Loading...
2104 - Apr 15 PC Pkt-Draft102 West Main Street \ Prattville, AL 36067 \ 334. 595.0500 \ prattvilleal.gov BILL GILLESPIE, JR. MAYOR J. SCOTT STEPHENS, AICPDIRECTOR CITY OF PRATTVILLE PLANNING COMMISSIONAGENDA April 15, 2021; 3:00 p.m. Call to Order: Roll Call: Mayor Gillespie, Councilman Chambers, Chairman Smith, Vice-Chairman Gardner, Chief Johnson, Mrs. Carpenter, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Hayden, and Mr. Mullins. Minutes: March 18, 2021; April 8, 2021 (Work Session) Committee Reports: Old Business: 1.Project Prattville 2040, the updated comprehensive master plan - Adoption Public Hearing Held 3/18 2.Proposed Ordinance Amendment: Multi-Family Residential & R-4 Zoning text amendment Public Hearing Held 3/18 New Business: 3.Preliminary Plat: Shepherd Ridge, Plat 1 [REQUESTED TO POSTPONE]Location: North of Ridge Trail Petitioner: Leonard & Carrie Schaefer Public Hearing District 3 4.Preliminary Plat: Hedgefield, Plat 5Location: McQueen Smith Road at Highway 82Owner: PRLD, LLCRepresentative: Goodwyn, Mills & Cawood, Inc. Public Hearing District 5 5.Preliminary Plat: Hedgefield, Plat 6Location: McQueen Smith Road at Highway 82Owner: PRLD, LLCRepresentative: Goodwyn, Mills & Cawood, Inc. Public Hearing District 5 6.Preliminary Plat Time Extension: Park LaneLocation: Ridgewood Rd, west of Mt Airy DrRepresentative: Larry E. Speaks & Associates, Inc District 2 7.Preliminary Plat Time Extension: Dawson’s Mill Phases I, II, III, & IV [REQUESTED TO POSTPONE]Location: West of Martin Luther King Jr Dr and south of Moses RdRepresentative: Larry E. Speaks & Associates, Inc District 2 8.Preliminary Plat Time Extension: Heather Drive Subdivision Plat No. 1Location: Heather Drive and Dee DriveRepresentative: Larry E. Speaks & Associates, Inc District 5 Miscellaneous: Adjourn:DRAFT Draft Prattville Planning Commission March 18, 2021 Minutes Page 1 of 5 CITY OF PRATTVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION 1 MINUTES 23 March 18, 2021 45 Call to order: 6 Chairman Tim Smith called the meeting to order at 3:02 p.m. 78 Roll Call: 9 Members present were Mayor Bill Gillespie, Councilman John Chambers, Chairman Tim Smith, Chief Dallis 10 Johnson, Mrs. Paula Carpenter, Mr. Ken Daniel, and Mr. Mugs Mullins. Absent: Vice-Chairman Reuben Gardner 11 and Mr. Seth Hayden. 12 13 (Quorum present) 14 15 Staff present: Mr. Scott Stephens, City Planner; Mr. Darrell Rigsby, Senior Planner; Mr. Tommie Williams, 16 Planner; and Ms. Alisa Morgan, Secretary. 17 18 Minutes: 19 Mr. Mullins moved to approve the minutes of the February 18, 2021 and March 11, 2021 (Public Hearing) 20 meetings. Councilman Chambers seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 21 22 Committee Reports: 23 Mr. Stephens provided an update on the progress of the Comprehensive Plan. He decided to hold discussion until 24 the end of the agenda. 25 26 Old Business: 27 1. Sketch Plan: Redfield Road Property28 Location: Eastwood Blvd and Redfield Road 29 Petitioner: Aliant Bank 30 Representative: Flowers & White Engineering, LLC 31 32 The sketch plan of the Redfield Road Property was withdrawn at the petitioner’s request. 33 34 2. Zoning Amendment: B-2 (General Business) to R-4 (Multi-Family Residential)35 Court Manor, Ltd. 36 Location: 202 Nisbett Court 37 Petitioner: Pine Creek Apartments, Ltd. 38 Representative: Barrett-Simpson, LLC 39 40 Mr. Williams provided the staff report for the zoning amendment of the property located at 202 Nisbett 41 Court. He stated that the petitioner is requesting to rezone the property to R-4 as its current use. Multi-42 family use was permitted at this site through a use-on-appeal by the BZA on March 9, 1999, however, 43 today, multi-family use is no longer allowed under the B-2 zoning classification. 44 45 Blake Rice of Barrett-Simpson, LLC, petitioner’s representative, stated that the petitioner is seeking 46 funding to rehab the current property. They are seeking rezoning to comply with the use as requirement 47 to receive those funds. 48 49 Chairman Smith opened the floor for public comments. There were none. The public hearing was closed. 50 51 Mr. Mullins introduced a resolution recommending approval of the rezoning of 202 Nisbitt Court from B-2 to R-52 4 and moved for its approval. Mr. Gardner seconded the motion. 53 54 In their discussion, the Mayor Gillespie and Councilman Chambers expressed that they would be abstaining from 55 voting because of the moratorium on apartments currently in place by City Council. After their discussion, the 56 DRAFT Draft Prattville Planning Commission March 18, 2021 Minutes Page 2 of 5 vote was called. The motion to approve passed by 5/2 vote as recorded. Favor: Chairman Smith, Chief Johnson, 57 Mrs. Carpenter, Mr. Daniel and Mr. Mullins. Opposed: None. Abstained: Mayor Gillespie and Councilman 58 Chambers. 59 60 New Business: 61 3. Zoning Amendment: R-2 (Single Family Residential) to B-2 (General Business)62 Location: 987 East Main Street 63 Petitioner: Juanita Jones 64 65 Mr. Williams provided the staff report for the zoning amendment of the property located at 987 E. Main 66 Street. He stated that the petitioner is requesting to rezone the property to B-2. The proposed rezoning 67 meets the general fabric of the area. If B-2 is too intensive, the commission may consider O-1 zoning or 68 B-1 zoning.69 70 Larry Jones, petitioner’s representative, stated that the petitioner is his mother who is interested in selling 71 the property. The B-2 zoning was requested because of the surrounding B-2 zoning. 72 73 Chairman Smith opened the floor for public comments. 74 75 Jon Lee Finnegan, 211 Deer Trace had questions about B-2 uses allowed. 76 77 After no further comments, the public hearing was closed. 78 79 Chief Johnson introduced a resolution recommending approval of the rezoning of 987 E. Main Street from R-2 80 to B-2 and moved for its approval. Mr. Mullins seconded the motion. 81 82 In their discussion, the Commission expressed the uses allowed in B-2 district and felt that O-1 zoning was less 83 intrusive for the area. Mr. Jones was asked if O-1 would be acceptable and he said it was. After their discussion, 84 the vote was called. Chief Johnson moved to amend and recommend the zoning change to O-1 zoning. Mrs. 85 Carpenter seconded the motion. The motion to amend passed unanimously. 86 87 The amended motion to approve passed by 6/1 vote as recorded. Favor: Chairman Smith, Councilman Chambers, 88 Chief Johnson, Mrs. Carpenter, Mr. Daniel and Mr. Mullins. Opposed: Mayor Gillespie. 89 90 4. Annexation: Glennbrooke 8 Extension91 Location: South of Old Ridge Road adjacent to Glennbrooke 8 92 Owner: David L. Avant/Diane R. Avant 93 Representative: Barrett-Simpson, Inc. 94 95 Mr. Rigsby provided the staff report for the annexation request of Glennbrooke 8 extension. He stated that the 96 petitioner is requesting to annex into the city a 6.14 acre parcel, adjoining previously annexed Glennbrooke Phase 97 8, for the development of single-family residential. The proposed annexation meets the consistency of the 98 surrounding land use of the comprehensive plan. He stated that annexation of this property will help eliminate 99 “donut-holes” of unincorporated property within the City. 100 101 Blake Rice of Barrett-Simpson, Inc., petitioner’s representative, presented the annexation request for the property 102 located in Glennbrooke Subdivision. He stated that the approximately 6.14 acre lot should have been included 103 with the previous approved Glennbrooke 8. 104 105 Chairman Smith opened the floor for public comments. There were none. The public hearing was closed. 106 107 Councilman Chambers introduced a resolution recommending approval of the annexation of Glennbrooke 8 108 Extension and moved for its approval. Mrs. Carpenter seconded the motion. 109 110 The motion to approve passed unanimously. 111 112 DRAFT Draft Prattville Planning Commission March 18, 2021 Minutes Page 3 of 5 113 114 5.Zoning Amendment: R-3 (Single Family Residential)115 Glennbrooke 8 Extension116 Location: South of Old Ridge Road adjacent to Glennbrooke 8117 Owner: David L. Avant/Diane R. Avant118 Representative: Barrett-Simpson, Inc.119 120 Mr. Rigsby provided the staff report for the zoning request of Glennbrooke 8 Extension. He stated that the 121 petitioner is requesting a zoning of 6.14 acre parcel adjoining previously annexed Glennbrooke Phase 8 for the 122 development of single-family residential building lots. The proposed rezoning meets the general fabric of the 123 area. 124 125 Blake Rice of Barrett-Simpson, Inc., petitioner’s representative, presented the rezoning request for the 126 approximately 6.14 acre property located in Glennbrooke Subdivision. 127 128 Chairman Smith opened the floor for public comments. There were none. The public hearing was closed. 129 130 Mrs. Carpenter introduced a resolution recommending approval of the rezoning of Glennbrooke 8 Extension and 131 moved for its approval. Mr. Mullins seconded the motion. 132 133 The motion to approve passed unanimously. 134 135 6. Preliminary Plat: Glennbrooke 8, Plat 1136 Location: South of Old Ridge Road adjacent to Glennbrooke 7 137 Owner: David L. Avant/Diane R. Avant 138 Representative: Barrett-Simpson, Inc. 139 140 Mr. Rigsby provided the staff report for the preliminary plat of Glennbrooke 8, Plat 1. He stated that the petitioner 141 is requesting preliminary plat approval of the approximately 69 acre parcel for the development of single-family 142 residential building lots. This plat proposes to connect to future Phase 9 to the west. 143 144 Blake Rice of Barrett-Simpson, Inc., petitioner’s representative, presented the preliminary plat of Glennbrooke 8, 145 Plat 1. 146 147 Chairman Smith opened the floor for public comments. There were none. The public hearing was closed. 148 149 Mr. Daniel introduced a resolution recommending approval of the preliminary plat of Glennbrooke 8, Plat 1 and 150 moved for its approval. Mrs. Carpenter seconded the motion. 151 152 The motion to approve passed unanimously. 153 154 7. Zoning Amendment: R-4 (Multi-Family Residential) to B-2 (General Business)155 Lot A & Lot B, The Reserve, a replat of Lot #8 High Point Town Center Plat 2-A 156 Location: Old Farm Lane S & Vista Point Blvd 157 Petitioner: BVCV High Point, LLC 158 159 Mr. Stephens provided the staff report for the zoning request of the BVCV High Point, LLC property. He stated 160 that the petitioner is requesting to rezone the two outer parcels (A & B) to B-2 and the larger parcel will remain 161 as R-4. 162 163 Will Barrett of Civil Southeast Engineering Group was present representing the petitioner. 164 165 Chairman Smith opened the floor for public comments. There were none. The public hearing was closed. 166 167 DRAFT Draft Prattville Planning Commission March 18, 2021 Minutes Page 4 of 5 Chairman Smith introduced a resolution recommending approval of the rezoning of Lot A & Lot B, The Reserve 168 and moved for its approval. Mr. Mullins seconded the motion. 169 170 The motion to approve passed by 5/1 vote as recorded. Favor: Chairman Smith, Chief Johnson, Mrs. Carpenter, 171 Mr. Daniel, and Mr. Mullins. Opposed: Councilman Chambers. Abstain: Mayor Gillespie. 172 173 8. Sketch Plan: Smith Property Phase 2174 Location: Highway 31, Highway 82 and McQueen Smith Road 175 Owner: H. D. & D. Land Company 176 Representative: Barrett-Simpson, Inc. 177 178 Mr. Rigsby provided the staff report for the sketch plan of Smith Property Phase 2. He stated that the 179 sketch plan is proposing to develop 84 single family homes on 35.35 acres of property. Public water and 180 sewer are available. Street connectivity consists of three outlets. Two outlets are on McQueen Smith Road 181 and one is located on highway 31. There will be no outlet on to US Hwy 82. He stated that the proposed 182 sketch does match the fabric of the surrounding area. The plan is an extension of McClain Landing. 183 184 Mr. Smith introduced a resolution recommending approval of the sketch plan of the Smith Property, 185 Phase 2 and moved for its approval. Mr. Mullins seconded the motion. 186 187 Blake Rice of Barrett-Simpson, Inc., petitioner’s representative, presented the sketch plan of Smith Property, 188 Phase 2. He stated that two lots (Lot 45 and Lot 46) are reserved for amenity lots. 189 190 Mrs. Carpenter moved to amend that the two lots are reserved for amenity lots. Mr. Daniel seconded the 191 motion. The motion to amend passed unanimously. 192 193 The vote was called. The amended motion to approve passed unanimously. 194 195 9. Proposed Ordinance Amendment: R-4 (Multi-Family Residential) text amendment.196 197 Mr. Stephens introduced the proposed amendments for the zoning requirements in R-4 zoning district. 198 Some items discussed were standards for site development, parking and driveways, open space and 199 stormwater management. 200 201 Chairman Smith called for a recess at 4:51. The meeting resumed at 4:56 with all members present at the 202 initial roll call. 203 204 Chairman Smith opened the floor for public comments. Comments were made by the following citizens. 205 Jon Lee Finnegan, 211 Deer Trace and Gerald Cimis, 141 N. Chestnut Street. Justin Pearson spoke via 206 Zoom. 207 208 After no further comments, the public hearing was closed. 209 210 Mr. Mullins introduced a resolution recommending approval of the zoning text amendment to Section 67-211 Multifamily Development and moved for its approval. Mrs. Carpenter seconded the motion. 212 213 Mr. Mullins was excused at 5:23. 214 215 In their discussion, the Commission wanted to address some issues that were brought up in the public’s 216 comments and felt that the amendments needed additional time to review. After their discussion, 217 Chairman Smith called for the vote. 218 219 Chief Johnson moved to postpone action until the next meeting. Mrs. Carpenter seconded the motion. 220 The motion to postpone passed unanimously. 221 222 10. Project Prattville 2040 -Adoption223 DRAFT Draft Prattville Planning Commission March 18, 2021 Minutes Page 5 of 5 224 Mayor Gillespie moved to postpone action until the next meeting. Councilman Chambers seconded the 225 motion. The motion to postpone passed unanimously. 226 227 Attached to the minutes are comments that were received and addressed via Zoom at the public hearing 228 held on March 11, 2021 for Project Prattville 2040. 229 230 Miscellaneous Business: 231 232 Adjourn: 233 There being no other business, the meeting was adjourned at 5:50 p.m. 234 235 Respectfully submitted, 236 237 238 239 Alisa Morgan, Secretary 240 Prattville Planning Commission 241 DRAFT Draft Prattville Planning Commission April 8, 2021 Work Session Minutes Page 1 of 1 CITY OF PRATTVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION 1 WORK SESSION 2 MINUTES 34 April 8, 2021 56 Chairman Tim Smith called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. 78 Members present were Chairman Tim Smith, Vice-Chairman Reuben Gardner, Mayor Bill Gillespie, Councilman 9 John Chambers, Mrs. Paula Carpenter, Chief Dallis Johnson, and Mr. Mugs Mullins. Attending via Zoom was 10 Mr. Ken Daniel. Absent was Mr. Seth Hayden. 11 12 Staff present: Mr. Scott Stephens, City Planner; Mr. Darrell Rigsby, Senior Planner; and Mr. Tommie Williams, 13 Planner. 14 15 Also participating via Zoom was Mr. Jason Fondren, KPS Group, the consultant for the zoning ordinance re-16 write. 17 18 The commissioners went through and discussed each section of the draft multi-family standards, 19 including parking requirements, building design, and height of structures in the R-4 requirements. 20 21 Comments were heard from members of the public: Kevin Buckner of TBG Residential, Justin Pearson of 22 Ball Ventures (via Zoom), and Dr. Gerald Cimis. 23 24 The multi-family standards and R-4 zoning requirements will be on the April 15th regular Planning 25 Commission agenda for consideration. 26 27 Chairman Tim Smith adjourned the meeting at 5:03 p.m. 28 29 30 31 Respectfully submitted, 32 33 34 35 J. Scott Stephens36 Planning Director 37 DRAFT RESOLUTION [Adopting Project Prattville 2040, the comprehensive master plan for the City of Prattville] WHEREAS, the Prattville Planning Commission has the function and duty, pursuant to Section 11-52-8, Code of Alabama, 1975, to make and adopt a comprehensive master plan for the physical development of the City and its surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Prattville Planning Commission adopted Project Prattville, the most recent update to the comprehensive plan on January 21, 2010; and WHEREAS, the City of Prattville and the Prattville Planning Commission began the process to further update Project Prattville in February 2020; and WHEREAS, the Commission has engaged in surveys, interviews, and public meetings of the community, including residents, educators, civic and religious leaders, and local business and industry leaders, and has studied the present conditions and future growth of the City; and WHEREAS, the Commission has created an updated, comprehensive master plan entitled Project Prattville 2040, which is made with the general purpose of guiding and accomplishing a coordinated, adjusted, and harmonious development of the City of Prattville, in order to best promote the health, safety, morals, order, convenience, prosperity, and general welfare; and WHEREAS, the Commission held a public hearing on Project Prattville 2040 on March 11, 2021. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Prattville Planning Commission that Project Prattville 2040, the comprehensive master plan for the City of Prattville, including its text, maps, tables, illustrations, and other descriptive matters, is adopted, and supersedes and replaces any prior master plan or comprehensive plan previously adopted by the Commission. ADOPTED THIS 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2021. ____________________________ Tim Smith, Chairman ____________________________ Reuben Gardner, Vice-Chairman ____________________________ Paula Carpenter ____________________________ John Chambers ____________________________ Ken Daniel ____________________________ Bill Gillespie, Jr. ____________________________ Seth Hayden ____________________________ Dallis Johnson ____________________________ Patrick “Mugs” Mullins I, Alisa Morgan, Secretary to the Prattville Planning Commission, hereby certify and attest that the foregoing is a full, true, and correct copy of the resolution duly adopted by the Prattville Planning Commission at a regular meeting on the 15th day of April, 2021. ____________________________ Alisa Morgan, Secretary Agenda Item #1 DRAFT 102 West Main Street \ Prattville, AL 36067 \ 334. 595.05 00 \ prattvilleal.gov BILL GILLESPIE, JR. MAYOR J. SCOTT STEPHENS, AICP DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: J. Scott Stephens, Planning Director DATE: April 13, 2021 RE: Proposed Zoning Text Amendment – Multi-family Developments, R-4 Please see attached the proposed draft of multi-family standards. The proposal is to amend the current Section 67 - Multifamily housing projects, and Section 71 - Residential district requirements. Below is the current Section 67 proposed to be deleted: Section 67. - Multifamily housing projects. In the case of a multifamily housing project consisting of a group of two (2) or more buildings to be constructed on a plot of ground of at least four (4) acres not subdivided into the customary streets and lots and not to be so subdivided or where existing or contemplated street and lot layout make it impracticable to apply the requirements of this ordinance to the individual buildings in such housing projects, the application of such requirements to such housing projects shall be done by the Board of Zoning Adjustment with the advice of the Planning Commission, in a manner that will be in harmony with the character of the neighborhood, will insure substantially the same character of occupancy, a density of land use no higher and a standard of open space at least as high as required by this ordinance in the district in which the proposed project is to be located, and will provide layout design and public utilities in harmony with the general requirements and minimum standards of design of the subdivision regulations of the municipality. In no case shall the Board of Zoning Adjustment authorize a use or a building height or building area prohibited in the district in which the housing project is to be located. DRAFT Use table for R-4 Districts: Section 71. - Residential district requirements. District Use Regulations Space and Height Regulations All "R" Districts [No changes proposed -JSS] MINIMUM YARD SIZE: For public and semi- public structures: Front Yard: 35 feet; Rear Yard: 35 feet; Side Yard: 35 feet. MINIMUM LOT SIZE: Width at building line: 45 feet. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: 50 feet 2 stories. R-4 USES PERMITTED: Dwellings and apartments for any number of families. [See Section 67 for multi-family development standards.] USES PERMITTED ON APPEAL: Clubs, not conducted for profit; rooming and boarding houses. (See: regulations common to all "R" Districts, listed above.) MINIMUM YARD SIZE: Front Yard: 25 feet; Rear Yard: 30 feet; Side Yard: 8 feet on one side; 6 feet on the other side. MINIMUM LOT SIZE: Area in Square Feet: One or two family dwellings 6,000; For each additional family unit, add: 5 feet. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: 35 feet; 3 stories. MAXIMUM BUILDING AREA PERCENT: 40% DRAFT RESOLUTION 1 2 Text Amendment – Multifamily Developments, Prattville Zoning Ordinance 3 4 5 Whereas, the Prattville Planning Commission may formulate and recommend changes to the 6 Zoning Ordinance of Prattville, Alabama; 7 8 Whereas, the Planning Commission has determined that the multifamily development and R-4 9 regulations should be revised and updated; and 10 11 Whereas, the Planning Commission has formulated an amendment to the zoning ordinance; 12 and 13 14 Whereas, a public hearing on a proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance was conducted 15 by the Prattville Planning Commission on April 15, 2021; 16 17 Now, Therefore, Be it Resolved, that the Prattville Planning Commission hereby recommends 18 that the Prattville City Council amend the Zoning Ordinance, Section 67, as detailed in 19 Attachment A, and Section 71, as detailed in Attachment B. 20 21 Be It Further Resolved, that this resolution, upon its adoption, be transmitted by the 22 Secretary of the Planning Commission to the Prattville City Council. 23 24 APPROVED THIS 15th day of April, 2021. 25 26 27 ___________________________________________ 28 Tim Smith, Chairman 29 30 31 ____________________________________________ 32 Alisa Morgan, Secretary 33 DRAFT Multifamily Standards Draft: April 13, 2021 1 Sec. 67 Multifamily Development A. Multifamily developments with buildings containing five or more dwelling units are subject to the following standards and to administrative site plan review to assure that the layout of buildings, open spaces, circulation, drainage and infrastructure is in harmony with the equivalent standards of the City Subdivision Regulations. B. Definitions. For the purposes of this Section, the following terms are defined as follows: 1. Articulation, articulated. Changes in the depth along the building façade such as attached columns, wall recesses, horizontal banding, cornices, etc. to provide depth and variety to the façade. 2. Fenestration, fenestrated. The pattern of window and door openings on a façade. 3. Low Impact Design. A site planning and engineering design approach to managing stormwater runoff that emphasizes conservation and use of natural features, infiltration, and on-site storage and treatment involving landscape elements integrated into the design of the site. This approach uses engineered small-scale hydrologic controls to replicate predevelopment hydrology through infiltrating, filtering, storing, evaporating, and detaining runoff close to its source. 4. Open Space, Improved. Open space that has been created or modified, including but not limited to parks, playgrounds, swimming pools, ball fields, plazas, landscaped green spaces. 5. Pervious pavement. Paving materials that allow water to penetrate into the ground below, including concrete paving blocks, concrete grid pavers, perforated brick pavers and similar paving materials. This shall not include compacted gravel. 6. Rain garden. A planted depression or hole that allows stormwater runoff from impervious surfaces to be absorbed into the ground. 7. Swale. An open, grassed or vegetated channel used to partially treat stormwater, attenuate flooding potential and convey stormwater. C. A Site Development Plan must provide for, at a minimum: 1. Convenient vehicular servicing of the buildings, satisfactory circulation of traffic in the parking areas and appropriate access management. 2. A preliminary plan or engineering report providing for the site grading, storm drainage, sanitary sewerage and water supply. 3. Suitable access points adjoining public streets serving the proposed development, which must be properly illuminated to reduce traffic hazards. 4. Waste collection facilities must be provided and must be the responsibility of the property owner or manager. D. Site Development Standards 1. The arrangement of buildings, open spaces, parking areas and drives must be suitable to existing topography to avoid extensive grading. 2. Barracks formations, in which buildings and parking areas are arranged and concentrated in a dense, rectilinear pattern are discouraged. Where rectilinear arrangements are proposed, courtyards or similar improved open spaces must be integrated into the arrangement of buildings and parking areas. Multifamily buildings may not be surrounded on all sides by parking and driveways. 3. Multifamily buildings must be oriented toward streets, interior drives and improved open spaces, not adjacent properties. A multifamily building may be aligned along a parking area provided it is also oriented toward a street, interior drive or improved open space. (a) Building entrances must face and be clearly visible from streets, interior drives or interior open space. This does not apply to entrances to individual dwelling units. DRAFT Multifamily Standards Draft: April 13, 2021 2 (b) Building entrances must be accessible from the street, interior drive or open space they face. 4. Building spacing. Buildings must be spaced no less than the sum of their lengths divided by three ((A+B)/3), as shown in Figure 67-1. In no case may buildings be placed closer together than 20 ft. Required building spacing is measured perpendicularly from the longer of the two building walls at the closest point between the two buildings. Figure 67-1: Minimum Building Spacing 5. Parking and Driveways (a) Off-street parking must be provided in the following amounts: (i) 1.5 spaces per one-bedroom unit (ii) 1 space per bedroom for each unit of two or more bedrooms (iii) One visitor parking space per four units (iv) For age-restricted senior units, 1.25 spaces per one-bedroom unit and 2 spaces per unit of two or more bedrooms (b) Minimum parking stall size shall be 9.5’ x 20’ (c) Visitor parking requirements may be reduced when approved on-street parking is available along the property frontage and by only the amount of approved on-street parking spaces contained within the frontage of the multifamily property. (d) Off-street parking must be located to the side or rear of buildings, and may not extend forward of the front building line. When located to the side of buildings and adjacent to a public street, off-street parking areas may not occupy more than 30% of each perimeter public street frontage. The Director may waive these requirements when off-street parking is located forward of the front building line on adjoining properties on both sides of the multifamily site; however, these requirements may not be waived where the site fronts on a local street or on the same frontage as an adjoining detached single- family dwelling. DRAFT Multifamily Standards Draft: April 13, 2021 3 Figure 67-2: Left: Permissible location of off-street parking. Right: Parking between multifamily buildings and public street not permitted unless the same condition is present on adjoining properties on both sides of the multifamily site. Figure 67-3: Maximum width of parking area facing public street when located to side of building. (e) Where provided, common or individual garage parking areas must be located away from public street views. (f) If allowed to be kept on the premises by the owner, boats and recreational vehicles may not encroach into required parking and may not be kept forward of the front building line. (g) The number and location of access points to a public street must be as required by the City Building and Fire Codes and subject to review by the City Engineer. (h) Private drives that provide access from a public street to off-street parking areas must comply with the dimensional standards in Table 67-1 below. Where parallel parking is provided, each parking lane must be at least 7.5 ft wide measured from face of curb. Trees, in accordance with the species and size types in Section 149, Table 1, must be provided on both sides of the drive and installed at least three feet from the back of curb. Root barrier and other treatment may be required to prevent damage to utilities and sidewalks. TABLE 67-1 DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR PRIVATE DRIVES Curb Type/Width Allowable travel lane width Allowable total width (face of curb to face of curb) Tree spacing Curb/gutter; 18 in 10-11 ft 22-24 ft 50 ft oc average 6. Open Space. (a) At least 20% of the site must be permanently reserved as open space. All common open spaces and recreational areas must be well maintained in a safe and orderly condition. DRAFT Multifamily Standards Draft: April 13, 2021 4 (b) At least 50% of the required open space must be improved and maintained as open space for the use of residents and guests. Improved open spaces should be consolidated into one or a few central locations to assure accessibility and usability and must be oriented to receive adequate sunlight. (c) Improved open space must be graded and sodded, at a minimum, to accommodate use by residents, and must be adequately drained to prevent ponding. (d) Open space and recreational areas are counted toward the improved open space requirement as follows: (i) Required setback areas do not count unless they otherwise meet the standards of this Subsection. Spaces must be large enough to support leisure and recreational activity; no dimension may be less than 15 ft. (ii) Gazebos, pavilions and similar open structures provided for the use of residents are permitted in improved open spaces. (iii) Covered porches, decks, or patios may be counted toward no more than 25% of the required open space. To qualify, such spaces must be at least 35 sf in area with no dimension less than five feet. Such spaces may not be counted when they are completely inset into the building; they must project at least two feet beyond the wall plane. (e) If one or more of the following amenities, or similar amenities as approved by the Director, are provided, then the minimum overall open space required in (a) above may be reduced to 16%: (i) Outdoor pool, hot tub, splash pad or combination of these with a combined area of at least 1,600 sf (ii) Tennis, volleyball or basketball court (iii) One or more areas improved for lawn bowling, shuffle board, pickle ball, bocce ball or similar activity with a combined area of at least 1,600 sf (iv) Off-leash area for dogs of at least 1,600 sf, must be enclosed with fence or solid hedge and gate with one or more watering stations and waste receptacles (v) One or more pavilions, gazebos or similar open structures, each having a covered area of at least 150 sf with a total combined covered area of at least 600 sf; each must be furnished with benches or other seating and at least one structure must be furnished suitably for outdoor dining (vi) Community garden of at least 1,600 sf (vii) Children’s playground area of at least 1,600 sf outfitted with swings, slides and/or similar play equipment; seating must be provided in or adjacent to the playground The combined area of the proposed amenities must total at least 50% of the improved open space requirement and must be maintained in accordance with the approved site plan. (f) Developments containing 100 or more units must include one or more of the approved amenities listed in (f) above totaling at least 35% of the improved open space requirement. (g) Amenities provided to meet the requirements of (e) or (f) above may be subsequently changed to another amenity type listed provided the total area of such amenities is not reduced below that in the approved site plan. Any subsequent change to an amenity type not listed must be approved by the Director. 7. Stormwater Management. Stormwater retention or detention facilities must be integrated, to the greatest extent practicable, into the design of parking areas and open spaces as landscape amenities and should include low impact design techniques such as swales and rain gardens. The use of cisterns to capture stormwater for on-site irrigation is also encouraged. Stormwater management facilities located within an open space may only be counted as improved open space if it is designed so that it need not be fenced and is landscaped and useable by residents. DRAFT Multifamily Standards Draft: April 13, 2021 5 8. Service, Loading and Waste Collection. Each development must be provided with a service area or areas for waste collection. Each such area must be located behind the front building line and away from public views but must be conveniently accessible to vehicles collecting such waste and to residents. The location of such areas must minimize negative visual, noise, odor and other impacts to adjoining streets, on-site dwellings and adjacent developments. Each such area must be paved with concrete and screened by an opaque fence or wall at least as tall as the waster container and as otherwise approved by the Director. The enclosure must have an opaque gate or closure that will be kept closed when not being accessed. 9. Fire Protection. (a) No portion of any building may be located farther from a fire hydrant than may be reached with 500 ft of hose. (b) If the adopted fire prevention and protection codes are in conflict, then the more restrictive requirements will prevail. (c) Every multifamily building must be accessible to fire trucks equipment as required and approved by the Fire Department. Provided adequate clearance, such access may be located along an interior drive, within a parking lot or within any open area adjacent to each building. The acceptable distance between buildings and the fire truck access area must be determined by the Fire Department based upon building height and design. E. Pedestrian Access Standards. A pedestrian circulation system meeting the following standards must be provided: 1. Walkways must connect the pedestrian circulation system to adjacent public streets. 2. If not already provided, a publicly accessible sidewalk at least five feet wide must be provided along all public street frontages. 3. Walkways must connect the main entrances of all buildings. For buildings fronting on a public street, a public sidewalk may be counted toward this standard. Walkways must be provided that connect building entrances to parking areas and common areas and facilities. 4. Walkways must be provided to connect to any public trails or similar bicycle-pedestrian facilities adjoining the site. 5. Materials Standards for Pathways. (a) Walkways must be of concrete or masonry pavers and at least five feet wide except that walkways serving no more than four units may be four feet wide. (b) Except as provided in Item c below, walkways must be clearly defined and designed so as to be separated from vehicular use areas through the use of raised curbs, elevation changes, bollards, landscaping, different paving materials or similar methods. Striping alone does not meet this requirement. If a raised path is used it must be at least four inches high. Bollard spacing must be no further apart than five feet on center. (c) A vehicular drive may be counted toward pedestrian access if the drive provides access to 16 or fewer parking spaces and is surfaced with paving blocks, bricks, or other special paving. F. Privacy and Security Standards. 1. When a multifamily building is located adjacent to a public street, any stairway must be enclosed within the building or otherwise screened from public street views. For street-facing buildings, upper floor units must be accessed from within the building interior or from an exterior walkway that overlooks an interior courtyard or similar common area. 2. Separation must be provided between windows of ground floor dwelling units and adjacent walkways, parking areas and common open spaces, including: DRAFT Multifamily Standards Draft: April 13, 2021 6 (a) A horizontal separation at least ten feet deep including a landscaped bed containing at least one row of evergreen shrubs with a mature height of at least three feet; and/or (b) Vertical separation so that the bottom edge of a ground-floor window is at least five feet above the grade of the adjacent walkway, parking area or open space. Developments are encouraged to raise the ground floor of residential buildings at least 30 inches above the adjoining sidewalk or parking area to enhance privacy. Wherever the ground floor is so raised, the minimum horizontal separation in (a) above is reduced to six feet. 3. Entrances and porches of individual units must be set back at least seven feet from walkways and at least twelve feet from the curb line of any driveway or parking area. If the entrance or porch level is at least 30 inches above the adjoining grade, the minimum setback from walkways is four feet and the minimum setback from the curb line of driveways and parking areas is nine feet. G. Lighting Standards. Lighting should eliminate adverse impacts of light spillover; provide attractive lighting fixtures and layout patterns that contribute to a unified exterior lighting design; and provide exterior lighting for safe vehicular and pedestrian access to and within a development. 1. Pedestrian Lighting. Pedestrian-level, bollard lighting, ground-mounted lighting, or other low, glare- controlled fixtures mounted on building or landscape walls must be used to light walkways. 2. Lighting Height. Light poles and lighting structures may not be taller than 20 feet. 3. Building-Mounted Lighting. Building-mounted lighting must be limited to accent lighting used to illuminate architectural features and entrances, with a maximum height of 20 ft. 4. Illumination Areas. Exterior lighting must be designed to a minimum average level of one footcandle along all pedestrian areas and driveways and throughout parking areas. Exterior lighting must be maintained in accordance with the approved site plan. 5. Spillover Glare. Light fixtures must use full cut-off lenses or hoods to prevent glare and light spillover onto adjacent properties, buildings, and roadways. H. Architectural Standards. 1. Four-sided design. All building elevations must reflect consistent design, textures, colors, and features. All walls must be articulated and fenestrated to provide visual interest. 2. Building Articulation. All buildings must include the following architectural design features at intervals of no more than 30 ft along all facades facing a street, open space or parking area: (a) Vertical building articulation. Minimum depth and width of articulation is 36 inches and four feet, respectively, if corresponding with a change in color or building material and/or roofline. Otherwise, minimum depth and width of articulation is ten feet and 15 ft, respectively. Porches and projecting balconies, including those that are partially recessed, count toward this requirement. DRAFT Multifamily Standards Draft: April 13, 2021 7 (b) Articulation of the “base, middle and top”. This typically includes a distinctive design for the portion of the elevation along the foundation and ground floor, consistent articulation of middle floors, and a distinctive roofline. 3. Diversity of Building Types. Multi-building developments must provide different architectural designs to achieve visual interest and variety, particularly where multiple buildings front on the same public street. Changes in building colors or reversal of facade designs are not sufficient to comply with this standard. To meet this requirement, changes must include a combination of at least two of the following: vertical articulation (meeting the requirements of (a) above), fenestration, building materials, and roof design. 4. Accessory structures. Accessory structures must reflect the same design and finish as principal buildings. 5. Roof Design. (a) Multifamily buildings must have a minimum 4:12 roof pitch. Alternative roof designs will be considered provided design elements are included to help the building and its roofline fit into the site’s context. (b) Pitched-roof buildings must incorporate variations in the roofline. The maximum length of any continuous roofline is 40 ft. The use, alone, of dormers and/or gables is not sufficient to comply with this requirement. Left: Continuous roofline exceeds 40 ft. Right: Acceptable variation in roof design. (c) Eaves must extend beyond the supporting wall at least 16 inches. I. Building Details and Materials. 1. Changes in material should occur at the horizontal divisions between the base, middle and top and on inside corners. “Heavier” materials, such as masonry, should be used on the base. 2. Exterior Finishes. Building facades must incorporate a coordinated color scheme consisting of matte finishes. A “coordinated color scheme” includes a limited number of complementary colors that are used throughout the development; and in the case of developments with multiple buildings, primary façade colors may alternate from building to building provided trim colors, materials and/or other design features visually tie together individual buildings. Neutral or earth tone colors are recommended. Gloss finishes may be used for trim and accent. Fluorescent and metallic paints are prohibited. DRAFT Multifamily Standards Draft: April 13, 2021 8 3. Windows (a) Transparent windows facing the street are required. At least 15% of each street-facing facade must be fenestration. All other facades must have a minimum fenestration area of 10%. (b) Windows must be recessed or project at least two inches from the wall plane or window trim must be used at least four inches in width with color that contrasts with the base building color. Exceptions will be considered where the design includes other distinctive window or facade treatment that adds visual interest to the building. 4. Preferred Building Materials. Building exteriors must be constructed from high quality, durable materials as follows: (a) Brick or other masonry. When used for the facade of any building, concrete blocks must be split, rock- or ground-faced and may not exceed 25% of the masonry area of the facade. To add visual interest, the use of specialized textures and/or colors used effectively with other building materials and details are encouraged. Plain concrete block or plain concrete may be used only as foundation material if the foundation material is not revealed more than three feet above finished grade at the foundation wall. (b) Exterior insulation and finish system (EIFS) and similar troweled finishes (stucco) must be trimmed in wood, masonry, or other approved materials and may not be used adjacent to grade. (c) Horizontal wood and cementitious siding. Composite boards manufactured from wood or other products, such as hardboard or plankboard, may only be used when the board product is less than nine inches wide. 5. Prohibited Materials. The following materials are prohibited in locations visible from the public right-of-way and adjoining properties: (a) Plywood siding (including T-111 or similar plywood), except when used as a component in board and batten siding (b) Highly tinted or mirrored glass (except stained glass) as more than 10 percent of the building facade (c) Corrugated fiberglass (d) Crushed colored rock/crushed tumbled glass (e) Noncorrugated and highly reflective sheet metal 6. Vinyl may be used as a trim material. Vinyl siding is permissible as an accent material comprising no more than 30% of any building façade and only when the board size is less than six inches wide. However, vinyl siding it may not be used adjacent to grade. Vinyl siding cannot be painted, which limits opportunities for changing building colors as part of future renovations. 7. Corrugated metal siding is permissible as an accent material comprising no more than 30% of any building façade. 8. Chain link fencing must be vinyl coated and may not be used forward of the front building line. J. Landscaping. Screening must be provided to conceal certain site elements, including but not limited to, mechanical equipment, loading and waste collection areas, from public view. In addition to any required parking lot landscaping, buffers and screening, landscaping must include the following: 1. Foundation Planting. All street-facing elevations must have landscaping along any exposed foundation. The landscaped area may be along the outer edge of a porch instead of the foundation. This landscaping requirement does not apply to portions of the building facade that provide access to the building. Foundation landscaping must meet the following standards: (a) The landscaped area must be at least three feet wide. (b) There must be at least one three-gallon shrub for every three lineal feet of foundation or the minimum spacing necessary for healthy growth as recommended by a landscape professional. DRAFT Multifamily Standards Draft: April 13, 2021 9 2. Landscaping techniques include the following: (a) Preserve existing trees and native vegetation whenever possible. (b) Use plants that require low amounts of water, including native drought-resistant species. (c) Use low-impact design techniques, including pervious pavement, swales, and rain gardens, to manage stormwater in parking lots. (d) Locate trees along street frontages at appropriate spacing so that, at maturity, ground floor entrances are clearly visible from the street and sidewalk. (e) Plant a mix of evergreen and deciduous plants to maintain year-round color and interest. (f) Install shrubs, grasses and other non-tree vegetation, as appropriate, for ground cover in landscaping beds, open spaces and other unpaved areas. 3. An irrigation method must be included in the landscaping plan. Underground irrigation systems should be used whenever possible to avoid drought loss. K. Additional Standards 1. Traffic Impact Study and Plan. A traffic impact study and plan, prepared by a Traffic Engineer, must be furnished together with the Site Plan for all developments of 100 units or more, or as may be required by the City Engineer. The study must be prepared in accordance with generally accepted standards for traffic studies. The traffic study must show, in detail reasonably satisfactory to the City Engineer, the effect that the proposed development will have on the area adjacent to and near the site. The study must make recommendations with respect to what additional traffic controls will be needed adjacent to or near the site as a result of the traffic generated by proposed development. The developer must pay the cost of any such signals and/or devices, if the City Engineer considers them necessary. 2. Drainage Study and Plan. For each development, a drainage study and plan must be furnished as part of the Site Plan. Such study must be prepared by a Professional Engineer. The plan must show, in detail, reasonably satisfactory to the City, the effect that the proposed development will have on the site and the land adjacent to and near the site. The plan must include drainage, grading, excavation, topography, erosion and sedimentation, stormwater detention and floodplain management controls. The plan must provide for such structures and devices as may be required by the City’s stormwater rules and regulations. L. Site Plan Requirements. In addition to the site plan requirements in Section 10, the following must be provided as necessary to determine compliance with the applicable standard: 1. Dimensions between buildings and calculations, Subsection D, Paragraph 4 2. Parking calculations in table form, Subsection D, Paragraph 5 3. Open space plan (as separate sheet or as part of landscaping plan), specifying all required improved and other open spaces with overall dimensions, area (sf) for each, proposed use and improvements, including a table with areas and percentages, Subsection D, Paragraph 6 4. Location and amount of dedicated storage space, Subsection D, Paragraph 10 5. Pedestrian circulation plan, with dimensions, materials in relation to open spaces, buildings and vehicular areas, Subsection E 6. Dimensioned plan or illustration of privacy and security measures, including method of horizontal and/or vertical separation, Subsection F 7. Lighting plan, prepared by a lighting designer documenting conformance with Subsection G 8. Dimensioned diagrams or illustrations of building and roof articulation for each unique building plan, Subsection H 9. Typical elevations for each unique building plan, including building details, materials and percentages of fenestration and materials used on facades, Subsection I DRAFT Multifamily Standards Draft: April 13, 2021 10 10. Traffic Impact Study and Plan, if required, Subsection K DRAFT 1 Stephens, Scott From:Rigsby, Darrell Sent:Monday, April 12, 2021 2:03 PM To:Morgan, Alisa Cc:Stephens, Scott; Williams, Tommie; Redmond, Leslie Subject:Re: Shepherd Ridge Preliminary Plat Staff Comments Ms. Alisa,   Please see email correspondence from Mr. Schaefer requesting to postpone the Shepherd Ridge Preliminary Plat to the  May Planning Commission meeting.   Darrell D. Rigsby Senior Planner p: 334.595.0502 e: darrell.rigsby@prattvilleal.gov From: Lenny Schaefer   Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 1:58 PM  To: Stephens, Scott <Scott.Stephens@prattvilleal.gov>  Cc: Williams, Tommie <Tommie.Williams@prattvilleal.gov>; Redmond, Leslie <Leslie.Redmond@prattvilleal.gov>;  Rigsby, Darrell <Darrell.Rigsby@prattvilleal.gov>  Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: [EXTERNAL]Re: Shepherd Ridge Preliminary Plat Staff Comments  Leslie and Darrell, Attached is the revised model for Shepherd Ridge. Please distribute this version rather than the previous model. Also, given our current open items, please post-pone my presentation until the May Planning Committee meeting to allow me time to have necessary discussions and coordination. Thank you. Lenny This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the  content is safe. If you are unsure if the email is safe, please forward it to help@prattvilleal.gov.  Agenda Item #3 DRAFT Planning Commission Staff Report TO: City of Prattville Planning Commission FROM: Tommie Williams DATE: April 15, 2021 SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat for Hedgefield 5 The information provided in this staff report has been included for the purpose of reviewing the proposed preliminary plat. There may be additional requirements placed on the property through the Site Plan Review process to address development regulations & access. A.BACKGROUND: Applicant/ Representative: PRLD, LLC / Goodwyn Mills & Cawood, Inc. Owner: PRLD, LLC Property Location: McQueen Smith Road @ Highway 82 Property Size: 10.21 +/- acres Current Future Land Use Map (FLUM) Designation: Mixed Use-Transitional Current Zoning District: PUD (Planned Unit Development) Existing Land Use: Vacant Land B.DEVELOPMENT STATUS & HISTORY: Previous Requests: 1.August 21, 2005 – sketch plan amended to provide for a revised street and alley design. 2.July 6, 2006 – sketch plan amended to add property on north end – site of the Park at HomePlace. 3.April 19, 2007 – sketch plan amended to adjust location of street connecting areas north and south of a central stream. 4.November 17, 2011 – sketch plan amended to accommodate apartment development at southern end of development (Meadows At Home Place). 5.June 21, 2018- Proposal for R-3 zoning & sketch plan amendment held to July 19th, 2018 meeting.DRAFT 6.July 19, 2018- Proposal for sketch plan amendment was given to allow for 50- & 60-foot lots. 7.August 16, 2018 – Proposal for R-3 Rezoning eliminated with adjustments made to comply with PUD development agreement approved with Ordinance 2004-017A for park space. 8.September 13th, 2018, - Development Plan for Hedgefield Plat 1 & 2 approved. 9.Hedgefield 3 & 4 was approved on 10/17/2019. C.ANALYSIS: Street Connectivity: Street connectivity will consist of Hedgefield Way which connects to Hedgefield Drive. There will not be any connectivity to Highway 82. Water/Sewer: The proposed site is serviced by existing water & sewer mains. PUD Residential District Performance Standards: Development requirements for uses in this PUD zoning include the following: MINIMUM YARD SIZE: Front Yard: 20 feet; Rear Yard: 15 feet; Side Yard: 5 feet Staff Comments: This proposed preliminary plat consists of Phase 5 of the Hedgefield Subdivision. Phase 3 will consist of 37 single-family residential building lot that will be built on 10.21 acres of land. These lots will have a minimum 60’ building line with a setback standard as described above. PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION: Surrounding Land Use Zoning North Hedgefield Subdivision PUD (Planned Unit Development) South Vacant Land PUD (Planned Unit Development) East Vacant Land PUD (Planned Unit Development) West Hedgefield Subdivision PUD (Planned Unit Development) DRAFT Reviewed by: Tommie Williams, Planner Site Visits Conducted: April 2021 Recommendation: Approval with condition, complete staff comments DRAFT HWY 82 BYP EHEDGEFIELD DR MCQUEEN SMITH RD SHEDGEFIELD WYSTANTON WY CHERRY TREE LN RUFUS RD MA N A S C O L N OL D Q U A R T E R S R DBLAKELEY CTBIG OAK DR FLINT WILLIAMS AVE PRIVET CTBARBERRY CT±Legend Project AreaAUTAUGA_ELMORE_LINEStreetsAutauga Tax Parcels 0 1,000500 Feet Locations are approximate Location Map - Hedgefield #5 DRAFT HWY 82 BYP EHEDGEFIELD DROLD QUARTERS RDSTANTON WY BLAKELEY CT±Legend Project AreaAUTAUGA_ELMORE_LINEStreetsAutauga Tax Parcels 0 500250 Feet Locations are approximate Aerial Map - Hedgefield #5 DRAFT HWY 82 BYP EHEDGEFIELD DR MCQUEEN SMITH RD SHEDGEFIELD WYSTANTON WY CHERRY TREE LN RUFUS RD MA N A S C O L N OL D Q U A R T E R S R DBLAKELEY CTBIG OAK DR FLINT WILLIAMS AVE PRIVET CTBARBERRY CTB-2 B-2 P.U.D. F.A.R. B-2 P.U.D. P.U.D. R-3 F.A.R. B-2 R-3 P.U.D. R-3 B-2 R-3±Legend Project AreaAUTAUGA_ELMORE_LINEStreetsAutauga Tax Parcels 0 1,000500 Feet Locations are approximate Zoning Map - Hedgefield #5 DRAFT BLOCK A BLOCK B BLOCK ABLO C K C BLOCK A BLOC K A BLOCK A BLOCK EBLOCK EBLOCK C BLOCK C BLOCK ABLOCK C BLOCK C BLOCK B BLOCK FBLOCK ABLOCK ABLOCK F BLOC K F BLOC K E BLOCK F0 100'200' Scale: 1" = 100'HEDGEFIELD SUBDIVISIONPLAT 5 & 6Prattville, AlabamaCONSTRUCTIONNOT RELEASED FOR CMGM 21-0022INITIAL SUBMITTAL03.16.2021RE-SUBMITTAL04.14.2021ENGINEER:DRAWN BY:.5"1"0"1"This drawing is and shall remain the property of Goodwyn, Mills and Cawood, Inc. (GMC) and Goodwyn Mills Cawood LLC (GMC). Unauthorized use of any kind including use on other projects is prohibited. In the event that a conflict arises between the sealed drawings and the electronic files, the sealed drawings will govern. ©Goodwyn, Mills and Cawood, Inc. (GMC) and ©Goodwyn Mills Cawood LLC (GMC)2660 East Chase Lane, Suite 200Montgomery, AL 36117T 334.271.3200ISSUEDATEDRAWING FILE: T:\Montgomery\CMGM Proj\Lowder New Homes\21-0022 Hedgefield Plat 5 & 6\0 DWG\C-002 OVERALL MAP.dwgPLOTTED: Apr 14, 2021 - 2:48pmOVERALLMAPC-002DRAFT BLOCK CBLOCK BBLOCK F BL O C K E BLOCK FBLOCK F BLOCK E HEDGEFIELD SUBDIVISION PLAT 5 & 6 Prattville, Alabama CONSTRUCTION NOT RELEASED FOR CMGM 21-0022 INITIAL SUBMITTAL 03.16.2021 RE-SUBMITTAL 04.14.2021 ENGINEER: DRAWN BY:.5"1"0"1"This drawing is and shall remain the property of Goodwyn, Mills and Cawood, Inc. (GMC) and Goodwyn Mills Cawood LLC (GMC). Unauthorized use of any kind including use on other projects is prohibited. In the event that a conflict arises between the sealed drawings and the electronic files, the sealed drawings will govern. ©Goodwyn, Mills and Cawood, Inc. (GMC) and ©Goodwyn Mills Cawood LLC (GMC)2660 East Chase Lane, Suite 200 Montgomery, AL 36117 T 334.271.3200 ISSUE DATE Fax (334) 272-1566Office (334) 271-3200CMGMAPRIL, 2021 Scale: 1"=50'Lying in the Southeast 0/0 of Section 00, T-00-N, R-00-EGoodwyn, Mills & Cawood, Inc.Engineers - Architects - Planners - SurveyorsHedgefield, Plat 52660 EastChase Lane, Suite 200Montgomery County, AlabamaStakedFieldMontgomery, Alabama 36117OfficeCheckedByDrawnCheckedNumberProjectClosurePreliminary Map ofJTSSETBACK DATASIDE - 5'REAR - 15'DRAWING FILE: T:\Montgomery\CMGM Proj\Lowder New Homes\21-0022 Hedgefield Plat 5 & 6\0 DWG\C-100 PLAT 5.dwgPLOTTED: Apr 14, 2021 - 2:50pm PRELIMINARY PLAT 5 C-100 210022444,896 S.F. ±/ 10.21 Ac. ±37 LOTSPROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED IN A SPECIAL HAZARD FLOOD AREA PERFEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD INFORMATION RATEMAP NO. 01001C0358E, DATED SEPTEMBER 3, 2014 (ZONE X)VICINITY MAPNOT TO SCALEPROJECTLOCATIONLinear Feet of Street1490Total Number of Lots37DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT Planning Commission Staff Report TO: City of Prattville Planning Commission FROM: Tommie Williams DATE: April 15, 2021 SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat for Hedgefield 6 The information provided in this staff report has been included for the purpose of reviewing the proposed preliminary plat. There may be additional requirements placed on the property through the Site Plan Review process to address development regulations & access. A.BACKGROUND: Applicant/ Representative: PRLD, LLC / Goodwyn Mills & Cawood, Inc. Owner: PRLD, LLC Property Location: McQueen Smith Road @ Highway 82 Property Size: 11.5 +/- acres (30 lots) Current Future Land Use Map (FLUM) Designation: Mixed Use-Transitional Current Zoning District: PUD (Planned Unit Development) Existing Land Use: Vacant Land B.DEVELOPMENT STATUS & HISTORY: Previous Requests: 1.August 21, 2005 – sketch plan amended to provide for a revised street and alley design. 2.July 6, 2006 – sketch plan amended to add property on north end – site of the Park at HomePlace. 3.April 19, 2007 – sketch plan amended to adjust location of street connecting areas north and south of a central stream. 4.November 17, 2011 – sketch plan amended to accommodate apartment development at southern end of development (Meadows At Home Place). 5.June 21, 2018- Proposal for R-3 zoning & sketch plan amendment held to July 19th, 2018 meeting.DRAFT 6.July 19, 2018- Proposal for sketch plan amendment was given to allow for 50- & 60-foot lots. 7.August 16, 2018 – Proposal for R-3 Rezoning eliminated with adjustments made to comply with PUD development agreement approved with Ordinance 2004-017A for park space. 8.September 13th, 2018, - Development Plan for Hedgefield Plat 1 & 2 approved. 9.Hedgefield 3 & 4 was approved on 10/17/2019. C.ANALYSIS: Street Connectivity: Street connectivity will consist of Hedgefield Way which connects to Hedgefield Drive. There will not be any connectivity to Highway 82. Water/Sewer: The proposed site is serviced by existing water & sewer mains. PUD Residential District Performance Standards: Development requirements for uses in this PUD zoning include the following: MINIMUM YARD SIZE: Front Yard: 20 feet; Rear Yard: 15 feet; Side Yard: 5 feet Staff Comments: This proposed preliminary plat consists of Phase 5 of the Hedgefield Subdivision. Phase 3 will consist of 37 single-family residential building lot that will be built on 10.21 acres of land. These lots will have a minimum 60’ building line with a setback standard as described above. PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION: Surrounding Land Use Zoning North Hedgefield Subdivision PUD (Planned Unit Development) South Vacant Land PUD (Planned Unit Development) East Vacant Land PUD (Planned Unit Development) West Hedgefield Subdivision PUD (Planned Unit Development) DRAFT Reviewed by: Tommie Williams, Planner Site Visits Conducted: April 2021 Recommendation: Approval with condition, complete staff comments. DRAFT HWY 82 BYP EMCQUEEN SMITH RD SHEDGEFIELD DR CHERRY TREE LN HEDGEFIELD WYSTANTON WY C O N S T I T U T I O N A V E RUFUS RD MA N A S C O L N OL D Q U A R T E R S R DBLAKELEY CTFLINT WILLIAMS AVE PRIVET CTCONSTITUTION AVE±Legend Project AreaAUTAUGA_ELMORE_LINEStreetsAutauga Tax Parcels 0 1,000500 Feet Locations are approximate Location Map - Hedgefield #6 DRAFT HWY 82 BYP EHEDGEFIE L D D R HEDGEFIELD WY±Legend Project AreaAUTAUGA_ELMORE_LINEStreetsAutauga Tax Parcels 0 500250 Feet Locations are approximate Aerial Map - Hedgefield #6 DRAFT HWY 82 BYP EMCQUEEN SMITH RD SHEDGEFIELD DR CHERRY TREE LN HEDGEFIELD WYSTANTON WY C O N S T I T U T I O N A V E RUFUS RD MA N A S C O L N OL D Q U A R T E R S R DBLAKELEY CTFLINT WILLIAMS AVE PRIVET CTCONSTITUTION AVEP.U.D. B-2 P.U.D. B-2 B-2 F.A.R.P.U.D. F.A.R. F.A.R. B-2 B-2 F.A.R. R-3 R-3 ±Legend Project AreaAUTAUGA_ELMORE_LINEStreetsAutauga Tax Parcels 0 1,000500 Feet Locations are approximate Zoning Map - Hedgefield #6 DRAFT BLOCK EBLOCK CBLOCK ABLOCK E HEDGEFIELD SUBDIVISION PLAT 5 & 6 Prattville, Alabama CONSTRUCTION NOT RELEASED FOR CMGM 21-0022 INITIAL SUBMITTAL 03.16.2021 RE-SUBMITTAL 04.14.2021 ENGINEER: DRAWN BY:.5"1"0"1"This drawing is and shall remain the property of Goodwyn, Mills and Cawood, Inc. (GMC) and Goodwyn Mills Cawood LLC (GMC). Unauthorized use of any kind including use on other projects is prohibited. In the event that a conflict arises between the sealed drawings and the electronic files, the sealed drawings will govern. ©Goodwyn, Mills and Cawood, Inc. (GMC) and ©Goodwyn Mills Cawood LLC (GMC)2660 East Chase Lane, Suite 200 Montgomery, AL 36117 T 334.271.3200 ISSUE DATEFax (334) 272-1566Office (334) 271-3200CMGMAPRIL, 2021 Scale: 1"=50'Lying in the Southeast 0/0 of Section 00, T-00-N, R-00-EGoodwyn, Mills & Cawood, Inc.Engineers - Architects - Planners - SurveyorsHedgefield, Plat 62660 EastChase Lane, Suite 200Montgomery County, AlabamaStakedFieldMontgomery, Alabama 36117OfficeCheckedByDrawnCheckedNumberProjectClosurePreliminary Map ofJTSSETBACK DATASIDE - 5'REAR - 15'DRAWING FILE: T:\Montgomery\CMGM Proj\Lowder New Homes\21-0022 Hedgefield Plat 5 & 6\0 DWG\C-101 PLAT 6.dwgPLOTTED: Apr 14, 2021 - 2:47pm PRELIMINARY PLAT 6 C-101 210022VICINITY MAPNOT TO SCALEPROJECTLOCATION501,330 S.F. ±/ 11.5 Ac. ±PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED IN A SPECIAL HAZARD FLOOD AREA PERFEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD INFORMATION RATEMAP NO. 01001C0358E, DATED SEPTEMBER 3, 2014 (ZONE X)Linear Feet of Street1117Total Number of Lots30DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT 102 West Main Street \ Prattville, AL 36067 \ 334. 595.05 00 \ prattvilleal.gov BILL GILLESPIE, JR. MAYOR J. SCOTT STEPHENS, AICP DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Tommie Williams, Planner DATE: April 15, 2021 RE: Park Lane Subdivision Please see attached letter requesting a time extension on Park Lane Subdivision. Preliminary plat approval is tentative for one year. Park Lane preliminary plat was first approved at the May 21, 2020 meeting. Phase I was recorded November 25, 2020, and houses are under construction. DRAFT DRAFT 1 Stephens, Scott From:Greg Gillian <ggillian@lespeaks.com> Sent:Monday, April 12, 2021 4:44 PM To:Stephens, Scott Subject:[EXTERNAL]DAWSON'S MILL TIME EXTENSION Please postpone time extension at this point in time.  Gregory M. Gillian Vice-President Larry E. Speaks & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors  535 Herron Street  Montgomery, AL 36104  Phone:   334‐262‐1091  Fax:   334‐262‐2211  Email:   ggillian@lespeaks.com  This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the  content is safe. If you are unsure if the email is safe, please forward it to help@prattvilleal.gov.   Agenda Item #7 DRAFT 1 0 2 W e s t M a i n S t r e e t \ P r a t t v i l l e , A L 3 6 0 6 7 \ 334. 5 9 5 . 0 5 0 0 \ p r a t t v i l l e a l . g o v BILL GILLESPIE, JR. MAYOR J.SCOTT STEPHENS, AICPDIRECTOR MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Darrell Rigsby, Senior Planner DATE: April 15, 2021 RE: Heather Drive Subdivision Time Extension Request Please see attached letter requesting a time extension on Heather Drive Subdivision. Preliminary plat approval is tentative for one year. Heather Drive Subdivision Preliminary Plat was first approved by Planning Commission at the June 18, 2020 meeting. See timeline below: December 19, 2019 – Sketch Plan approved June 18, 2020 – Heather Drive Subdivision Plat 1 approved Recommendation: DRAFT DRAFT