Loading...
2104-April 13 BZA1 0 2 W e s t M a i n S t r e e t \ P r a t t v i l l e , A L 3 6 0 6 7 \ 334. 5 9 5 . 0 5 0 0 \ p r a t t v i l l e a l . g o v BILL GILLESPIE, JR. MAYOR J. SCOTT STEPHENS, AICP DIRECTOR CITY OF PRATTVILLE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT A G E N D A April 13, 2021 4:00pm Call to Order: Roll Call: Chairman Jerry Crosby, Vice-Chairman Charles Knapp, Mr. Billy Barrett, Jr., Mr. Greg Duke, and Ms. Sarah Johnson. Committee Reports: Old Business: None New Business: 1. 210413-01 VARIANCE: Carport-Side yard setback encroachment. 220 Cynthia Street R-2 (Single Family Residential) David G. Meadows, Petitioner Public Hearing District 5 2. 210413-03 VARIANCE: Accessory Structure-Locate as the primary structure on the lot. 112 Andiron Court (Vacant Lot) R-2 (Single Family Residential) Jonathan & Natalie Warren, Petitioners Public Hearing District 7 3.210413-04 USE-ON-APPEAL: Home Occupation-Firearms Sales. 748 Silver Hills Drive R-2 (Single Family Residential) Jordan McKenzie, Petitioner Public Hearing District 6 Minutes: March 9, 2021 Miscellaneous: Adjourn: Alabama Code Section 11-52-81 Board of adjustment - Appeals to circuit court from final decision of board of adjustment. Any party aggrieved by any final judgment or decision of such board of zoning adjustment may within 15 days thereafter appeal therefrom to the circuit court by filing with such board a written notice of appeal specifying the judgment or decision from which the appeal is taken. In case of such appeal such board shall cause a transcript of the proceedings in the action to be certified to the court to which the appeal is taken, and the action in such court shall be tried de novo. Approved 5/11/21 Prattville Board of Zoning Adjustment April 13, 2021 Minutes Page 1 of 4 City of Prattville Board of Zoning Adjustment Minutes April 13, 2021 CALL TO ORDER: The regular meeting of the Prattville Board of Zoning Adjustment (BZA) was called to order by Chairman Charles Knapp at 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 9, 2021. ROLL CALL: Present: Chairman Charles Knapp, Vice Chairman Billy Barrett, Mr. Jerry Crosby, Mr. Greg Duke and Ms. Sarah Johnson. Quorum Present Staff present: Mr. Scott Stephens, City Planner; Mr. Darrell Rigsby, Senior Planner, Mr. Tommie Williams, Planner, and Ms. Alisa Morgan, Secretary. Chairman Knapp stated the governing rules for the Prattville Board of Zoning Adjustment and the procedure of the meeting. COMMITTEE REPORTS: There were no reports to be made. OLD BUSINESS: There was no old business to discuss. NEW BUSINESS: VARIANCE Carport-Side yard setback encroachment. 220 Cynthia Street R-2 (Single Family Residential) David G. Meadows, Petitioner Mr. Rigsby provided the staff report for a variance to allow a two feet side yard encroachment for a carport located at 220 Cynthia Street. David Meadows, petitioner, presented the request for an encroachment into the side yard for a carport on property at 220 Cynthia Street. He stated that the carport will not extend beyond the existing slab. Chairman Knapp opened the floor for public comments. There were none. The public hearing was closed. Mr. Knapp acknowledge an email in support of the request received from Phil Leistner, 221 Cynthia Street. Chairman Knapp opened discussion for the Board. After their discussion, the vote was called. Mr. Crosby moved to establish the findings of fact stating that 1) granting of a variance is in harmony with the intent and purposes of the zoning ordinance and 2) that a variance will not adversely affect the surrounding property, the general neighborhood, or the community as a whole. Mr. Duke seconded the motion. The motion to approve the findings of fact passed unanimously. After no further discussion, the vote was called. Mr. Barrett moved to approve the request as submitted based on the approved findings of fact. Mr. Crosby seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously. Approved 5/11/21 Prattville Board of Zoning Adjustment April 13, 2021 Minutes Page 2 of 4 The BZA voted to approve the variance to a carport to encroach (2 feet) into the side yard setback on property located at 220 Cynthia Street. VARIANCE Accessory Structure-Locate as the primary structure on the lot. 112 Andiron Court (Vacant Lot) R-2 (Single Family Residential) Jonathan & Natalie Warren, Petitioners Mr. Williams provided the staff report for a variance to allow an accessory structure as the main structure on a vacant lot located at 112 Andiron Court. He stated that the applicant tried to subdivide the lots into one but there is a city ROW located between the two lots that cannot be vacated. He stated that support and approval from the Hearthstone Architectural Review Committee of that subdivision was received via email from Robert Mahoney, 111 Andiron Court. The petitioners Jonathan & Natalie Warren were not present for the hearing. Chairman Knapp opened the floor for public comments. There were none. The public hearing was closed. Chairman Knapp moved this item until next month’s meeting. However, the petitioner, Jonathan Warren, arrived before the end of business and Chairman Knapp proceeded to hear the case at the end. Mr. Warren presented the variance request to allow an accessory structure as the primary structure on the vacant lot located at 112 Andiron Court. He stated that the structure will be a detached two car garage with an above bonus area. The design will be similar to the existing house. He stated that the proposed lot is limited in how it can be used for a standard residence. He stated that the sewer ROW prevents them from combining the two lots together. He stated that they have received verbal approval from City Engineer to access the lot by a paved crossing over the existing easement with the understanding that the city would not be responsible to the homeowner for any repairs to access that easement. Chairman Knapp opened discussion for the Board. After their discussion, the vote was called. Mr. Crosby moved to establish the findings of fact stating that 1) the special conditions and circumstances do not result from actions of the applicant (self-imposed hardship); 2) that granting of a variance will not confer a special privilege on the applicant that is denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district; 3) that granting of a variance is in harmony with the intent and purposes of the zoning ordinance; and 4) that a variance will not adversely affect the surrounding property, the general neighborhood, or the community as a whole. Mr. Barrett seconded the motion. The motion to approve the findings of fact passed unanimously. After no further discussion, the vote was called. Mr. Crosby moved to approve the request as submitted based on the approved findings of fact. Ms. Johnson seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously. The BZA voted to approve the variance to locate an accessory structure as the primary structure on the lot on property located at 112 Andiron Court. USE-ON-APPEAL Home Occupation-Firearms Sales. 748 Silver Hills Drive R-2 (Single Family Residential) Jordan McKenzie, Petitioner Mr. Rigsby provided the staff report for a use-on-appeal to allow home occupation for the sale of firearms on property located at 748 Silver Hills Drive. He stated that the petitioner is seeking Federal Firearms License to accept and assemble firearms and accessories. He stated that staff recommends Approved 5/11/21 Prattville Board of Zoning Adjustment April 13, 2021 Minutes Page 3 of 4 approval with the following conditions: final approval by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), final approval and any additional conditions set by Prattville Police Department, and petitioner must receive a business license. Jordan McKenzie, petitioner, along with business partner and property owner Braxton Bagi presented the request for a use-on-appeal to allow for a home occupation business to sale firearms on property at 748 Silver Hills Drive. Mr. McKenzie stated that the business would primarily be online orders and the client will pick up orders from the home location. He stated that zoning certification is part of their federal process to obtain a license. Mr. Bagi stated that zoning certification is the beginning process. He stated that they plan to start with six to eight appointments a day. They have plans to expand the business outside of residential if this is successful. Mr. Barrett asked how much ammunition and how many guns would be stored on the property. Mr. McKenzie stated that there would not be much ammunition in this start up, but there would be approximately eight to 10 orders waiting pick up. Mr. Stephens asked that Daniel Oakley, City Finance Director, speak on current number of this type business currently in the city and the process required for obtaining business license. Mr. Oakley stated that he is not sure how many exactly, but he is aware of a couple similar type that that are licensed in a residential area that were licensed prior to the current requirements for BZA approval. Mr. Stephens stated that he requested feedback from the both the Fire Department and Police Department. He stated that the Fire Marshall didn’t see any issues from a fire standpoint; however, the Police Department is concerned about potential customers coming to browse as a retail display. Chairman Knapp opened the floor for public comments. He stated that six notices were received regarding the petition. James Morgan, 744 Silver Hills Drive, commented concerning safety for the children in the neighborhood and the school nearby. Jon Lee Finnegan, 211 Deer Trace, stated that there is a similar business in her neighborhood that she was not aware. She was concerned about the number of guns that could be allowed on the property and the safety and security of the neighborhood. Chairman Knapp asked Ms. Finnegan if she was aware of any adverse effect that this business has caused in her neighborhood. She stated that she was not aware of any and just happen to find the business on the website as she was searching for something else unrelated. Susan Clayton, 1763 Windermere Avenue, stated that this is her daughter’s house and she doesn’t want the traffic in her home. She suggested that they be a limited to a certain number until they get their clientele built up so they can move to a business location. Shawn Meeks, 760 Silver Hills Drive, spoke in opposition to the request. He stated that the location is not ideal for this type business. He also presented a letter of opposition from Jill Johnson, 761 Silver Hills Drive. Analisa Payne, 1754 Planters Hill Court, spoke in opposition to the request. Christopher Tarantino, 518 Seasons Court, stated that this use would set a precedence to allow similar uses in the neighborhood. He asked who would hold the petitioners accountable to restrictions/limits set and would they be allowed to manufacture guns at the location? Diane Jones, 1756 Silver Hills, spoke in opposition to the request due to increased traffic and child safety. Approved 5/11/21 Prattville Board of Zoning Adjustment April 13, 2021 Minutes Page 4 of 4 Mr. Barrett asked Mr. McKenzie if there is a limit in the types of gun he can sell. Mr. McKenzie stated that his (Title 1) type license would limit him to semi-automatic type weapons. He stated that they would probably seek Title 2 licensing when they are in a business district. Ms. Johnson asked what their projected time line of growth for the business. Mr. McKenzie stated that within the next two to three years they hope to see the success of the business and then will be able to move to a commercial space. He also stated that the hours of operation 3:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. appointment only is set because that is the time frame that they have outside of their regular full time jobs. Mr. Bagi stated that they live in the neighborhood and want to be good neighbors. He stated that their main focus of the business starting out will be the online sales. There being no further public comment, the public hearing was closed. Chairman Knapp opened discussion for the Board. After their discussion, the vote was called. Mr. Barrett moved to establish the findings of fact stating that 1) the proposed home occupation is an allowable use-on-appeal, and is not a prohibited use in a R-2 district; 2) development of the proposed use is not in the public interest and does not meet the spirit of the City of Prattville Zoning Ordinance; and 3) the proposed use will cause substantial adverse impact to adjacent or nearby properties or uses. Mr. Crosby seconded the motion. The motion to approve the findings of fact passed unanimously. After no further discussion, the vote was called. Mr. Duke moved to deny the request as submitted based on the approved findings of fact. Ms. Johnson seconded the motion. The motion to deny passed unanimously. The BZA voted to deny the use-on-appeal to operate a home occupation for firearm sales on property located at 748 Silver Hills Drive. MINUTES: Mr. Duke moved to approve the minutes of the March 9, 2021, regular meeting. Mr. Barrett seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously. MISCELLANEOUS: Mr. Stephens discussed with the BZA the Planning Commission’s plan to rewrite the City of Prattville Zoning Ordinance and the changes in the ordinance that will affect the board. He also discussed issues the department was having with the newspaper meeting the ad requirements. He wanted their opinion on eliminating that process if it’s not a state requirement. He stated that posting signs and sending letters have been the most effective means of meeting notification. Jon Lee Finnegan, 211 Deer Trace, addressed the Board and asked if they would reconsider having their video meetings posted online. Mr. Stephens informed the Board that the meetings are not posted to the website after consultation and recommendation by the City Attorney in 2012. ADJOURN: After no further comments, questions, or discussion the meeting was adjourned at 5:41 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Alisa Morgan, Secretary Board of Zoning Adjustment Page 2 of 2 PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION: Reviewed by: Darrell Rigsby, Senior Planner Recommendation: The board shall determine if a legitimate hardship is found with the placement of the proposed carport. A distinctive topographic variation, unique lot layout, or something that results from conditions that are unique to the property can hold standing as hardship. The hardship shall not be self-created. From:Phil Leistner To:Morgan, Alisa Subject:[EXTERNAL]Zoning adjustment- 220 Cynthia St. Date:Monday, April 12, 2021 8:46:53 PM This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If you are unsure if the email is safe, please forward it to help@prattvilleal.gov. My name is Phil Leistner. I live at 221 Cynthia Street, across the street from David Meadows. I will not be able to attend the 4 p.m. meeting tomorrow, but I wanted to give my input. I have lived across the street from the Meadows for 21 years. They are good neighbors and keep their house and property looking nice. I have no issues with the carport. Sincerely, Phil Leistner- 334-354-2959 Page 2 of 3 e. Exterior materials or cladding shall be similar to and complement that of the primary structure. An exception to this shall be the allowance of one metal sided structure no larger than 200 square feet located in a rear yard; f. Accessory structures shall not be used as a dwelling unit; g. Residential zones with specific accessory structure requirements (e.g., R-5) for locations and setbacks shall be followed in those zones. Article 3. – Board of Zoning Adjustment Section 36. - Variances. a. The Board may authorize upon appeal in specific cases such variances from the terms of this ordinance as will not be contrary to the public interest, where, owing to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions of this ordinance will result in unnecessary hardship, and so that the spirit of the ordinance shall be observed and substantial justice done. b. A variance may be granted in such individual cases upon a finding by the Board that an unnecessary hardship does, in fact, exist. In no case shall the Board grant a variance that permits the land, building or structure to be occupied by a use prohibited within the zoning district in which the land, building or structure is located. c. It is the intent of this ordinance that a variance be issued only to mitigate a physical condition of a parcel of land which poses a practical barrier to its development and use conformance with this ordinance. Variances shall be limited to the minimum adjustment necessary for the reasonable use of the land. d. Before any variance is granted, the Board shall make written findings certifying the existence of the following standards. 1. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands structures, or buildings in the same district. 2. That a literal interpretation of the ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of the ordinance. 3. That special conditions do not result from actions of the applicant (self-imposed hardship); 4. That granting of the variance will not confer any special privilege on the applicant that is denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district; 5. That granting of the variance is in harmony with the intent and purposes of the ordinance; 6. That the variance will not adversely affect surrounding property, the general neighborhood, or the community as a whole; 7. That no non-conforming use of neighboring lands, structures, or buildings in the same district, and no permitted or non-conforming use of lands, structures, or buildings in other districts were considered as a basis for the issuance of a variance; 8. That the variance will not allow the establishment of a use not permissible under the terms of the ordinance in the district involved, or any use expressly or by implication prohibited by the terms of the ordinance in said district; 9. The variance requested is the minimum adjustment necessary to enable the legal use of the land, building or structure. Page 3 of 3 ANAYLSIS/EVALUATION: The applicant is requesting to put an accessory structure on a vacant lot without a primary structure. The lots are located next to each other (lots 110 & 112). The applicant tried to subdivide the lots into one but there is a city ROW located between the two lots that must stay vacant. Therefore, the applicant is seeking to add an accessory structure onto lot 112 without having a primary structure on the same lot. This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If you are unsure if the email is safe, please forward it to help@prattvilleal.gov. From:Robert Mahoney To:Morgan, Alisa Cc:Jonathan Warren Subject:[EXTERNAL]112 Andiron Ct Zoning Adjustment - I Recommend Approval Date:Thursday, April 8, 2021 5:15:17 PM Ms Morgan, I am emailing to respond to the letter the Prattville Board of Zoning Adjustment sent regarding Jonathan and Natalie Warren's request for a variance to allow an accessory structure as the primary structure on property located at 112 Andiron Court (vacant lot). I approve of the request and hope the Board will do the same. I am the President of the Hearthstone Architectural Review Committee which has considered and approved over 50 requests for house plans and/or modifications to existing homes and lots. Some of those were requests to combine lots, which were approved as long as the city re-platted the lots into one. I am very familiar with the Warrens' plans and the lot at 112 Andiron Ct. The ARC has tentatively approved their proposal because the building will be in compliance with the Hearthstone covenants if the variance is granted. The lot is very difficult to support a house with the minimum square footage required by the Hearthstone covenants. In fact, a house on that lot may require a variance from the covenants. I am also a neighbor and will be happy to have a landscaped and attractive structure across the street from me versus an empty lot. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Robert Mahoney 111 Andiron Ct Prattville AL 36067 703-509-1271 Page 2 of 3 ZONING ORDINANCE REFERENCED: Article 6 – General Provisions Section 69.1. - Home occupations. Tier 2 Home Occupations require use-on-appeal approval from the Board of Adjustment. Examples of Tier 2 home occupations include, but are not limited to: lawn care or landscaping businesses, home maintenance, on-site music instruction, on-site tutoring, professional offices involving client visits, small engine repair, cosmetology, animal grooming, any use involving guns or weapons of any kind, any home occupation employing someone not living at the home. Tier 1 home occupations that are unable to meet one or more of the criteria listed in (1), and other activities which the City Planner determines to be substantially similar in character, nature, intensity, or impact to these. Tier 2 home occupations must comply with the following criteria: a. At least one resident of the home must be engaged in the home occupation and no more than one non-resident may be engaged or employed in the business activity; b. No advertising material shall indicate address or physical location of the business (not to include business cards or email signatures); c. No more than 25% of the total gross floor area of the home shall be used for the home occupation; d. Any business-related materials or equipment, including trailers, must be kept inside the home or fully enclosed behind a fence. On lots larger than one acre, materials or equipment may be located in rear or side yards, at least fifty feet (50') from property line, without being enclosed; e. Any necessary parking shall be provided off-street and shall be in addition to what is otherwise required for the residential use of the property, and shall not be in the front yard; f. No signs or advertisements related to the home occupation on the property or the mailbox; g. The business owner shall be responsible for observing any private covenants or restrictions which may impact the home occupation; h. No equipment or process shall be used in the home occupation which creates noise, vibration, glare, smoke, fumes, odors, or is dangerous or otherwise detrimental to persons in the home or adjacent areas; i. For music instruction, tutoring or similar teaching, professional or consulting services involving clients coming to the home, animal grooming, cosmetology, and similar services, no more than two clients may be on the premises at any time, and no more than ten clients visiting the home on any day. This number may be reduced by the Board of Adjustment; j. Small engine repair shall be limited to small engines no larger than two cylinders used in lawn mowers, trimmers, and similar lawn equipment; k. Any other restrictions or conditions as may be considered appropriate by the Board of Adjustment. Page 3 of 3 Article 3. – Board of Zoning Adjustment Section 35. – Use-On-Appeal a. The Board of Adjustment shall hear and decide requests for approval of uses permitted on appeal as defined by Article 1, Section 4 and non-conforming uses as defined by Article 1, Sections 4 and 5. b. Uses-on-Appeal shall require the submission of an application to the Board. The application shall be filed according to rules and submission requirements published by the Board. c. Notice of the scheduled hearing shall be to the applicant and other interested parties in accordance with board rules. d. The Board shall review the application for compliance with this ordinance and all other applicable codes and ordinances of the city. The Board shall make written findings determining that the proposed use-on-appeal will not: 1. Be contrary to the public interest and will insure that the spirit of this ordinance is observed; 2. Permit the establishment of a use prohibited in the zoning district; or 3. Cause a substantial adverse impact on property or improvements in the vicinity or in the district in which the proposed use is located. e. The Board may impose such conditions for approval that it deems necessary in the particular case to protect the public interest and the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and this ordinance. Such conditions shall apply to the land, structure, and use for which the use-on-appeal is granted and not to a particular person. Violations of conditions lawfully attached to any use-on-appeal shall be deemed to be violations of this ordinance. f. Any approval granted by the Board for a use-on-appeal shall pertain solely to that specific use at the location specified in the application. Such approval shall not be transferable to another use at that location or the same use at another location. g. A use-on-appeal granted by the Board shall lapse and be of no effect if, after the expiration of one (1) year from the date of such action by the Board, no construction or change in use pursuant to such use-on-appeal has taken place. The Board may, for good cause shown, specify a longer period of time in conjunction with its approval to grant the use-on-appeal. ANAYLSIS/EVALUATION: The applicant is requesting a Tier 2 Home Occupation to operate a firearms business out of Mr. Braxton Bagi’s home at 748 Silver Hills Drive. In addition to being the homeowner, Mr. Bagi is an employee of the firearms business. Mr. Jordan McKenzie is in the process of seeking a Federal Firearms License (FFL) for manufacturers (Type 07 FFL) from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to accept and assemble firearms and accessories. ATF requires zoning approval from the local jurisdiction prior to issuing an FFL. Mr. McKenzie wishes to receive firearms from online sellers, resell firearms, and assemble firearms and accessories. Final approval should be conditioned upon the following: 1. Final approval by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) 2. Final approval and any additional conditions set by Prattville Police Department 3. Must receive a business license This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If you are unsure if the email is safe, please forward it to help@prattvilleal.gov. From:Al Cotton To:Morgan, Alisa Subject:[EXTERNAL]Board of Zoning Adjustment April 13, 2021 Public Hearing Date:Wednesday, April 7, 2021 6:48:48 PM To the Board of Zoning Adjustment: Regarding the petition of Jordan McKenzie, 748 Silver Hills Drive, Prattville, AL, to operate ahome occupation for firearms and accessories sales: We oppose granting the petitioner's request because the purpose is inappropriate for an area zoned for single family residential property. Silver Hills Drive already has heavy traffic which a commercial business will just exacerbate. A commercial business in an area zoned for single family residential will decrease propertyvalues throughout the neighborhood. If the petitioner wants to open a firearms and accessories sales business there are plenty of vacant store front properties available in Prattville that are zoned more appropriately for theproposed operation. Respectfully submitted, //signed\\ Shelia K and Allen H Cotton1751 Planters Hill Court Prattville, AL From:Dawn Chandler To:Morgan, Alisa Subject:[EXTERNAL]Zoning request. 748 Silver Hills Dr Date:Monday, April 12, 2021 10:08:52 AM This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If you are unsure if the email is safe, please forward it to help@prattvilleal.gov. We are not able to attend the meeting due to work schedules. We are homeowners on silver hills. My husband and I have concerns over this request. We do not want additional traffic in the area as there are many children who ride bikes and play up and down Silver Hills. Specifically because the hours listed on the request are between 3pm-8pm and Saturdays We also are not sure why Mr McKenzie would receive approval since he does not even reside in the home. Whether it is firearms or another business request we would prefer our neighborhood remain for homeowners and not businesses. Thank you Matt & Dawn Chandler 334-531-2187 Sent from my iPhone This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If you are unsure if the email is safe, please forward it to help@prattvilleal.gov. From:Mack Post To:Morgan, Alisa Subject:[EXTERNAL]Fwd: I want to protest having a occupation for firearms an accessions at 748 Silver Hills Dr doing business. From a residence I do not want people coming on our street to buy firearms or have them worked onare to buy ammunition this person w... Date:Monday, April 12, 2021 2:12:12 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Mack Post <post.mack1@gmail.com>Date: April 12, 2021 at 12:26:04 PM CDTTo: alisa.morgan@prattvilleal.govSubject: I want to protest having a occupation for firearms an accessions at748 Silver Hills Dr doing business. From a residence I do not want peoplecoming on our street to buy firearms or have them worked on are to buyammunition this person who lives there needs to get him a place to dobusiness in a commercial residence not in a Subdivison where people live anwalk on the sidewalks all time of the day it would not be appropriate signedMack Post  Sent from my iPhone This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If you are unsure if the email is safe, please forward it to help@prattvilleal.gov. From:Simmons, Glenna To:Morgan, Alisa Subject:[EXTERNAL]RE: Public Hearing for Jordan McKenzie on April 13, 2021 at 4:00 PM Date:Tuesday, April 13, 2021 9:12:52 AM As I cannot physically be present at the hearing this afternoon, I wouldlike to express my objection via email. I have lived in this neighborhood for 25 years and I totally object to this kind of business in our residential neighborhood. I live at 738 Silver Hills Drive, therefore, this house is literally only a few houses down from mine. This matter was posted on ourneighborhood Facebook page, and I can tell you, there are SEVERAL concerned neighbors that object to this. There are a lot of children in this neighborhood, and more specifically, on our street. I have young grandchildren under the age of 5 and I do not want this type of business inour neighborhood, much less on our street. If any further information is needed from me, please contact me at (334) 207-1411. Thank you in advance for any consideration given to this objection. Sincerely, Glenna Simmons From:Joy Sorensen (Business) To:Morgan, Alisa Subject:[EXTERNAL]Gun Business on Silver Hills Drive Date:Tuesday, April 13, 2021 12:36:09 PM This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If you are unsure if the email is safe, please forward it to help@prattvilleal.gov. Hello. My husband and I live on Sweet Ridge Road, about 2 blocks from the home in question. We’re both a bit concerned about this situation. In general, we have no problems with people operating businesses out of their homes. But, guns are different entirely. Our main concern is that customers, who can be anyone from anywhere, will be entering and leaving the subdivision armed. That’s a bit scary to us. Thank you. Joy and Phil Sorensen 334-651-5150