2202-February 24 HPC Pkt (Draft)102 West Main Street \ Prattville, AL 36067 \ 334. 595.0500 \ prattvilleal.gov
BILL GILLESPIE, JR.
MAYOR
J.SCOTT STEPHENS, AICPDIRECTOR
CITY OF PRATTVILLE
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
AGENDA
February 24, 2022 4:30 p.m.
Call to Order:
Roll Call: Chairman Sanford, Vice-Chairman Stewart, Mr. Barker, Mrs. Davis, Mr. Ferguson, Mrs. Nettles, and Ms. Rollins.
Minutes: January 27, 2022
Committee Reports:
Old Business: None
New Business: 1.COA2202-01 Certificate of AppropriatenessFence 204, 216, 224, and 234 N. Northington Street Steve Till, Petitioner
Public Hearing
2.COA2202-02 Certificate of AppropriatenessAlterations-Replacing Windows and Rear Door 150 1st Street River Region Pregnancy Center, Petitioner
Public Hearing
Miscellaneous: 1. Resolution of Support: Historic Resources Survey 2. Guidelines Update
Adjourn:
DR
A
F
T
Draft
Prattville Historic Preservation Commission January 27, 2022 Minutes Page 1 of 4
CITY OF PRATTVILLE 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 2 MINUTES 3 January 27, 2022 4 5 6 Call to order: 7 The Chairman called the regular meeting of the Prattville Historic Preservation Commission to order on Thursday, 8 January 27, 2022 at 4:28 p.m. 9 10 Roll Call: 11 The secretary called the roll. Members present were Chairman Tim Sanford, Vice-Chair Taylor Stewart, Mrs. Jean 12 Davis, Mr. Scott Ferguson, and Mrs. Teresa Nettles. Members Absent: Mr. Zack Barker and Ms. Kristi Rollins. 13
14 Quorum present 15 16
Also present was Mr. Scott Stephens, City Planner; Mr. Darrell Rigsby, Senior Planner; Mr. Tommie Williams, 17 Planner; and Ms. Alisa Morgan, Secretary. 18 19 Minutes: 20 Mrs. Nettles moved to approve the minutes of the December 7, 2021 meeting. Mr. Ferguson seconded the motion. 21 The motion passed unanimously. 22 23 Committee Reports: 24 There were no reports to be made. 25 26 Old Business: 27 Certificate of Appropriateness 28 New Structure-Restroom 29 342 S. Chestnut Street (Creekwalk Area) 30 City of Prattville, Petitioner 31 32 At the previous meeting (12/7/21), this agenda item was postponed at the petitioner’s request. Mr. Williams provided 33
the staff comments for the public use restroom that is proposed by the City of Prattville. He stated that the proposed 34 structure will be an Ozark 1 model restroom. The proposed wall textures will be Barnwood at the top and Napa 35 Valley Rock at the bottom. 36
37 Ms. Kellie Cook, petitioner’s representative, presented the request for a restroom located in the Historic District. 38 She stated that the building is a prefabricated structure that will be fully assembled, pre-wired, and pre-plumbed. 39 She also stated that the structure will be in a centralized location where the restroom will be open and visible from 40 all directions along the creekwalk. 41 42 After no further discussion, the vote was called. Mr. Ferguson moved to approve contingent that the finish be Board 43 and Batten or horizontal lap with no Barnwood or Napa Valley (Rock). Mrs. Davis seconded the motion. The 44 motion to approve passed unanimously. 45 46 At the Chairman’s request, Mr. Ferguson moved to change the order that the agenda items were heard. Mrs. Nettles 47 seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 48 49 *There were no public comments. 50
51 52 53 54 55
DR
A
F
T
Draft
Prattville Historic Preservation Commission January 27, 2022 Minutes Page 2 of 4
New Business: 56 Certificate of Appropriateness 57 New Structure-Fence Gate 58 331 S. Chestnut Street 59 Wesley Andrews, Petitioner 60 61 Mr. Rigsby provided the staff report for the Certificate of Appropriateness to allow a fence gate on property located 62 at 331 S. Chestnut Street. He stated that the petitioner received approval for a 3ft fence at the December 2021 63 meeting. The petitioner is now requesting to install a decorative gate that will match the existing 4’ fence. He stated 64 that the proposed gate will be black metal and stand approximately 42 inches in height with a 3+/- in clearance at 65 the bottom. There would also be a pedestrian gate to the side. 66 67 Wesley Andrews, petitioner, presented the request for a fence gate on property located at 331 S. Chestnut Street. He 68
stated that the difference in the existing fence and the proposed gage will be aesthetically displeasing. 69 70 Chairman Sanford agreed that the two different heights would look awkward and should consider if they should 71
allow the gate that does not meet the guidelines but matches that which is existing. 72 73 After their discussion, the vote was called. Mrs. Davis moved to approve the request as presented. Ms. Nettles 74
seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously. 75 76 Chairman Sanford opened the floor for public comments. There were none. The public hearing was closed. 77 78 Certificate of Appropriateness 79 Alterations-Renovation, Demolition, Addition 80 132 Tichnor Ave. 81 Gillespie Tire & Automotive, Petitioner 82 83 Mr. Rigsby provided the staff report for the Certificate of Appropriateness to make alteration on property located at 84 132 Tichnor Avenue. He stated that the petitioner is requesting the following alterations to the property as submitted. 85
1. Demolition of portions of existing building and awnings 86 a) removing two existing canopies on the south (front bordering Tichnor) and southeast (front right) sides of 87 the building 88
b) removing stand-alone building on the northeast corner (right rear) of the property 89 c) removing windows and doors on the front façade of the building retrofit as bay doors. 90 He stated that staff recommends approval as this structure does not contribute to the historic character of the district. 91
2. Alter front façade 92 He stated that the proposed alterations are appropriate per the historic guidelines because it brings it more into 93 compliance with historic design compared to the existing state of the structures. The doors should be made of wood 94 or dark anodized metal with a clear-glass single-light opening. He stated that staff recommends approval of alteration 95 of front façade, conditioned that doors and windows follow historic guidelines. 96 3. Construct ramp on west side of building 97 He stated that the petitioner is proposing to add a ramp to the west side elevation of the existing building. The 98 proposed ramp will be constructed of concrete, with a painted metal railing. He stated that staff recommends 99 approval of ramp addition as proposed. 100 4. New Signage 101 He stated that the petitioner is proposing to add new wall signage to the new parapet of the existing block building 102 on the left, the proposed lobby and customer entrance area. Also, new signage is proposed on the front façade of the 103 new canopy on the right side of the building. He stated that the new signage appears appropriate per the historic 104 guidelines and staff recommends approval of signage as proposed, contingent it meets requirements of zoning 105
ordinance at time of construction. 106 5. Construct new shop building at rear. 107 He stated that the petitioner is proposing to construct a new ~2,800 sqft (30’W x 93’L x 18’H) building at the 108
northeastern corner of the current building and lot. The structure is proposed to sit back from Tichnor Street 109 approximately sixty (60) feet, behind the existing buildings. Approximately half of the new building will be visible 110
DR
A
F
T
Draft
Prattville Historic Preservation Commission January 27, 2022 Minutes Page 3 of 4
from Tichnor Street due its relation to the existing building and the majority of the rear façade will be visible from 111 West 3rd Street due to its relation to adjoining properties at the rear of Gillespie Tire, including Autauga County 112 Rescue Squad building and an old storefront that both front West 3rd Street. He stated that the proposed materials 113 for the building are vertical, ribbed metal on all four sides. He stated that staff recommends that the commission 114 considers in their decision if this addition’s design, materials, and placement minimize the impact on the district’s 115 historic character; is the proposed addition compatible with the original building in scale, proportion, rhythm, and 116 materials; and is the proposed addition compatible with adjacent buildings in terms of height, width, materials, roof 117 form, scale and proportions. 118 119 Bobby Gillespie of Gillespie Tire and Automotive, petitioner’s representative, presented the request for the proposed 120 alterations on property located 132 Tichnor Avenue. He addressed each item proposed. He also stated that the 121 proposed interior alterations to the building on the left, future customer area, will be compliant with flood plain 122 requirements. 123
124 Chairman Sanford opened the floor for public comments. There were none. The public hearing was closed. 125 126
Chairman Sanford opened the discussion for the board. After their discussion, the vote was called. Mr. Ferguson 127 moved to approve the request as submitted. Mrs. Nettles seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed 128 unanimously. 129
130 Certificate of Appropriateness 131 New Structure 132 148 1st Street 133 Nelson Vincent, Petitioner 134 135 Mr. Williams provided the staff report for the Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a two-story residence 136 consisting of two executive suites on property located at 148 1st Street. The residential use was approved by the 137 Board of Zoning Adjustment in December 2021. He stated that staff recommends approval. 138 139 Nelson Vincent, petitioner, presented the request for a new structure to be constructed on property located at 148 1st 140
Street. He stated that the proposed structure will be an upscale duplex which will occupy the owners on the second 141 floor and the first floor will leased with the potential for business/office use. He also stated that the material will be 142 similar to the material used on property on Washington St. and on Maple and Bridge Street. 143
144 Chairman Sanford opened the floor for public comments. There were none. The public hearing was closed. 145 146
Chairman Sanford opened the discussion for the board. After their discussion, the vote was called. Ms. Stewart 147 moved to approve the request as submitted. Mr. Ferguson seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed 148 unanimously. 149 150 Certificate of Appropriateness 151 Alteration-Extending an exterior wall 152 326 S. Washington Street 153 Autauga Baptist Association, Inc., Petitioner 154 155 Mr. Williams provided the staff report for the Certificate of Appropriateness to extend a wall on property located at 156 326 S. Washington Street. He stated that the interior storage closet wall will be extended 9’ to 18’ to be converted 157 for office space. He stated that staff recommends approval. 158 159 Mel Johnson, petitioner’s representative, presented the request for the Certificate of Appropriateness for property 160
located at 326 S. Washington Street. 161 162 Chairman Sanford opened the floor for public comments. Dr. Clark spoke in favor of the request. After no further 163
comments, the public hearing was closed. 164 165
DR
A
F
T
Draft
Prattville Historic Preservation Commission January 27, 2022 Minutes Page 4 of 4
166 167 Chairman Sanford opened the discussion for the board. Ms. Stewart asked if the style of the doors (barndoors) were 168 optional. Mr. Johnson stated that they are willing to make the look more consistent with the Historic District. After 169 their discussion, the vote was called. Ms. Stewart moved to approve the request as submitted contingent that the 170 barndoors shown are solid wood material. Mrs. Davis seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed 171 unanimously. 172 173 Certificate of Appropriateness 174 Addition-Fence 175 319 S. Washington Street 176 Lisa & James Sherrill, Petitioners 177 178
Mr. Rigsby provided the staff report for the Certificate of Appropriateness to allow a fence on property located at 179 319 S. Washington Street. He stated that the proposed fence with a wrought iron gate will be near the back 180 connecting with the neighbor’s fence. 181
182 Lisa Sherrill, petitioner, along with Heaven Gilmore, presented the request for a fence on property located at 319 S. 183 Washington Street. 184
185 Chairman Sanford opened the floor for public comments. There were none. The public hearing was closed 186 187 After their discussion, the vote was called. Mr. Ferguson moved to approve the request as submitted. Mrs. Nettles 188 seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously. 189 190 Miscellaneous: 191 Street Sign Toppers 192 Mr. Stephens stated the city’s Engineering Department will be placing new street sign toppers in the Historic District 193 and has requested the Commission’s consideration on the sign preference as presented in the samples. The 194 Commission agreed upon the black sign with white letters. 195
196 Mr. Stephens also discussed plans for updating the HPC Guidelines. 197 198 Bylaws 199 The Commission reviewed the HPC Bylaws. 200 201 Election of Officers 202 Ms. Stewart moved to elect Tim Sanford Chairman. Mrs. Davis seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed 203 unanimously. There were no other nominations. 204 205 Mr. Sanford moved to elect Taylor Stewart as Vice Chair. Mrs. Davis seconded the motion. The motion 206 to approve passed unanimously. There were no other nominations. 207 208 Adjourn: 209 With no further business, Ms. Stewart motioned to adjourn the meeting. Ms. Rollins seconded the motion. The 210 meeting was adjourned at 5:43 p.m. 211 212 Respectfully submitted, 213 214
215 Alisa Morgan, Secretary 216 Historic Preservation Commission 217
DR
A
F
T
Page 1 of 6
Historic Preservation Commission
Staff Report
CERTIFICATE OF
APPROPRIATENESS
204, 216, 224, 234 N. Northington –CA2202-01
DATE
February 24, 2022
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Petitioner: Steve Till
Property Owner: Summit Investment Group – 216, 224, 234 N. Northington
Nathaniel Fritz - 204 N. Northington
Agent: Steve Till
Location: North Northington
Review Status and History
Submission Status: CoA 2006-02
Construct four new single family structures on N.
Northington. Approved as submitted
Previous Approvals: Approvals above
DR
A
F
T
Page 2 of 6
1984/2007 Historic
Properties Inventory
Details
This property was not included in the 1984 or 2007
Historic Properties inventories.
Proposed Alteration, Renovation or Addition
The following alterations have been requested by the applicant.
1. Install front yard fence (204 N. Northington)
2. Install side/rear yard fences (216, 224, 234 N. Northington)
PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION:
Reviewed by: Darrell Rigsby, Senior Planner
Site Visits Conducted: February 2022
Recommendation: Approval, with conditions
Proposed project is in keeping with the Historic Preservation
Guidelines for Residential buildings, with the exception of the
height.* Proposed project does not detract from the existing
structures in the area.
DR
A
F
T
Page 3 of 6
Evaluation:
Since the subject property/structure was initially developed as a residence, the requested alterations were
reviewed against the standards contained in the Prattville Residential Design Review Guidelines Manual.
The relevant sections of manual are included. Staff comments/evaluations are summarized at the end of
each section. The following changes are proposed:
1. Construct fences in front yard and rear yards
Fences and Walls (Residential Guidelines, page 46)
Fences and walls have historically been used to define ownership or function and to separate
public and private space. Historic fences and walls should be retained and maintained. New
fences and walls should use design, materials, and placement that minimize their effect on the
district’s historic character.
1. Historic fences and walls should be retained and maintained.
2. Wood and metal picket fences are appropriate new construction. If wooden, they
should be painted using colors complementary to the adjacent house. They should
be less than three feet tall, and the pickets should be set less than three inches apart
and be less than four inches in width.
3. Cast iron fences are appropriate for 19th and early 20th century dwellings. These fences
should be less than three feet tall.
4. Wood board fences may be located in back yards and should be less than six feet
tall. Flat tops, dog-ear tops, or pointed tops are all appropriate designs. Fences
should be painted to blend with the building.
5. Free-standing brick or concrete walls may be located in back yards or, if not visible from the
street, side yards.
6. Chain-link fences may be located in back yards or, if not visible from the street, side yards.
Chain-link fences should be painted dark green or black, coated with green or black plastic,
or screened with plants.
7. Split or horizontal rail, railroad tie, or timber fences may be located in rear yards but should
be avoided on the fronts of houses.
Item 1 Recommendation: Approval, with conditions
Applicant was granted HPC approval to build four new residences at the corner of North
Northington and 6th Street that front Northington in June 2020 (CoA 2006-02). One home has
been completed on the corner lot and the three remaining lots are currently under construction.
Upon completion of 204 N. Northington, the contractor constructed a wooden picket fence
along the side yard bordering 6th Street without first seeking a City Fence Permit or HPC CoA
for the fence. Additionally, fence was constructed within City Right-of-Way (ROW) and may
have to be moved back from 6th street to comply with City Regulations prior to City permitting.
The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Appropriateness (CoA) to allow the unpermitted
fence in the side yard bordering 6th Street at 204 N. Northington St. The fence is a picket style
DR
A
F
T
Page 4 of 6
fence of wood construction, which stands approximately 42 inches in height. Because this is a
corner lot, the frontage bordering 6th Street is considered front yard. The guidelines state
fences in front yards should be less than three feet (36 inches) tall. Fencing is consistent with
other fences in the area in terms of height and style and consistent with the Historic
Guidelines.
Staff recommend approval, subject that the fence be painted to compliment the home to meet
the guidelines.
* Staff recommendation is based on interpretation of front yard in the Zoning Ordinance, not
necessarily the Historic Preservation Guidelines. Prattville Zoning Ordinance Section 69.2
(2) d. allows corner lots to have different fencing requirements for the secondary front yard,
matching those of the rear and side yards, see below.
d. For the purposes of this section, on corner lots with two front yards, the primary front
yard shall be defined as the yard on the side of the front facade or front entrance, and
the secondary front yard shall be the adjacent yard fronting the street.
i. Secondary front yards may have fences not exceeding eight feet (8') up to the
side setback line based on the zoning district the lot is in.
HPC may define front yard differently, thus allowing an increased height and less
opaqueness.
Item 2 Recommendation: Approval
Applicant is requesting a Certificate of Appropriateness (CoA) to construct side and rear yard
fencing on the side of the three remaining homes, currently under construction (216, 224, &
234 N. Northington). Proposed fence is wooden picket construction, approximately 42” in
height. Per guidelines, rear and side yard fences are limited to 6 feet, therefore, this proposal
is well within the historic guidelines.
Fencing is consistent with other fences in the area in terms of height and style and consistent
with the Historic Guidelines.
Staff recommend approval of proposed fences, subject that the fences be painted to blend with
the building to meet the guidelines.
DR
A
F
T
Page 5 of 6
PICTURES
Sample Fence Materials and Look - Applicant provided picture
204 N. Northington Existing Fence - Applicant Provided Picture
204 N. Northington Existing Fence - Applicant Provided Picture
DR
A
F
T
Page 6 of 6
204 N. Northington Existing Fence - Applicant Provided Picture
204 N. Northington Existing Fence - Applicant Provided Picture
234-204 N Northington Existing - Staff Picture
DR
A
F
T
E 6TH ST
WETUMPKA ST
BOOTH
S
T
N
N
O
R
T
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
S
T
E 5TH ST
E 4TH ST
PIN
E
S
T
N C
H
E
S
T
N
U
T
S
T
RU
S
S
E
L
L
L
N
8TH ST
7TH ST
BENT
T
R
E
E
D
R
MA
R
T
I
N
L
U
T
H
E
R
K
I
N
G
J
R
D
R
PI
N
E
C
R
E
S
T
S
T
N
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
S
T
BO
O
T
H
L
N
COSBY CT
W 6TH ST
W 5TH ST
HA
R
L
E
M
S
T
W 4TH ST
S
N
O
R
T
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
S
T
WA
R
R
E
N
C
I
R
OAK HILL CEMETARY
RA
I
L
R
O
A
D
S
T
Location Map - 204, 216, 224,234 N. Northington Street
±0 1,500750
Feet
Locations are approximate
Legend
Project Area
Elmore_Parcels_Nov_2021
Autauga_Parcels_2021_Nov
Prattville City Limit
Streets
DR
A
F
T
204
216
224
234
225
199
E 6TH ST
N
N
O
R
T
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
S
T
Aerial Map - 204, 216, 224, 234 N Northington Street
±0 200100
Feet
Locations are approximate
Legend
Project Area
Elmore_Parcels_Nov_2021
Autauga_Parcels_2021_Nov
Prattville City Limit
Streets
DR
A
F
T
E 6TH ST
WETUMPKA ST
BOOTH
S
T
N
N
O
R
T
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
S
T
E 5TH ST
E 4TH ST
PIN
E
S
T
N C
H
E
S
T
N
U
T
S
T
RU
S
S
E
L
L
L
N
8TH ST
7TH ST
BENT
T
R
E
E
D
R
MA
R
T
I
N
L
U
T
H
E
R
K
I
N
G
J
R
D
R
PI
N
E
C
R
E
S
T
S
T
N
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
S
T
BO
O
T
H
L
N
COSBY CT
W 6TH ST
W 5TH ST
HA
R
L
E
M
S
T
W 4TH ST
S
N
O
R
T
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
S
T
WA
R
R
E
N
C
I
R
OAK HILL CEMETARY
RA
I
L
R
O
A
D
S
T
R-3
R-2
R-3
R-2
R-2 R-3
R-4
R-3
B-1
B-2
Zoning Map - 204, 216, 224,234 N. Northington Street
±0 1,500750
Feet
Locations are approximate
Legend
Project Area
Elmore_Parcels_Nov_2021
Autauga_Parcels_2021_Nov
Prattville City Limit
Streets
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
Page 1 of 7
Historic Preservation Commission
Staff Report
CERTIFICATE OF
APPROPRIATENESS
150 1st Street-COA2202-02
DATE
February 24, 2022
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Petitioner: River Region Pregnancy Center
Property Owner: River Region Pregnancy Center
Agent: Bob Burton & Chris George
Location: 150 1st Street
Review Status and History
Previous Approvals: N/A
1984/2007 Historic
Properties Inventory
Details
150 East First Street; c. 1895; one story, frame
(asbestos shingle siding), basically square with
asymmetrical facade formed by offset projecting bay; tall
pyramidal roof broken at front, sides and rear by low
secondary gables; single large dormer at front with
colored glass sash; full-length porch (now screened) with
turned posts and spindle frieze; turned and pierced work
bargeboards trim gables. House occupies site of c.1850
structure for which site #151 functioned as servants 1
quarters.
DR
A
F
T
Page 2 of 7
Proposed Alteration, Renovation or Addition
The following alterations have been requested by the applicant. See the application
included as Attachment A for a description of each element.
1. Remove and replace back door with standard 6-panel door
2. Remove windows and replace them with white vinyl windows
PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION:
Reviewed by: Tommie Williams, Planner
Site Visits Conducted: February 2022
Recommendation: See Analysis Details
Evaluation:
The requested alterations were reviewed against the standards contained in the Prattville Residential
Design Review Guidelines Manual. The relevant sections of the manual are included. Staff
comments/evaluations are summarized at the end of each section. The following changes are proposed:
1. Remove and replace the back door with a standard 6-panel door.
Door and Entrances (page 18)
Doors are often buildings’ central visual elements and are particularly important features. Historic
entrances and doors should be retained, maintained, and, if needed, repaired. Missing or
severely deteriorated doors should be replaced with historically appropriate replacements.
Screen, storm, and security doors should not detract from the historic appearance of their
building.
1. Historic doors should be retained and maintained. 2. Deteriorated or damaged historic doors should be repaired using methods that allow them to retain their historic appearance and as much of their historic fabric as possible. Epoxy is
helpful in strengthening and replacing deteriorated wood.
DR
A
F
T
Page 3 of 7
3. Owners are encouraged to replace missing or severely damaged historic doors with new doors that replicate the originals or other historic examples. 4. Replacements for primary residential doors may appropriately be of painted paneled
wood with or without a clear-glass single or multiple-light opening.
Item 1 Recommendation: Approval
The dwelling at 150 1st first street was built as a residential dwelling. Therefore, The Planning
Department utilized the Prattville Residential Design Review Guidelines Manual, even though it
is now being used as a commercial dwelling. The applicant is proposing to replace the existing
flat steel commercial door with a 6-panel door. Applicants should be aware that new doors should
be replicate the originals or other historic examples.
CURRENT BACK DOOR
2. Remove windows and replace them with white vinyl windows
DR
A
F
T
Page 4 of 7
Windows (page 34)
Windows are prominent building components. They help to establish the rhythm of a building or
streetscape. Sometimes, particularly in industrial buildings, they are the dominant visual element
of a building exterior. Historic windows should be retained, visible, maintained, and, if needed,
repaired.
1. Historic windows should be retained and maintained.
2. Historic windows should remain visible and their openings transparent.
3. Deteriorated or damaged windows should be repaired so that the windows retain their
historic appearance.
4. The replacement of original windows with vinyl or aluminum windows is
discouraged.
5. Missing windows or elements should be replaced so that they replicate the historic
windows or other historic examples. Window openings should not be added or removed
from locations visible from the street.
6. Historic shutters should be retained and maintained.
7. Shutters should not be added unless the building historically had them and replacements
replicate historic shutters, fit the window opening, and are constructed of painted wood.
8. Screen and storm windows should be constructed of painted wood, baked-on enamel,
anodized aluminum, or painted-to-match-the-frames mill-finish aluminum.
9. Screen, storm, and security windows should fit within the window frames and be full-view
design or have a central meeting rail in the same location as the window.
10. Security windows and bars should not be visible from the street.
Item 2 Recommendation: Approval with conditions (Condition being that windows
must be replaced with historic windows.
The applicant is proposing to remove the existing windows (except transom and colored attic
windows) and replace them with white vinyl windows. The windows are mostly 2 by 2. They
are proposing to replace the windows with 6 by 6 vinyl windows, which are discouraged in
the historic district, the applicant should try and replace the windows that will replicate the
historic windows or other historic examples.
CURRENT WINDOWS
DR
A
F
T
Page 5 of 7
DR
A
F
T
Page 6 of 7
DR
A
F
T
Page 7 of 7
PROPOSED WINDOWS
DR
A
F
T
1ST ST
E MAIN ST
MA
P
L
E
S
T
DOSTER ST
PL
E
T
C
H
E
R
S
T
W MAIN ST
S W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
S
T
SE
L
M
A
H
W
Y
S C
H
E
S
T
N
U
T
S
T
CO
L
L
E
G
E
S
T
Location Map - 150 1st Street
±0 500250
Feet
Locations are approximate
Legend
Project Area
Elmore_Parcels_Nov_2021
Autauga_Parcels_2021_Nov
Prattville City Limit
Streets
DR
A
F
T
1ST ST
Aerial Map - 150 1st Street
±0 10050
Feet
Locations are approximate
Legend
Project Area
Elmore_Parcels_Nov_2021
Autauga_Parcels_2021_Nov
Prattville City Limit
Streets
DR
A
F
T
1ST ST
E MAIN ST
MA
P
L
E
S
T
DOSTER ST
PL
E
T
C
H
E
R
S
T
W MAIN ST
S W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
S
T
SE
L
M
A
H
W
Y
S C
H
E
S
T
N
U
T
S
T
CO
L
L
E
G
E
S
T
B-2
R-2
R-2
R-3
B-2
R-6
O-1
Zoning Map - 150 1st Street
±0 500250
Feet
Locations are approximate
Legend
Project Area
Elmore_Parcels_Nov_2021
Autauga_Parcels_2021_Nov
Prattville City Limit
Streets
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
RESOLUTION 1 2 [In Support of Historic Resource Survey Grant for Certified Local Governments] 3 4
February 24, 2022 5 6 7 Whereas, the Prattville downtown historic area was surveyed prior to 1984 and again in in 2007; and 8 9
Whereas, fifteen years have since passed and numerous structures have achieved contributing historic 10
status; and 11 12 Whereas, the Historic Preservation Commission desires to commission a new survey of the Prattville 13 Historic District and surrounding areas; and 14
15 Whereas, the City of Prattville became a Certified Local Government on December 21, 2020; and 16 17 Whereas, the Alabama Historical Commission offers grant funding to Certified Local Governments for, 18 among other things, historic resource surveys. 19
20 Now, Therefore, Be it Resolved, that the City of Prattville Historic Preservation Commission requests 21 and is in support of the City Planner/Planning Director applying to the Alabama Historical Commission 22 for a Certified Local Government Grant for a historic resource survey. 23 24
APPROVED: 25 26 27 ___________________________________________ 28 Tim Sanford, Chairman 29
30 ATTEST: 31 32 33 ____________________________________________ 34
Alisa Morgan, Secretary 35