2401 January 25 HPC PKT (Draft)102 West Main Street \ Prattville, AL 36067 \ 334. 595.0500 \ prattvilleal.gov
BILL GILLESPIE, JR.
MAYOR
J.SCOTT STEPHENS, AICPDIRECTOR
CITY OF PRATTVILLE
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA January 25, 2024 4:30 p.m.
Call to Order:
Roll Call: Chairman Miller, Vice-Chairman Stewart, Mrs. Davis, Mr. Ferguson, Ms. Fritz, and Ms. Rollins.
Minutes: December 14, 2023
Committee Reports:
Old Business: None
New Business: 1.COA2401-01 Certificate of AppropriatenessAlterations - Paint, Driveway, Fence, Shutters, et al 342 S Northington Street Taylor Harmon & Kayleigh Powers, Petitioners
Public Hearing
2.COA2401-02 Certificate of AppropriatenessAlterations to rear of building (Awning/Carport) 136 W Main Street Michael Thompson, Petitioner
Public Hearing
3.COA2401-03 Certificate of AppropriatenessAlterations to Front Façade 138 W Main Street Michael Thompson, Petitioner
Public Hearing
Miscellaneous: Expedited Approvals:
Adjourn:
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT
Prattville Historic Preservation Commission December 14, 2023 Minutes Page 1 of 2
CITY OF PRATTVILLE 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 2 MINUTES 3 December 14, 2023 4 5 6 Call to order: 7 The Chairman called the special meeting of the Prattville Historic Preservation Commission to order on Thursday, 8 December 14, 2023, at 4:30 p.m. 9 10 Roll Call: 11 The acting secretary called the roll. Chairman Tom Miller, Vice-Chair Taylor Stewart, Mrs. Jean Davis, Mr. Scott 12 Ferguson, Ms. Precious Fritz, Ms. Kristi Rollins, and Mr. Tim Sanford were present. 13
14 Quorum present 15 16
Also present were Mr. Scott Stephens, City Planner; Mr. Joshua McKinney, Planner; and Ms. Bria Hudson, Planner. 17 18 Minutes: 19
Ms. Rollins moved to approve the minutes of the October 26, 2023, regular meeting. Mr. Sanford seconded the 20 motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously. 21 22 Committee Reports: 23 There were no reports to be made. 24 25 Old Business: 26 There was no old business to discuss. 27 28 New Business: 29 30
Certificate of Appropriateness 31
New Residential Construction 32
242 N Chestnut Street 33
Vincent Nelson, Petitioner 34 35 Mr. McKinney provided the staff report for the Certificate of Appropriateness for a two bed/two bath house with 36
detached garage at 242 N Chestnut Street. He informed the Commission that the Board of Zoning Adjustment 37 recently granted a variance for reduced setbacks. He summarized what the design guidelines require for new 38 construction and pointed out proposed materials for the new house. 39 40 Nelson Vincent, petitioner, presented the request for the Certificate of Appropriateness at the corner of Chestnut St 41 and 6th Street. He stated the design of the proposed house would be similar to the duplex he recently built at 146/148 42 1st Street (his residence). He answered questions from the commission regarding design and materials of the house 43 and garage. 44 45 Mr. Stephens mentioned that this is the location of the former Blue Moon Café that was demolished sometime in the 46 1980s. 47
48 Chairman Miller opened the floor for public comments. There was no one desiring to speak, so the public hearing 49 was closed. 50
51 Ms. Stewart moved to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness based on the submitted design. Ms. Rollins 52 seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed unanimously. 53
54 55
DR
A
F
T
DRAFT
Prattville Historic Preservation Commission December 14, 2023 Minutes Page 2 of 2
Miscellaneous: 56 57 Ms. Stewart suggested that it would be helpful to be more explicit on stating the findings of the commission based 58 on the guidelines when deciding to approve or deny requests. Ms. Rollins asked about having pre-written resolutions 59 for the commission to consider. 60 61 Ms. Stewart discussed the idea of creating a work plan for the upcoming year to consider projects or grants. 62 63 Mr. Stephens reminded the commission members about officer elections needing to be held at their January meeting. 64 65 Chairman Miller pointed out that this will be Mr. Sanford’s last meeting as a member of the Commission and 66 expressed his gratitude to Mr. Sanford for his service. 67 68
Expedited Review-none. 69 70 Adjourn: 71
With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 4:55 p.m. 72 73 Respectfully submitted, 74
75 76 77 Scott Stephens, City Planner 78 Historic Preservation Commission 79
DR
A
F
T
Page 1 of 8
Historic Preservation Commission
Staff Report
CERTIFICATE OF
APPROPRIATENESS
342 S Northington Street – COA 2401-01
DATE
January 25, 2024
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Petitioner: Taylor Harmon & Kayleigh Powers
Property Owner: Taylor Harmon & Kayleigh Powers
Agent:
Location: 342 S Northington Street
Review Status and History
Previous Approvals: N/A
1984/2007/2023
Historic Properties
Inventory Details
N/A
Proposed Alteration, Renovation or Addition
The following alterations have been requested by the applicant.
1. Fence
2. Circular Driveway
3. Window Replacement
4. Shutters
5. Exterior Paint ( Painted Brick & Vinyl Siding)
DR
A
F
T
Page 2 of 8
PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION:
Reviewed by: Bria Hudson, City Planner
Site Visits Conducted: January 2024
Evaluation:
1. Fence
2. Circular Driveway
3. Window Replacement
4. Shutters
5. Exterior Paint ( Painted Brick & Vinyl Siding)
Historic District Design Guidelines referenced:
1. Fence
Fences (p25)
1. Historic fences and walls shall be retained and maintained.
2. For new fences, wood and metal fencing is most appropriate for the district.
3. New fences shall not obscure or damage any defining landscaping or streetscaping elements such
as historic sidewalks, lighting, and other elements that add to the character of the block.
4. Avoid erecting solid fences in the front yard or where there is street frontage.
Choose instead wood or metal lattice fences, picket fences, spindle fences, and other fence types
that provide some transparency.
5. All front yard and street frontage fences shall be 4 feet or less and shall not obscure historic
elements of the property.
6. Privacy fences may be located in the side or rear of a lot, though they shall be setback from the
front facade of the building to reduce their visual prominence.
In the case of corner lots, they shall be setback from both building faces where there is street
frontage.
7. Fences in the side and rear of a property may be constructed of alternative materials as long as
they are not highly visible from the right of way and do not detract from the character of the district.
DR
A
F
T
Page 3 of 8
8. Rock and brick landscape retaining walls are generally appropriate for the district, though they shall
be low in height and not obscure historic elements of the property.
Staff Comments/Evaluation:
The petitioner is proposing fence located on 1st street and the materials will be pressure treated pine french
gothic spaced picket fence with a gate(painted white). The proposal will meet the guidelines.
2. Driveways and Sidewalks
Driveways and Sidewalks (p21/22)
1. Historic driveways and sidewalks shall be retained and maintained.
2. New driveways shall not damage or destroy important landscaping features and shall be oriented
to be compatible with the overall streetscape of the block.
3. New driveways shall be of a similar size and scale to what is found nearby within the historic
district.
4. New driveways shall make use of existing curbcuts when possible. Avoid new curbcuts unless they
are necessary for driveway access. New curbcuts shall match historic curbcuts along the street in
size, profile, and configuration.
5. Driveways shall be located to the side of the main structure when possible. Unique or unusually
shaped lots may warrant a driveway in a different location, though the applicant shall make a best
faith effort to incorporate a driveway that is compatible with the streetscape.
6. Driveways shall be constructed of materials typically found within the historic district such
as gravel, concrete ribbons, pavers, dirt, and concrete.
7. Larger driveways may be appropriate if they are located in the rear of the lot.
8. Materials such as blacktop and asphalt were not historically found within the residential part of the
historic district and are prohibited.
9. New sidewalks and walkways shall follow historical trends set by the historic district. Many
residential buildings have narrow concrete walkways leading from the sidewalk to the building
entrance; construction of new walkways shall follow this historical precedent.
Staff Comments/Evaluation:
The petitioner is proposing a circular driveway located on S Northington Street. The petitioner is requesting to
remove the sidewalk to the house and install concrete pavers to the circular driveway on South Northington
Street. The proposed driveway materials will be gray gravel . Please note that the petitioner has been consulting
with the City Engineer to confirm the driveway will be located properly.
3. Windows
DR
A
F
T
Page 4 of 8
Windows (p30)
1. Historic windows and their frames shall be retained and maintained.
2. Damaged or deteriorated windows shall be repaired before they are replaced.
3. Historic window openings shall remain visible and shall not be obscured from view through paint,
wood, or other materials and methods which may alter their transparency or appearance.
4. Stained glass and other decorative window elements shall be retained and maintained. Do not
introduce these decorative window elements where there is no historical basis for them.
5. New and replacement windows shall be of a compatible style, configuration, and material of the
historic windows found on the structure.
a. Contemporary materials such as vinyl and other high gloss materials are generally discouraged.
b. Reflective glass windows are generally discouraged.
c. When replacement windows of the same original material cannot be found, the replacement
window shall be of a compatible size, type, configuration, material, appearance and form as the
original windows.
d. Replacement windows shall match the appearance of the original window to the greatest extent
possible. If the structure has no distinctive style, then window configuration and style shall be of a
simple, compatible style with surrounding structures.
e. Replacement windows shall make use of the existing window frame, it shall not be appropriate to
remove the historic framing of window openings.
f. For replacement windows on tertiary building faces that are not easily visible from the right of way,
materials such as vinyl and reflective glass may be considered on a case-by-case basis.
6. The addition of window openings to tertiary faces may be considered on a case-by-case basis if
they do not damage or detract from the integrity of the structure.
Staff Comments/Evaluation:
The petitioner is requesting to replace 16 existing 2:2, horizontal paine windows with 9:9 colonial style window
treatment. This is a noncontributing structure and the multi-pane proposed windows will be simliar to nearby
houses.
4. Shutters and Storm Windows
Shutters and Storm Windows (p31)
1. Historic shutters shall be retained and maintained.
2. Non-functional shutters shall not be added to existing structures unless they were historically
present.
3. New shutters shall match the height, width, and other proportions of the window opening and shall
be mounted to be operational.
DR
A
F
T
Page 5 of 8
4. New shutters shall not be mounted directly onto any historic exterior walls; instead, mount them
directly onto window frames.
5. Screen and storm windows shall be constructed of painted wood, baked-on enamel, anodized
aluminum, or other materials which can be painted to match the frames mill finish construction.
6. Screen and storm windows shall fit within window frames and openings.
7. Security windows and metal bars shall not be permitted on primary and secondary faces of
structures.
8. Window inserts and other fixtures that improve the energy efficiency of windows shall be installed
on the interior of the window frame.
Staff Comments/Evaluation:
The petitioner is requesting that the material of the proposed shutters to be wood and to install two shutters on
five windows. There are no existing shutters.
5. Siding Materials
Siding Materials (p32)
1. Historic materials such as brick, stone, mortar, clapboard, and wood shall be retained and
maintained.
2. Damaged historic materials shall be repaired and replaced in-kind before wholesale removal and
replacement. When repairs are required, replacements shall be of a compatible material and mirror
the appearance of the historic materials.
3. When wholesale replacement of materials is required, the replacement materials shall be of a
compatible design, profile, shape, and material to what was historically found on the structure.
4. New materials may be used if they create a cohesive appearance with the existing structure.
a. Materials such as vinyl, aluminum, panelized brick, and other similar materials are prohibited.
b. Composition siding or engineered wood is generally appropriate though the new material shall
match historical wood siding in size, exposed lap, and material finish.
c. New materials shall match the original historic materials in composition and scale.
5. Materials that have no historic basis shall not be used in the alteration and rehabilitation of historic
structures.
Staff Comments/Evaluation:
The petitioner is requesting to install white vinyl siding. Please note that the alterations have already been
completed prior to applying for Certificate of Appropriateness.
6. Painting
DR
A
F
T
Page 6 of 8
Alterations to Non-Contributing Residential Buildings (pp35-36):
Guidelines for alterations to non-contributing buildings are less strict than those of contributing historic buildings. As a general rule, alterations to non-contributing buildings should be contemporary and not
create a false sense of history.
1. Alterations to non-historic residential buildings shall not copy historic architecture styles. Contemporary alterations are appropriate if they do not detract from the integrity of the district. 2. In general, alterations to non-historic buildings shall appear similar in scale, massing, and height to the main structure and other nearby residential buildings.
3. Alterations to windows, door openings, and porches shall be compatible with the rhythm
established by window, door openings, and porches of nearby historic structures. 4. Alterations that detract from the overall character of the district shall be prohibited. 5. Avoid alterations that disrupt the spacing and orientation of the structure or overshadow nearby historic structures.
New Construction (Residential); Materials (p38):
1. Materials for new construction shall be of a similar design, profile, shape, style, and composition to what was used with nearby structures.
a. Siding such as wood, engineered wood, and composition board siding are appropriate as long as they are of a similar appearance, size, and shape to what is found on nearby historic structures.
b. Masonry, brick, and stone shall remain unpainted.
2. New construction shall avoid using a wide variety of different materials unless nearby historic structures have a similar composition.
3. Roof materials shall be of a similar construction type, style, and material to what is found on nearby structures.
Staff Comments/Evaluation:
The petitioner is requesting to paint the exterior by white washing the brick. This is a c1968 structure that in
noncontributing to the Historic District. Please note that the alterations have already been completed prior to
applying for Certificate of Appropriateness.
View from South Northington Street:
DR
A
F
T
Page 7 of 8
DR
A
F
T
Page 8 of 8
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
Page 1 of 6
Historic Preservation Commission
Staff Report
CERTIFICATE OF
APPROPRIATENESS
136 W Main Street – COA2401-02
DATE
January 25, 2024
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Petitioner: M.A. Thompson
Property Owner: M.A. Thompson
Location: 136 W Main Street
Review Status and History
Previous Approvals: 07/2008 – Removal of aluminum façade and removal of canopy. Install of
new canopy
4/2013 – Enclose existing patio with antique doors and windows
1984/2007/2023
Historic Properties
Inventory Details
138 – 142 West Main Street, Spigner-Grouby Building, Now 136 and 138 West
Main Street
a) 1984: contributing. “c. 1895 (west half 1910); one story, brick, paneled brick
parapet. Erected as two distinct units, now functions as one. Originally housed
Spigener furniture and undertaking establishment. Older three-bay east unit
retains cast-iron storefront stamped ‘Chattanooga Roofing and Foundry Co.’”
b) 2007: c. 1895 and 1910, non-contributing. “These two units were
constructed separately, though they now function as one building. The older,
Eastern unit retains its original three-bay cast-iron storefront stamped
‘Chattanooga Roofing and Foundry Co.’”
DR
A
F
T
Page 2 of 6
c) 2023: c. 1895 and 1910, non-contributing. These two units were constructed
separately, once functioned as one building, and are now function separately
again. Originally housed Spigener furniture and undertaking establishment.
136 West Main Street has been restored over the years, with its brick façade
visible and a 3 bay storefront with recessed (but incompatible) entry. 138
West Main has a stuccoed lower façade and a corrugated metal facing on the
upper façade.
Proposed Alteration, Renovation or Addition
The following alterations have been requested by the applicant.
1. Extend existing metal canopy 20’ for food truck cover. Wrap existing and new metal cover wood to match existing rear entrance to Uncle mick’s
PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION:
Reviewed by: Joshua McKinney, Planner
Site Visits Conducted: January 2024
Evaluation:
MISCELLANEOUS (pg. 61)
Mechanical and Utility Equipment 1. Mechanical and utility equipment should be shielded from view when possible. 2. Public artwork may be used as a way of integrating mechanical or utility equipment into pedestrian environments where there is no alternative to their placement.
Accessory Structures and Storm Shelters 1. Existing historic accessory structures shall be retained and maintained.
DR
A
F
T
Page 3 of 6
2. New accessory structures that are visible from the right of way shall be compatible with the style of
the main structure. 3. New accessory structures shall be subordinate to the main structure.
4. New accessory structures shall be constructed of materials similar in pattern, texture, and
appearance to the main structure. 5. Storm shelters shall not be visible from the right of way, or shall be made to have a style that is compatible with the style of the main structure.
Canopies and Awnings (pg. 47) 1. Canopies and awnings shall be preserved through regular cleaning and replacement of materials and fixtures when necessary.
2. When new canopies and awnings are installed on a building, they shall not damage the historic
structure or any existing architectural features. Visibility of architectural features should be maintained when installing a new canopy or awning. 3. When adding a new canopy or awning, make use of any existing fixtures. When no fixtures exist,
install them in ways that are minimally invasive to the existing structure.
4. When an awning is for a window, it shall mirror the shape of the window opening to which it is attached. Canopies shall align with horizontal elements of the facade such as the cornice or roof lines.
5. Awnings shall be constructed of canvas duck, cotton, or polyester blends. Metal and wood is the most appropriate material for canopies. 6. Canopy and awning colors shall accent that of the main structure and should not be garishly
colored.
7. Canopies and awnings shall not be internally lit. Light fixtures shall be shielded so as to not cause the appearance of internal illumination.
DR
A
F
T
Page 4 of 6
Evaluation: The current canopy is located behind Uncle Mick’s restaurant. It is not in public view from W
Main St. The canopy is in public view from Tichnor St. Extending the current canopy, for food truck, will
not alter the historical building. Canopy colors should accent that of the main structure and should not be
garishly colored. Canopy is made of metal. Applicant is proposing to clad existing with metal awning
siding with wooden siding similar to the rear of the Uncle Mick’s building.
DR
A
F
T
Page 5 of 6
DR
A
F
T
Page 6 of 6
DR
A
F
T
W 3RD ST
S
C
H
E
S
T
N
U
T
S
T
W MAIN ST
TICHNOR ST
E 3RD ST
BRI
D
G
E
S
T
E MAIN ST
S
C
O
U
R
T
S
T
1ST ST
M
A
P
L
E
S
T
HU
N
T
S
A
L
Y
Maxar, Microsoft
Legend
Project Area
Autauga Parcels
Elmore Parcels
0 400200
Feet
Locations are approximate ±
Location Map
DR
A
F
T
W MAIN ST
TICHNOR ST
S C
H
E
S
T
N
U
T
S
T
S
C
O
U
R
T
S
T
BR
I
D
G
E
S
T
E MAIN ST
Maxar, Microsoft
Legend
Project Area
Autauga Parcels
Elmore Parcels
0 200100
Feet
Locations are approximate ±
Aerial Map
DR
A
F
T
W 3RD ST
S C
H
E
S
T
N
U
T
S
T
W MAIN ST
TICHNOR ST
BRI
D
G
E
S
T
E 3RD ST
S
C
O
U
R
T
S
T
E MAIN ST
1ST ST
M
A
P
L
E
S
T
HU
N
T
S
A
L
Y
Maxar, Microsoft
Legend
Project Area
Autauga Parcels
Elmore Parcels
Zoning
Downtown Overlay
B-1
B-2
B-3
B-4
F.A.R.
M-1
M-2
O-1
P.U.D.
R-1
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-5
R-6
RD-1
T-1
T-2
T-3
0 400200
Feet
Locations are approximate ±
Zoning Map
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
Page 1 of 10
Historic Preservation Commission
Staff Report
CERTIFICATE OF
APPROPRIATENESS
138 W Main Street – COA2401-03
DATE
January 25, 2024
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Petitioner: M.A. Thompson
Property Owner: M.A. Thompson
Agent:
Location: 138 W Main Street
Review Status and History
Previous Approvals: None found
1984/2007/2023
Historic Properties
Inventory Details
138 – 142 West Main Street, Spigner-Grouby Building, Now 136 and 138 West
Main Street
a) 1984: contributing. “c. 1895 (west half 1910); one story, brick, paneled brick
parapet. Erected as two distinct units, now functions as one. Originally housed
Spigener furniture and undertaking establishment. Older three-bay east unit
retains cast-iron storefront stamped ‘Chattanooga Roofing and Foundry Co.’”
b) 2007: c. 1895 and 1910, non-contributing. “These two units were
constructed separately, though they now function as one building. The older,
Eastern unit retains its original three-bay cast-iron storefront stamped
‘Chattanooga Roofing and Foundry Co.’”
DR
A
F
T
Page 2 of 10
c) 2023: c. 1895 and 1910, non-contributing. These two units were constructed
separately, once functioned as one building, and are now function separately
again. Originally housed Spigener furniture and undertaking establishment.
136 West Main Street has been restored over the years, with its brick façade
visible and a 3 bay storefront with recessed (but incompatible) entry. 138
West Main has a stuccoed lower façade and a corrugated metal facing on the
upper façade.
Proposed Alteration, Renovation or Addition
The following alterations have been requested by the applicant.
1. Remove existing store front plate glass windows and push the entrance 12 ft back
2. Move existing old wood. Install knee wall back (12’) and install smaller glass windows, trimmed in wood
3. Use antique wood entrance door
4. Cover exterior floor with stone
5. Install antique iron railing & gate where existing window is now
PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION:
Reviewed by: Joshua McKinney, Planner
Site Visits Conducted: January 2024
Evaluation:
COMMERCIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES (pg. 40)
ALTERATIONS AND REHABILITATION (COMMERCIAL) (pg. 46) The commercial downtown of the Prattville Historic District is largely defined by the physical design of
structures, the composition of architectural elements, and each building’s interaction with the public
realm. Facades often feature the most architectural detail and are the first thing many people see as
DR
A
F
T
Page 3 of 10
they walk through downtown Prattville. Early 20th century storefronts usually have large display
glasses, a slightly recessed entry, and decorative tiled entryways. Upper stories on commercial buildings typically are adorned with decorative cornice lines, brick window surrounds, narrow windows, and a variety of parapet heights. The combination of first floor and upper story elements combine to create a unique architectural composition in downtown Prattville.
Architectural Details and Features (pg. 46) 1. Historic architectural details shall be retained and maintained. Do not remove historic architectural details from structures.
2. Historic architectural details shall be repaired before they are replaced.
a. When replacement is necessary, only the damaged portion of the detail should be removed and replaced. b. original replacement materials should be utilized if possible. Alternative materials may be used if the original material cannot be found.
3. When architectural details need to be fully replaced, the replacement shall be designed to match the missing details as much as possible. a. When the details cannot be replicated, a simplified version of the original detail shall be used instead.
b. When full scale replacement is necessary, the replacement materials shall match the
original as much as possible. Alternative materials may be used if the original material cannot be found. 4. Historic architecture details shall not be obscured from public view when rehabilitating a historic
structure.
5. When removing non-historic siding and other similar materials, the applicant shall make a best faith effort to preserve and restore existing historic elements and any details that may be uncovered during the restoration process.
6. Architectural details shall not be added to existing historic commercial buildings, unless there is evidence that the detail existed there previously. If there is evidence of missing architectural details, restore the missing elements as long as the alteration does not damage or obscure any other historic features of the structure. a. New architectural elements shall be constructed of a similar material to what was historically
found on the building. b. Alternative materials that mirror the appearance of historic materials may be used if the original materials cannot be found. Doors, Entrances, and Storefronts (pg. 48) 1. Storefronts and their elements such as display windows, transoms, doors, pillars, pilasters, and bulkheads shall be retained and maintained. 2. Elements of the storefront shall be visible and not obscured from view by alterations.
3. When removing non-historic elements from storefronts, the applicant shall make a best faith effort to preserve and restore any existing historic elements or those that may be recovered during the renovation.
DR
A
F
T
Page 4 of 10
4. Deteriorated or damaged storefronts and their elements shall be repaired before they are replaced. a. When replacement is necessary, only the damaged portion of the detail should be removed and replaced. b. Original replacement materials should be utilized if they are available, though alternative
materials may be used if the original material cannot be found.
5. When storefronts or their elements need to be fully replaced, the replacement shall be designed to match the original as much as possible. a. When the details cannot be replicated, a simplified version of the original shall be used
instead.
b. When full scale replacement is necessary, the replacement materials shall match the original as much as possible. Alternative materials may be used if the original material cannot be found.
6. For storefront doors, the historic appearance of existing doors shall be retained and maintained. When replacement is necessary, the new door shall be of a similar style and material to what was historically found on historic commercial structures such as clear glass, single light, and wooden doors with or without paneling.
7. Do not use highly reflective glass on storefronts. New or replacement glass to storefronts shall be
clear and transparent. 8. Storefronts, doors, and entrances shall not be added to historic structures where none was previously present. If there is evidence of a historic storefront or entrance, then the added feature
shall be of a compatible style and material to the building’s architectural style.
Windows (pg. 50) 1. Historic windows and their openings shall be retained and maintained.
2. Damaged or deteriorated windows shall be repaired before they are replaced.
3. Historic window openings shall remain visible and shall not be obscured by paint, wood, or other materials and methods that alter their transparency or appearance. 4. Stained glass and other decorative window elements shall be retained and maintained. It shall not
be appropriate to introduce these decorative window elements where there is not a historic basis for them. 5. New and replacement windows shall be of a compatible style, configuration, and material of the historic windows found on the structure. a. Materials such as vinyl are generally discouraged. b. The greatest scrutiny shall be directed towards first floor windows which are easily visible from the right of way. c. Metal clad wood and other similar window materials may be used on the first floor if they
match the profile of historic windows. d. For second story or higher, windows of alternative materials such as metal or fiberglass may be used if they match the profile of historic windows.
DR
A
F
T
Page 5 of 10
e. Replacement windows shall match the appearance of the original window the greatest
extent possible; if the structure has no distinctive style, then window configuration and style shall be of a simple, compatible style with surrounding structures. f. Replacement windows shall make use of the existing window frame. Do not remove the historic framing of window openings.
g. For replacement windows on tertiary building faces, materials such as vinyl may be
considered on a case-by-case basis. 6. Do not add window designs or configurations with no historical basis.
7. Do not add window openings where none were previously present on primary or secondary faces
of historic structures. 8. The addition of window openings may be considered on a case-by-case basis to tertiary faces if they do not damage or detract from the integrity of the structure.
Evaluation: Storefronts and their elements should be retained and maintained according to the Historic
District Guidelines. Removing current historical store front entrance/elements and adding proposed
features will not be a compatible style and material to the buildings and downtown historical buildings’
architectural style.
DR
A
F
T
Page 6 of 10
PICTURES
CURRENT
DR
A
F
T
Page 7 of 10
DR
A
F
T
Page 8 of 10
DR
A
F
T
Page 9 of 10
Photos of building – Circa 1980s
DR
A
F
T
Page 10 of 10
DR
A
F
T
W 3RD ST
S C
H
E
S
T
N
U
T
S
T
W MAIN ST
TICHNOR ST
BRI
D
G
E
S
T
E 3RD ST
S
C
O
U
R
T
S
T
E MAIN ST
1ST ST
M
A
P
L
E
S
T
HU
N
T
S
A
L
Y
Maxar, Microsoft
Legend
Project Area
Autauga Parcels
Elmore Parcels
0 400200
Feet
Locations are approximate ±
Location Map
DR
A
F
T
W MAIN ST
TICHNOR ST
S C
H
E
S
T
N
U
T
S
T
S
C
O
U
R
T
S
T
BR
I
D
G
E
S
T
E MAIN ST
Maxar, Microsoft
Legend
Project Area
Autauga Parcels
Elmore Parcels
0 200100
Feet
Locations are approximate ±
Aerial Map
DR
A
F
T
W 3RD ST
S C
H
E
S
T
N
U
T
S
T
W MAIN ST
TICHNOR ST
BRI
D
G
E
S
T
E 3RD ST
S
C
O
U
R
T
S
T
E MAIN ST
1ST ST
M
A
P
L
E
S
T
HU
N
T
S
A
L
Y
Maxar, Microsoft
Legend
Project Area
Autauga Parcels
Elmore Parcels
Zoning
Downtown Overlay
B-1
B-2
B-3
B-4
F.A.R.
M-1
M-2
O-1
P.U.D.
R-1
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-5
R-6
RD-1
T-1
T-2
T-3
0 400200
Feet
Locations are approximate ±
Zoning Map
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T