Loading...
2207 July 28 HPC Pkt (Draft) 102 West Main Street \ Prattville, AL 36067 \ 334. 595.0500 \ prattvilleal.gov BILL GILLESPIE, JR. MAYOR J. SCOTT STEPHENS, AICP DIRECTOR CITY OF PRATTVILLE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA July 28, 2022 4:30 p.m. Call to Order: Roll Call: Chairman Sanford, Vice-Chairman Stewart, Mr. Barker, Mrs. Davis, Mr. Ferguson, Mrs. Nettles, and Ms. Rollins. Minutes: June 2, 2022 (Special Meeting) and June 23, 2022 Regular Meeting Committee Reports: Old Business: None New Business: 1. COA2207-01 Certificate of Appropriateness Addition 319 S Washington Street Lisa & James Sherrill, Petitioners Public Hearing 2. COA2207-02 Certificate of Appropriateness Carport Enclosure 144 W 5th Street Harold & Thelma Hunt, Petitioners Public Hearing Miscellaneous: Design Review Guidelines Update Adjourn: DR A F T Draft Prattville Historic Preservation Commission June 2, 2022 Minutes (Special Meeting) Page 1 of 3 CITY OF PRATTVILLE 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 2 MINUTES 3 Special Meeting 4 June 2, 2022 5 6 7 Call to order: 8 The Chairman called the regular meeting of the Prattville Historic Preservation Commission to order on Thursday, 9 June 2, 2022, at 4:28 p.m. 10 11 Roll Call: 12 The secretary called the roll. Members present were Chairman Tim Sanford, Vice-Chair Taylor Stewart, Mr. Zack 13 Barker, Mrs. Jean Davis, Mrs. Teresa Nettles, and Ms. Kristi Rollins. Members Absent: Mr. Scott Ferguson. 14 15 Quorum present 16 17 Also present were Mr. Scott Stephens, City Planner; Mr. Darrell Rigsby, Senior Planner; and Mr. Tommie Williams, 18 Planner. 19 20 Minutes 21 Mrs. Davis moved to approve the minutes of April 28, 2022, regular meeting. Mrs. Nettles seconded the motion. 22 The motion passed unanimously. 23 24 Committee Reports: 25 There were no reports to be made. 26 27 The Commission voted unanimously to move the discussion of Old Business after the New Business. 28 29 New Business: 30 Certificate of Appropriateness 31 Fence 32 141 N. Chestnut Street 33 Gerald & Beverly Cimis, Petitioner 34 35 Mr. Williams provided the staff report for the Certificate of Appropriateness to add a wooden fence on three sides 36 of the dwelling. Mr. Williams stated that the proposed fence will be wood material that will be painted white to 37 match the primary dwelling and be 5ft tall with a gate. He stated that the staff recommends approval. 38 39 Gerald Cimis, the petitioner, presented the request for the Certificate of Appropriateness to add a white wooden 40 fence to three areas of the yard located at 141 N. Chestnut Street to contain their dog. 41 42 Chairman Sanford opened the floor for public comments. There were no public comments made. 43 44 Chairman Sanford opened a discussion for the board. After their discussion, the vote was called. Ms. Davis moved 45 to approve the request as presented. Mrs. Nettles seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously. 46 47 Certificate of Appropriateness 48 126 E. 5th Street 49 J.B & Jaylene Carteret, Petitioner50 51 Mr. Rigsby provided the staff report for the Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a 6-foot privacy fence Mr. 52 Rigsby stated that the proposed fence would be shadow box style with a wrought iron gate. He stated that the staff 53 recommends approval. 54 55 DR A F T Draft Prattville Historic Preservation Commission June 2, 2022 Minutes (Special Meeting) Page 2 of 3 Jaylene Carteret, the petitioner, presented the request for the Certificate of Appropriateness to add a 6-foot privacy 56 fence shadow box style with a wrought iron gate. Ms. Carteret stated that the fence would match both fences on each 57 side of her house. 58 59 Chairman Sanford opened the floor for public comments. There were no public comments made. 60 61 Chairman Sanford opened a discussion for the board. After their discussion, the vote was called. Ms. Stewart moved 62 to approve the request as presented. Mr. Barker seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously. 63 64 Old Business: 65 Certificate of Appropriateness 66 319 S Washington Street 67 Lisa Sherrill, Petitioner 68 69 Mr. Rigsby provided the staff report for the Certificate of Appropriateness to construct an accessory dwelling unit 70 to the rear of the property. Mr. Rigsby stated that the primary dwelling is about +/- 2,000 sq. ft. built-in 1921. The 71 proposed addition would be a two-story and 1,855 sq. ft. It would be attached at the rear, accessible through the 72 primary dwelling by a hallway. The applicant proposed to use like materials, windows, and doors as the primary 73 dwelling. He stated that the staff did not have a recommendation for this case due to the interpretation of the Historic 74 Preservation Guidelines examples include visibility, compatibility with scale and rhythm, distinguishability, and 75 imitation of structure. 76 77 Daniel & Hayley Sherrill Gilmore, the petitioner (petitioner’s daughter), presented the request for the Certificate of 78 Appropriateness to construct an accessory dwelling unit to the rear of the property. Ms. Sherrill-Gilmore stated that 79 the addition would have the same style, windows, and siding as the primary dwelling. 80 81 Chairman Sanford opened the floor for public comments. 82 83 Betsy Carter (327 South Washington Street), the petitioner’s neighbor, stated the size would be 1,855 sq. ft. w/o the 84 porches and they are only allowed to build an addition of 1,000 sq. ft. She states that the roof pitch would be different 85 than the primary dwelling. She was against the accessory dwelling. 86 87 Joel McCord (225 1st Street) stated, that the new addition would expose his house to additional run-off rain and for 88 that reason, he opposed the new addition. 89 90 Ron Pinkard (315 South Washington), the petitioner’s neighbor, stated that flooding was an issue and that the new 91 addition would add more water to the neighborhood. He also stated that a previous approval given to the petitioner 92 in 2020 to add a side porch was not completed. He was opposed to the new addition. 93 94 Chairman Sanford opened a discussion for the board. The Chairman stated, that you can see the new accessory 95 dwelling from the front elevation. In their discussion the board felt like the two additions to the house would be a 96 greater sq. ft. than the sq. footage of the original dwelling. After their discussion, Mr. Barker moved to deny the 97 request as presented. Mrs. Davis seconded the motion. The motion to deny passed unanimously. 98 99 Miscellaneous: 100 Caleb from PaleoWest provided an update via MS Teams on the process of the Design Guidelines being managed 101 by PaleoWest. 102 103 Adjourn: 104 With no further business, Ms. Davis motioned to adjourn the meeting. Ms. Rollins seconded the motion. The 105 meeting was adjourned at 6:00 p.m. 106 107 Respectfully submitted, 108 109 110 DR A F T Draft Prattville Historic Preservation Commission June 2, 2022 Minutes (Special Meeting) Page 3 of 3 111 Tommie Williams, Acting Secretary 112 Historic Preservation Commission 113 DR A F T DRAFT Prattville Historic Preservation Commission June 23, 2022 Minutes Page 1 of 1 CITY OF PRATTVILLE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES June 23, 2022 Call to order: The Chairman called the regular meeting of the Prattville Historic Preservation Commission to order on Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 4:30 p.m. Roll Call: The secretary called the roll. Members present were Chairman Tim Sanford, Vice-Chair Taylor Stewart (via MS Teams), Mr. Zack Barker, Mrs. Jean Davis, Mrs. Teresa Nettles, and Ms. Kristi Rollins. Members Absent: Mr. Scott Ferguson. Quorum present Also present was Mr. Scott Stephens, City Planner; Mr. Darrell Rigsby, Senior Planner; and Mr. Tommie Williams, Planner. Committee Reports: There were no reports to be made. Old Business: There was no old business to discuss. New Business: There was no new business to discuss. Miscellaneous: Chairman Sanford recognized Mayor Bill Gillespie and Councilor Albert Striplin in attendance. They were invited to share their thoughts and participate in the discussion on the draft copy of the design review guidelines. Commissioners, Mayor Gillespie, Councilor Striplin, and staff discussed various sections of the draft guidelines as provided by PaleoWest. Adjourn: With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 6:06 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Scott Stephens, Acting Secretary Historic Preservation Commission DR A F T Page 1 of 7 Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 319 South Washington Street – CA2207-01 DATE July 28, 2022 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Petitioner: Lisa & James Sherrill Property Owner: Lisa & James Sherrill Agent: N/A Location: 319 South Washington Street Review Status and History Submission Status: CoA 2204-02 Item 1 – Construct attached two story addition to rear of structure - Denied CoA 2007-02 Item 1 – Replace porch on north side of house – Approved as submitted contingent that the porch has piers made of brick veneer material and porch material and roof material to match the existing front porch as approved by Planning Department (Not completed) CoA 1703-01 Item 1 – Demolition of an existing structure on the rear of building – Approved as requested Item 2 – construction of new addition on the rear of building (14’x30’, 420 sq ft) with a covered porch – Approved as requested. DR A F T Page 2 of 7 Item 3 – Modifications to front façade and north façade. Front – remove one of the existing front doors to replaces with window. Side – replace existing single window with double window (master bedroom), relocate single window – Approved contingent to modify the kitchen and master bedroom window according to the codes that the building department and planning department deems appropriate. No changes to the window on the front of the house on either side of the dining room and sitting room. (Front doors will not be removed). Previous Approvals: See previous cases above 1984/2007 Historic Properties Inventory Details 319 South Washington Street, Walker House (1921, contributing) This one-story frame bungalow has a broad front gable breaking into an offset secondary gable that extends over its brick-pier and post porch. Proposed Alteration, Renovation or Addition The following alterations have been requested by the applicant. See the application included as Attachment A for a description of each element. 1. Construct 1 story addition to rear (east) of main house PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION: Reviewed by: Darrell Rigsby, Senior Planner Site Visits Conducted: July 2022 Recommendation: Approval – Proposed structure meets the guidelines for Additions in the Residential Design Review Guidelines. See detailed recommendation below. Recommended Condition: Complete previously approved side porch on principal structure prior to construction of addition. DR A F T Page 3 of 7 Evaluation: Since the subject property/structure was initially developed as a residence, the requested alterations were reviewed against the standards contained in the Prattville Residential Design Review Guidelines Manual. The relevant sections of manual are included. Staff comments/evaluations are summarized at the end of each section. The following changes are proposed: 1. Construction of attached single story 30’ x 42’ residential addition attached to rear of main residence via a single story 8’x10’ hallway connector using matching exterior materials to main house Additions (page 40) Additions to dwellings are appropriate as long as they are placed on rear elevations or non-readily visible side elevations. Additions should be designed to complement the historic qualities of the dwelling. 1. Additions should cause minimal damage or removal of historic walls, roofs, and features from historic buildings. Existing openings should be used to connect the building and the addition. 2. Additions should have no or limited visibility from the street. Generally, rear elevation are appropriate locations for additions. 3. Additions should be compatible with the original building in scale, proportion, rhythm, and materials. 4. Additions should be distinguishable from the historic building: they should be smaller and simpler in design. 5. Additions should not imitate earlier architectural styles, but should be contemporary in design. Item 1 Analysis: 319 South Washington Street is a 2016 square feet, one story framed bungalow style home built in 1921. Dimensions are approximately 30 feet wide by approximately 70 feet deep, with additional porches on the front and side elevations. The applicant is proposing to add a single story, 1,350 square feet addition to the rear of the existing structure. Proposed addition will maintain the width of the existing structure, and extend approximately 52 feet into the rear yard. Proposed addition will have a height and roof pitch that appears similar to that of the main structure’s primary roof peak. The applicant is proposing to continue similar design elements of the existing house, using lap siding (currently vinyl on house), similar windows, doors, trim and roofing materials offering compatibility with the original house. Addition has a footprint of approximately 1,400 square feet, including connector and side porches. The existing primary structure has a footprint of approximately 2,400 including all porches. DR A F T Page 4 of 7 Recommendation: Approval – Proposed structure meets the guidelines for Additions in the Residential Design Review Guidelines. 1. Proposed structure will do minimal damage or removal will be done to historic structure. Addition will use an existing opening to connect new structure. 2. Addition will have limited visibility from the street. The addition will be the same width and profile as the existing structure and should not be seen from standing in front of the existing structure. 3. Addition will be compatible with original building by maintaining a similar height, width, roof design, style and materials. 4. Addition will be distinguishable from historic building by being smaller and simpler in design. Addition is connected by a lower roof line that make it clear where the historic structure ends and addition begins. 5. Addition does not imitate earlier architectural styles and maintains that design of the existing structure. EXISTING CONDITIONS Staff Photo (5/20/2022) DR A F T Page 5 of 7 Staff Photo (5/20/2022) Staff Photo (5/20/2022) DR A F T Page 6 of 7 Staff Photo (5/20/2022) Aerial (Credit: Google Earth 3/2021) – Same as existing DR A F T Page 7 of 7 Side Elevations (Provided by Applicant) DR A F T 327 319 S W A S H I N G T O N S T Aerial Map - 319 South Washington Street ±0 10050 Feet Locations are approximate Legend Project Area Prattville City Limit Autauga_Parcels Elmore_Parcels Streets DR A F T 1ST ST E MAIN ST DOSTER ST S N O R T H I N G T O N S T S W A S H I N G T O N S T CO L L E G E S T MA P L E S T S C H E S T N U T S T W MAIN ST SE L M A H W Y P L E T C H E R S T Location Map - 319 South Washington Street ±0 1,000500 Feet Locations are approximate Legend Project Area Prattville City Limit Autauga_Parcels Elmore_Parcels Streets DR A F T 1ST ST E MAIN ST DOSTER ST S N O R T H I N G T O N S T S W A S H I N G T O N S T CO L L E G E S T MA P L E S T S C H E S T N U T S T W MAIN ST SE L M A H W Y P L E T C H E R S T B-2 R-2 R-3 R-2 B-2 O-1 R-6 O-1 Zoning Map - 319 South Washington Street ±0 1,000500 Feet Locations are approximate Legend Project Area Prattville City Limit Autauga_Parcels Elmore_Parcels Streets DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T Page 1 of 5 Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 144 West 5th Street – CA2207-02 DATE July 28, 2022 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Petitioner: Harold & Thelma Hunt Property Owner: Harold & Thelma Hunt Agent: N/A Location: 144 West 5th Street Review Status and History Submission Status: None Known Previous Approvals: None Known 1984/2007 Historic Properties Inventory Details 144 West 5th Street: Non-Contributing No information listed DR A F T Page 2 of 5 Proposed Alteration, Renovation, or Addition The following addition has been requested by the applicant. See the application included as Attachment A for a description of each element. 1. Enclose the existing carport PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION: Reviewed by: Tommie Williams, Planner Site Visits Conducted: July 2022 Recommendation: Approve Evaluation: Since the subject property/structure was initially developed as a residence, the requested alterations were reviewed against the Prattville Residential Design Review Guidelines Manual standards. The relevant sections of the manual are included. Staff comments/evaluations are summarized at the end of each section. The following changes are proposed: 1. Addition Addition (Page 40) Additions to dwellings are appropriate as long as they are placed on rear elevations or non-readily visible side elevations. Additions should be designed to complement the historic qualities of the dwelling. 1. Additions should cause minimal damage or removal of historic walls, roofs, and features from historic buildings. Existing openings should be used to connect the building and the addition. The addition/carport is not removing or damaging any wall of the primary dwelling walls, roofs, and features. This is a non-contributing dwelling and limited historical features. 2. Additions should have no or limited visibility from the street. Generally, rear elevations are appropriate locations for additions. This addition will be located on the side elevation and utilize the existing roofline. The roofline of the primary dwelling will be the same roofline for the carport. DR A F T Page 3 of 5 3. Additions should be compatible with the original building in scale, proportion, rhythm, and materials. The proposed project will be compatible with the original dwelling in scale, proportion, and rhythm. The material will be a hardy plank with atrium doors. 4. Additions should be distinguishable from the historic building: they should be smaller and simpler in design. The addition, since the dwelling is non-contributing will be distinguishable from other historic dwellings in the district. The addition will match the primary dwelling and will be smaller and simpler in design. The primary dwelling is brick, the addition will utilize hardy plank. 5. Additions should not imitate earlier architectural styles, but should be contemporary in design. The addition will reflect the popular carport designs of today by utilizing hardy plank and modern techniques. Analysis: The applicant would like to enclose their current carport and make a den area. The front of the carport (the part facing the street) will have windows installed that will be 5’w x 6’ and match the primary dwelling, and a sliding glass door that will be 13 x 6 (atrium door). The enclosure will consist of a wall on the west elevation that will be 22’ long with a 6-panel door. This dwelling is non-contributing to the Historic District. PHOTOS DR A F T Page 4 of 5 DR A F T Page 5 of 5 This picture was created and provided to you by the City of Prattville Planning Staff. DR A F T 132 158 152 144 W 5TH ST Aerial Map - 144 West 5th Street ±0 200100 Feet Locations are approximate Legend Project Area Prattville City Limit Autauga_Parcels Elmore_Parcels Streets DR A F T W 6TH ST W 4TH ST W 5TH ST E 3RD ST E 6TH ST 7TH ST N C O U R T S T WA L N U T S T E 5TH ST E 4TH ST N N O R T H I N G T O N S T W 3RD ST PIN E S T S C O U R T S T TICHNOR ST N C H E S T N U T S T WETUMPKA ST S N O R T H I N G T O N S T S C H E S T N U T S T U P P E R K I N G S T O N R D LO W E R K I N G S T O N R D HUNTS ALY BENT T R E E D R S W A S H I N G T O N S T N W A S H I N G T O N S T MA R T I N L U T H E R K I N G J R D R PR A T T V I L L E P U B L I C S A F E T Y FAULK QTRS RAILRO A D S T N C O U R T S T Location Map - 144 West 5th Street ±0 2,0001,000 Feet Locations are approximate Legend Project Area Prattville City Limit Autauga_Parcels Elmore_Parcels Streets DR A F T W 6TH ST W 4TH ST W 5TH ST E 3RD ST E 6TH ST 7TH ST N C O U R T S T WA L N U T S T E 5TH ST E 4TH ST N N O R T H I N G T O N S T W 3RD ST PIN E S T S C O U R T S T TICHNOR ST N C H E S T N U T S T WETUMPKA ST S N O R T H I N G T O N S T S C H E S T N U T S T U P P E R K I N G S T O N R D LO W E R K I N G S T O N R D HUNTS ALY BENT T R E E D R S W A S H I N G T O N S T N W A S H I N G T O N S T MA R T I N L U T H E R K I N G J R D R PR A T T V I L L E P U B L I C S A F E T Y FAULK QTRS RAILRO A D S T N C O U R T S T R-3 R-3 R-2 R-2 M-1 B-2 B-2 R-4 R-4 R-3 B-2 T-2 B-1 O-1 R-3 B-2 R-3 R-5 F.A.R. T-2 R-3 R-4R-3 Zoning Map - 144 West 5th Street ±0 2,0001,000 Feet Locations are approximate Legend Project Area Prattville City Limit Autauga_Parcels Elmore_Parcels Streets DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T DR A F T