Loading...
PH Minutes 2024.04.09 - Redistricting1 PRATTVILLE CITY COUNCIL REDISTRICTING PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES TUESDAY, APRIL 9, 2024 6:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: The Prattville City Council met in Public Hearing on Tuesday, April 9, 2024, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. Roll was called with all Councilors recorded as present with the exception of Councilor Striplin and Councilor Chambers. Council President Boone declared a quorum and called the meeting to order. Councilor Chambers entered the Council Chambers at 6:00 p.m. after the roll was called. Council President Boone explained the order of service for the meeting advising City Planner Scott Stephens and City Attorney Andrew Odom will giving an overview of the redistricting process followed by comments from the public. Mr. Stephens discussed the Benchmark Plan which gathered information from the currently adopted council districts from Ordinance 2011, Page 024, adopted on September 6, 2011, with the numbers from the 2020 census. The 2020 Census shows the City of Prattville has a population of 37,781. He further advised this number divided between the seven districts is 5,397 persons per district which would be the ideal population and would allow for equal representation accomplishing the one person, one vote. He continued stating the variances on the Benchmark plan show the percentage of people above or below the ideal population in each district. In conclusion, Mr. Stephens states these variances tell us that the current districts are not close to equal population having cause for the current redistricting process. Mr. Odom discussed the redistricting guidelines stating that public feedback needs to fall within these guidelines and these guidelines will be what the consultant will use to prepare the first alternative map. REDISTRICTING GUIDELINES 1. All districts shall have equal representation. Districts will be drawn so that council districts provide “one person-one vote” representation. The deviation of plus or minus five percent from the ideal district population maintains an acceptable level of representation. 2. The plan shall comply with the Voting Rights Act of 1965. According to the Voting Rights Act, districts shall be drawn in such a way that assures all voters have an equal opportunity to participate in the political process and to elect representatives of their choice. 3. Where possible, existing district boundaries shall be maintained. Traditional lines should not be redrawn if their existing locations can be reasonably accommodated and equal representation achieved. 4. The plan shall strive to be non-retrogressive, meaning the ability of minority voters to participate in the political process and to elect candidates of choice is not diminished by the resulting redistricting. 5. As much as reasonably possible, council districts should be a compact and contiguous geographic unit. • Mr. Odom pointed out this is not an absolute mentioning District 2 and maintaining what we have achieved thus far. 6. The 2020 U. S. Census of Population shall be the source of data for determining population and representation. • Mr. Odom addressed concerns of several new neighborhood developments advising the 2020 Census data is what is required by law to be used as the source for the map. 2 7. To the maximum extent possible, district boundaries in the redistricting plan should strive to include whole neighborhoods. 8. Existing voting centers should be maintained, if possible, for voter convenience and efficient election administration. 9. District boundaries should be easily identifiable physical features such as the centerlines of streets, alleys, roadways, streams, or other well-defined natural or manmade landmarks as boundaries. 10. Proposed redistricting plans requiring less change to current districts in order to balance population and comply with the criteria set forth herein will be generally preferred over plans which require more change to achieve such balance and compliance, so long as other rational municipal policies are not jeopardized. 11. All citizens and interested groups shall be given the opportunity to use the official data and to present alternative district plans. All submitted plans will be evaluated and considered by the City Council. COMMENTS FROM PERSONS PRESENT: Ell White, 621 W 4th Street, discussed the population growth for the City and commented on the consideration of an opportunistic district with the increase of minorities from the last census. Councilor President Pro Tempore Strichik inquired of Mr. White what areas would he consider making an opportunistic district? Mr. White stated he would like to do additional research to find more information. Mr. Stephens noted this meeting is being recorded and will be shared with the consultant and invited all to visit the website http://prattvilleal.gov/redistricting-2024 or send an email to redistricting@prattvilleal.gov if someone wishes to participate online. The next steps will include the consultant putting together a map with a second public hearing with a future date to come. ADJOURN: There being no one further requesting to speak at the Public Hearing and no further business to come before the Council, Council President Pro Tempore Strichik made a motion to adjourn and Councilor Merrick seconded the motion. The meeting adjourned at 6:12 p.m. (6-0) APPROVED: Paula G. Barlow City Clerk Lora Lee Boone, President Prattville City Council SUBMITTED BY: Loucretia Harrell Assistant City Clerk