiary faces if they do not damage or detract from the integrity of the structure
Item #2 Staff Evaluation: Approve
The applicant is requesting to replace all 12 windows, citing concerns that the current windows pose a public safety hazard to adjacent walkways. According to the applicant, the proposed repairs or replacements will maintain the same window treatment design with all 12 windows.
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
Page 6 of 8
Item #3: Roof and roof elements
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
Page 7 of 8
Design Guidelines section referenced:
Roof (p49)
Roofs
1. Historic roofs and roof forms shall be maintained and retained. Their associated elements such as parapet walls, cornices, and chimneys shall be maintained and retained; any alterations to roof elements shall follow the guidelines for Architectural Details and Features.
2. New roof elements that have no historical basis shall not be introduced to buildings.
3. Replacement roofs shall be of durable and long-lasting materials. Synthetic materials may be used if they are not easily visible from the right of way.
4. Replacement roofs shall not obscure historic elements or other characteristics of the structure.
5. Historic elements shall be protected from damage when a roof must be replaced.
6. Added roof elements that make a roof an active area, such as screening or shade structures, shall be setback from the façade of the structure to decrease visibility from the street as much as possible.
7. Mechanical equipment, solar panels, and other auxiliary roof equipment shall be setback from the façade and not visible from the right of way.
Item #3 Staff Evaluation: Approve
The applicant is requesting approval to replace the existing roof and roof siding due to its
deteriorating condition and associated safety hazards. According to the applicant, the proposed
replacement siding will consist of hand-made cedar siding.
Based on what is being proposed, this request could be approved administratively. Staff wanted to
present to the HPC along with other requests.
Item #4: Paint (Exterior)
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
Page 8 of 8
Design Guidelines section referenced:
Painting (p54)
1. Painting of existing painted surfaces is an important facet of maintaining the integrity of the material and
is encouraged.
2. Building features that were historically painted such as cornices, pilasters, bulkheads, wooden doors, and wood and metal trim should be repainted regularly to maintain their appearance.
3. Historically unpainted features and surfaces shall remain unpainted.
4. When a surface is mismatched or damaged, paint may conceal the defect or be used to maintain the
surface
Item #1 Staff Evaluation: Approve
The applicant is requesting approval to repaint the exterior of the building in the existing painted
areas. According to the applicant, the proposed color scheme includes dove white with black trim.
Based on what is being proposed, this request could be approved administratively or would not
require specific approval at all. Staff wanted to present to the HPC along with other requests.
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
Page 1 of 13
Historic Preservation Commission
Staff Report
CERTIFICATE OF
APPROPRIATENESS
135 E Main Street – COA2412-02
DATE December 12, 2024
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Petitioner: Alfred and June Booth
Property Owner: Alfred Q Booth
Agent: N/A
Location: 135 E Main Street
Review Status and History
Previous Approvals: N/A
1984/2007/2023
Historic Properties
Inventory Details
139 East Main Street, Stewart-Murphree-Smith House a) 1984: “c. 1900; one story, frame, gable roof with cross-gable over ell at rear
as well as slightly projecting left front bay; half-hipped full-length porch with turned posts and balustrade.”
b) 2007: c. 1900, contributing. “This is a one-story frame gable-roofed building with a gabled rear ell and slightly projecting left front bay. It possesses a half-
hipped full-length porch with turned posts and balustrade.” c) 2023: c. 1900, contributing. This one-story frame building has a side-gabled roof with a cross gable and slightly projecting left front bay. It has a full-length, half-hipped porch with turned posts. The balustrade was removed at some point.
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
Page 2 of 13
Proposed Alteration, Renovation or Addition
The following alterations have been requested by the applicant.
1. Replace 23 windows
PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION:
Reviewed by: Joshua McKinney, Planner
ALTERATIONS AND REHABILITATION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES (p 25)
Windows (p 30) 1. Historic windows and their frames shall be retained and maintained. 2. Damaged or deteriorated windows shall be repaired before they are replaced.
3. Historic window openings shall remain visible and shall not be obscured from view through
paint, wood, or other materials and methods which may alter their transparency or appearance.
4. Stained glass and other decorative window elements shall be retained and maintained. Do not introduce these decorative window elements where there is no historical basis for them. 5. New and replacement windows shall be of a compatible style, configuration, and material of the historic windows found on the structure. a. Contemporary materials such as vinyl and other high gloss materials are generally discouraged. b. Reflective glass windows are generally discouraged. c. When replacement windows of the same original material cannot be found, the
replacement window shall be of a compatible size, type, configuration, material,
appearance and form as the original windows.
d. Replacement windows shall match the appearance of the original window to the greatest
extent possible. If the structure has no distinctive style, then window configuration and
style shall be of a simple, compatible style with surrounding structures.
e. Replacement windows shall make use of the existing window frame, it shall not be
appropriate to remove the historic framing of window openings.
f. For replacement windows on tertiary building faces that are not easily visible from the
right of way, materials such as vinyl and reflective glass may be considered on a case-
by-case basis.
6. The addition of window openings to tertiary faces may be considered on a case-by-case basis if they
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
Page 3 of 13
do not damage or detract from the integrity of the structure.
Shutters and Storm Windows (p 31)
1. Historic shutters shall be retained and maintained
2. Non-functional shutters shall not be added to existing structures unless they were historically present
3. New shutters shall match the height, width, and other proportions of the window opening and shall be
mounted to be operational.
4. New shutters shall not be mounted directly onto any historic exterior walls; instead, mount them directly onto window frames.
5. Screen and storm windows shall be constructed of painted wood, baked-on enamel, anodized aluminum, or other materials which can be painted to match the frames mill finish construction. 6. Screen and storm windows shall fit within window frames and openings.
7. Security windows and metal bars shall not be permitted on primary and secondary faces of structures
8. Window inserts and other fixtures that improve the energy efficiency of windows shall be
installed on the interior of the window frame.
Evaluation: Disapprove; The windows contractor stated that the proposed replacement windows will
be trimmed with wood and the window frame will be vinyl. Each grid window will be replaced according
to their size and grid.
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
Page 4 of 13
PICTURES
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
Page 5 of 13
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
Page 6 of 13
EAST SIDE
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
Page 7 of 13
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
Page 8 of 13
REAR
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
Page 9 of 13
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
Page 10 of 13
WEST SIDE
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
Page 11 of 13
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
Page 12 of 13
Proposed Look
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
Page 13 of 13
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
468 S. Perry Street
Montgomery, Alabama 36130-0900
Voice: (334)242-3184
Fax: (334)262-1083
www.ahc.alabama.gov
HISTORIC BUILDING SURVEY FORM
1. Location/Ownership
AHC Survey Number: Form completed by: Date:
Property Name:
Location/Street Address:
City/Zip: County:
USGS Quad: Township/Range/Section:
Current Owner’s Name & Contact Info (if known):
2. Physical Description
Construction date: Source:
Alteration date: Source:
Architect/Builder: Contractor:
Physical condition:
(Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor, Ruinous)
Remaining historic fabric:
(High, Medium, Low)
No. of stories:
Historic use of property:
Current use of property:
Architectural style category: Architectural style sub-category:
Basic typology: Basic shape:
Basic floor plan: Historic Construction material(s):
Current exterior wall
material(s)
Roof finish material(s):
Main roof configuration: Foundation material:
Porch type:
Window type and materials:
Describe alterations:
Number and type of all outbuildings:
(if significant, fill out separate survey form)
Exterior Architectural Description:
Description of Setting:
Historical Notes:
3. Eligibility
Appears Eligible for Alabama Register: Yes No would contribute to a district Undetermined
Appears Eligible for National Register: Yes No would contribute to a district Undetermined
AR Criteria: A B C D Undetermined
NR Criteria: A B C D Undetermined
Level of Significance: Local State National Undetermined
Justification of Eligibility/Ineligibility:
Au00074 Taylor Stewart 7/27/2023
Stewart-Murphree-Smith House
135 East Main Street (formerly 139)
Prattville, 36067 Autauga
Prattville
c. 1900
fair medium
1
residential
commercial
vernacular
wood, brick
wood asphalt shingle
gable piers
full-length wood porch with half-hipped roof
This one-story frame building has a side-gabled roof with a cross gable and slightly projecting left front bay. It has a full-length, half-hipped porch with turned posts. The balustrade was removed at some point.
✔
✔
✔✔
✔✔
✔
Contributes to the historic fabric of the existing district due to architecture and patterns of development.
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT 12/09/2024