2006-Jun 25 HPC
1 0 2 W e s t M a i n S t r e e t \ P r a t t v i l l e , A L 3 6 0 6 7 \ 334. 5 9 5 . 0 5 0 0 \ p r a t t v i l l e a l . g o v
BILL GILLESPIE, JR.
MAYOR
J. SCOTT STEPHENS, AICP
DIRECTOR
C I T Y OF P R A T T VI LL E
H I S T OR I C P R E SE R VA T I O N C O M M IS S ION
AGENDA
June 25, 2020
4:30 p.m.
Call to Order:
Roll Call:
Chairman Langley, Mr. Barrett, Mrs. Davis, Mr. Ferguson, Mr. McCord, Ms. Musgrove and Ms. Teresa Nettles.
Minutes:
May 28, 2020
Old Business:
1. CA2005-03 Certificate of Appropriateness
Alteration- Rooftop solar panels
115 Maple Street
Thomas Miller, Petitioner
Tabled 5/28
New Business:
2. CA2006-01 Certificate of Appropriateness
Demolition-Removal of existing outbuilding
New Structure-Construct a new outbuilding
225 Wetumpka Street
David & Kim Williams, Petitioners
Public Hearing
3. CA2006-02 Certificate of Appropriateness
New Structures
Intersection of Northington Street and East 6th Street
Steve Till, Petitioner
Public Hearing
4. CA2006-03 Certificate of Appropriateness
Sign
119 South Court Street
Cortney Jones, Petitioner
Public Hearing
Miscellaneous:
Adjourn:
Approved 8/27/20
Prattville Historic Preservation Commission June 25, 2020 Minutes
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF PRATTVILLE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
MINUTES June 25, 2020 Call to order: The regular meeting of the Prattville Historic Preservation Commission was called to order on Thursday, June 25, 2020 at 4:30 p.m.
Roll Call: The secretary called the roll. Members present were Chairman Thea Langley, Vice-Chairman Joel McCord, Mr. Will Barrett, Mrs. Jean Davis, Mr. Scott Ferguson, and Ms. Kate Musgrove. Members Absent: Mrs.
Teresa Nettles. Quorum present Also present was Mr. Scott Stephens, City Planner; Mr. Darrell Rigsby, Senior Planner; Mr. Tommie Williams, Planner; and Ms. Alisa Morgan, Secretary. Minutes: Ms. Musgrove moved to approve the minutes of the May 28, 2020 meeting. Mr. McCord seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
Old Business: Certificate of Appropriateness Alteration- Rooftop solar panels and home batteries 115 Maple Street Thomas Miller, Petitioner The request was tabled at the previous meeting (5/28/20) until more details the petitioner could be provided about the placement and number of panels to be used. The petitioner has made a written request that the item be tabled until the next meeting (letter made a part of the minutes). After no further discussion, Mrs. Davis moved to table the request at the petitioner’s request until the next meeting. Ms. Musgrove seconded the motion. The motion to table passed unanimously.
Chairman Langley changed the order that the agenda items were heard.
New Business: Certificate of Appropriateness Sign 119 South Court Street Cortney Jones, Petitioner Cortney Cox, petitioner, presented the request for a two signs to be attached to the building located on property at 119 South Court Street.
Mr. Williams provided the staff comments.
Chairman Langley opened the floor for public comments. There being none, the public hearing was closed. After no other discussion, the vote was called. Mrs. Davis moved to approve the request as presented. Ms.
Musgrove seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously.
Approved 8/27/20
Prattville Historic Preservation Commission June 25, 2020 Minutes
Page 2 of 3
Certificate of Appropriateness Demolition-Removal of existing outbuilding
New Structure-Construct a new outbuilding 225 Wetumpka Street David & Kim Williams, Petitioners David & Kim Williams, petitioners, presented the request for demolition and new structure request for an
outbuilding on property located at 225 Wetumpka Street. He stated that the existing 18’x20’ outbuilding is deteriorating and is collapsing. He stated that the new proposed outbuilding would be constructed in a different location of the old outbuilding, out of view from Wetumpka Street. He stated that the roof will
be same color and material as the house. Mr. Rigsby provided the staff comments.
Chairman Langley opened the floor for public comments. Matt Holtzscher, 246 Wetumpka Street, spoke in favor of the request. After no further comments, the public hearing was closed. After no further discussion, the vote was called. Mr. Ferguson moved to approve the request as submitted. Mrs. Davis seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously. Certificate of Appropriateness New Structures Intersection of Northington Street and East 6th Street Steve Till, Petitioner Steve Till, petitioner, presented the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct four new single family residences.
Mr. Stephens provided the staff report for the construction of four new single family residences in the historic district. He stated that the property received preliminary plat approval from the Prattville Planning Commission (5/21/20) for the development. Mr. Till provided the details of the materials to be used (detailed in the staff report). He presented the two types of window materials of wood and vinyl. He stated that the vinyl would look like the wood, but it is more cost effective and less maintenance for the owner. He stated that the homes would have raised front porches and colonial style columns. He stated that the driveways will access from 6th Street to the rear of the property. Chairman Langley opened the floor for public comments. Rex Musgrove, 161 North Northington Street, spoke in favor of the request.
After no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
After no further discussion, the vote was called. Mrs. Davis moved to approve the request as submitted contingent that vinyl windows as proposed are installed. Mr. McCord seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously.
Approved 8/27/20
Prattville Historic Preservation Commission June 25, 2020 Minutes
Page 3 of 3
Miscellaneous: Mr. Stephens made mention of the importance of completing the census report. He also stated that the process has begun for updating the city’s comprehensive plan. Additional information about the comprehensive plan can be found at projectprattville.com. Adjourn: With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 5:09 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Alisa Morgan, Secretary Historic Preservation Commission
From:Tom Miller
To:Morgan, Alisa
Subject:HPC meeting this Thursday
Date:Wednesday, June 24, 2020 12:48:10 PM
After a site visit, I got the initial proposal for solar panels from Eagle Solar and Light in Birmingham. After
reviewing it, we discussed some modifications and I have not Yet received the updated plan. Please ask the HPC to
table my request until next month’s meeting. Thanks.
Tom
CITY OF PRATTVILLE
Historic Preservation Commission
Planning Department Staff Report
CERTIFICATE OF
APPROPRIATENESS
119 South Court Street – CA2006-03
DATE
June 25, 2020
PROPOSED DEVLOPMENT
Petitioner: Cortney Jones
Property Owner: Old Gin Properties, LLC.
Location: 119 South Court Street
Review Status and History
Submission Status: First request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for this
address.
Previous Approvals: N/A
1984/2007 Historic
Properties Inventory
Details
119 South Court Street
The property was not included in the 1984 or 2007
Historic Properties inventories.
Proposed Alteration, Renovation or Addition
The following alteration has been requested by the applicant. See the application
included as Attachment A for a description of each element.
1. Add two attached signs to the building. One sign will be in front of the
business and the other sign will be located on the side of the building.
PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION:
Reviewed by: Tommie Williams, Planner
Site Visits Conducted: June 2020
Page 2 of 2
Recommendation: Approval, see analysis below
Evaluation:
Since the subject property/structure was initially developed as and remains a commercial
structure, the requested alterations were reviewed against the standards contained in the
Prattville Commercial Design Review Guidelines Manual. The relevant sections of manual
are included. Staff comments/evaluations are summarized at the end of each section.
1. Add two attached signs to the building. One sign will be in front of the business
and the other sign will be located on the side of the building.
Signs (page 29)
Signs are important elements in the historic and commercial character of the
downtown business district, and historic signage should be retained and
maintained. Signs are also important means of advertising and establishing
business identities.
1. Historic signs should be retained, maintained, and, if needed, repaired.
2. New signs should be of traditional materials such as finished wood, glass,
copper, or bronze.
3. New signs should be installed in locations historically used for signs such
as on awnings, on upper façade walls covering five percent or less of the
wall surface, inside windows, projecting from the building façade or
elevation. Signs should not cover or obscure architectural features.
4. New signs should be properly proportioned relative to their buildings.
5. Letters should be eighteen or less inches high and should cover sixty
percent or less of the total sign area.
6. Colors used in signs should be coordinated with their buildings. Three
colors or less should be used per sign.
7. Mounting equipment should be anchored in mortar, not bricks or stones,
and should avoid damaging the building.
8. Lighting sources for signs should be external and concealed. The
exception is if historic or replica neon signs are used.
Analysis:
W 4TH ST
S COURT STW 3RD ST
W MAIN ST
TICHNOR ST HUNTS ALYN COURT STBRIDGE STN COURT STLocation Map - 119 South Court St
±
Legend
Subject Area
Streets
Autauga Tax Parcels
0 500250
Feet Locations are approximate
S COURT STHUNTS ALY
Aerial Map - 119 South Court St
±
Legend
Subject Area
Streets
Autauga Tax Parcels
0 10050
Feet Locations are approximate
S COURT STHUNTS ALY
B-2
B-2
R-5
B-2
Zoning Map - 119 South Court St
±
Legend
Subject Area
Streets
Autauga Tax Parcels
R-5
B-2
0 10050
Feet Locations are approximate
Page 1 of 4
Historic Preservation Commission
Staff Report
CERTIFICATE OF
APPROPRIATENESS
225 Wetumpka Street – CA2006-01
DATE
June 25, 2020
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Petitioner: David and Kim Williams
Property Owner: Same
Agent: N/A
Location: 225 Wetumpka Street
Review Status and History
Submission Status: No known requests for a Certification of Appropriateness for
this address
Previous Approvals: No known CoA requests
1984/2007 Historic
Properties Inventory
Details
225 Wetumpka Street, (circa 1905, contributing) -
story and a half, frame, modified California bungalow
style with broad sloping roof terminated by hipped-roof
"California room" (second-floor sunroom); front slope of
roof extends over brick-pier porch. Later alterations
include removal of original sash in solarium. Built for
William T. Northington.
Page 2 of 4
Proposed Alteration, Renovation or Addition
The following alteration has been requested by the applicant. See the application included
as Attachment A for a description of each element.
1. Construction of Accessory Structure
2. Demolition of existing accessory structure
PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION:
Reviewed by: Darrell Rigsby, Senior Planner
Site Visits Conducted: June, 2020
Recommendation: Approve
Evaluation:
Since the subject property/structure was initially developed as a residence, the requested alterations
were reviewed against the standards contained in the Prattville Residential Design Review Guidelines
Manual. The relevant sections of manual are included. Staff comments/evaluations are summarized at
the end of each section. The following changes are proposed:
1. Construction of Accessory Structure
Outbuildings (page 50)
Outbuildings contribute to the historic and residential character of the district. Historic outbuildings
should be retained and maintained. New outbuildings should use design, materials, and placement that
support the district’s historic character.
1. Historic outbuildings should be retained and maintained.
2. New outbuildings should be smaller than the adjoining main building.
3. New outbuildings should be simple in appearance.
4. New outbuildings should use building and roof forms compatible to those used in the
adjoining main building.
5. New outbuildings should use materials compatible to those used in the adjoining main
buildings. Outbuildings that are not visible from public vantage points or have very limited
visibility may use modern synthetic siding materials.
2. Demolition of existing Accessory Structure
Demolition (page 55)
Demolition of buildings that contribute to the historic character of the district results in an irreversible
loss to the physical fabric of the community. Demolition of such buildings is an outcome to be avoided.
Page 3 of 4
1. Demolition is appropriate if the building does not contribute to the historic character of the district.
2. Applicants for demolition and the Historic Preservation Commission should explore possibilities
for selling or reusing historic buildings, preferably onsite but also in other locations, as alternatives
to demolition.
3. Demolition may be appropriate if the denial of the demolition will result in a demonstrable
economic hardship on the owner.
Analysis:
The petitioner would like demolish an existing outbuilding that borders the home and faces Wetumpka
Street. Additionally, the petitioner would like to construct an 800 square foot (20 ft x 40 ft) accessory
structure at the rear of the property, bordering the railroad tracks. The proposed accessory structure will
be a metal frame and metal roof building with wood lap siding.
Page 4 of 4
E 6 T H S T
E 3RD ST
WETUM PK A S T
E 5TH ST
E 4TH ST S NORTHINGTON STN NORTHINGTON STPINE STN WASHINGTON STS WASHINGTON STOAK HILL CEMETARY
Location Map - 225 Wetumpka St
±
Legend
Subject Area
Address Points
Streets
Autauga Tax Parcels
0 1,000500
Feet Locations are approximate
WETUM PK A S T
Aerial Map - 225 Wetumpka St
±
Legend
Subject Area
Address Points
Streets
Autauga Tax Parcels
0 10050
Feet Locations are approximate
WETUM PK A S T
R-2
R-2
Zoning Map - 225 Wetumpka St
±
Legend
Subject Area
Address Points
Streets
Autauga Tax Parcels
R-2
0 10050
Feet Locations are approximate
CITY OF PRATTVILLE
Historic Preservation Commission
Planning Department Staff Report
CERTIFICATE OF
APPROPRIATENESS
Northington & East 6th Street – CA2006-02
DATE
June 25, 2020
PROPOSED DEVLOPMENT
Petitioner: Steve Till
Property Owner: Steve Till
Location: Northington & East 6th Street
Review Status and History
Submission Status: N/A
Previous Approvals: N/A
1984/2007 Historic
Properties Inventory
Details
Northington & East 6th Street
The property was not included in the 1984 or 2007
Historic Properties inventories.
Proposed Alteration, Renovation or Addition
The following alteration has been requested by the applicant. See the application
included as Attachment A for a description of each element.
1. New construction of four single family residences.
PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION:
Reviewed by: Tommie Williams, Planner
Site Visits Conducted: June 2020
Recommendation: Approval, see analysis below
Page 2 of 9
Evaluation:
Since the subject property/structure was initially developed as and remains a residential
structure, the requested alterations were reviewed against the standards contained in the
Prattville Residential Design Review Guidelines Manual. The relevant sections of manual
are included. Staff comments/evaluations are summarized at the end of each section.
1. New construction of four single family residences.
Infill Buildings (page 41)
New construction is welcome on vacant lots in the historic district. They enable
land uses to follow historical patterns and provide for visual continuity of the district
landscape. New dwellings should be designed to be contemporary but compatible
with the district.
1. New buildings should be compatible with adjacent buildings in terms of
height.
2. New buildings should be compatible with adjacent buildings in terms of
materials.
3. New buildings should be compatible with adjacent buildings in terms of
setbacks.
4. New buildings should be compatible with adjacent buildings in terms of
width, scale, and proportions.
5. New buildings should be compatible with adjacent buildings in terms of
roof form.
6. New construction should be oriented toward the major street.
Analysis:
The proposed new construction of four single-family residences would meet the infill
building guidelines. The single-family dwellings will be constructed of fiber cement
siding. Guideline 3 varies from dwelling to dwelling but the required setback for an R-2
zoned district is 35ft front, 40ft back, and 10 sides.
Doors and Entrance (page 18)
Doors are often buildings’ central visual elements and are particularly important
features. Historic entrances and doors should be retained, maintained, and, if
needed, repaired. Missing or severely deteriorated doors should be replaced with
historically appropriate replacements. Screen, storm, and security doors should
not detract from the historic appearance of their building.
Page 3 of 9
6. New screen doors should be sympathetic to the style of the house, have a
wood frame, and be full view or have structural members that align with
those of the door.
7. Storm doors should be full view and of baked-on enamel or anodized
aluminum.
These and other historic doors should be retained and maintained.
They are also appropriate models should replacement doors be
required. Replacement doors should be of wood, may be with or
without glass lights, and should be sympathetic to the style of the
house.
Analysis:
The proposed new construction of four single-family residences will have a front door
constructed of solid wood, ¼ lite with panels. The side and rear will be solid doors to
match the panel style front door. Garage doors will be aluminum and painted to match
the trim.
Gutters and Downspouts (page 21)
Using well-maintained gutters and downspouts helps to protect buildings from water
damage. If new gutters are required, half-round designs are the most appropriate.
4. If new gutters are needed, the most appropriate design for hanging gutters
is half round. For buildings dating from or influenced by designs from the
1940s or later, ogee gutters are also appropriate.
5. Downspouts should be located away from architectural features and on
the least public building elevation.
Analysis:
The proposed new construction of four single-family residences will not have gutters
unless otherwise stated by the purchaser.
Lighting (page 22)
Remaining historic light fixtures should be retained and maintained. New light fixtures
should be unobtrusive in design, materials, and placement.
4. If modern light fixtures are desired as replacements or where light fixtures
previously did not exist, they should be unobtrusive and constructed of
traditional materials.
Page 4 of 9
5. Light fixtures should not damage or obscure architectural features or other
building elements.
Analysis:
The proposed new construction of four single-family residences will be historically
correct for exterior ceiling and wall mounted fixtures. There will be no landscape
lighting.
Roofs (page 31)
Roofs help to determine building style and are important elements of historic
appearance. Historic roof shapes and, when feasible, materials, should be
retained and maintained. Public visibility of modern features should be very
limited.
4. If historic roofing materials are severely damaged or deteriorated or are
missing and are prohibitively expensive to replace, dark grey, black,
brown, dark green, or dark red asphalt or fiberglass shingles may be used
Analysis:
The proposed new construction of four single-family residences will have a roof coating
of 30 year architectural, asphalt, and a fiberglass composition.
Driveways, Sidewalks, and Walkways (page 44)
Driveways, sidewalks, and walkways are common district features. Historic
examples should be retained and maintained, and new construction should follow
historic examples.
2. Driveways should be of gravel, concrete ribbons, grass and dirt, or
concrete. Blacktop and asphalt driveways were not historically features of
the district, and should be avoided. Driveways should be located to the
side of the house.
3. Residential parking areas larger than one car width should be screened
and located behind the house or out of view from the sidewalk.
5. Many district residences have narrow concrete walkways connecting the
sidewalk or street to the main entrance. New walkways should follow
these historic models.
Analysis:
Page 5 of 9
The proposed new construction of four single-family residences will have driveways
located in the rear with a light broom finish. A walkway will be from the front elevation to
the street.
Fences and Walls (page 46)
Fences and walls have historically been used to define ownership or function and to
separate public and private space. Historic fences and walls should be retained and
maintained. New fences and walls should use design, materials, and placement that
minimize their effect on the district’s historic character.
2. Wood and metal picket fences are appropriate new construction. If
wooden, they should be painted using colors complementary to the
adjacent house. They should be less than three feet tall, and the pickets
should be set less than three inches apart and be less than four inches in
width.
4. Wood board fences may be located in back yards and should be less than
six feet tall. Flat tops, dog-ear tops, or pointed tops are all appropriate
designs. Fences should be painted to blend with the building.
Analysis:
The proposed new construction of four single-family residences will have a 3 feet front
picketed fence that will be 50% opaque. If wooden, the fence should be painted using
colors complementary to adjacent houses.
Utilities
Utilities such as trash containers and mechanical systems are important to the
functionality of buildings and the district. They should be located out of public view, have
minimal physical effect on historic buildings, and be accessible for pick up, reading, or
servicing.
4. Meters, conduits, and other equipment should be located on rear
elevations.
Analysis:
The proposed new construction of four single-family residences will have meters located
at the rear of the dwelling.
Page 6 of 9
Examples provided by petitioner:
Board & Batten Siding
Front Door
Page 7 of 9
Lap Siding
Shingle Shake Siding
Page 8 of 9
Ykk Style view 1
Ykk Style view 2
Page 9 of 9
Ply Gem 100 Series
E 6 T H S T
WE T U MPKA STN COURT STE 3RD ST
BOOTH ST
WOODVALE RD7TH ST N NORTHINGTON STW 6TH ST
8TH ST
9TH ST COSBY CTW 5TH ST
W 4TH ST BENT TREE DRE 5TH ST
E 4TH ST PINECREST ST
JU N IPE R CT
W 3RD ST
NEWBY ST
MARTIN LUTHER KING JR DRS COURT STPINE STRUSSELL LNTICHNOR ST N CHESTNUT STS NORTHINGTON STS CHESTNUT STE A S Y ST
GARDENIA CT
S WASHINGTON STKNOB HILL RDN WASHINGTON STBOOTH LNOAKLAND DRHARLEM STDOUGLAS CI
RRAILROAD ST
N COURT STLocation Map - N Northington Street
±
Legend
Subject Area
Streets
Autauga Tax Parcels
0 2,0001,000
Feet Locations are approximate
E 6 T H S T BOOTH STN NORTHI
NGTON STR-2
R-3
Zoning Map - N Northington Street
±
Legend
Subject Area
Streets
Autauga Tax Parcels
R-2
R-3
0 500250
Feet Locations are approximate
E 6 T H S T BOOTH STN NORTHI
NGTON STAerial Map - N Northington Street
±
Legend
Subject Area
Streets
Autauga Tax Parcels
0 500250
Feet Locations are approximate
LOT 1
FINCH (ALT)
LOT 2
HUMMINGBIRD
LOT 3
HUMMINGBIRD
(ALT)
LOT 4
FINCH
Date
Drawn By
Project Number
PAGE #
A001Steve TillNORTH NORTHINGTON STREETJSR
05/31/2020
2020.04NORTH NORTHINGTON STREET, PRATTVILLE, ALPRELIMINARY REVIEW
COVER
1 STREET VIEW
Sheet List
Sheet Number Sheet Name
A001 COVER
A002 SITE PLAN
A101 HUMMINGBIRD FLOOR PLANS
A102 HUMMINGBIRD ELEVATIONS
A201 FINCH FLOOR PLANS
A202 FINCH ELEVATIONS
NORTH NORTHINGTON STREET DEVELOPMENT
PRATTVILLE, AL
227.70226.50225.23223.78224.43228.75244.31242.31239.13242.09244.31243.99242.24237.85234.25228.45227.94224.90227.53S 78°33'46" W 189.59'N 79°36'55" E 195.56'N 80°27'23" E 201.68'N 81°14'52" E 207.84'N 87°28'38" E 191.72'S 78°33'46" W 332.54'N 07°18'07" W 309.47'N 54°36'24" E25.40'35' BUILDING LINE68.33'77.37'77.37'77.37'77.36'0.33 Ac±14,519 sq. ft.0.35 Ac±15,055 sq. ft.0.36 Ac±15,540 sq. ft.0.32 Ac±FIP-1" REBARFIP-1" CRIMPTOP4"X4"CONCRETEMONUMENTPUBLIC PAVED ROAD75.00'75.00'74.47'N 02°31'22" W 510.80'S 78°33'46" W 142.98''30' PRIVATE ACCESS &UTILITY EASEMENTDN
LOT 1
FINCH (ALT)LOT 2
HUMMINGBIRD LOT 3
HUMMINGBIRD
(ALT)
LOT 4
FINCH
Date
Drawn By
Project Number
PAGE #
A002Steve TillNORTH NORTHINGTON STREETJSR
05/31/2020
2020.04NORTH NORTHINGTON STREET, PRATTVILLE, ALPRELIMINARY REVIEW
SITE PLAN
UP
DN
DN
GARAGE
MUD ROOM
CLOSET
MASTER BATH
MASTER BED
FAMILY
OFFICE
POWDER
CLOSET
DINING
KITCHEN
PORCH
PORCH
LAUNDRY
30' - 9 1/2"84' - 8"BED #4
BED #3
HALL
CLOSET
BED #2
BATH
STORAGE
CLOSET CLOSET
LINEN
CLOSET
ATTIC
Date
Drawn By
Project Number
PAGE #
A101Steve TillNORTH NORTHINGTON STREETAuthor
05/31/2020
2020.04NORTH NORTHINGTON STREET, PRATTVILLE, ALPRELIMINARY REVIEW
HUMMINGBIRD
FLOOR PLANS
1/4" = 1'-0"1 HUMMINGBIRD -LEVEL 1
1/4" = 1'-0"2 HUMMINGBIRD -LEVEL 2
Date
Drawn By
Project Number
PAGE #
A102Steve TillNORTH NORTHINGTON STREETJSR
05/31/2020
2020.04NORTH NORTHINGTON STREET, PRATTVILLE, ALPRELIMINARY REVIEW
HUMMINGBIRD
ELEVATIONS
3/16" = 1'-0"1 HUMMINGBIRD -WEST ELEVATION
3/16" = 1'-0"2 HUMMINGBIRD -NORTH ELEVATION
3/16" = 1'-0"3 HUMMINGBIRD -SOUTH ELEVATION
3/16" = 1'-0"4 HUMMINGBIRD -EAST ELEVATION
DN
DN
32' - 0"75' - 11 3/4"CLOSET
MASTER BATH GARAGE
MASTER BED
Room
LAUNDRY
PORCH
KITCHEN
LIVING
POWDERPANTRY
DINING
FOYER
CLOS.
PORCH
STORAGE
HALL
BED #2
BED #3
BED #4
BATHCLOSETCLOSET
CLOSET
Date
Drawn By
Project Number
PAGE #
A201Steve TillNORTH NORTHINGTON STREETJSR
05/31/2020
2020.04NORTH NORTHINGTON STREET, PRATTVILLE, ALPRELIMINARY REVIEW
FINCH FLOOR
PLANS
1/4" = 1'-0"1 FINCH -LEVEL 1
1/4" = 1'-0"2 FINCH -LEVEL 2
5' - 0"Date
Drawn By
Project Number
PAGE #
A202Steve TillNORTH NORTHINGTON STREETJSR
05/31/2020
2020.04NORTH NORTHINGTON STREET, PRATTVILLE, ALPRELIMINARY REVIEW
FINCH
ELEVATIONS
3/16" = 1'-0"1 FINCH -WEST ELEVATION
3/16" = 1'-0"2 FINCH -NORTH ELEVATION
3/16" = 1'-0"3 FINCH -SOUTH ELEVATION
3/16" = 1'-0"4 FINCH -EAST ELEVATION
Windows
Wood ‐ Ply Gem 100 Series Wood single hung Windows
Vinyl ‐ YKK Styleview Single Hung Windows
Doors
Front ‐ Solid wood 1/4 lite with panels
Side, rear ‐ paint grade solid doors to match panel style of front.
Gargage ‐ Solid door, aluminum construction. Painted to match trim.
Overhangs
Boxed confriguration. All wood construction. Painted.
Porches
Raised front porch elevation, open configuration. Masonary underpinning, solid or pier type. Steps from grade to porch floor.
If porch over 30" from grade, wood railings with square wooden ballusters to be constructed. All paint grade.
Columns to be colonial style, solid wood or craftsman style wood square, tapered or straight.
Beam to be cased in paint grade lumber.
Flat wood ceiling, painted.
Exterior Cladding
All fiber cement construction. Lap siding with a 7" exposure with accent of a shingle shake style.
Windows and doors trimmed with 1"x4" flat casing. Square configuration. 1"x4" frieze board.
Roof Coating
30 year architectural, asphalt & fiberglass composititon.
Lighting
Historically correct for exterior ceiling and wall mounted fixtures. No landscape lighting.
Landscaping
Finish graded for proper drainage, sod over entire lot, ample plantings.
Mechanical systems hidden from public view through plantings
Driveways/Sidewalks
All concrete construction, light broom finish. Walkway from front elevation to street.
Hummingbird and Finch Exterior Finish Schedule
BUILDER SERIES 100
3
Technical Drawing
(Double hung unit shown)
Unit Dimension (width)
Brick-face Opening (width)
Rough Opening (width)Unit Dimension (height)Rough Opening (height)Brick-face Opening (height)HORIZONTAL
V
E
R
T
I
C
A
L
Unit Dimension (width)Unit Dimension (height)Rough Opening (width)Rough Opening (height)HORIZONTAL
V
E
R
T
I
C
A
L
Wood Siding
Brick Siding
Unit Dimension (width)Unit Dimension (height)Rough Opening (width)Rough Opening (height)HORIZONTAL
V
E
R
T
I
C
A
L
Vinyl Siding
3